Advert

Illegal slaughter house found in Mosta

Viewer discretion is advised.

VIDEO - Viewer discretion is advised

An illegal slaughterhouse was found in the heart of an urban area in Mosta this evening.

Officials of the Animal Welfare Department, the Veterinary Services and the police swooped on a house and garage in Parish Street and found three men in the process of slaughtering up to 10 goats and sheep. One lamb had already been killed.

Officials said the operation was carried out after some days of observation. The alarm had been raised by a neighbour who noticed blood in the garage, a corner away from the police station.

It appeared that the animals were brought to the garage in a van and slaughtered.

Three men, two of them foreigners, were arrested. One tried to escape and was slightly hurt.

Only one of the animals had the disc through which its ownership may be traced.

The officials and vets are checking the condition of the animals and investigating what happened to the meat and the remains. 

 

Advert

87 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Christina Pace

Feb 3rd, 16:34

That of course is only the other extreme! Moderation, appropriate legislation and public education should give everyone the tools to choose the right products.

Emma Xerri

Feb 3rd, 16:38

Ahh, yes, the simple life was the best.

Alex Buds

Feb 2nd, 20:58

Jew mal-UFOs? Jew mal-global warming? Jew ma Mother Teresa??? Ghidulna xi haga!!

:-)

Lawrence Fenech

Feb 3rd, 07:10

@Bugeja.

As seen on the news of TVM the hanging whatever it is has a ghastly resemblence to the animals seen in mosta.

Christina Pace

Feb 3rd, 15:39

I condamn both illegal acts however the only link I can see is that they are upside down. In this case that is the was animals are positioned for cleaning after they are killed. Otherwise no upside down crosses were involved, no note was left, they were not hung outside a chirch or where a prist would find them or outside a house.
I see no link between the deliberate and useless killing of a defensless domestic pet to send a message and the illegal slaughtering of farm animals for food.
An illegal slaughterhouse as such means a slaughterhouse that does not carry a license to kill animals and process their meat for human consumption. More often than not these illegal establishents are so to avoid paying fees, upgrading their equipment and keeping to health and safety practices. In essence they oinly want to make money and don't care if the end product is not satisfactory as long as someone is willing to pay for it.

Mr Stephen Camilleri

Feb 2nd, 10:35

Religion has nothing to do with the food we consume. I’m just implying that strict control is necessary for healthy eating and we have very proficient authorized people to keep our country safe from any known diseases. Unfortunately, I heard cases of Halel which weren’t so hygienic.
http://soundvision.com/info/halalhealthy/organicornot.asp

Emma Xerri

Feb 2nd, 15:12

@Stephen Camilleri

Halal is a religious requisite. This is barbaric and should not be condoned by civilised people.

Kenneth Cassar

Feb 2nd, 09:31

You'll satisfy your curiosity when if and when they are eventually arraigned in court.

Mr Stephen Camilleri

Feb 2nd, 07:51

No, they were selling them as ornaments on mantle pieces.

Mark Mangion

Feb 2nd, 09:23

Lol good one started my day with a smile.

Mr Stephen Camilleri

Feb 2nd, 08:07

No wonder that Halal food is the worst cause of diseases in Islam communities. 75 percent of Halal meat in America came from pork fed cows which resulted in the Mad Cow Disease.

Luke Scicluna

Feb 2nd, 08:08

whats your point???

William Flynn

Feb 2nd, 09:14

Stephen Camilleri

Is pork fed meat hallal or is this one of your jokes, again. You made me laugh with the mantlepiece joke.

Patrick Zammit

Feb 2nd, 09:58

We do not need Imams telling us how to beat our wives.

c p agius

Feb 3rd, 06:57

this method presicribed by the holy bible is the same as that prescribed by the Koran...............................

