Is Labour fit for purpose?
The political predicament that befell this country was resolved when Parliament rejected a motion of no confidence presented by the opposition to determine whether this Administration can proceed with the work at hand.
The country has to contend with a difficult economic forecast that might catapult the international community into another recession. Only the other day, the International Monetary Fund announced that it is expecting the euro area to go into a mild recession in 2012.
This foreboding necessitates further consolidation of our public finances to buffer a potential downturn in economic stability. While cautioning on the difficulties that lie ahead, the IMF acknowledged that Malta registered progress in the past years to consolidate and give credibility to its public finances.
Ultimately, it requires more, not less, of current policy and definitely not U-turns, which could negatively impinge on this credibility.
Is this a coincidence?
Some say yes, particularly those whose biased partisan perception blurs their vision to this reality.
Certainly not. It is the result of prudent and calculated decisions taken to safeguard the national interest. Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi has relentlessly and incessantly striven to save Malta the humiliation and embarrassment of other euro area members that are on the brink of collapse.
In sharp contrast is the Leader of the Opposition who has systematically underestimated, out of sheer denial, incompetence and lack of policy proposals, the reality of the impending economic situation. For the Labour Party it is business as usual.
This was clearly evident during the Labour general conference. Instead of rolling out, as one would expect, concrete actions, the Leader of the Opposition decided to go down memory lane and narrate his childhood story.
What was he hoping to achieve? Sympathy votes?
Despite declaring that he is ready to decide, ready to govern, ready to lead and ready to unite, he failed on all counts in explaining exactly how he intends to do just that. Indeed, in this sense it is business as usual for the PL. Joseph Muscat might, after all, get his way through sympathy and win the day. Winning the future is, however, a totally different scenario that excludes sympathy.
His 30-minute speech was a self-professed accolade devoid of any substance worthy of a future Prime Minister.
How can the Leader of the Opposition, on the eve of what could possibly be an election and against the prevailing economic backdrop, fail to explain what the government-in-waiting is proposing to do when in power? What are the policies that will guide him to ensure economic and financial stability, address the economic turmoil, generate new jobs, strengthen education and sustain free health care and social benefits?
If the past is anything to go by, then the future is truly bleak and murky. Speaking of Dom Mintoff’s portrait hanging high on the wall in your living room, the school you went to or a conversation with your grandfather on the principles governing a market economy seem all that is required in times of challenge!
The Nationalist Party, albeit not perfect, has consistently proved itself and delivered tangible results.
We enjoy one of the lowest unemployment rates, a high penetration of foreign direct investment, a state-of-the-art health service, record tourist arrivals, an ever-increasing expenditure on education and, the latest news of just a few days ago, the largest maritime register in Europe.
No wonder Dr Muscat was unable to come up with just one argument to substantiate his no-confidence motion in the opening speech on the motion in Parliament late last month. Speculation on possible outcomes on who votes what and how was deemed more relevant and fit for purpose.
The PL is so intent on being at the helm of this country that it is missing the bigger picture. Getting there might be the easy part; it is steering the country in the right direction that will pose the major challenge. Without adequate policies in place and the right mindset, a Labour government will only manage to plunge this country into an abyss.
The government-in-waiting has a long way to go to instil confidence and convince the electorate that it is fit for purpose.
The author is vice president of the Youth of the European People’s Party and international secretary of the Nationalist Party’s Youth Movement.
19 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Mr Joseph Carmel Chetcuti
Feb 8th, 05:07
By any chance would Ryan be a PN supporter? The blurb about it says it all.
Victor Gelfo
Feb 7th, 18:35
Many goverments in other democracies loose their parliamentary majority. It is no big deal and it will cause no instability whatsoever as no investor will look at parliament, which to be rights is more of a game and formality. Investors will defenitly look at the economy and forighn policy. After all the state is not that important. It is here that it is given a god like dimension. Belgium has been without a goverment for months, and they fared much more better without the plundering of the state!
j brincat
Feb 7th, 08:59
"The political predicament that befell this country was resolved when Parliament rejected a motion of no confidence presented by the opposition to determine whether this Administration can proceed with the work at hand".
What was resolved, for Pete's sake?
Perhaps, you haven't understood fully the predicament of a government which on that eventful day lost its ONLY seat majority thus flinging the country into uncertainty and so instability!
It can be seen by one and all how much this Administration can 'proceed with work at hand'! We now have part-time Parliament sittings or better still we have a hung government!
But then your title at the end of this so called opinion shades some light of how unbiased it is!
