EU treaty agreed... but without UK
26-member treaty to be signed by March
European leaders yesterday struck a deal that promises to save the euro through greater financial integration among all European states bar the UK, one of Malta’s strongest allies on financial services.
The UK effectively used its veto to block an attempt, led by France and Germany, to get all 27 EU states to support changes to the treaties after it failed to get guarantees for the City of London and its massive financial services industry.
Initially, it looked like the agreement might only have 23 countries. However, Hungary, Sweden and the Czech Republic, which also wavered, eventually said they would take the agreement to their parliaments, leaving the UK on its own.
In spite of Malta losing a major ally in the battle to safeguard financial services – on which both countries depend significantly – the Maltese government’s lobbying still paid off because the introduction of a financial transaction tax and a common corporate tax base were dropped from the final communiqué agreed upon.
“This is a successful summit for Malta because we have managed, albeit with difficulty, to safeguard our national interest,” an exhausted but satisfied Lawrence Gonzi said yesterday afternoon after marathon talks that ran through the night, save for a short break between 5.30 and 8 a.m.
According to the summit’s conclusions, the 17 member states of the eurozone and nine out of the 10 remaining member states plan to sign a new intergovernmental treaty by March to strengthen fiscal union particularly in the euro area.
The new rules will have significant impact on Malta.
The island will have to adhere to stricter deficit and debt rules. The country will have to slash its deficit by at least 0.5 per cent of GDP a year in order to reach a balanced or surplus Budget. Failure to do so will incur automatic sanctions, defined by the Commission and the Council, should the country go beyond the threshold of three per cent of the GDP. The government is aiming to end the year with a deficit of 2.8 per cent.
The new rules will effectively mean that eurozone members will not have much room for manoeuvre when deciding their annual budgets because they have to stick to spending what they actually rake in.
Malta, as a signatory to the new treaty, will also have to submit a draft Budget to the EU for approval before presenting it to Parliament.
Another innovation will be a constitutional amendment with the agreement of the opposition to commit the country towards balanced budgets.
This “golden rule” – already adopted by some member states including Germany – will contain an automatic correction mechanism that will be triggered in the event of a deviation.
This will be defined on the basis of principles proposed by the Commission. Moreover, the European Court of Justice will have jurisdiction to verify the transposition of this rule at national level.
Dr Gonzi said that, although Malta was already moving towards a balanced Budget, with the only deviation happening in 2008 when the country was hit by a global economic recession, it agreed with a constitutional amendment to make sure that future Maltese governments followed this rule.
“We have to make sure that what happened to Greece will not happen again and all these measures point towards that direction.”
Asked whether the constitutional amendment would be treated with urgency, Dr Gonzi said he hoped that the opposition would also be on board so the change could be passed through Parliament in the shortest possible time.
In a statement last night, Labour leader Joseph Muscat said he realised the need to have legal mechanisms that ensured fiscal discipline. However, such mechanisms had to give the government enough elbow room to manoeuvre in exceptional circumstances, such as in a recession.
Dr Muscat urged the Prime Minister to ensure such flexibility would be ensured.
He expressed concern at the mandate given to the European Council to draw up a report on more fiscal integration.
Dr Muscat said he was willing to support the government, so long as decisions on taxes would continue to be made by the Maltese government. “Today’s deal does not seem to have overstepped this line,” he noted.
He made it clear he would never agree to a common consolidated corporate tax base or a financial transaction tax.
Agreement among member states was also reached on the bailout funds, with the €500 billion European Stability Mechanism entering into force next July, a year before it was originally planned to be in place.
Eurozone member states will also provide additional sources to the International Monetary Fund by up to €200 billion in the form of bilateral loans to ensure that the fund has adequate resources to deal with a potential worsening of the crisis.
Malta’s part in the new financial outlay is expected to be to the tune of €150 million, to be provided through the Central Bank’s reserves. Malta’s loan to the IMF will be based on commercial interest rates.
On the political level, the summit will be characterised by the UK’s isolation.
Although EU leaders played down the UK’s refusal to follow the other member states, unofficially many observers are interpreting the move as a new EU relationship with the UK.
The decision by Sweden, the Czech Republic and Hungary to consult their Parliaments before deciding to join is seen largely as a formality.
Commission president José Manuel Barroso said it would have been better had the deal enjoyed the support of all the 27 member states.
However, he said, he respected David Cameron’s decision.
“This summit agreed on issues that, until a few weeks ago, were unimaginable. Member states agreed to accept ‘intrusive powers of the EU’ in order to have a better union,” Mr Barroso said.
11 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Mr Tony Gatt
Dec 10th 2011, 22:23
This whole summit is a farce- the E.U. accounts are so full of holes they have not been signed-off for the past 15 or so years, and here are these po-faced politicians telling everyone they are going to enforce fiscal probity!
