Advert

Attacks on gays: Victims urged to come forward

‘He grabbed my breasts then headbutted my nose and threw me onto the ground, grabbing my hair’

A 16-year-old lesbian girl who was attacked a month ago while in Ħamrun with her girlfriend is urging those harassed because of their sexual orientation to speak up, as she did.

I’m happy that my message has been heard

The teenager, who became known by the fictitious name Amy, said she was positively surprised by the reaction to her story.

Over the past month there were several condemnations, a protest and political pledges to strengthen laws protecting gay people from hate crimes.

The latter development followed a second incident that came to light on February 6 when an Arriva bus driver was sacked for assaulting two women in what the transport company said seemed to be a homophobic act.

“I’m happy that my message has been heard ... I like how my story ended up meaning that they did something about it ... Anyone who goes through my experience should speak up and other people should not do what they did to me,” Amy said.

A month ago today, Amy went to a Ħamrun square with her girlfriend and another two friends.

The two friends were dancing in a gazebo and Amy and her girlfriend were sitting on a bench when two brothers, about 17 and 19 years old, emerged from a nearby balcony and hurled insults at them.

They called them “twisted” and the girls retaliated and shouted back at the boys. Suddenly, the younger boy allegedly turned up in the square. He hit Amy’s girlfriend and pushed her to the ground.

When Amy intervened, the 19-year-old boy picked her up and punched her in the eye.

“He grabbed my breasts then head-butted my nose and threw me onto the ground, grabbed my hair and pulled me across the ground,” Amy had told The Sunday Times.

Amy ended up at a health centre with a fractured nose, a grazed face and bruises on her breasts.

Her girlfriend got away with a bruise to the head and scratches on her wrists, which she sustained when pushed to the ground.

The police later said the boys would be charged in court for attacking and injuring the girls. However, they could not be charged with committing a hate crime because homophobia is not covered by law. The only legal protection gay people have refers to discrimination emanating from harassment. The law protects anyone from actions that amount to threats, violence or harassment irrespective of the intent of such actions.

The part of the law that speaks about hate crime is limited to racial hatred.

Last year, the Justice Minister an­nounced there were plans to extend this to include homophobia.

The need for stronger gay hate crime legislation is highlighted in a 2003 study carried out by the Malta Gay Rights Movement.

The study showed that one in every 10 gay people is subjected to some form of violence because of their sexual orientation.

This was backed by a 2008 study, carried out by the National Commission for the Promotion of Equality, showing that eight per cent of gay people had been attacked in the previous two years and half of these said it happened more than once.

Two-thirds were young women.

Amy is glad the police are taking action against the boys who attacked her. She has since recovered from her injuries although she still has problems with her nose.

“My nose plays up a little ... There is a little bleeding if I touch it but the rest is back to normal,” she said.

Referring to the Arriva bus driver attack, Amy said: “It’s a shame that another lesbian got attacked. It shouldn’t have happened after what happened to me.”

The Amy revolution

January 22: The Sunday Times carries the story of Amy and her girlfriend who were attacked because of their sexual orientation. Various organisations condemn the act. The Amy initiative, a Facebook group, is set up and calls for Maltese law to include hate crime on the basis of sexual orientation.

January 24: The Times reports that the police have issued charges against the two boys who allegedly attacked the lesbian couple. They have still to appear in court.

January 26: A peaceful protest is held in Ħamrun during which various organisations call for action to amend the hate crime laws. They also present their proposed legal amendments.

January 31: US human rights politician Daniel Baer, speaking during a web interview, says the attack on the two teenagers provides Malta’s leaders with the opportunity to condemn such violence.

February 3: The Malta Gay Rights Movement holds a meeting with new Justice Minister Chris Said. He tells them that their proposed legal changes are being analysed by the Attorney General and the Justice Ministry’s legal experts.

February 6: The Times reports that an Arriva bus driver was sacked for assaulting two women in what the transport company said seemed to be a homophobic act.

February 7: Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi calls an urgent press conference in which he calls for respect for human dignity. He says he instructed the Justice Minister to review hate crime laws and, if necessary, make them tighter.