Get some animals, kill them, chop up their bodies, wave body parts in the air, burn the carcasses, and sprinkle the blood all around -- in precisely the way God tells you. It may well make you sick, but it makes God feel good. 29:11-37

MALCOLM SEYCHELL

Feb 2nd, 08:05

Darren I think that you are missing the point. In the EU and recently also in Malta animals have some rights too. You cannot slaughter animals as you like but you have to kill them the less painfully possible. If these people want to slaughter animals they should go back to an islamic country.

D Gatt

Feb 2nd, 08:52

I agree with Mr. Seychell here, animals have rights and they should not be treated any less. Slaughtering them in this kind of unsupervised manner is despicable and barbaric. I you were to be executed I reckon you would prefer to be stunned first to dull the pain. Animals feel pain too and proceeding according to regulations and directives is the humane thing to do. To forgo this is to let go of our humanity and sense of compassion.

R Malia

Feb 2nd, 10:14

Darren, as you said, but the other way round.. If you want halal meat leave the EU and go to Saudi Arabia. In Europe, Animals have rights too...you can't do this.

Reinhard Azzopardi

Feb 2nd, 12:01

Well said R Malia. If you want to live the Muslim way, there are many countries that are predominantly Muslim and will welcome you with open arms. If you want halal, go to LIbya, Egypt, Saudi Arabia or wherever.

Darren Portelli

Feb 2nd, 19:06

Whatever, thankfully I left Malta a long time ago. You people are backward. The difference between those close minded nations you mentioned and Malta, is that Malta is supposedly part of a modern society. When the Maltese moved elsewhere, here to Australia, they brought their customs to a foreign land. Shame that most of you lot do not understand that concept

Emma Xerri

Feb 2nd, 23:54

@Darren Portelli

Where do you draw the line? What is next public beheadings and amputations or perhaps stonings?

It is ironic that you mentioned the Saudi's because this is a place of 'mono-culturalism' were no other religions or cultures are tolerated. Ever wonder why immigration is only acceptable if incoming to Europe but it is never the other way around? Christians on work visas in this country are always under threat, being raided and put in jail for practicing their faith. Learn more about it.

www.jihadwatch.org.

Darren Portelli

Feb 4th, 22:38

Emma what is ironic is you not seeing why I referenced Saudi Arabia. We're supposed to be more tolerant than them. Ironic also that you are pasting a known bigoted website numerous times over these pages, and the moderators are tolerating it

Roger Tirazona

Feb 2nd, 00:09

Why should this be about race?

Patrick Zammit

Feb 2nd, 09:17

Wishing that animals are killed in a way that does not inflict unnecessary pain is not racism.

Stop using the racism card to subdue criticism of a barbaric way of killing animals.

Ramon Casha

Feb 2nd, 05:45

I fully agree. Believe what you want to, but where actions are concerned, everyone is bound by the law, religion or no religion.

Matthew Borg

Feb 1st, 23:33

really? if the animal suffered a slow painful death it wouldn't matter? .... honestly....

Ivan Calleja

Feb 2nd, 00:09

@ Agius - ara veru ghadek tghix fil-medjuevu !!

Ryan Scicluna

Feb 2nd, 06:53

What is a normal christian family value manner of dining????

Maria Muscat

Feb 2nd, 07:56

that has to be the dumbest arguement ever

Roger Tirazona

Feb 1st, 23:25

Animals eat other animals Karl. We've seen it on the Discovery channel. I have lots of respect for Vegetarians and their rejection of speciesist anthropocentric views, but this is where the naturalistic fallacy fails. We are omnivores and require externally procured protein, preferably from the muscle of other animals.

What I share with Vegetarians' views, is that since we have the capabilities and technologies to treat animals with respect and dignity, a good standard of living and to give them a painless death, we should spend the extra buck to do so.

R Bartolo

Feb 1st, 23:58

Could not have said it better Roger.

Kenneth Cassar

Feb 2nd, 07:27

@ Roger Tirazona:

"What I share with Vegetarians' views, is that since we have the capabilities and technologies to treat animals with respect and dignity, a good standard of living and to give them a painless death, we should spend the extra buck to do so".

You don't actually share vegetarians' views. A vegetarian will tell you that since we don't actually need meat to live a healthy life, we should stop breeding animals for the slaughter.