Pull the other one.
carlos ellul
Dec 10th 2011, 17:01
We always seem to agree with everything that EU asks us to agree on. Dublin 2 treaty, Greece Bail out and now this.
MALCOLM SEYCHELL
Dec 10th 2011, 14:06
Cameron is the only prime minister who stood for his people. Well done. Time will prove you right unlike our politicians
Peter Murray
Dec 10th 2011, 17:57
Hear ,hear sir.Cameron is not my cup of tea nor do I agree with his politics but in this instance I admire his fortitude .Can you imagine Gonzi doing anything remotely like this/For he has merely and meekly agreed to even more powers being transferred to Brussels-talk about puppets!
ALBERT FENECH
Dec 10th 2011, 12:28
Vide your editorial attempt at graphic "amusement", may I suggest you change the comments of Merkle/Sarkozi and have them spouting something like: "Have you heard of how Malta's Dr Austin Gatt re-organised their public transport bus system? It was an instant success. Perhaps we should have him in Brussels re-organising Europe". I think that would have been more tastefully appropriate.
ALBERT FENECH
R. Cilia
Dec 10th 2011, 15:35
LIKE :)
ALBERT FENECH
Dec 10th 2011, 10:56
Germany's Adolf Hitler tried to dominate the world. France's Napoleon Bonaparte tried to dominate Europe. Both failed because Britain - mainly - stood up to them and went to war to stop them. Are we seeing a replay with the Merkle-Sarkozi duo using economic squeeze as an alternative to military means? Once more Britain has gone it alone and stood up to thier dictat. I am not a fan of David Cameron. To me he appears slick, smarmy, patronising and sly, speaking with a plum in his mouth having been born with a silver spoon between his lips - a real classic and conservative Tory. However, I have sprung enormous overnight admiration for him. He has struck out against the EU-Brussels steamroller and has made a courageous stand.
If the 27 EU countries were to call a referendum today in each of their 27 countries on whether their electorates want to remain in the EU or not, I am more than certain the vast majority would opt to instantly opt out - very much against the wishes of their politicians who find it convenient to blame everything on Brussels to paper over their own shortcomings. Well done David Cameron!
ALBERT FENECH
john gittos
Dec 10th 2011, 12:36
At last someone is talking sense Cameron yesterday had to protect the City of London and what Merkle/Sarkozi want Cameron to sign up to would put that in jeopardy ,London is the leading financial centre in the world are you telling me if that were Paris or Frankfurt their leaders would tie their hands of course not .The whole idea of Europe having the same currency was flawed from the beginning you cannot align the economies of Greece or Malta or Portugal with a country like Germany and thats why the Euro is in a mess , so please before anyone in Malta points the finger at the UK dont wish for something you may all regret in 2012 , and as Albert has pointed out history has proven that decisions made here in the UK in the past has proven to be Europes gain .I believe in Europe has a market , and do not want to leave the EU , and I certainly do not want to become the 51 state of America .
Nick Borg
Dec 10th 2011, 14:00
You're missng the point. The reason that the Euro hasnt worked well so far is that govenrments can play silly buggers knowing that the EU will have to bail them out. Its a bit like a maltese dinenr outing among"friends".. A few will always order the most expensive things and drink as much as possible knowing that the bill will be split.
Its a different story when everyone pays for what they ordered...
And why should a government spend more than what it brings in? Why should they run a deficit and pass it on to future generations so they can look good while in power?
The idea of being forced to balance the country's books properly and govern with what you have rather than borrowing and then passing the buck is over and about time too.
Do you borrow outrageously, spend it left fright and centre and then pass on the debts to your children to deal with? I hope not - well that's what the govenrments have been doing for years and now its time to settle the bill. Anybody out there scraming "Not fair!" grow up and realise that unless there is governance and someone standing up to make sure that things are done fairly, it is never going to happen - especially in Malta.
Government self regulating. Good joke.
The UK may look brave going it alone right now and it does have a certain amount of strength due to its size and assets, but in the long term it is going to suffer outside the EU. The Financial centre may have a repreive for the moment but if a member of a club doesnt play to the rules, it doesnt stay part of the club for long.
I am glad that taxation is still dealt with at a national level but I am equally glad that there will be penalties for deficits. Countries should aim to run at a surplus - How many companies do you know that aim to run at a deficit?
R. Cilia
Dec 10th 2011, 15:33
Nick Borg,although I can understand your reasoning I am not confident that things will work out as you said.For example the EU commissioner may object if the maltese government decides to raise the wages in Malta but is in favour of Malta forking out 150 billion euros to help bail out Greece.Where would that leave us?
Carmel Cilia
Dec 10th 2011, 16:46
I am under the impression from what I heard our prime minister say the the Financial question was put out of the way at this meeting. So how come Cameron stayed out of the game because of this. What is going really on here.