Advert

80 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

wayne scicluna

Feb 18th, 16:33

@ Joe xuereb. Dw mate I am also choosy and don't really want to be contaminated. And regarding that yuck bit, I am not gay.... But everybody has their opinions I suppose. Now be a good boy and go do something useful in leaps and bounds :-)

Joseph Aquilina

Feb 14th, 10:53

"Two wrongs never make a right."

Insults are mostly one sided; calling people as coming from the dark ages and taliban just because they hold dear certain values or a particular faith is an insult according to my books.

"In public, norms which are accepted for heterosexuals should and MUST be accepted for homosexuals."

Agree with you 100%, which is why in all my posts I always clearly stated that what I said applies to both gay and non-gay couples; it is not acceptable that a couple does in the public what is meant to be done in the private (and this is not a kiss or holding hands, but well beyond then that).

"discrimination, which should be unheard of in a truly democratic country."

Agree with you 100%, which is why the law should not be different when applied to a person coloured different then me, to a person who has a different sexual orientation, to a person who has a different political belief then mine or fait. The law should punish violence regardless of who makes it or on who such violence is made.

Hossam Helwani

Feb 14th, 09:29

again attack on gonzipn!! what has this got to do with this?

it is becoming really a waste of time reading your comments, it is reduced to rubbish

Francis Saliba M.D.

Feb 13th, 21:37

Who says so? apart from you, of course! And what is a "Taiban", whilst you are about it.

Francis Saliba M.D.

Feb 14th, 06:39

The Taliban did not even exist in the 12th century.

Joseph Aquilina

Feb 13th, 18:36

an array of personal insults? The majority of the comments were from people who condemned the attack but expressed their opinion that they feel that couples (gay or non-gay) should not cross the line between public affection and “public” foreplay!! I wonder from which side of the argument the insults started coming first …

Ken Cowan

Feb 13th, 22:49

Omigod... children might understand that people can show affection for one another. Horrors!
Meanwhile their parents let them watch all kinds of action-packed tv programs where killing others is considered an ok thing for children to see.
WHO has decided that children seeing people "making out" in public is bad for them?
The French have been doing so for centuries.. the children still seem to be doing ok in France; In fact, they seem to be more "advanced" in their thinking than the average Maltese... maybe there is a link between the two?

Joseph Aquilina

Feb 13th, 16:33

What is your point? Their defense is doing its job. Or maybe unequal and unfair to such an extent that any person involved in cases against gay people should not even be allowed to defend themselves? Do you consider that as just?

Joseph Aquilina

Feb 13th, 16:46

Or maybe [the law should be] unequal and unfair ...

Joseph Grech Attard

Feb 13th, 17:31

i disagree with you that gay people might be doing this to get preferential treatment, as much as Catholics do not proclaim their faith to get preferential treatment. That is very unChristian and not at all in line with the teaching of Jesus Christ. I refer you and all to the article on gay people in the February issue of 'Flimkien,' the local Catholic Church's magazine. Even the Catholic Church is changing heart regarding sex orientation because it is seeing that gays, lesbians, transgendered, etc are being marginalized more than ever and homophobia and hate crimes are on the increase worldwide. We are slowly moving back to far right Nazism and Fascism.

Pia Attard

Feb 13th, 18:34

No need for that, your belief is that you should turn the other cheek. You should be ashamed of yourself, your "saints" died for their faith, and you can't handle a bit of mocking. You should find solace in your bible.

Pia Attard

Feb 13th, 18:35

in other words, your faith commands you to do nothing, except maybe forgive them. Deal with it, it's your faith, not mine.

Mike Hunt

Feb 13th, 19:46

Awesome .... so you have no problem with two gay men holding hands in public.

Luke Lanzon

Feb 13th, 16:56

Repeating the same sentence over and over is getting boring now. To answer your question its highly unlikely that someone is going to beat you up for that reason.

Franco Farrugia

Feb 13th, 13:49

Quote: 'watch and endure personal disgusting displays of affection'. I assume you are also referring to more common, heterosexual 'displays', no? In other words, you have something wrong, in that you seem to imply that you cannot accept these 'displaysof affection'.
I think it's you who should 'get a room'. Or rather, the very inner part of a forgotten cave.

