Advert

Censorship laws revamp announced

Stitching may now be staged

Video: Mark Zammit Cordina

The government this afternoon announced its intention to carry out a major overhaul of the much-criticised censorship laws affecting stage performances and films.

A three-week public consultation process has been launched.

Tourism and Culture Minister Mario de Marco said the new proposed laws fulfilled the aspirations of the artistic community. He regretted that the current laws may have failed some people in the past.

He explained that the proposed amendments will move towards a system of self-regulation, whereby the producer/director and in some instances, the venue, will be responsible for setting the age classification of a performance.

The amendments also propose that the cinema and stage regulations will be transferred from the police laws to the law which regulates the Malta Council for the Arts.

The Film and Stage Classification Board will be abolished but there will be a Theatre Guidance Board which will publish age classification guidelines and suggest criteria to help producers take their own decisions.

The new board will also receive and discuss complaints if patrons feel that a production does not match the rating given to it.  Should the board uphold the request, the board will recommend a new rating to the producer and he will be required to advertise it along with his own rating so that the people can be duly informed of what the board considers to be an appropriate rating.

With regard to cinema, a board of Film Age Classification will issue ratings, but will be obliged to give reasons for its ratings and if they are considered inadequate, an appeal may be filed.

Adrian Buckle, the producer of the banned play Stitching, was present for the announcement, held at St James Cavalier and thanked the minister for his decision. He said the play would be staged after the new regulations came into force.

Full details of the proposals can be found at http://doi.gov.mt/classification.asp

Advert

78 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Mr T Zahra

Jan 19th, 11:00

The fact that you are even attempting to defend Norman Lowell says it all !!!!

Joe Fenech

Jan 19th, 13:53

Mr Zahra

Someone who's attempting to silence others says it all too !

Charles J. Buttigieg

Jan 18th, 08:46

Dream on Adrian. This administration has only a few weeks of life left.

Kevin Wain

Jan 18th, 10:05

Mr. Fenech, I believe that we ought to make a distinction here. I will explain: I am in favour of ending censorship laws, but Norman Lowell and racism is a completely different issue than ending censorship in the Arts. Art must be taken for what it is i.e. an expression intended as fiction, sometimes for a more sophisticated audiences, but not always. Hate speech on the other hand is a different issue altogether and, this all lies in what it is intended for i.e. to instill hate in populist manner, which could ultimately lead to violence. Liberty is like a national economy you take some of it from some to give to others. Lowell's case is that of restraining Lowell for garanteeing the safety and liberties of minorities that happen to be living in our country. On religious indoctrination I agree with you utterly. As I see it, what we should teach in our schools is respect towards different religions, opinions and, ethnic origin as well. As far as crucifixes are concerned I do not see why they or any other religious symbol ought to be removed from classrooms. Religions could be comforting for some people. Why not respect them and all others?

Francis Coquelin

Jan 17th, 22:30

Did you read that on the cereal box during breakfast?

Joe Fenech

Jan 18th, 07:20

These are desperate trying to rake in a couple of votes by re-arranging deckchairs on the Titanic !

Jonathan Camilleri

Jan 17th, 21:19

X'ghandu x'jaqsam Mr Chetcuti?

Mr Joseph Carmel Chetcuti

Jan 17th, 23:20

Ma nistaqx infissirlek dak li hi car u ovvju!

E. Vassallo

Jan 17th, 20:43

Why a few weeks...the election is not so near after all!!!!

fred fellon

Jan 18th, 04:33

That Job is already promised to ADAMI"s SON

Paul Giordimaina

Jan 18th, 08:58

As being a Nationalist it doesent matter Good luck to him

Jonathan Camilleri

Jan 17th, 21:20

The benefits of crisis management in a constitution...haha

John M Grima

Jan 18th, 00:44

Agree....agree.

Mr Clayton Mangion

Jan 17th, 22:55

The church is always ANGRY ...

Francis Coquelin

Jan 17th, 18:41

Good to see that you finally got around to trying out the keyboard on your computer. Now don't be a shy neighbour. Keep these pearls of wisdom coming.

Francis Coquelin

Jan 17th, 18:29

I'm really looking forward to reading that avant garde play of yours now that the censorship laws are to be scrapped.

Francis Coquelin

Jan 17th, 17:22

I'm sure the current censorship laws must be absolutely devastating for an avid consumer of local art and culture such as you undoubtedly are.

Francis Coquelin

Jan 17th, 17:31

Clearly the prospect of an end to censorship has sent him into a state of delirium.

Advert
Advert