All God’s children
A blog post by columnist Alison Bezzina about adoptions from Ethiopia raised the prospect of yet another Church versus Gay Lobby skirmish. In the post – entitled ‘Children of God?’ – Bezzina lists the difficulties that single prospective parents encounter when going through the adoption process.
Under Maltese law, both married couples and individuals are allowed to adopt, regardless of sexual orientation. In fact, there have been cases where lesbian couples have adopted children.
However, Bezzina says that the adoption approval process is highly subjective and that revealing one’s homosexual orientation may hinder a successful outcome. She also says many countries prioritise the adoption of children by married couples.
At the moment only Malta and Russia are accepting adoptions by single Maltese prospective adoptive parents. Bezzina says that now it has become even more difficult for these prospective parents because “the Church-run orphanage, through which the Maltese adopt from Ethiopia, has suddenly stopped accepting applications from single people”.
From here it was a short hop and skip away, to speculation about bigoted nuns preferring to keep starving Ethiopian children in orphanages rather than letting them be adopted by loving single parents. There was also much heavy-handed hinting at this decision being a sort of ‘Keep Away’ sign for prospective parents who are gay.
Looking at it that way, it seemed rather damning for the Church. How could it turn away individuals who were ready to open their hearts and their home to countless children languishing in orphanages? On what basis was it granting favourable treatment to married couples as opposed to single applicants?
We’ll come to the issue of adoption by single people later, but it would be a good idea to look into the situation properly to establish the facts before sounding off. Many people are up in arms because it is alleged that the prohibition of single parent adoption has come from Church quarters. But has it really?
Practically every website about international adoptions states that married couples are preferred in Ethiopian adoptions, although they must have been married for at least two years, and preferably five.
Ethiopian government policy regarding adoptions by unmarried women is one of the issues being studied as part of the government’s current review of all adoption regulations and practices. It is unclear whether Ethiopian government’s policy about single adoptive mothers will change, and if so, when it might change.
The US State Department cautions that the Ethiopian government does not allow adoptions by openly gay or lesbian individuals or couples. So unless these sites are all reporting incorrect information, it would appear that the preference for adoption by married couples emanates from the Ethiopian authorities and not from some gay-hating cabal ensconced in Malta.
Perhaps some prospective adoptive parents have noticed a slowdown in adoptions from Ethiopia and have attributed this to some anti-singles directive to the Ethiopian orphanage.
In this regard, it is worth noting that last year the Ethiopian Ministry of Women’s, Children’s and Youth Affairs announced plans to reduce inter-country adoptions by 90 per cent as from March 2011 by establishing a quota for processing adoptions.
These cutbacks were a response to indications of widespread fraud in the adoption process. Essentially the Ethiopian authorities were becoming wary of what they perceived to be baby-selling and tried to put a stop to it. Instead of imposing a complete moratorium on adoptions as other countries have done in the past, they cut down on the processing of adoption documents in a big way.
This all shows that there has been a drastic decrease in the adoption by all prospective adoptive parents and that whenever reporting on such issues a little bit of context would not go amiss.
• The issue of single parent adoption is a thorny one and whenever I voice an opinion on the topic, I am often dismissed as someone ‘smug-married’ who has not gone through the heartbreak of trying to adopt a child.
So I asked a friend who is a single mother what she thought about the issue. Although her single status is not of her own choosing, my friend has resisted the urge to shrink into a bitter cloud of misery and is one of the brightest, wittiest and kindest people I know. Her child is a joy to behold and reflects her mother’s love and warmth.
My friend has always dreamt of a big family with children tumbling joyfully through her life. When her marriage crumbled, she contemplated adopting in future. And yet she never did.
What stopped her from pursuing her dream was not her ineligibility for the adoption process or some bureaucratic hurdle, but the realisation that she could not provide the time, the economic stability, or the security needed by a child who had already been deprived of his birth parents.
Ultimately that’s the kind of attitude prospective adoptive parents should have – whether they are married or not.
4 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Magnus Mitchell
Feb 19th, 22:54
The fact it is getting harder for singles to adopt anyway in Ethiopia is more an issue of practicality rather than principle .I agree that the original article wasn’t an examination of practical realities governing the process of adoption in Ethiopia ,rather it was a reaction to the possibility that singles where being stopped from adopting from this particular orphanage in order to ensure no “Secret Gays” slip through the net . I have been told that the reason why it has happened, directly from someone involved in the orphanage, that it actually was to prevent gay people ,posing as single to adopt. Given the conservative nature of the church it isn’t an enormous stretch of logic to believe that is the case. So in the end it’s an issue of principle rather than practically .Having adopted two children myself I know first-hand how difficult the whole process is .If you don’t fit the standard requirements which most countries specify ie. being married for no less than two years, than it is even a longer and arduous journey you have on hands .To be honest my heart goes out to the single people wanting to adopt , independent of the sexual orientation, who now have to will have to mark X in a box for Ethiopia, adding to the already sizable list of Xs .I think when a door closes due to a governments shift of policy or non-compliance to Hague or something “bureaucratic “ then it’s painful but you can suck it in with the knowing that it is not personal to you .If then you discover that slim chance you did have at adopting has now been stopped because you don’t fit a requirement that you are have little or no choice in, then I think you could easily go from disappointed to aggrieved , as impersonal policy change has been supplemented by what will feel like personal discrimination. Yet in my experience that rational and reasoning within many countries adoption policy is hard to grasp .This case ,whatever a real reason, will just add to that list. I think in the case of Claire Bonello friend having that realisation that she couldn’t provide the time and economic stability required to adopt was a very personal choice .Obviously the singles that do choose to adopt feel that they do have what is required and I have no doubt have ruminated and pondered those question at length before to committing to the process. Social services and the whole process involved in becoming eligible, is then meant to validate that self-perception or to enlighten someone that in reality not as ready as they thought.
Joseph Aquilina
Feb 20th, 17:06
"I have been told that the reason why it has happened, directly from someone involved in the orphanage, that it actually was to prevent gay people ,posing as single to adopt."
Why don't you give us the name? I can also say "I have been told that the reason why it has happened, directly from someone involved in the orphanage, is NOT in anyway related with gays" ... but then I need to give the name and surname of the person in order for it not to be interpreted as a comment meant for purely propaganda purposes .
M Xuereb
Feb 19th, 21:25
I feel so sorry for your friend's biological child. From what you relate, he/she must be lacking attention, economic stability and security. Has your friend ever considered having him/her adopted by a married couple? Granted, married couples don't usually rush to adopt older children. There might be a single person who has more resources and who would be willing and able to adopt him/her. Arguably, planned single parenthood is easier than circumstantial single parenthood. But many of these single parents do a brilliant job with their children anyway. Well done to them!
Andy Farrugia
Feb 19th, 12:26
But Ms Bezzina thinks otherwise, and who are we to disabuse her of her fancies (or pet hates)? Seriously!