Advert

Whip insists MPs do not have blank cheque to do what they like

CONSTANTLY UPDATED - MPs do not have a blank cheque by the people to do what they like, and they must by loyal to the government and their party, while making their contribution, David Agius, the whip of the PN parliamentary group said this morning.

He was opening the last sitting of the no confidence debate.

Mr Agius said the PN was a party of values and this motion should not be approved because the party was true to its values.

Among them was the value of work, and this was the government which was creating jobs, giving the people dignity, fulfilment and peace of mind. For this alone, the government did not deserve to be defeated.

It was right that MPs had a clash of ideas. All MPs should be heard, like the people should also be heard. But criticism had to be timely, appropriate and with the best method because it should be criticism inspired by love.

He would as whip continue to work for all MPs to make their voice heard in the interest of the common good. MPs were important when their voice was heard by the collective group. The value of loyalty was key in such communication. Loyalty should be a unifying factor. 

In terms of democracy, everyone had a right to his opinion and to try to influence others, but decisions had to be taken collectively and it was the prime minister who was responsible for the leadership of the government.

This government had not shirked from taking tough decisions in the national interest. This government had even nominated a President from the labour camp.

The government needed to correct what was wrong within it, rather than demolish everything.

An MP without a party would not be elected. Neither would the party without its MPs. The two, therefore, had to work together to ensure that the will of the people was implemented. The will of the people was supreme.

MPs had to be heard, and they had a duty to serve the people while being loyal to their party. MPs did not have a blank cheque by the people to do what they wished and they had to at within parameters set by the party and the government. One could discuss how to extend those parameters without violating loyalty to the people and the party, but loyalty had to be observed, Mr Agius said.

Home Affairs Minister Carm Mifsud Bonnici, a frequent target of Franco Debono, said that the Opposition had moved this no-confidence motion because it was hungry for power.  It was ironic that Malta was managing to weather the economic storm which had brought so many countries to their knees. This was a certificate for the government.

And yet the governemnt here was facing a no-confidence motion.

Dr Mifsud Bonnici said the governemnt was continuing to work for the common good, and a long list of Bills was pending before the House.

OPPOSITION IN FAIRYLAND

The Opposition was acting like it was in fairyland, ignoring the turmoil all around Malta and instead seeking to bring down the government.

Dr Mifsud Bonnici said he was of no doubt that Lawrence Gonzi was the best prime minister for Malta in such critical times. Thanks to his abilities, Malta had managed to move forward while others had gone backwards.

Indeed, the fact that the Opposition had not given any reasons for its no confidence motion actual proved this. And the people could more easily compare how the government and the opposition were acting and who had the interests of the country at heart, Dr Mifsud Bonnici said.

Foreign Minister Tonio Borg compared the no confidence motion to a bill of indictment and said the charges had to be proved. But the opposition was failing to do so. Indeed, so far only Joseph Muscat had spoken in this debate, and he had spoken about procedure, not the substance of the debate.

Dr Borg noted how in his opening speech, Dr Muscat had spoken on procedure and implied that whatever the outcome, he would win, claiming that even if the motion was defeated, there would be instability. This was a case of heads I win, tails you lose!

STIPENDS UNDER THREAT

It was a disgrace, he said, that the Opposition had not allowed its MPs to speak in this debate. That government MPs had spoken on the government's achievements because that was what the people expected and what was their duty.

They were justly proud of job creation, of the e-government achievements, of the records in tourism despite the tough times, of the fact that Malta's shipping register was now the biggest in Europe, of the high rate of healthy life expectancy, and how education had improved in leaps and bounds.

People still remembered how the last Labour government had removed student stipends and the current would-be Labour finance minister had said, some years ago, that the stipends scheme was unsustainable and was unproductive use of scarce resources.

Turning to foreign affairs, Dr Borg said it was ironic that while the Opposition wanted parliament to declare no confidence in the governemnt, foreign dignitaries, one after the other, were coming to Malta to thank its government for its actions during the Libyan crisis, possibly one of the most serious foreign crises that Malta faced in recent years. The government had not sat on the fence but sided with whoeever was right.

Referring to a point raised yesterday by Franco Debono on a Constitutional Court decision that mandatory arbitration breached human rights, Dr Borg noted that there were actually two court decisions, which were contradictory.