Joseph Aquilina

Feb 13th, 14:24

@ Franco Farrugia
I do not believe anyone (including Mr. Scicluna) is against public affection! I have no problem in seeing a gay couple giving a kiss to each other or holding hands! However I do not like it when a couple (even a non-gay couple) starts doing foreplay in front of me … all this while I’m sitting on a bench!! This has nothing to do with the sexual orientation of the people involved and all to do with the level of respect people should show to each other.

Charles Bayliss

Feb 13th, 15:49

So many straight couples should get a room. Mr Scicluna, if by any chance next summer you might find a few minutes to visit St George's Bay area late at night you might encounter straight youngsters having sex behind cars etc. Why is it disgusting that a gay couple hold hands or kiss in public?

Franco Attard Trevisan

Feb 13th, 15:54

What is your point exactly Wayne Scicluna??

'The study showed that one in every 10 gay people is subjected to some form of violence because of their sexual orientation....well that is human nature. The odd one out is more likely to be harassed and as such, should be prepared for it'

Are you condoning violence through shear ignorance???

I surely agree that public decency should be respected but can never excuse anyone attacking anyone because he doesn't like what he sees or better still is narrow minded enough not to accept what he sees.

Just keep one thing in mind gays, blacks, disabled, women etc (as you stated above) are all part of your so called 'Joe Public' too.


Mike Hunt

Feb 13th, 12:34

Can you please describe what the 'Gay Agenda' is?

Charles Bayliss

Feb 13th, 15:56

Can you please the chapter, paragraph and verse in the Maltese Law were it states that "Violence against homosexuals is illegal"? The Prime Minister himself urged the minister last week to legislate Homophobia as a Hate Crime. Kindly wake up to the reality.

Joseph Aquilina

Feb 13th, 16:22

@Charles Bayliss
Attacking someone is illegal regardless of sex orientation ... or maybe you would want our law to go against gay principals and all of a sudden see gay people as different? I do not want that, I want laws that ARE EQUAL TO EVERYONE.

Mario Pace

Feb 13th, 17:56

"Can you please describe what the 'Gay Agenda' is?"

It's a coordinated effort to enact laws that would force our society to approve homosexuality and support the Gay lifestyle at every social level.

Catherine Sultana

Feb 13th, 12:45

I commend you for being the voice of reason while so many others would rather argue their biased opinions which show hindrance towards certain human rights, however I must say how I think you are wrong to assume that because this society isn't educated strongly in the acceptance of those who differ from the norm then one shouldn't act the way they truly wish to. Surely it should be that society should see the need to change and better educate itself if it can actually see that one's needs are not being met, rather than having someone pretending to conform to what is considered 'normal'. Society will not change if it can't see where it's going wrong.

Mike Hunt

Feb 13th, 10:28

Oh my oh my ... and what do you consider as provocative demonstration of sex affection? Holding hands?

Mr Joseph Carmel Chetcuti

Feb 13th, 11:30

Violence against gay men is not sex related. It is related to a person's sexual orientation, our very identity. Homosexuality like heterosexuality has both a behavioural and an emotive side. Why is public demonstration of human affection provocative, I wonder? Because of your warped morality ? Perhaps you should revisit history. Was not Christian assertion of their faith provocative to the Romans? Would you have expected the early Christians to keep their mouth shut. The mere fact that you consider public demonstration of homosexual human affection provicative is of and in itself indicative of your prejudice.

John L Galea

Feb 13th, 11:36

@F. Saliba: you are sex obsessed. Showing affection doesn't mean sex affection.

Joseph Aquilina

Feb 13th, 12:15

@Mr Joseph Carmel Chetcuti
Do you think it would be ok if a MAN starts touching his GIRLFRIEND (so we are speaking of a strait couple here) on a School or Public Transport? or in front of the City Gate ( ... ups you're right we no longer have one ... *blushing* ). Showing affection - as John L Galea is saying - is NOT WRONG! However is it ok to have people having sex on a beach or in a disco? We need laws (equal to all people regardless of colour, sex orientation, political believes, etc) in order define what are the limits. And once the limit is broken the law should not depend on (for example) the colour of a person to determine the fit punishment.

