Advert

EVERYONE'S AN EXPERT

As I step out of my front door, I just glance to the left and I can get a sight of the placards publicising what the newspapers think are the most important issues of the day – you know, the couple of words that are designed to persuade you to part with some coins to read the meat of the story.

MaltaToday's placard this morning read something on the lines of "Government should stall ACTA Ratification – JPO". Since I don't part with coins for that particular paper, I'm not au fait with what JPO (their descriptor, not mine) actually said or even whether my recollection of the detail of his dictum is precise, but that's the sense of it.

My reaction, though, I can recollect precisely: "and so?".

Precisely what qualifications does Pullicino Orlando have that qualify him to pronounce himself from on high (or on Facebook, which is one of his preferred modes of communication) about what should or should not be done with ACTA? His opinion about the darn thing is as valid, or not, as that of any other Tom, Dick or Harry, and the fact that he is an MP with a dissident streak in him does not make said opinion any more valid.

In fact, if anything it dilutes his opinion, because it adds elements of axe-grinding to it, to say nothing of bandwagon-jumping a la Labour.

The opinion of people I respect way more in the field of intellectual property than bandwagon hoppers and axe grinders is that this is a storm in a teacup of gargantuan proportions. Apparently, our national law already reflects what ACTA would require to be done, so what's illegal now would be illegal then too, and all the hysteria has been pumped up by people relying on half-baked bits of information much of which is either intentionally misleading or referring to old versions of the ACTA or SOPA.

Still, never let it be said that Labour and its hangers-on have eschewed a single opportunity to spit out a few convenient sound-bites.

Advert

11 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Angus Black

Feb 17th, 16:43

The fact that JPO is Chairman of Science and Technology, makes him neither a scientist nor a technology whiz as much as taking a course which includes a chapter on economics, an economist does not make. For that reason, one cannot take JPO's opinion any more seriously as the one given by a quasi-economist who consistently reads the Maltese economic tea leaves wrong.

If you think that JPO's appointment was just "a way to fill JPO's pockets", you may be wrong because if JPO spends the equivalent time in his clinic as he spends attending to his Chairman's duties, he will probably make more money pulling and fixing defective teeth. He could also spend less time on Facebook and uploading pictures of his breakfast fare and more time practicing his profession.

Andrew Borg-Cardona

Feb 16th, 09:56

Annoying, aren't I?

Joseph Calleja

Feb 17th, 11:00

Do not bother just ignore him Mr Grima.

B Ellul

Feb 15th, 15:20

as if it will change anything! Illegal is illegal and that's it

Advert
Advert