He also highlighted increased rights given by this governemnt to arrested persons, including the need war a warrant of arrest issued by a magistrate, particularly in the case of searchers.

Indeed, he said, no one came near the PN where it came to legislation on human rights.

The government would face this vote in a serene manner, whatever the outcome. The people's mandate was for a five-year term and whoever moved this motion should shoulder responsibility for letting his hunger for power take the better of him.

Dr Borg was followed by the prime minister, who is being reported separately.

Advert

65 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Charles Sammut

Jan 26th, 22:22

is'nt it obvious ??!??...from GOOGLE....LOL...LOL

Henry Samut

Jan 27th, 08:18

Welcome to the real world and to last century..... all of the EU legislated divorce, perhaps before our parents were even born. Get real!

I think asking who is going to pay for the unnecessary costs incurred in this week's parliamentary debate is a more relevant question which is in relation to and in connection with the real world!

R. Cilia

Jan 26th, 16:20

Miskin!

Victor Vella

Jan 26th, 11:53

This is one of the issues that Franco Debono is fighting for, Politicians like Agius in democratic countries have to or forced to resign. These scandals are unacceptable in a democratic country. We have to legislate to have codified the culture of resignations and accountability.

M Farrugia

Jan 26th, 11:57

Victor dak li qed tghid ma ireggix ghax dak sar bi ftehim ben iz-zewg nahat. Mela kemm kienet aktar demokritkali isir dibattitu f'1.5 hours bisskif riedet l-opposizzjoni.

John Scerri

Jan 26th, 10:45

there was an agreement on this ...dont twist facts . Dr,Muscat said that MLP only needed 1.5hours....obviously they had nothing of substance to put forward .

Carmel Zammit

Jan 26th, 11:21

Mr. John Scerri,

Facts are that the initial agreement was for the time allotment to discuss the motion of confidence in government presented by Dr. Gonzi in November to 3 hours equally divided by both sides of the house. Why should this motion which is complimentary to the one presented by Dr. Gonzi in November be allotted different discussion times? What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.

Maria Debono

Jan 26th, 10:27

Idont' think I agree with mr Grima. dr Debono is the loser in this saga. he can say goodbye to politics. who is going to trust him now? the PL I don't think so

Robert Agius

Jan 26th, 11:46

Honest people will trust him Maria. So you are very right when you say he can say bye to politics!! Loser - the people; as usual.

Mr Marcel Dingli

Jan 26th, 10:30

instant ones Dr Saliba.

Joe Grech

Jan 26th, 10:37

@Francis Saliba M.D.
Yes indeed we do not need to have 69M.P.s Tell that to your chums at P.N. perhaps they will reduce the number of parliamentarians. As if - they're having a field day earning big salaries and pensions!
Please consider putting a stop to your biased comments. If you're really an M.D. (Medical Doctor??) please go about doing your rounds.....But take off your Politically Biased Blinkers before you do!

Robert Agius

Jan 26th, 11:52

Evidently Franco would NOT be one of your choice. That is why there should be 69 unbiased ones ideally. I know, wishful thinking, especially in a island split in blue and red

Maria Debono

Jan 26th, 10:00

what alot of nonsense you are spouting Kirsty. what about your power hungry party?. your leader keeps on harping that HE (and ony He) is raedy to govern. Did he mention any policies? He only said that he is going to lower water and electricity. How? by giving soft loans to students instead of stipends? by making us pay for hospital visits? by giving part raise to pensionners. Please do tell us how, you might make me vote labour during my nightmare

Joe E Galea

Jan 26th, 10:15

@Mario Debono: There is a big problem stuck up with you Nationalists,. You try to distort the truth in a lie to favour yourselves. Since when telling the truth and speaking in favour of the country has become a power hungry bla bla bla.

You keep on mention mistakes done in the past for which the PL has severly suffered and learned its lessons very well. Again the PN here it has another problem. They never learn from their mistakes, they think that they have the Divine right to govern.

Then you started saying the following crap: "How? by giving soft loans to students instead of stipends? by making us pay for hospital visits? by giving part raise to pensionners. "
The stipends issue I already expalined to you. The payment to hospital visits, if I am not mistaken, the PN government has a white paper in the drawer to make the health system against payment. Pensionners have a pension thanks to the PL.

