Cultural mosaic in Australia
Australia is fully committed to multiculturalism, the doctrine that several different cultures, rather than one national culture, can coexist peacefully and equitably in a single country.
I have just been selected as one of the 40 persons from each state and territory of Australia to serve as People of Australia Ambassador.
The Parliamentary Secretary for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, Kate Lundy, considers the ambassadors to be an integral part of her community consultation strategy and will provide her, the government and the Australian Multicultural Council with important grassroots information.
Australia is and will remain a multicultural society. These facts speak for themselves:
Since 1945, seven million people have migrated to Australia. The total population is only 20 million. Today, over 44 per cent of all Australians were either born overseas or had at least one overseas-born parent.
People here speak over 260 languages, including indigenous ones, and identify with more than 270 ancestries.
The Australian government did not “hand pick” the 40 ambassadors. A national campaign encouraged anyone in Australia who contributes to the social cohesion and harmony of their community to nominate themselves or someone else as an ambassador.
Senator Lundy appreciated the recommended short list submitted by the Australian Multicultural Council, which was derived from some 358 applications provided by the public.
In short, the ambassadors, who serve in a voluntary capacity, will during their term meet their local communities to articulate these benefits:
Multiculturalism is our shared future and is central to our national interest.
Australia’s multicultural composition is at the heart of our national identity and is intrinsic to our history and character.
Immigration adds much needed skills and labour and our multicultural workforce gives Australia a distinct competitive edge in an increasingly globalised world.
Australia’s successful multicultural society and democracy are built around shared rights and responsibilities, fundamental to living in Australia and enshrined in our citizenship pledge.
Australians of all backgrounds have the right to celebrate, practise and maintain their cultural heritage, traditions and language within the law and free from discrimination.
Building social cohesion and understanding within our communities enriches our social fabric, strengthens our nation and ensures that we will continue to be an ever evolving and diversifying population.
Australia has moved away from the “melting pot” concept and is now firmly committed to assimilation, lightly described as the salad bowl or cultural mosaic method.
Multiculturalism had its share of critics. Geoffrey Blainey writes that such a policy, with its emphasis on what is different and on the rights of the new minority rather than the old majority, was unnecessarily creating division and threatened national cohesion. He says that we should think very carefully about the perils of converting Australia into a giant multicultural laboratory for the assumed benefit of the peoples of the world
Historian John Hirst is another intellectual critic of multiculturalism. He argued that while multiculturalism might serve the needs of ethnic politics and the demands of certain ethnic groups for government money to be used solely for the promotion of their separate ethnic identity, it is a perilous concept on which to found policy.
While the debate continues it is very clear that there is general consensus by the major political parties on multiculturalism as the nation celebrates and values the benefits of cultural diversity for all Australians, within the broader aims of national unity, community harmony and maintenance of our democratic values.
Diverse cultural expression enriches all Australians and makes our multicultural nation more vibrant and creative. An enduring theme of Australia’s multicultural policy is that everyone belongs. We celebrate diversity and recognise that expressions of diversity sit within Australia’s national legal framework.
Australians from all backgrounds will be given every opportunity to participate in and contribute to Australia and its social, economic and cultural life. Australians from all backgrounds are also entitled to receive equitable access to government services.
The government will strengthen its access and equity policies to ensure that government programmes and services are responsive to the needs of Australia’s culturally and linguistically diverse communities.
The Australian government welcomes the economic, trade and investment benefits that arise from our successful multicultural nation. Immigration brings much needed skills and labour. It has also given us energy, ingenuity and enterprise. Immigration and cultural diversity have created economic renewal and prosperity in our communities. Our trade relations have been strengthened, our business horizons broadened and we have become more open to the world.
Our diversity of cultures and our multilingual workforce give Australia a distinct competitive advantage in the global economy.
I am indeed proud to be one of Australia’s people ambassadors for such a dynamic nation that opened its shores to so many thousands of my fellow Maltese.
