Advert

Hondoq developers want to remove planned yacht marina

The planning appeal hearing on the €120 million development of a tourist complex in Hondoq Ir-Rummien, due to be held today, was postponed to May to allow Mepa and the developers to give replies over a legal issue.

The legal issue revolves around a fresh set of plans by the developers, who are proposing to remove the planned yacht marina and replace it with a swimming lagoon.

Mepa had refused to  accept the amendments, saying these needed to be submitted under a new application.

On hearing this, the developers appealed.

Advert

58 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Kleaven Maniscalco

Feb 1st, 13:48

If it is approved as a lagoon and it is built as a marina, then mepa will put an enforcement on it, which will hold up that part of the application. And I very much doubt it that mepa will ever sanction such thing because it has a lot of implications.....and there is a lot of controversy involved.

But if the depth of the lagoon is kept shallow, which it is at the moment, then physically it cannot be used as a marina.....so mepa through a depth restriction would have resolved the issue that such thing as you mentioned happens.

C Galea

Feb 1st, 10:21

I am sorry but you have got it all wrong!

What work is this project going to create? Yes there will be some work in construction for the first couple of years (and I bet you most of the workers will not be gozitans) and then what thousands of jobs are going to be created? As cleaners and maintenance? Because in the end it will only be flats and villas (because that is were the big money is for the developers).

obviously you do not speak to the visitors in Gozo because most of them can tell you that they come to Gozo for its natural beauty and not to visit concrete jungles!

In chambray thousands of jobs were promised, tell us how many are working there now?

Mark Vella

Feb 1st, 12:22

You live up in the clouds or have something to get from it Mr Azzopardi.

Mr leo attard

Feb 1st, 19:28

destroying the natural aspects of gozo which attracts tourists is not the answer! It has been proven that such a development would not be sustainable....Gozitans also need a place to relax. all work and no play make gozo-jack a grumpy boy!

C Galea

Feb 1st, 19:40

Mr Azzopardi if this promise of work will materialise like Smart City we will have full employment here in Gozo

Chambray and Mgarr hotel act as a reminder for us .

We will never trust promises

Mr Derek Steele

Jan 31st, 20:41

If I am not mistaken the building that you allude to is the now defunct desallination plant.I suppose it could be turned into an appartment block?I don't think so but am surprised nobody has thought of that.On a serious note however please,please please leave Hondoq alone!!!!!!!!

Joseph John Camilleri

Jan 31st, 19:20

Exactly, the beauty of the photograph says it all. I like to go there when I'm in Gozo. Developers keep your hands off Hondoq.

John J Borg

Jan 31st, 21:19

you should see some close ups before you speak, bet you have never been there either, apart from the bay area...its a dump site!!

James Tyrrell

Jan 31st, 22:44

Yes John and we know why it has become a dump site don't we? So that some nice developer can clean it up for us! It's known as the Maltese way.

david debattista

Jan 31st, 20:40

Then it is up to all of us in Malta and Gozo to stop them ! Even if it means having to spend our holidays in other more environmentally friendly countries and not just on a piece of Rock . This is what is already happening in Gozo. NOT TO MENTION THE FACT THAT THOSE OF US WHO SEE THIS DANGER AND BRING IT TO THE ATTENTION AND AWARENESS OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC BY SPEAKING OUT TO TRY AND SAVE WHAT LITTLE IS LEFT ON OUR SMALL ISLAND ARE BEING HARASSED AND INTIMIDATED BY THE SAME CONTRACTORS AND DEVELOPERS . IF SUCH IS THE CASE MR CAMEL XUERED THEN IT WILL GIVE ALL OF US AN IDEA OF THE INTEGRITY MEPA HAS NOT TO MENTION A UNDESERVED IMAGE TO THE MINISTER FOR CULTURE AND TOURISM . Past mistakes are there for all to see LETS US LEARN FROM THEM !!!!! Some type of harassment that is taking place IN GOZO is dangerous ONE HAS THE RIGHT TO PROTECT HIMSELF. MINISTER FOR GOZO AND COMMISSIONER OF POLICE TAKE NOTE . more to follow !

Kleaven Maniscalco

Jan 31st, 17:10

Mepa is not a fool. A swimming lagoon would be of limited depth which will not cater for most boats to come in comfortably

Wilfred Camilleri

Jan 31st, 18:16

Mr. Maniscalco, you obviously do not know Maltese very well if you really believe that a swimming lagoon will not eventually be full of boats of every kind. All you have to so is look at the summer residences, oops I mean "boat houses" in Armier and elsewhere. If MEPA is not a fool as you claim, howbcome these "boat houses" are still standing?

Kleaven Maniscalco

Jan 31st, 20:36

@Wilfred Camilleri

Well I know what I did when I was working on the project - so I know what fits and what does not

John J Borg

Jan 31st, 21:27

Tourists do NOT want to go to gozo to see more-of-the-same like Malta......nice theory but it looks like it works the other way round...there are tourists in malta while gozo has been completely empty for weeks!!!

Adrian E. Camilleri

Jan 31st, 16:43

Hear, hear Pamela!

pat muscat

Jan 31st, 15:21

That Gonzi kollox possible!

Martin Bugeja

Jan 31st, 15:23

Touche' Ms Vella!

O GALEA

Jan 31st, 15:47

DITTO :-(

Kleaven Maniscalco

Jan 31st, 15:56

@ Astrid Vella

Well the new design was a response to the public consultation held in May 2010. But guess what? someone was not sincere in his replies

C Galea

Jan 31st, 16:05

Astrid I agree 100%.

Mr Andrew Camilleri

Jan 31st, 16:34

Thank you Astrid for once again making all the effort to defend our country from developers. What you say should open MEPA's eyes to what the developers plan to do.

Adrian E. Camilleri

Jan 31st, 16:46

Please keep up the pressure AGAINST the development please. We love the place as it is! Thanks for all your work though.

Advert
Advert