So please stop with your nonsense and stop parrotting what NET NEWS try to brainwash you with. Deep down you know that this government is in a big crisis and have failed on many fronts. Finally you had someone who uncovered all the wrongdoings done by this government.

You can keep ad eternum trying to blame everyone else except yourselves for the mess the country is in.

Ms Xaxa Caruana

Jan 26th, 10:16

@Maria Debono

Mohhok f stipendju, FYI JOSEPH QAL LI MHUX HA JMISSHOM SO SHUT UP U MOVE ON ....KEMM TOBDU LIL GONZIPN, MOHHKHOM BIEX TITFU BLAME FUQ IL-PL, NO MY DEAR MARIA, GONZIPN IS TO BLAME SO POINT UR FINGER AT HIM.

Joe E Galea

Jan 26th, 10:15

The check was not blank, it showed 500 Eur/week.

Alfred Vassallo

Jan 26th, 09:47

quote ''At the end of the day it will be the government and Franco who will be the real casualties, if Franco votes against his own party''.

Franco has been a casuality from day one, and all this crap about ''this country'' from the pn Cabinet, all they are interested is to cling to power as much as possible so as to continue riding the gravy train.


M Grima

Jan 26th, 10:19

I do not think that Franco needs your advice or for that matter mine either. He is man enough to decide whether he has been taken for a ride during the past three and a half years by Gonzi who is surrounded by the elite clique of mini prime ministers or as he likes to call it the clique of evil. This is gross coming from the nationalists, first they use you and then they throw you away just like they did with Franco. If there is anyone who would benefit if Franco votes in favour of the no confidence motion it is the the people of this small nation, including yourself, from the grips of corruption, favouritism, 'hbieb tal-hbieb', political incorrectness, inefficiency and squandering of our taxes.

No single labourite can be singled out for being the reason why Franco is acting in this manner, a man who has the balls to call a spade a spade. Why are you making it appear as if labour was all behind the PN's fracas. Where were you when the same happened to Alfred Sant, did you utter the same nonsense? I guess not?

Franco may have made his point but will one single nationalist ever absolve his actions? You and those of your ilk have been boot-licking the guy for these past two weeks only to demonise him after today's vote.

Franco there is only one avenue for your future 'be the change you wish to see in this world' - Mahatma Gandhi, and rid yourself and us of these parasites and hypocrites.


Rita Smith

Jan 26th, 09:37

Proset Joseph tal-kumment. Jien ukoll nghid lil Dr.Debono jahsibha ghax ghandu punti tajbin izda ma jistax isir kollox f'daqqa. Jekk jivvota mal-Gverm ghad ikollu pozizzjoni tajba. Daqxejn ta goodwill minn naha tieghu.

Rita Smith

Mr Charles Falzon

Jan 26th, 09:51

@ Rita Smith & Joseph Portelli......ghal li jista jkum ma kontux Marsaxlokk tghajtu viva Austin u Franco TRADITUR hux????

Alfred Vassallo

Jan 26th, 09:55

@ Joseph Portelli & Rita Smith
U halluna. ISSA Qedin izzelu bih ghax bezzanin li titilfu il vot, tahsbu intom li l-ewwel taghmlu LI TRIDU u tiqbqu ghaddejin tirummblaw fuq kullhadd umbad tigu b'hafna xema. Tahsbu intom in-nies imginnen jew.

Alfred Vassallo

Jan 26th, 10:12

@Rita Smith
U haga ohra ara naqra x'ghadek kemm ktibt int xi nofsija illu fil TOM f'rokna ohra

''Dan Dr. Franco Debono ma nafx kemm hu biex jghid li l-Prim Ministru ma jimpurtah minn xejn. Dik jien insejhilha 'grudge" . Ghandu ghalih personali u jekk tkun politikant fi hdan partit ma tistax ikollok ghejra ghall-Prim Ministru. Allura irrizenja. Dan mohhu one way, Courts, Courts etc. Il-Gvern ma jistax jieqaf fuq problema wahda.''

L-ewwel tghidlu li mhux f'sessieh u issa tigi u tejdlu biex jahsiba ghax ghandu punti tajbin. Ehhh!! hekk sewwa.

Advert
Advert