Francis Saliba M.D.

Feb 13th, 13:06

@ John L Galea.

I did not say anywhere that showing affection means "sex". In a blog about violence against homosexuals I commented on "all violence" generally without excluding sex-related violence. If anyone is "sex obsesed" that person is not I.

Hossam Helwani

Feb 13th, 13:15

you are right I agree with you

gays can be provoking through sex affection. They do it on purpose

Franco Farrugia

Feb 13th, 13:50

'Non-provocative restraint in any public demonstration of sex affection.' If I hadn't known before that you are Maltese, I would have thought this comment was coming from some wild, 12th-century Taliban! But then,....!

Andy Farrugia

Feb 13th, 15:38

You are beyond the pale. I invite all to see your comments about the queeriness of the Church and that of Jesus Christ, our Lord, on Fr Joe Borg's blog. Beyond the pale!

Colin Stanley

Feb 13th, 10:41

Listen to the recording and hear who is calling the bus driver names. which was censored when I mentioned it before it is a five letter word in Maltese. can this word be used?

Mike Hunt

Feb 13th, 11:06

The so called 'gay movement' are only fighting for what shouldn't even be a topic of debate in 2012.

Patrick Mulholland

Feb 13th, 10:40

@A Spiteri
Spot on!

Franco Farrugia

Feb 13th, 13:52

What do you mean by 'special minority rights'? Minority rights HAVE EVERY RIGHT to have their rights respected - even if it means legislating FOR ONE, INDIVIDUAL PERSON! Everyone has a right to live his or her right as s/he thinks fit. If you have a problem, tough. You don't belong in civil society.

Patrick Mulholland

Feb 13th, 10:39

Alison,
1 - can you support your statement "the Church discriminating against homosexuals" with facts please?
2 - It's no wonder that people are "still linking homosexuality to peadophilia"; I'm sure you know NAMBLA! I've never seen or read any statments from any (homosoexual) group condemning these people.

Whilst I will always strongly condemn attacks on ANY human being, it seems like the media and whoever has an active interest, is sensationalising this for their own purposes.
Again - I will always strongly condemn attacks on ANY human being but I have to point out that similar attacks and much much worse happen every day to innocent people in "civilised and modern" countries but yet it is evident that politicians have no (financial or vote-grabbing) interest whatsoever in supporting the victims. Not only that; countries like Britain support their governments financially too. Hardly anybody lifts a finger in condemnation - it should not be difficult to work out to what I am referring to.

Joseph Aquilina

Feb 13th, 11:36

@Alison Bezzina
The Church is very clear on the subject; any attack on gay people is wrong. In fact the Church goes beyond and indeed sees any attack on any person – regardless of sex orientation, political believe, religious believes, etc., etc., as wrong and not in line with Church policy.

"it's surprising that there aren't even more of these vile attacks"

We all know who would benefit from that, right?

E Schembri

Feb 13th, 13:00

What nonsense!!!

The church does not discriminate against homosexuals. On the contrary, it opposes and it is the only organization in society that has the best track record of protecting and defending minority groups who are discriminated by society. Take a look at the thousands of children, wives, husbands, drug addicts, homeless, immigrants that have been abandoned by society and taken in by church organizations.

With regards to the homosexual act, the church's teachings are crystal clear, but if you don't like it, no one is forcing you to follow the church. You are free to live as you please.

So please, next time you put pen to pare, get your facts right!

Alison Bezzina

Feb 13th, 13:43

Patrick, clicking on the referred link should clear out what I'm referring to. Here it is again - http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20120211/blogs/children-of-god.406307

Now don't tell me that it's got nothing to do with violence...of course it doesn't, but it's still discrimination bil-pulit

Mr Ernest Vella

Feb 13th, 15:32

Alison...don't fight hatred with hatred...don't fight those who preach love and mercy. The Roman Catholic Church as others said preach that every human being has a dignity which must be protected and defended. The Church does not preach violence and you know that, so it's a shame saying something without any proofs.

Andy Farrugia

Feb 13th, 16:45

What a cheap shot that is, Alison; really cheap shot. "Getting away with it," too. Your pet hates do cloud your sense of judgement, oftentimes.

Advert
Advert