Advert

Cannabis, Schengen and double standards

Malta is a signatory to the Schengen agreement, which it signed on joining the EU. For anyone who is not familiar with this agreement, it allows for the free movement of EU nationals.

It also allows for EU nationals to transport their medicines across borders. Schengen allows medical users of either Sativex (which is cannabis oil in a spray bottle) or Bedrocan to travel to another country that signed the Schengen agreement for up to 90 days. Any person harassed or detained would be looking forward to hefty compensation from that country.

So why are people like Daniel Holmes doing lengthy prison sentences for cultivation when any other EU national can enter Malta with a prescribed legal cannabis medicine? Or does Malta enjoy an exemption from this part of the agreement?

Why should someone who cultivated such small amounts of cannabis, which, obviously, were not for sale – as the quantity was so small and the effort involved so large – end up with such a long, draconian sentence?

There really needs to be a lengthy, educated discussion on this issue with all the science put on the table; not pseudo science from aging police medical doctors, which is mostly taken from studies that are heavily biased and paid for by prohibitionist groups and alcohol industry insiders.

If cannabis caused half the harm some paid-up prohibitionists say it does, then why was Sativex given a licence and why is Bedrocan legal?

Why have cases of schizophrenia dropped dramatically or remained static in so many European countries while cannabis use has increased threefold over the last three decades?

Governments can’t just cherry-pick data that supports their own outdated prejudice. Any government that does not reclassify alcohol and tobacco to Class A has failed in its duty to protect its own citizens.

There are about 75 million cannabis users in Europe and we deserve the same rights as those who enjoy wine, spirits, beer and tobacco.

Those who use cannabis hold down jobs, pay tax and vote!

Advert

20 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Paul Smith

Jan 21st, 15:42

So If i bring Sativex in a bottle into Malta my medicine will be taken off me? You are then in breach of schengen and will have to pay me the victim of your ignorance and a fine to Brussels

Cant wait

Karl Consiglio

Jan 21st, 12:29

You can go and play football Im not stopping you and I have the right to a filthy habit if I want one.

Mr Duncan Scerri

Jan 21st, 13:07

Evidently you speak without knowledge. Regular consumers of cannabis have a lower risk of cancer than those who do not smoke at all. The sales of Sativex only serve to line the pockets of the pharmaceutical industry. I'll wager you do not even know why cannabis became illegal globally.

Roger Camilleri

Jan 21st, 14:08

Drinking alcohol or smoking cigarettes are just as filthy as so called 'drug abuse'... 'tis indeed a hypocritical world we live in.. sad

Gordon Camenzuli

Jan 21st, 14:11

1. One has to distinguish between smoking and selling. I never smoked and never will but i do grow my own food and two homegrown plants are surely for personal use.
2. Better smoke what one grows than what one gets hold off on the black market!

Common sense doesnt seem to be soo common nowadays. Simple isnt it?

Matthew Micallef

Jan 21st, 14:39

You're confusing drug use with abuse again. There is a lack of research conducted on both sides of the argument for medicinal use, however do note that in 1929 when Harry J Anslinger pushed for the prohibition of marijuana, all doctors that were unaffiliated with government opposed it, for the simple fact that most medicines were based on herbal remedies, and most of these included some extracted form of cannabis. Indeed, smoked marijuana is the least ideal way to medicate, however it's use stems from the very rapid reposnse to medication that smoked marijuana gives. No other form of marijuana ingestion produces medical pain relief as quickly as when it is smoked. That is the reason why smoked marijuana is used as a medicine, but in truth there are a large number of ways that marijuana can be beneficial without smoking it.

JOSEPH ZAMMIT

Jan 21st, 16:53

Personally, what is so difficult to understand is the comments made by people like you. Educate yourself C Cassar, at least you can do yourself that favour!!

angelo cilia

Jan 22nd, 17:29


"Using a medicinal spray is exactly that - primarily for medicinal purposes."


If I do not want to use liver destroying paracetamol - codeine pills to combat the pain of arthritis So if I grow some good cannabis Indica bud and place the ground up flower bud in capsules it is ok to use it as medicine to treat the pain and inflammation from my arthritis.

Up to 80 years ago such ready made medicine was available from such pharmaceutical firms as Eli Lilly and Parke Davis and countless others.

Advert
Advert