‘I never saw shopkeeper’
In his ‘final interview’ convicted Lockerbie bomber al Megrahi insists he is innocent
The man convicted of the Lockerbie bombing protested his innocence again yesterday, saying he had “never seen” a Maltese shopkeeper whose identification was central to the conviction.
The Sliema shopkeeper, Tony Gauci, had identified Libyan Abdelbaset al Megrahi in court as having bought clothes from him, the fragments of which were found among the wreckage of the flight.
In what he declared was his final interview, Mr Megrahi said: “I never bought clothes from him. He dealt with me very wrongly. I have never seen him in my life before he came to court.”
The interview was published in several British newspapers, shortly after a memorial service marking the 23rd anniversary of the atrocity was held in the United States.
Two hundred and seventy people were killed when Pan Am Flight 103 exploded over the town of Lockerbie on December 21, 1988. Mr Megrahi was convicted of carrying out the bombing at a Scottish court sitting at Camp Zeist in the Netherlands in 2001 and sentenced to life imprisonment.
The connection with Malta and with Mr Al-Megrahi was made after Scottish police recovered items of baby clothing from the wreckage. They bore the label Yorkie, made by a Maltese company, and were in a suitcase believed to have been carrying the bomb. The clothing was subsequently traced to Mr Gauci’s Sliema shop.
The courts decided that the bomb left from Malta. Another theory, however, was that it had been placed on board a London-bound plane at Frankfurt airport before reaching the Pam Am jet that was bound for New York. Some believe Iran, and not Libya, was behind the bombing.
Mr Megrahi was released on compassionate grounds in 2009 after he was diagnosed with terminal cancer.
In the interview he said: “I am an innocent man. I am about to die and I ask now to be left in peace with my family.”
Meanwhile, Scotland’s Lord Advocate Frank Mulholland travelled to the US for the memorial and laid a wreath on behalf of the people of Scotland. He also made a speech in remembrance of the victims of the atrocity and met their relatives. Earlier this week, he met FBI director Robert Mueller and US attorney general Eric Holder to discuss the opportunities for stepping up the investigation in Libya into the bombing. He said: “I think I would be failing in my duty if I didn’t properly seek to take advantage of the opportunity that has opened up with the fall of Gaddafi.
“I am determined to get the answers these families deserve.”
Amin Khalifa Fhimah also stood trial with Mr Megrahi but was acquitted of any involvement.
Mr Mulholland said the idea that Mr Megrahi had acted alone was “risible”, and said “justice has only partly been done. The evidence pointed to it being an act of state-sponsored terrorism.”
Scottish police are expected to go to Libya next year as part of the ongoing investigation into the 1988 attack.
“Megrahi was a member of the Libyan security service – it is risible to think that he acted alone. What we want to do is bring the others to book.
“A huge opportunity has opened up. It was very difficult when Gaddafi was alive and in power in Libya, and the answers are in Libya.”
Last March, in the midst of the Libyan uprising, Muammar Gaddafi’s Justice Minister Mustafa Abdel-Jalil, who had just stepped down, was reported telling a Swedish tabloid he had proof the Libyan leader had personally ordered the Locker-bie bombing.
Mr Megrahi had reportedly warned Col Gaddafi he would “reveal everything” about the downing of the airliner unless he was rescued from the Scottish prison where he was being held.
7 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
robert pace
Dec 24th 2011, 09:33
Well whoever lies for his own reason whether to get rich or play innocent will one day burn in hell literally .
We dont know who is saying the truth although Megrahi has nothing to lose now at his last days before death. So it does shed some light on the matter , everyone will pay for his doings whether its Gaddafi , Megrahi or Gauci they all have to pay their dues , money is nothing near life!!!!!
Victor Vella
Dec 23rd 2011, 21:58
@ Evarist Saliba
How can I enlighten you when the only colour that you see is blue. For sure when you watched the Lockerbie disaster very closely you saw only one colour, blue, blue, and blue. So who is going to believe you?
Evarist Saliba
Dec 24th 2011, 18:26
Just ignore me, and enlighten other readers who see other colours apart from blue, by substantiating your claim that the government of Malta has been saying lies about this terrorist attack.
You are not able to do so because it is not the governement of Malta that is lying.
Instead you turn to cheap personal remarks which I treat with the disdain that they deserve.
Joseph Calleja
Dec 23rd 2011, 15:41
You seldom come across a convict that admits to his crime. Their favourite answer is like Mr Megrahi. I did not do it. If he did not do it then Mr Gauci must have lied on the stand or it could be a case of mistaken identity. With all the evidence that was presented in court, I think Mr Gauci was correct in identifying Mr Megrahi as the man in his store and the courts proved Mr Gauci right. Mr Megrahi should still be in a Scottish prison doing the Jig. But alas, he was supposed to have died 2 years ago, diagnosed and suffering from terminal cancer. LOL
Victor Vella
Dec 23rd 2011, 10:51
If this person is saying that he never saw the shopkeeper on his dead bed he must be taken seriously. The case of the Lockerbie disaster has to be reviewed so that the truth will become apparent and who found it so comfortable to lie about this person and sent him to jail must be brought again to justice. The name of Malta in this disaster is still bleached with lies coming from Maltese authorities and people alike.
Edward Mallia
Dec 23rd 2011, 17:45
But the case WAS coming up for review by the Scottish Authorities when someone had the bright idea of releasing Megrahi "on humanitarian" grounds. If memory serves me right, one of the conditions for release was that all idea of a review be dropped. That does sound a little fishy. The fact leading light in the Lockerbie Victims Group, Mr. Jim Swires had come roundto the view that Megrahi was innocent.
There was also the information of the break-in into a transfer luggage hut at Heathrow on the night before the fatal flight was never mentioned in court. Add to that reports - never denied - that the Sliema man who 'identified' Megrahi was in receipt of a fat sum of CIA money and the case against Megrahi begins to wilt.
Evarist Saliba
Dec 23rd 2011, 17:57
I have followed the destruction of PanAm 103 over Lockerbie very closely. Could you please enlighten me to what lies coming from the Maltese authroties you are refering?