Advert

Permit decision ‘outrageous and dangerous’

The extension will house the private chambers of the members of the judiciary and other offices. Photo: Matthew Mirabelli

The extension will house the private chambers of the members of the judiciary and other offices. Photo: Matthew Mirabelli

The unsightly additional floors built on judges’ new chambers in Valletta’s Old Bakery Street have been slammed by the Chamber of Architects’ president.

He said it could compromise the city’s Unesco heritage status.

Describing it as an “eyesore”, chamber president Vince Cassar said the permit to raise the old building to eight floors should not have been granted.

“Valletta has its own particular skyline which has already been ruined by other projects. However, the other developments do not jar as much as the one in Bakery Street,” he said.

Commissioned by the government, the €1.8 million project involves joining two adjacent houses in Strait Street and raising it to eight floors to house the judiciary’s chambers as well as a drugs court.

However, the extra floors added on top of the building, built with new limestone and cement blocks, stand out prominently in the area’s skyline and prompted a barrage of criticism on social networking sites – especially from Maltese architects.

Photos of the structure have gone viral on Facebook with architect Chris Briffa highlighting it as an example of “bad design” as he sarcastically complimented the Malta Environment and Planning Authority for managing “your typically strict ‘save our skyline’ strategy, and to whomever commissioned this new monster”.

Mr Cassar underlined the need for care with construction in Valletta.

“If we continue as it is, Valletta could lose its Unesco heritage status,” he said, pointing out the capital’s plans as the European Cultural Capital in 2018. Architect Conrad Thake described the decision to grant the permit as “dangerous” and “outrageous”, especially because of Valletta’s protected heritage status.

Dr Thake said that judges’ chambers should have been built elsewhere and not in a historic building as the environment was not conducive because of issues of space.

The project had been recommended for refusal by the planning directorate since the government applied in 2001.

However, a Development Control Commission overturned the recommendation and granted the permit after asking the developer to remove a bridge linking the new chambers with the law courts.

Although Valletta is a Unesco World Heritage Site, there are no planning policies setting a height limitation for buildings in the city.

Advert

16 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

James Tyrrell

Jan 22nd, 23:48

Not unreasonable in such cases where you may have to factor in what is skimmed of the top even before you start paying bribes.

stephen koludrovic

Jan 22nd, 10:51

@ Carmel Debattista,

Just add a few more euros in your calculations for the consultants fees that might be needed.

Advert
Advert