Roger Tirazona

Feb 2nd, 08:08

@Kenneth Cassar

I know many vegetarians from around the world who choose this diet for the sake of animal welfare. The irony is that none of them are ready to give up their leather shoes, leather belts, leather handbags, fur coats, the use of wool, leather soccer and rugby balls, the use of animal-tested pharmaceuticals and cosmetics, milk, ricotta, cheese, gbejniet etc. which are all coming from animals that are bred and kept in captivity.

Kenneth Cassar

Feb 2nd, 08:28

@ Roger Tirazona:

"The irony is that none of them (vegetarians) are ready to give up their leather shoes, leather belts, leather handbags, fur coats, the use of wool, leather soccer and rugby balls, the use of animal-tested pharmaceuticals and cosmetics, milk, ricotta, cheese, gbejniet etc. which are all coming from animals that are bred and kept in captivity".

You're wrong on several counts.

1. Vegans exist. They don't consume dairies.
2. There are alternatives to leather. Many vegetarians and all vegans don't buy leather products.
3. Vegans don't buy wool products.
4. There are good-quality non-leather football/rugby shoes and balls. In fact, many football stars actually use them. We wouldn't know because they actually look like leather - but you may check for yourself.
5. If we were to forego (for moral reasons) all pharmaceutical products that were animal-tested, we'd have to re-start civilization from scratch, because much of our wealth, knowledge and infrastracture (and also much medical advances) came, directly or indirectly, from human slavery. We cannot change the past, but we can work for a better future.

Roger Tirazona

Feb 2nd, 08:42

Yes I know what Vegans are. I spoke of vegetarians....

Roger Tirazona

Feb 2nd, 09:01

@Kenneth Cassar

What I tried to point out is that there are no middle ways against animal breeding in captivity. One is either in favour or against. I for one am in favour but with reservations on conditions and slaughter practise. The middle road of vegetarianism does not seem to stick well enough to the position against animal breeding in captivity. Veganism is more thorough and loyal to this principle. However there are many criticisms of Veganism from the Health sciences. I'm only aware of this however, not the details.

Karl Consiglio

Feb 2nd, 09:11

@Roger Tirazona and all

X'ghandu x'jaqsam with what I just said?

All I said is that the above footage is not going to shock us, we seen it all before at the butcher.

Kenneth Cassar

Feb 2nd, 09:30

@ Roger Tirazona:

I don't wish to derail the discussion into a long-winded debate about animal rights, so this will probably be my last reply.

I'll only say that it is not necessarily about being for or against breeding in captivity (being against is the vegan position). One could - as all vegetarians are - be "merely" against the slaughter of animals, and not against breeding and captivity per-se, as long as the animals are treated humanely. There is no such thing as "humane slaughter"...there's only different degrees of suffering.

@ Karl Consiglio:

I know. I was only replying to Roger. Apologies.



Roger Tirazona

Feb 2nd, 10:21

@Karl

Apologies - I just get carried away when I see emotivism take over rationality.

@Kenneth

Animals don't have rights. Rights are something that we have Claimed for ourselves as human beings from other human beings. You should really look into this perspective as to me the idea that an antelope sues a lion for denying her the right to family because the lion ate its offspring is risible. We should speak more in terms of our duties and responsibilities towards the welfare of animals or rather, fellow inhabitants of this planet...and not animal rights; as rights imply laws and claims.

maria borg

Feb 2nd, 12:49

roger triganza
i am a vegitarian and happy to be so
i don`t buy any leather
i don`t tell people around me what to eat,if they want to eat meat it`s their choice...i would prefer that they don`t eat meat but everyone has his rights,,,even animals have rights
at least if they have to slaughtered animals for humans consume ...humans should treat them with a little respect and kill them in a painless way

Emma Xerri

Feb 3rd, 03:20

@Roger Tirazona

Roger, I usually agree with all your posts. However, in as far as this one - animals do not have rights - I am sorry to say that I have to disagree with you. If by rights you mean Rights as an artificial construct whereby people can sue is one thing, but as fellow creatures who live and breathe and who suffer like us, then yes I believe that they have rights by virtue of their existence. I do not adhere to the biblical teaching that man was made to rule over all the beasts of the earth.

