Advert

Air Malta: New management should provide explanations - PL spokesman

Video: Mark Zammit Cordina

The salvation of Air Malta is paramount for the airline and the tourism industry, PL spokesman Gavin Gulia said this afternoon in his initial reaction to the European Commission's report on the proposed restructuring and the minister's reaction to it.

Dr Gulia said that reacting to a report in The Times, the airline had, only yesterday, said that its slots at Heathrow and Gatwick airports, which gave it a competitive advantage, were not for sale.

But in its report today the EC confirmed that Air Malta was offering to give up these slots and others by 2013. A clarification was required, he said, as giving up these slots would negatively affect the business sector.

Dr Gulia said the Labour Party hoped the restructuring process would be successful but said that had the restructuring report been drawn up as it should in the first place, time would have been saved.

The fact that the EC had expressed doubts showed that proposals had not been well thought out and time was essential. Someone also had to shoulder responsibility for the report.

He noted that not only was the Opposition not consulted, it was not even kept informed. Dr Gulia said he submitted many parliamentary questions on aspects of the process and the reply always was that the information being requested was commercially sensitive and could not be given.

Dr Gulia said that there was now the Commission's public reaction to a report, the contents of which were not known.

He noted that it was positive that the Commission was accepting the argument that air travel was essential for a country on the periphery such as Malta.

However, it had expressed doubts on how realistic were the government's long term projections.

In its report, for example, the government did not say how Air Malta was planning to return to profitability in five years and the Commission wanted an explanation.

He asked about the transparent of the process with which subsidiaries were being sold and said it was preoccupying for the industry that certain routes were being halted.

Air Malta was responsible for 50 per cent of seat capacity to Malta, the other 50 per cent were from other legacy airlines and low cost carriers.

The airline, which was vital for the long-term sustainability of the tourism industry had last summer reduced seat capacity although the load factor increased.

There was scepticism, Dr Gulia said, on how it could keep the load factor on a reasonably good level in the medium to long term.

He noted that there seemed to be a lack of consultation between Air Malta and the Malta Tourism Authority and said that the minister responsible for tourism had admitted this himself.

Dr Gulia said that the new airline management were being paid millions and had he been minister he would have called those responsible and requested an explanation.

Advert

17 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Lawrence Fenech

Feb 22nd 2012, 09:11

@ Azzopardi.

Idea tajba ghal-Gonzi li issa ghalaq il-parliament, nahdmu fl'imkien. Hallina.

Adrian Attard

Feb 22nd 2012, 08:14

Dear Mr Busuttil,

What do you mean with "20 million of hidden expenses never explained in audited accounts"?. This allegation is really serious and if so this issue should be brought forward for thorough investigation. May I remind you that the preparation of audited accounts is the sole responsibility of the management of the company. If you or your union have substantial evidence in hand about these Eur 20 million hidden expenses, there it is your obligation to bring them forward to the top persons in charge within the company.

Also, with regards to the subsidies given to Ryanair, as far as I know during Mr L Zammit's tenure, KM had the opportunity to apply for new routes which were subsidised, something which the company did not venture into for unknown reasons. Also, as you know Ryanair are not competing directly with KM on its main routes. It is Easyjet who are competing directly mainly on Rome, Milan and Gatwick but according to the Finance Minister no subsidies are being given to Easy on these routes.

With regards to Ground Handling, KM used to handle other airlines but after a new competitor entered the scene, these carriers shifted with the other competitor since the service was cheaper. I do not think that the service is better than that given by KM ground handlers. Simply it is cheaper, something which KM is trying to emulate today.

Joseph Calleja

Feb 21st 2012, 19:12

They call that POLITICS and MORE POLITICS.

D. A . Agius

Feb 21st 2012, 19:22

Yep, fire the foreign and local bosses, high street consultancy firms, which rake in millions at the expense of any profits made in operations.

Put instead productive (not political) people, starting with current employees willing to take the base salaries and let them share in profits if they manage to make them in a co-op way, with themselves taking in suggestions and consultancies made to improve Air Malta's business, not someone else's.

Secondly, LCC airlines have brought about a service for many Maltese and Tourists alike which was desired and is being used. Fighting them is no way to win, and as they say, if you can't beat them, join them. Air Malta should offer some routes in the LCC model to improve its profitability, but that's only going to come if no one else puts his fingers into the pie. And that means that Air Malta needs to be supported on such routes with the same way LCC's are supported through airport concessions and Government payouts / subsidies, which at the end of the day, it's the taxpayers who fork it! Maybe having a new low cost arm could be evaluated, shifting some of the airplanes and staff.

Unfortunately, now that the proverbial human waste has hit the fan, it needs to be redressed within what the EU will decide, for which "Close up and go home" would probably be the easiest and possibly most beneficial answer as the big lobbies would have their day, eating into that 51% share and then be free to do whatever they like with our air transport options.

Mario Giuliano

Feb 21st 2012, 20:11

Just for correctness sake ... it is "HOZZ FL-ILMA" from the verb "hazzez" = to scribble. Incidently the letters "z" are the ones with the dot on them :))

Carmel Cilia

Feb 21st 2012, 18:19

Il vantagg li kellna fit turismu siehbi gie mhux biss sahha ta Demarco izda bl'inkwiet li kien hemm fl-Afrika ta fuq u jekk joghgobkom tibqawx tippruvaw taghhtu ix-xemx bl-arbiel. Il-kwistjoni hi fuq l-airmalta kumpanija li kienet taghmel miljuni qliegh u illum spiccat bhal ma spiccaw il-baqar jehelbu li kellna: Il-Mid Med, l-Enemalta, It-Telemalta is-Sea Malta fost l-ohrajn. Mela gvern mimli idejat kif jissellef aktar u aktar imissek ghidt. Ghas sur-Gulia Jien nahseb li flok jitlob spjegazzjonijiet bil fomm ahjar imur naqra lura fl-istorja u jipprova jorganizza protesta ghal dan l-isfregu kollu li ghamel dan il-gvern. Il-Poplu ghandu jzomm lil politici kolla responsabbli ta ghemilhom jew in-nuqqas ta ghemilhom. Il-Holm illum spicca fuq iz-zewg nahat.

Philip Hili

Feb 22nd 2012, 01:14

@ Pat Muscat

Taf li qieghed tghid hmerija!

pat muscat

Feb 22nd 2012, 21:03

Read between the lines Mr Hili. Hmerija kienet :il-hofra hrafa, finanzi fis-sod, ir-ricessjoni mhix se tilqotna, u iz-zieda minn taht tal-500 mitt ewro fil-gimgha!

Advert
Advert