Advert

BirdLife insists it will continue to film illegal hunting

BirdLife insisted today that it will continue to film illegal hunting, when this is in the public interest.

It said that recent communication received from the Data Protection Commissioner did not, as the FKNK claimed, request that BirdLife Malta gains the consent of hunters before filming them or say that BirdLife Malta may not process such footage.

"The letter actually refers to only one incident where footage was released prior to the sentencing of an individual. The Commissioner deemed that BirdLife Malta had been acting in the public interest when publishing the video concerned, but that individuals ought not to be identifiable in such material."

BirdLife said the filming of individuals engaged in illegal acts or otherwise is not prohibited as long as the footage is taken in the interests of the public.

"The communication from the Data Protection Commissioner related to the person being identified and not to the actual filming of the incident. Footage gathered by BirdLife Malta involving illegal hunting and trapping is regularly passed on to the appropriate authorities and identities are disguised when footage is utilised for other purposes."

Last year, BirdLife Malta submitted over 100 investigation reports to the police including footage and photographs of individuals committing hunting and trapping offences.

BirdLife Malta also regularly receives reports and video material from members of the public which are passed on to the authorities for investigation purposes.

"There is no reason why BirdLife Malta, other NGOs and the public should not continue to report hunting and trapping illegalities by gathering video and photographic evidence to assist the police with their investigations," the society said.

Advert

26 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

M. Cardona

Jan 9th, 19:48

Ms Pia Attard, the solution is simple; there's a ruling by the Data Protection Commissioner, whether omnipotent and wanna be above the law BLM like it or not.

M. Cardona

Jan 9th, 19:47

Ms Rosalind Agius, how old are you exactly? And who helped you make this up? Typical inconsistency; Dearest Rosalind if the bird was butchered nearly above you, you wouldn't have felt "like tiny needles all over your body". Now have a cup of warm milk and off to bed.

Victor Falzon

Jan 9th, 21:56

@M. Cardona

What's your point, M. Cardona? Are you implying that anyone who reports a bird being shot down is imagining things? You guys are unbelievable! But then, people like you are precious to the cause, because what you write punches some serious gash in the hunters' credibility (what credibility?). So good boy!

Emma Xerri

Jan 9th, 19:28

Bird Life should inform them that they are being filmed when they inform the birds that they are about to be shot.

M. Cardona

Jan 9th, 18:26

Mr Calleja,

your assertion clearly indicates you have not seen the ruling. Unqualified allocation of credibility may yet prove quite disappointing.

Regards

C Borg

Jan 9th, 17:39

miskin!


C Formosa

Jan 9th, 18:24

jahasra, morrulu miskin!!!

Victor Falzon

Jan 9th, 17:09

You wish!

Advert
Advert