Advert

Malta slips two places on enlarged corruption index

Malta has slipped two places in the 2011 global corruption index, published in Brussels this morning.

The country retained last year's score of 5.6 out of 10 in the survey, which this year includes five more countries, bringing the total to 183. This means that Malta's perceived corruption remained at the same level as last year - perceived the 39th least corrupt

According to the survey, based on assessments and data from various independent sources, the least corrupt country in this year's ranking is New Zealand, surpassing for the first time Denmark which always topped the ranking in past years.

On the other hand, Afghanistan and Myanmar share second to last place with a score of 1.5, with Somalia and North Korea - measured for the first time - coming in last with a score of one.

The CPI scores countries on a scale of zero to 10, with zero indicating high levels of corruption and 10, low levels. This year, two thirds of countries covered by the index were given scores less than five - which means they are considered significantly corrupt.

Advert

67 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Stephen Sultana

Dec 1st 2011, 20:37

Illum min jibqabad jitrressaq il-qorti u jiehu li haqqu. Fi zmien il-Lejber hadd ma kien jinqabad ghax hadd ma kien jissogra jirrapporta minhabba li il-korruzzjoni kienet tibqa tiela sa fuq nett.

Seamus Riolo

Dec 2nd 2011, 12:06

@Stephen Sultana
LOL Tajba kienet din sihbi, mela bhalisa kull had jejt u jgerger hlief xi erba bhalek jigru kem il qrati mux jatu sentenzi li haqom, Specalment wara bniedem li kabar erba pjanti tal cannabis jehel iktar min qasis li xeba jabuza it tfal jew iktar min minn itajar it tfal bil karozza taht abuzz ta droga!

Proset Stephen, haba nies bhalek nimxu il qudiem f dal pajjiez, ma nafx fejn ijed tara in nies jihdu li haqom fil qorti! ENLIGHTEN ME!

Victor Vella

Dec 2nd 2011, 21:36

@ Seamus Riolo

Seamus a man I know is at the moment undergoing proceedings in court for alleged corruption.He is a finished man, suspended from work on half pay, waiting for God knows how many years for his case to be heard, not knowing if he is going to be found guilty and go to prison or if he would be set free.believe me it is not easy even if you say that no one gets what he deserves.Speaking about cultivating cannabis, hm we all know what he was going to do with them.maybe you do not have a son or daughter to worry about. I will not mention Labour of the 70's and 80;s I will mention Labour of 96/98 where we had 3 clear cases of corruption.

Stephen Sultana

Dec 1st 2011, 20:38

In fact there are many countries which are much more corrupt than ours. So we are in fact doing something about it.

David Bezzina

Dec 1st 2011, 23:46

THAT IS THE PAST....THE PEOPLE VOTED THAT ADMINISTRATION OUT.TIME TO DO THE SAME TO THE PRESENT ADMINISTRATION.CORRUPTION IS NOT EXCUSABLE IN ANY CIRCUMSTANCES.

Stephen Sultana

Dec 1st 2011, 18:07

And your metaphors are getting worse.

joseph saliba

Dec 1st 2011, 17:10

Something worth celebrating? Percieved corruption not of 'Mr Gonzi team' who came unscathed out of two years BWSC bombardment. Perception from talk like yours and certain media reporting. Perception which at times might be a perversion of the truth. Maybe Botswana and Taiwan enjoy the same transparency as 1970 to 80 Malta, that's why their perceived corroption is lower than here.

Carmel Cilia

Dec 1st 2011, 16:15

Lies Mr. Vella , damned lies, do you really think so? Just take MEPA for example and go and have a look at Wied Ghajn Zejtuna in Mellieha. This is supposed to be a bungalow area: go and see for yourself Buildings on a single plot: 6 storeys high: two semi detached on a single plot with double garages in between: corruption galore: you would have fourteen courses basements with thirteen courses first storey and then to crown it all a n eleven courses washroom with another 6 courses for the lift. Corruption galore my friend. In the same area I was not allowed to erect a Nine course high garage for a small car 10ft X20ft because they said this was a bangalow area.
At the same time today two Somalies were awarded 10,000 euros each for breaking their constitutional rights.
You can slice corruption today like you slice a block of butter my friend.

Paul Attard

Dec 1st 2011, 14:45

You assume that because they are legal there must be something wrong with the data? Rather it is because they are legal that the level of corruption is low. Think about it.

Anthony Formosa

Dec 1st 2011, 15:21

Mr Svensson, So what makes you joining the club?

