Advert

Lest we forget (some things)

It seems almost unbelievable to think that practically 25 years ago to the day that this article will be published, Raymond Caruana, a young PN supporter, was lying in a pool of his own blood, on the floor of the PN Gudja Club.

Why isn’t the spotlight shone on those police officers who were allegedto have participated in torture sessions and frame-ups during Labour times?
- Claire Bonello

He had been felled by bullets shot from the gun of someone in a vehicle which sped by in the dead of night. His murder was the worst in a series of violent incidents which characterised the ever-escalating political violence of the 1980s.

It was also the catalyst for change and a transformation of the political landscape.

The general feeling was that such horrors could not continue to be perpetuated and people voted out the Socialist government of the time (albeit by a mere 4,000 or so, votes).

But Raymond Caruana was not only the innocent victim of crime. His murder was the one which launched a thousand publicity campaigns. From the days after his death, in PN mass meetings held through the years, to the commemorative events being held by the PN this week, we are not allowed to forget Caruana’s death.

I remember a meeting on the Fosos where a huge backdrop featuring Caruana’s face billowed behind the stage as the crowd chanted the words of a song about the young political martyr. That’s where small circular stickers bearing the words, ‘Raymond Caruana – martri tal-liberta’ (Raymond Caruana – Martyr for Freedom) were handed out.

Then there were the periodical reminders – the programmes on Net TV, the odd Xarabank programme (with a bit about the Karin Grech murder thrown in to ‘balance’ things out in accordance to that absurd notion of what passes for impartiality in this country).

The murder of Caruana was given pride of place in Liberta Mhedda the book written by veteran PN journalist Dione Borg, which also focuses big time on the accusations made by Ganni Psaila ‘Il-Pupa’ an erstwhile Labour thug who found God and the Nationalist Party – but only after Labour had been booted out of office. Just this week Borg’s Evidenza programme – one about cold cases – was all about the RaymondCaruana case.

I have no doubt that things will continue in this vein in the coming weeks and in forthcoming anniversaries of that fatal shooting of December 5. We will not be allowed to forget. That’s fine with me. Remembering may go some way towards ensuring that we do not give rise to the toxic atmosphere of hatred and a repeat of those violent days.

If the PN is trying to eke any political mileage from incidents which took place so long ago, it can go ahead and do so, although I doubt it would swing many voters of the younger generation who feel they are too far removed from them to consider them as actualities.

But I have a thing about consistency. If so much effort is expended (and rightly so) in ensuring that we never forget the injustices wreaked on people who were framed and of corrupt policemen who closed an eye to the goings-on of thugs, why isn’t the same attention given to those police officers who were alleged to have participated in torture sessions and frame-ups during Labour times, and who were promoted under the PN?

Why isn’t the beam of publicity directed on to the police officers who were involved – in any capacity – in the frame-up on Pietru Pawl Busuttil? Why don’t we get constant reminders of their steady upwards trajectory throughout the ranks, perhaps accompanied by grainy footage of them intheir heyday, when it was so much easier to plant incriminating weapons on political enemies?

I guess we won’t be seeing much of those. That’s because it’s so much easier to continue presenting events in black and white terms where the innocent were slain and the bad guys got their just desserts and were shamedin the Nationalist utopia that followed.

It’s convenient, easy to understand and fits in perfectly with a narrative where the country is forever divided into the good and the bad. So much for justice, and everyone getting his due. The hideous reality which emerges from the Raymond Caruana murder is that a young man lost his life.

His martyrdom has become part of the national myth and we are invited to commemorate it every so often, but that’s where it stops and where selective amnesia sets in, lest we remember some unsavoury detail which mars our picture of history.

cl.bon@nextgen.net.mt

Advert

9 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Francis Saliba M.D.

Dec 5th 2011, 10:37

@ Paul Micallef of the LP "selective memory".

The Zebbug MLP supporters mentioned by you were criminals who had departed from the route assigned to them by the police, leapt over police barriers, who were trying to "break and enter" a NP club where members were peacefully gathered until the MLP criminal mob tried to break in. According to their usual modus operandi the MLP police did not charge those criminals trying to make a forcible entry into a private building. No, sir! They hauled to court those who tried to defend themselves anf their family legitimately. In fact the court set them free.

Does that jog your memory into being less selective?

Francis Saliba M.D.

Dec 4th 2011, 21:41

@ Victor Laiviera.

Cui bono? Let me explain why the MLP was the beneficiary.

The recurrent incidents of burning down the presses of The Times, the ransacking and spraying of NP political clubs with submachine gun fire knowing that there were people inside, the snatching away of voting documents from NP members queueing to vote. all had the same purpose of intimidating the political rivals of the MLP.

Evidently the murder of a peaceful NP supporter in his club was not specifically intended. It was a grievous risk callously taken by the usual MLP thugs heedless of the manifest danger. The subsequent frame up of an innocent person was carried out by MLP police to divert attention deliberately away from the real culpritsl

That should answer your "Cui bono?" question about who was intended to benefit from those political crimes. But only if you remove your blinkers.

Victor Laiviera

Dec 6th 2011, 16:35

@ Francis Saliba.

Did you take a course in convoluted thinking or does it come naturally?

Francis Saliba M.D.

Dec 6th 2011, 22:35

@ Victor Laiviera.

My comments are not convoluted at all. Some people feign not to understand them when they are stumped for a reply. You know the feeling.

Advert
Advert