Advert

Two parts dishonest, three parts stupid

No, I'm not talking about our beloved politicians for a change. I'm referring to the way I'd describe our genetic make-up, at a pinch. I use the word "our" loosely, of course, by dint of the fact that I happen to share the same passport as you lot. A fact I'm okay with on most days.

Then there are days when I remember how half a dozen local government/industry officials were recently hauled to court on a charge of attempting to defraud the EU big boys out of several thousand Euros. Allegedly, of course.

Anyone remember the story? It happened but a few weeks ago. And yet there is no public outcry from the usual media suspects. Not a peep was heard from the relevant authorities, except for a rather mystifying declaration by the Minister for Local Councils that "this is a private matter".

The story died a fast death, almost as if we are so used to this sort of thing that it's not worth any comment. Which in fact, we are. On days when I'm faced with this display of apathy from our nation, I roll my eyes and wonder where it was that our ancestors went wrong. So bear with me while I pour my righteous scorn on the way a handful of public officials are accused of pulling a fast one over the big bureaucratic beast that is the European Commission without raising as much as an eyebrow from their voters.

The only thing I'm unsure of is whether my righteousness should be directed at this bunch's (alleged!) dishonesty or at the totally moronic way they chose to give vent to said (alleged!) dishonesty. I mean seriously, in which world can anyone inflate expenses to such a ridiculous extent and on a pretty regular basis without people noticing? Or did they think that vague and nebulous entity, the European Commission, would happily pay up without question? After all, the money belongs to no-one right?

This is a phenomenon that seems to be ingrained in our nation's collective psyche: stealing money from an organisation – or better still, from the government – is perfectly okay because it belongs to no-one. I've always found this attitude extremely weird, particularly when you bear in mind that the majority of the population is supposed to have had a Catholic upbringing.

But apparently the eighth commandment comes with a loophole: feel free to defraud the authorities out of any amount of cash you like, no-one will miss it anyway. It is very rare that I encounter a fellow Maltese who wouldn't be happy to stick it to the system.

So that explains the two parts dishonesty. By now I'm sure you've figured out the three parts stupidity too. I'd love to be able to conduct some loud tsk tsking at the fraud part while secretly admiring the daring ingeniousness of it all. After all, I appreciate a good heist as much as the next gal. But no. The scheme is as stupid as it is dishonest. Stupidity seems to be a trait common to most local, would-be criminals.

Daily court reports reveal a dreary stream of petty and not very well thought out crimes that would be hilarious if only the consequences didn't actually cause damage to the rest of us.

A few examples are in order. We have the scores of youngsters who, whenever there's some big party happening get caught with less than savoury substances in their pockets. The fact that everyone knows to expect police presence at these events doesn't seem to deter their endeavours at all. Ten on ten for letting the authorities know where to get off, loud and clear - but a big, fat zero for choosing a rather dim way to go about it.

Then there are those who decide that a spot of signature forging on their mother's/aunt's/dog's cheque book is the perfect way to get rid of their creditors. Right. Because that will never come to light, of course. Equally incredible are the credit card scams where the customer gets charged twice. If memory serves me right, there was the owner of a prominent local hotel and a restaurateur who were found guilty of precisely this in recent years.

I could go on, but you get the drift. Arsenio Lupin would weep.

Advert

12 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Kenneth Cassar

Feb 22nd, 16:44

The problem is when people comment saying things like the emphasis in blogs has shifted from quality to quantity without having the courage to say which blogs or blog posts they are actually referring to.

The resulting comments of people with such attitudes are equally predictable.

For instance, if one feels a particular article lacks quality, why not explain how one came to this conclusion? Would this perhaps also be a matter of the emphasis of comments shifting from quality to quantity, and of feeling the irresistible urge to comment even when one has nothing of substance to say?

Kenneth Cassar

Feb 22nd, 12:47

I wouldn't call expecting Catholics to be good citizens "hate writing towards a religious group". The opposite actually seems to be the case. Far from implying that wherever there are no Catholics there is no crime, I find that she is rather implying that where there is a truly Catholic majority, there should be less crime.

Then again, and taking the risk of being accused of generalising too, the Maltese seem to like to play the victims, and make up imaginary persecutions.

Morana Axisa

Feb 22nd, 13:24

- 'We are experiencing the outcome of decades of frodulent behaviour of citeznes institutions politicians all across Europe with an end result being countries which were quoted amongst the richest risking bancrupcy '... and doesn't that tell you anything? Seems like certain people never learn. Ignorance piled on ignorance doesn't make ignorance plausable.

- 'she decides to nit pick on us whom a good majority of us are far more hard working, wise savers tax paying lot than any other' - I thought Ms Depares was writing about people with the mentality that defrouding an organisation/the government is alright. I don't put myself in this category, but apparently Mr E does?

- 'Is she not aware that Malta has been defined as one of the countries with the lowest crime rate? ' - Malta has also been defined by an EU census as the country with least readers - does that mean we are illiterate?

- 'And who says Malta is Catholic?' - erm yes, Malta is officially described as a Catholic country. Meaning that the majority of people are Catholic.

- 'is it meant to imply that whereever there are no Catholics there is no crime?' - One of the Catholic commandments says that to steal is a crime. So, if the majority of the Maltese who are Catholic adhered to it, as they are supposed to, there would be no stealing. But... there is...

I'm really sorry I had to waste time explaining a perfectly understandable and brilliant article, but unfortunately, certain people, like Mr E, seem to be unable to understand simple English. Oh wait, that's because most Maltese are illiterate right? lol

Kenneth Cassar

Feb 22nd, 07:00

Religion has little to do with it, since people will always find excuses to justify what they do, including verses in the Bible sometimes.

A sound morality is sufficient, but that requires serious thought about actions and their consequences, rights, duties and responsibilities, and the ability to think about the bigger picture. It also requires people to empathise with others, and the humility necessary to realise that we as individuals are not the centre of the universe.

I don't have a religion, and so I don't believe in sin. However, I know that tax evasion is wrong for two reasons:

1. Money does not grow on trees, and the undeserved benefits I get must necessarily be deducted from the benefits the deserving should get.

2. The more undeserved benefits people get, the more taxes that need to be collected.

Advert
Advert