M Sciberras

Dec 1st 2011, 16:26

As The Wise Mam said, the benefit of living on a small island is that the airport and a plane to Sweden is not far away (hint, hint, nudge nudge)

John Vella

Dec 1st 2011, 13:37

well said. You need a thief to catch a thief.

George Azzopardi

Dec 1st 2011, 14:13

@Matthew Galea Debono ./ John Vella

this is the result of 25 years of PN .. no matter what you say!!!

Mr Joseph Scicluna

Dec 1st 2011, 13:35

like, like, like!!!!!!!

Mr Tony Gatt

Dec 1st 2011, 15:56

We wish!!

Mr Aaron Sammut

Dec 1st 2011, 16:01

Might be...... it would be interesting to check what happened when:

The government issued an application to tender for companies able to built a GAS POWER STATION....... somehow a company offering a power plant running on Heavy Fuel Oil tendered when it didn't even qualify.

This application was not only accepted when it should have been rejected, but our cabinet met urgently to allow this company to be eligible...... the rest is history!!! including the 4 million Euro paid in ....in inverted commas COMMISION!!

Wake up.... these are the things that happen in the 180th place in the Corruption List, we should be well below our position

W Cassar

Dec 1st 2011, 12:53

No probably the same though.

Mr F J Brincat

Dec 1st 2011, 13:06

Yes you may ask but, have you got an answer for the present situation?

Ramon Casha

Dec 1st 2011, 13:09

Where did the EU come in?

As for your second question, for all we know under a Labour government Malta could fare better or worse. We won't know until next election.

C. Sammut

Dec 1st 2011, 13:14

Shame on you for throwing such bad light on a government which hasn't been in office in over 20 years instead of admitting the present government's deficiencies!! Yours is another blue blinkered argument!

Stephen Grech

Dec 1st 2011, 13:24

Mr Calleja,
This statistic does not distinguish between Nationalist or PL, but as a whole country.
The latest trend is that when positive statistics are published we praise the PN and when negative ones crop up we implicate PL.
Well IMHO who rules this country should face all comments and statistics being positive or negative.
Good day.

Paul Micallef

Dec 1st 2011, 13:40

You can always ask Commissioner John Dalli or Nationalist MP Franco Debono

B Azzopardi

Dec 1st 2011, 14:23

@ C. Sammut
There's no shame. Yes the Pn has been in government for over 20 years but we're still suffering the consequences of MLP.

Paul Micallef

Dec 1st 2011, 14:54

B Azzopardi: Ghax ma tghidx li qed inbaghtu l konsegwenzi tal 'money no problem' u tal korruzzjoni grassa li gab il partit li int tant int ferventi ghalih! Hallina trid!

W Cassar

Dec 1st 2011, 15:32

@ B Azzopardi

I can only shake my head in disbelief at your comment!

I guess with your same logic... I can say the PN has done very little mela?

Victor Boyde

Dec 1st 2011, 13:50

Mr Cremona, you are wearing blinkers and only seeing what's ahead of you. There are many pointers and statistics are their to prove the facts.

Angus Black

Dec 1st 2011, 18:00

Can you imagine at what position Malta would be, if the authors of institutionalized corruption who wrote Malta's history pages between 1971 and 1987, were governing today?

I am sure that the dinosaurs brought back to life by Joseph will have borrowed a few pages from the 'golden years'.

Mr Ernest Vella

Dec 1st 2011, 13:05

we are on top...fic-cuccatti li jghid Joseph Muscat!!!

Peter Seebohm

Dec 1st 2011, 13:27

Dear Mr. or Misses Mercieca

Knowing almost all countries in Europe, we decided to come to Malta.

See it as a positive list.

No country is perfect, but Malta is so special. We love it.


Corruption? Should be a NO GO, but it´s even present in the ritched countries on the world.




Julian Borg

Dec 1st 2011, 13:41

We are in the top quarter meaning we are in the least corrupt 20% of countries.....which is positive not negative!

Paul Micallef

Dec 1st 2011, 14:51

Sur Vella, ghax ma tghidx fuq ic cucati li jaghmel siehbek Gonzi! L aktar il 500 euro zieda li ha u lilna jissikkalna c cintorin!

Mary Ann Borg

Dec 1st 2011, 15:20

'Is there something positive that we are close to the top of the list?'

Yes, the only positive we have on this island is the leader of the opposition for his foresight and l-Orizzont for best reporting on earth.

Advert
Advert