Debono angered by report on party financing
Franco Debono’s law sets lower thresholds for public donations
Party financing sparked a controversy during the last MEP elections when the expenditure of certain candidates was publicly questioned. Photo: Chris Sant Fournier
Nationalist MP Franco Debono yesterday disassociated himself from a draft Bill on party financing slammed by the Council of Europe’s anti-corruption watchdog, insisting this was not his work.
The Group of States Against Corruption (Greco) pointed out inadequacies in the draft Bill, such as that it made a distinction between donations from party members and ordinary individuals.
An infuriated Dr Debono said the Greco report was based on an old draft that was never meant to be sent out and which had since been revised.
“This is not my draft and I disassociate myself fully from it,” he said, adding that his version not only satisfied Greco requirements but went beyond them.
Dr Debono, who had originally been tasked with drafting the law, had filed a crude document with the government’s law drafting unit.
He said it was then substantially “diluted” to the point that he decided to rewrite it himself, something MPs and even ministers rarely did.
In the meantime, however, the “obsolete” draft was mistakenly sent to Greco for review.
The government last night said the draft presented to Greco, upon their request, represented the “state-of-play” at the time when Greco undertook the evaluation (between October 17 and 21). At that stage it was the only draft available to the Office of the Attorney General.
“In the meantime further work was being carried out by Dr Debono who has now finalised a draft Bill which is being fine tuned by experts. The government intends to publish the draft Bill for public consultation after referral to the Parliamentary Group.”
Dr Debono is still threatening to stop supporting the government in Parliament unless the Prime Minister divides the justice and home affairs portfolios as the first step towards a wide-ranging justice reform.
The Prime Minister has kept mum about his intentions, though that could change when Parliament reconvenes after the Christmas recess on January 18.
However, the focus now seems to be shifting onto the party financing law, which Dr Debono is very passionate about and has been campaigning for since his very first speech in Parliament in May 2008.
If the draft law remains on the shelf, the problems between him and the Administration are likely to escalate.
On Monday, Dr Debono said on TVAM that the Nationalist Party could not afford to go to the election without enacting the party funding law.
In response, a spokesman for the Prime Minister had said this was an important item on the government’s agenda and the draft Bill was being “fine tuned by experts”. It would then be published for public consultation after referral to the parliamentary group.
Meanwhile, sources said the draft Bill was vastly different from the one criticised by Greco, both structurally and in terms of details.
Dr Debono’s draft stipulates that political parties must register all donations exceeding €300 made from any one source in a calendar year.
When aggregate donations add up to more than €7,000, the names of the donors must be made public by being given to the Electoral Commissioner. Donations of more than €50,000 in one year would not be permissible.
On the other hand, the law submitted to Greco says only donations of more than €3,000 should be publicly declared and the name of the contributor would only be made public if the contribution exceeds €10,000.
Dr Debono’s draft makes no distinction between donations from party and non-party members whereas the draft seen by Greco makes party members exempt.
The Debono draft encompasses various other aspects including that political parties must be formally registered after satisfying a number of criteria, including the submission of proper accounts.
The draft also speaks about party discipline and says no member can be expelled from a party without a process of ascertainment of facts and opportunity of defence within an independent tribunal.
His Bill sets more realistic thresholds for candidate spending, an issue that sparked controversy during the last MEP elections when the expenditure of certain candidates was publicly questioned.
The Labour Party said it had not seen a draft of the party financing Bill nor was it ever consulted. It wondered which draft the Prime Minister supported.
“Such equivocal episodes, which have now become the order of the day under the Gonzi government, are symptomatic of the mediocrity of the present Administration,” the party said.
It said there should be no distinction between party and non-party members and the donation thresholds must be realistic, not set to pay lip service to regulating party financing.
The draft seen by Greco, Labour said, “consciously creates loopholes”.
7 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Mr Giovanni Barbaro-Sant
Jan 5th, 21:16
(Debono) here, (debono) there, (debono) everywhere...but who de ( ) is debono ?
...& after a 3 day break...debono rose again, this time to ping-touch! :)
Jo Meli
Jan 4th, 15:35
The Prime Minister should shoulder the RESPONSIBILITY of the mix up.
Was it intentional or not, I prefare to take it as a vendetta against Dr Franco Debono to make Dr Debono look like a fool.
TIME has PROVEN Dr Franco Debono RIGHT once AGAIN !!
J. Debono
Jan 4th, 21:03
Yeah, Franco Debono is always right, and everyone else is always wrong.
Good one. Pull he other one please.
GEORGE CUTAJAR
Jan 4th, 12:52
This is Dr. Debono's new weapon to hit at the PM and the PN.
it seems that the holiday over last week-end had no soothing effect on him. After this latest windmill more and more will come.
Mr J Xerri
Jan 4th, 11:26
"the “obsolete” draft was mistakenly sent to Greco for review." but a few lines down it is reported that this draft was sent as "At that stage it was the only draft available to the Office of the Attorney General." Was the draft mistakenly sent or was it sent because the AD Office was caught unprepared and rushed the 'obsolete' copy they had? And by stating that this was the 'obsolete' copy, one can come to the conclusion that there was another draft. Was Dr Debono's Draft already at the AG's Office? The Government statement raises more questions than answers.
Carmel Grima
Jan 4th, 10:36
Nista' jien, bhala cittadin tat-tielet classi, nirraporta lil A.G. talli qed jinjora t-talba tieghi biex jaghati risposta fuq il-frame up ta' missieri, Karm Grima, ta' dak il-15 ta' Ottubru 1979? Nista' ukoll nirraporta lis-seg. tal- Kumm. Ghall-Amm. tal-Gustizzja talli wara li irrapurtajt Imhallef ghax ma riedzx jaghati gurament lil-prim xhud; biddel sentenza li ftiehmna ma xulxin meta dahal l-avukat ta' l-education, fuqna, qallu : "le din il-ministru ma jistax jitlifha!"; u halla l-indhil mill-Ministru sfaccat. Kas oxxen ta konflitt ta' interess.
Fil-25/11/2008 ktibt lill-Prim Imhallef u kien hu li qalli biex nikteb lill-Kumm. Fit-23/12/2008 kitbitli lura Dr. Deborah Farrugia Seg. tal-Kumm. u qaltli li," ma ghandha xejn x'izied ma l-ittra taghha tal-21 ta' Gunju 2005." li kien tfisser li l-Imhallef ghandu dritt jaghamel li jrid .[] fl-opinjoni tieghi u tal-Prim Imhallef! Nista' nirrapurta' kollox lil-GRECO?
John Borg
Jan 4th, 10:18
Franco Debono is always angry about something. I heard him the other day on One news, who reproduced clips of what he said on TVAM, and he sounded like man barking up the wrong tree. One News, the labour party media, tried to use him in their favour. My conclusion after watching it was that they managed to show what he really is.