This belief has done a lot of damage to the environment, resulted in untold number of species going extinct and has led to a lot of animal suffering. If you think that animals do not have emotions, think again. Cows and sheep going to the slaughter can smell the blood and hear the cries of their fellows in agony.They suffer emotionally and physically just like we do and since they suffer they should have rights.

Kenneth Cassar

Feb 3rd, 07:51

@ Roger Tirazona:

"Animals don't have rights".

So says the speciesist, just as the racist used to say that black people are lesser beings with no rights (in fact, they were considered property, just as non-human animals still are).

"You should really look into this perspective as to me the idea that an antelope sues a lion for denying her the right to family because the lion ate its offspring is risible".

Yes, it is indeed risible. But that's because you fail to make the distinction between moral and legal rights. In the absence of laws to protect the vulnerable, the vulnerable would still have moral rights. A baby cannot sue for cruelty, and yet, he/she has the moral right not to be treated cruelly.

As for the antelope vs lion example, lions are natural carnivores...they need meat to survive. We don't.

"We should speak more in terms of our duties and responsibilities towards the welfare of animals or rather, fellow inhabitants of this planet...and not animal rights; as rights imply laws and claims".

Again, babies cannot legislate, and yet we legislate for their protection. Babies have rights, despite having no duties or the means to enforce their own protection of their rights.

Suggested reading: http://www.goodreads.com/review/list/2338165-kenneth-cassar?shelf=animal-rights


Kenneth Cassar

Feb 3rd, 09:44

@ Roger Tirazona:

This might interest you: http://www.animal-rights-library.com/texts-m/dawkins01.htm

Ben Agius

Feb 2nd, 00:34

and you're calling them "savages"! Just apply the full force of the law - if there is one, would suffice.

Mike Hunt

Feb 2nd, 11:50

Or maybe cows and pigs are too big to move about discreetly

M Cachia

Feb 1st, 22:17

Meat is a necessary part of a balanced diet. Show me one vegitarian that does not resort to suppliments and vitamins to boost thier diet. We are by nature omnivores not herbivores.

Steve Busuttil

Feb 1st, 22:29

u hallina .... meat is food - if you choose not to consume it its up to you but don't come calling eating meat murder, get real.

I agree that there are health issues with slaughtering animals and this should be done at an abattoir but murder really? lol I am a committed mass murderer then hahaha

Barbara Vella

Feb 1st, 23:24

Eating meat is only a matter of taste, definitely not a question of nutrition. Ignorance is bliss.

Yana Mifsud

Feb 2nd, 00:02

To M Cachia... I am a vegetarian and have been so for practically all my life and I have never taken supplements. I can assure you I am as healthy as any other meat eater!

Franco Farrugia

Feb 2nd, 00:27

@ Steve Busuttil - Idhaq, Gahan!

Kenneth Cassar

Feb 2nd, 07:25

@ M Cachia:

"Show me one vegitarian that does not resort to suppliments and vitamins to boost thier diet".

Shall I send you a photo by email?

Steve Busuttil

Feb 2nd, 08:41

Franco, is name calling a vegan thing too? Rest assured i pity you and dont really care about your comments.

I hunt, skin and cook animals including rabbits, dear, birds and fish. Now do you think name calling is going to change this?

I wonder what you eat at Christmas? Stuffed broccoli?

Karl Consiglio

Feb 2nd, 09:12

Yes yes I agree,

its necessary murder.

Kenneth Cassar

Feb 2nd, 09:37

@ Steve Busuttil:

"I wonder what you eat at Christmas? Stuffed broccoli?".

Yes, that's right. In fact, stuffed broccoli is all we eat. And to think that joining the EU would have broadened our horizens a little.

Advert
Advert