New regulations on quarry blasting
Mepa is to introduce a set of regulations on blasting in quarries, chairman Austin walker said today.
Addressing the press, he said the guidelines will come into force through environmental permits which will be granted to the quarry operators.
They will place responsibility on the owners and Mepa-approved independent monitors who would be hired by the quarry owners. The guidelines will regulate vibrations and air overpressure dispersion.
There are 22 quarries which are licensed to extract stone through blasting, but only 12 actually use blasting.
The activity is also regulated by the Explosives Ordnance Act.
Permits will continue to be issued by the police after consultation with Mepa and the Malta Resources Authority.
Mr Walker said blasting was a regular source of complaint by people who lived near quarries. A public consultation was held in June last year and the feedback from residents and operators was 'reasonably good', Mr Walker said.
The chairman said that before any blasting, the quarry owners will have to provide a method statement with the exact location of the blast in the quarry. The method statement has to observe a number of thresholds governing the air overpressure and ground vibration.
No blasting can take place before Mepa approval.
After the blasts, the operator has, within five days, to hand over the independent report.
Regarding the potential conflict of interest created by the quarry owners hiring the independent monitors, Mr Walker pointed out that the values were calculated by machines.
4 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Eric Camilleri (Q)
May 23rd, 20:22
MEPA Circus and very deserving.
The quarry owner monitoring himself. What a joke Mr Walker.
Yes values are calculated by machines, so come instal a monitoring sensor in my home then at Mosta tal-Wej and come for tea from noon till 12.30pm. Bring a set of spare clothes just in case you spill your tea.
Mario Spiteri
Feb 22nd, 14:26
The quarry owners are to hire the 'independent' monitors? F'gieh Alla, we have been there for the last few years with the developers hiring the consultants for the Environment Impact Assesments and where it got us? The Hondoq EIA was delayed for years because MEPA iteself complainted that the study was biased!
This is putting the fox to guard the chickens. A lot of fine regulations, that when you squeeze them they are always tipped in favour of the speculators/quarry owners etc.
Vincent Gauci
Feb 22nd, 13:43
Would appreciate if MEPA clarifies whether these will be "regulations" (mandatory) or "guidelines" (voluntary).
Patrick Pace
Feb 22nd, 13:24
I am more interested in hearing about what deterrrants MEPA has established as a counter to breaches in this area. What speed of action will MEPA be effecting? In short, will MEPA - as usual - be taking YEARS to implement any actions it will decide in cases of breaches to these directives. We should have quick decisions, hefty fines, and the deterrant of instant closure of business, otherwise, we may end up with the usual loud bark, no bite measure.