11 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Emma Xerri
Jan 31st, 04:31
Australia was taken from the Aborigines the same way that the Americas were taken from the native Amerindian populations. Now, Europe's indigenous populations will be taken over by North and sub-Saharan Africans.
The poliicy changes from that of a melting pot to a multicultural one were largely due to the Muslim immigration which demand appeasement and not integration. Australia's, Europe's and to a certain extent North America are all on the Multicultural bandwagon because of this. Ever wonder what is really behind this?
Mr Joseph Carmel Chetcuti
Jan 29th, 00:32
There is no denying that Australia is, descriptively, multicultural. The question is not whether Australia should continue to be a country of migrants (like the US) but whether this should continue to be so with migrants continuing to import their culture or expressions thereof (prescriptively). There is much disagreement as to whether or not Australia should have a politics of multiculturalism and whether Australia's migration program should continue along the same lines. In the 1970s, multiculturalism was a vehicle for greater tolerance, less discrimination and increased equal opportunity. Most liberals were all on the side of multiculturalism. Sadly, today, multiculturalism has become a nice home for reactionaries. For that reason, people like me reject it. We reject it not because we are intolerant but because in Australia we see the worst forms of ethnic expression and, in any event, many migrants are still living in a cultural freeze. Furthermore, multiculturalism and assimilation are not one and the same thing and assimilation is not an official governmental policy. We now have to look well beyond multiculturalism.
Emma Xerri
Feb 1st, 16:28
When you really analyse it, multiculturalism precludes assimilation. You cannot have both.
In fact, what you will find with the multicultural project is ghettoization. Each ethnic group as it arrives is encouraged to keep its culture, language and traditions. Which in effect means - go live in your ghetto.
Mr Joseph Carmel Chetcuti
Feb 10th, 23:08
I agree Emma. What is really happening in Australia (with very few exceptions) is a 'melting pot'. You can see that in the provision of food. True some ethnic groups tend to live in a ghetto but this tends to change over the years.
Etienne Bonanno
Jan 27th, 14:55
I guess this article was not written at the most favorable moment - with the Australian Prime Minister Gillard still reeling from having been virtually assaulted during a race riot!
Wenzu Vella
Jan 28th, 07:43
Come now Etienne you do not consider a handful of people a riot are you!!
Joseph Ellul
Jan 28th, 08:45
The truth is that the Australian PM and the leader of the opposition where having an Australia Day celebration inside a restaurant and where mobbed by a mixed race group of people who call themselves "aboriginal activists". This mob are permanent dwellers of a slum area in front of Federal Parlament and is referred to as the "Aboriginal Embassy".
These people are mostly unemployed and some are on drugs and alcohol. Politicians should get rid of this dirty lot and let the true aboriginals be the real representatives.
Real aboriginals are great people and are proud to be active in society.
Mr Joseph Carmel Chetcuti
Jan 29th, 00:43
A race riot! I hope you are no Maltese historian. In Australia, everyone is entitled to protest including the unemployed, alcoholics and drug addicts. The presence of the 'tent embassy' provides ample proof of the country's high level of tolerance. Fancy dismissing them as alcoholics and drug addicts.
Pauline Peterson
Jan 27th, 13:50
With respect Sir, but how many in Malta would be interested in what Australia does with its Multicultural policies?
Wenzu Vella
Jan 28th, 08:03
Pauline I am sure that there would be more people in Malta interested in our Australian affairs than you think, because of the very strong connection that exists between the two countries. You must realize that there are about the same number of Maltase people here as there are in Malta with Maltase heritage and most of us still have very strong ties with our relatives in Malta.
Mr Joseph Carmel Chetcuti
Jan 29th, 00:35
Pauline, with equal respect, how many people would be interested in your narrow and ignorant views? Unlike Malta, and I say this respectfully of the country I love, Australia is a world player in politics. Without exception, all of our universities are in the top 500. Sadly that of Malta does not even get a mention. Get a life!