(jb)
Robert Henry Bugeja
Feb 7th, 07:57
Ryan the only blurred mind I notice in this house of comments is yours. You are in no position to say or decide what Labour has to offer for this country. You are in no position to ponder on the future when in the present your own government does not even hold a majority in parliament and is holding this country hostage in sure uncertainty because of purely partisan reasons. I well may join AD's Chairman statement that the Gonzipn is just delaying the inevitable.
A. Schembri
Feb 6th, 16:40
Having a good government doesn't justify why we shouldn't hold democratic practises such as vote in parliament or elections. Who ever says malta can't go through elections because the government is handling the situation good is being purely undemocratic
m. borg (slm)
Feb 6th, 13:37
"The government-in-waiting has a long way to go to instil confidence and convince the electorate that it is fit for purpose.".............. and polls considtently show a good difference between PL and PN , just imagine what it would be like when PL shows how it's going to run things.
Ryan then it will be time for you to sit back and enjoy the show.
Paul Bartolo
Feb 6th, 17:03
In 2008, PL were leading in the polls, yet still they lost ... it-Tigrija sal-Barkun Dear SLM!
m. borg (slm)
Feb 6th, 13:34
"How can the Leader of the Opposition, on the eve of what could possibly be an election and against the prevailing economic backdrop, fail to explain what the government-in-waiting is proposing to do when in power?" It has become worse than a drug addiction for gonzipn apologists to ask what are PL policies and strategies.
.
What different does it make if they are announced now or a month or two before the elections.?
.
If announced now they will certainly be rubbished by gonzipn only to copy them later into their own electoral manifest.
.
All in good time and as gonzi does not feel that the time is not right for elections so does PL feels it is not time to show its hand.
Paul Bartolo
Feb 6th, 17:06
Maybe the 'hand' is still not ready neither to propose policies nor govern.
John Zammit
Feb 6th, 11:38
So we don't need hold elections any more because according to you we are in safe hands
Marco Said
Feb 6th, 13:14
Better in the hands you know, than in the other which are secretive, ambiguous and empty....
John Zammit
Feb 6th, 14:01
@ Mr Said We just have a perfect government Take or else Doom will be here
Pat Hobson
Feb 6th, 11:32
The motion did not pass because of the Speaker's vote! I don't know if this was correct or not, but one thing is for sure if the PL lost the motion, the PN government lost is majority in parliament which is worse!
Anthony Curmi
Feb 6th, 13:17
You are wrong. The Speaker's vote had no influence. The Opposition's motion was not passed because it got only 34 votes in favour whilsts it needed 35.
Anthony Charles Abela
Feb 7th, 01:51
Remember Mr. Hobson, this is Malta where the normal is abnormal and vice versa. Must be the mushrooms in Ghar Dalam and by the looks of things quiet a few have been munching on them. I thank God I am here in Australia. In here I vote according to plain and common sense, of performance, integrity and vision. I have voted for Labour and Liberal. Currently this Country is being run the same way as in Malta. Labour have taken their speaker out and put in an independent in. He knows he will not be re-elected again for betraying his electorates but for an extra $100,000 his greed got the better of him. His name is Slipper. Australia is being run by a fornicator and a faggot. They are hanging on by their fingernails.I know that the way things are going , the liberals will get my vote come next election. Alas in Malta young children listen to their parents and are brainwashed from an early age. I find very few people in Malta who change from their political support unless they don't get what they want. Malta has to be more mature about other people's opinions, weather it's soccer, politics ,festas, parish bands,and so on. I wish the Island all the best. Anthony C. Abela Melb. Aust.
Peter Murray
Feb 6th, 10:36
We are soon about to ascertain if " Labour is fit for purpose ".However,what is indisptuable is that whilst the answer to this question is indeed a known unknown what is known is that the present Nationalist government -and in particular their present leader- is most definitely not fit for anything but the file marked "good riddance".
Carmel Serracino-inglott
Feb 6th, 21:54
This is simply your sole opinion. Definitely it is not mine, far from it. I hail this present government PN for keeping this country of ours standing on firm ground. Well done PN and thank you so much.
Lawrence Fenech
Feb 6th, 09:18
Parliament did not reject it was Gonzi who lost the majority for the vote of non confidence to pass.
Anthony Curmi
Feb 6th, 11:36
The motion was not passed by Parliament because, according to the Constitution, it required 35 votes to be approved. The fact is that only 34 votes were mustered by the opposition. Why try to distort facts?