Advert

Application for Church primary school rejected

St Augustine's college in Pietà.

St Augustine's college in Pietà.

The planning authority has thrown out a request to build a primary school as part of St Augustine’s College in Pietà, denting an ambitious €20 million Church project to expand five of its schools.

The vote went four in favour and three against after the planning officer on the case said the design and height of the proposed building were unacceptable.

He said the project lacked coordination, would constitute overdevelopment of the site and failed to respect the context of the Urban Conservation Area.

St Augustine’s College was once a primary school, which now functions as a secondary school with 450 students. It now needs to reintroduce a primary school, adding another 350 pupils, as the national education reform emphasises a smooth transition between primary and secondary schooling.

The Church’s plan is to expand five of its schools to incorporate both levels, at a cost of €20 million.

The proposal of St Augustine’s was for four floors and two basement levels, covering an area of 7,700 square metres, to be built in an undeveloped site between the college and back gardens in a residential area.

The case officer pointed out that the building was “very modern in design” and was in “conspicuous contrast” to the surrounding scheduled buildings. The height was also a concern because it was two storeys higher than the adjacent scheduled building, making it “incompatible with the area’s characteristics”. The lack of parking spaces was another issue raised by a number of objectors who pointed out that the area already suffered from a shortage.

When it was consulted, Transport Malta had agreed with a proposed car park of 74 spaces and did not object to the project because of measures listed in a traffic study.

While acknowledging that traffic issues had been addressed, the case officer pointed out that the “need” for a school did not justify the “intensification of the development in a very restricted site” which would affect the area.

Advert

13 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Lorraine Darmanin

Feb 4th, 17:41

Why don't you stop and think before you write?

Do you realise the impact of this decision on the children involved, their parents and the teachers? Appropriately run schools are an investment in the our country's future. Deciding to which school one sends his children is a human right.

L Darmanin

Patrick Pace

Feb 3rd, 11:29

Mr Spiteri, I totally agree with you re-MEPA and its approval practice of too many building units that most probably, as you say, dont make sense and would still remain empty. However, this valid point should make us EVEN MORE aware that we have innumerable areas all over the maltese islands that could be re-developed to a better use - as is the case of this school extention. I am all for further development of education - but never at the expense of the environment while also causing great inconvenience to residents. Pieta residents have endured a lot in the past decades, let us not take advantage that they are `used` to this to invent new ways of making their lives miserable. As for the fact that Pieta residents are "priveledged" with parking for residents, I would take the matter up with your St. Venera Local Council, not the other way round, and use this matter as a bargaining point with both parties for the next Local Council elections. One last point, filling a building to the brim with children has great sustainability implications - not the other way round.

Mr Andrew Camilleri

Feb 3rd, 15:35

The scholo can be built elsewhere. Let me make a suggestion: many convents and monastries are being depleted of their members; there are much fewer vocations these days. Why doesn't the church come to an agreement with some order and take over one of these hardly-used monastries or convents? wW have had enough of building especially in already built up areas. Hands of the grass!

Advert
Advert