Muscat’s energy proposal may not survive rating test
A Labour Party proposal to slash electricity bills by reducing the investment capital recouped from consumers may be severely compromised unless Enemalta downsizes its new projects, according to a major credit rating agency.
Standard and Poor’s said that if any reduction in tariffs was not compensated by measures on the investment side, the ratings agency would have to reassess the likelihood of exceptional support.
If this happens, Enemalta’s credit rating may worsen, leading banks to breathe down the corporation’s neck.
In his reply to the Budget last week, opposition leader Joseph Muscat said that if Enemalta reduced the percentage return on its investment from the current 8.5 per cent, it could translate to a €12 million saving for consumers.
Last January, Standard and Poor’s lowered the energy company’s credit rating by one notch to BB with a negative outlook and this assessment may create a sticking point for the Labour Party’s proposal.
According to infrastructure ratings director Vittoria Ferraris, one of the analysts who worked on the Enemalta report, it is difficult to say what the final impact of such a proposal on the corporation will be.
But the ratings agency, she said, would expect that a reduction in tariffs from a lower return on capital is followed by “an equivalent downsizing of Enemalta’s investment plan”.
The Labour Party has not hinted at any plans to downsize the corporation’s capital investments. On the contrary, it hascommitted itself to continue with the interconnector cable with Sicily and promised to run the Delimara power station on gas, which would require substantial new investment.
Standard and Poor’s downgrade earlier this year was attributed among other things to Enemalta’s weak debt coverage ratios.The report had also insisted that ratingstability depended on the execution of “a sustainable refinancing plan”.
The company’s saving grace is the “exceptional support” it receives from the government that guarantees its debt, which runs into half a billion euros.
According to the Finance Ministry, a reduction in return on capital will endanger Enemalta’s financial situation and have “significant repercussions on the financial stability of the country as a whole”.
In its defence, the Labour Party drew a comparison with the UK where the energy regulator set the return on capital rate for utility companies at 4.7 per cent in 2009 for the next five years.
Unlike the UK, electricity in Malta is provided by a monopoly and regulation was required not only to limit excessive pricing but also to set incentives for efficient performance, a spokesman for the Labour Party said.
He added that keeping the return on capital “artificially high” provided no incentive for the company to improve its efficiency levels.
“Ultimately this will result in a loss of competitiveness for the country, given that energy is a basic input for all production processes and this negative loop would feed back onto Enemalta and have a negative effect on its credit rating,” he said.
Labour’s claim
If Enemalta’s return on capital is benchmarked with the UK’s 4.7 per cent, the Labour Party estimates that savings could reach €15.3 million.
Adopting a slightly higher rate of 5.5 per cent, which is more in line with the European Commission’s recommendations, the Labour Party says that it would still cut down return on capital by €12.1 million.
However, when asked what such a saving would mean for individual consumers, the Labour Party insisted that reducing return on capital was only one of a raft of proposals that would be presented to the electorate.
“The plan will be a holistic one that will offer realistic and sustainable savings,” a spokesman said, without quantifying the savings.
Broadly offering similar calculations, the Finance Ministry is insisting that any reduction in return on capital by €12 million would lead to “a maximum decrease of €4 per €100”.
If this is the case a consumer currently receiving a bill for €300 would see this go down to €288.
13 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Mr Adrian Zahra
Nov 28th 2011, 05:38
There is only one way, that electricity bills can go down and that is
1) Make Enemalta efficient and that will mean firing people.
2) Ensure that investment id made in the cleanest of technologies, We are sure that in the coming years there will be a tax imposed on CO2 emissions.
3) Publilsh Enemalta's accounts for anyone to see so that we can know who is taking us for a ride if either JM or TF.
4) Enemalta is the new drydocks. Let's see if anyone will have the guts to get the bull by it's horns there.
Mr M Spiteri
Nov 27th 2011, 21:55
According to this report i understand that we are being charged by Enemalta on capital which currently is not yet in place? Are we already charged for future investments?
Carmel camilleri
Nov 27th 2011, 16:28
Insomma storja ohra bhal tal-Vat gejja jekk labour jirnexxielu jiehu 'l-Gvern.
Joseph Calleja
Nov 27th 2011, 16:23
Mr Muscat, we know you are a politician but please don't promise something you know you cannot deliver. Nobody can, because that ship has sailed.
C. Bartoli
Nov 27th 2011, 14:50
looks like history is repeating itself, Alfred Sant promised the removal of VAT and it was a flop and now more and more promises which will never come true from Joseph Muscat
Ms Maria Vella
Nov 27th 2011, 14:49
Oh well, that was a short lived joy
Mario J Spiteri
Nov 27th 2011, 11:10
Min ilu jhawwad u jgerfex jaf x'hemm! Biex ha 500 Ewro fil-gimgha zieda bil-mohbi ma bazwarx l'hawn u l'hemm minn butek biex ha jaghtik stazzjon tal-energija bl-aktar uzu ta zjut li jhammgu, kontijiet astronomici u MHUX realistici minn fomm il-PM stess u l-famus trasport pubbliku gdid li ntefqu balal tal-flus biex hadna SERVIZZ 0% Dak li jaf jaghmel Sur Caruana dak li qal flimkien kollox possibli. The buck stops here Hon PM!!!
Paul Caruana
Nov 27th 2011, 10:37
Both PN and PL think they are being very clever by playing these accountant games to delay payment by a few years but, ultimately, as people in Greece, Spain, Italy etc etc are finding out, your creditors will stop being polite about your bills - they will smash open your door, barge in and demand their dues.
Richard Caruana
Nov 27th 2011, 10:28
Insomma, bhal ta' qablu dan JM. Kif kei qal Alfred Sant: 'Bazwar ftit l'hawn u bazwar ftit l'hemm'!
Guido Farrugia
Nov 27th 2011, 16:41
Tista jekk joghgbok telabora aktar u tghid min fejn gibt din il-quote? Jien niftakar lil xi hadt jghid " 10 miljuni l-hawn u 10 miljuni l'hemm ser noqodu nfetqu" " Inaqqas l-income tax gha 25" qabel it 2010" " It-tabib ta l-ghazla tieghek" Litanija li ma tispicca qatt. Eh bilhaqq..... ittra ta garanzzija ta xoghol lil imjegati ta l'Airmalta.
j brincat
Nov 27th 2011, 10:27
"Broadly offering similar calculations, the Finance Ministry is insisting that any reduction in return on capital by €12 million would lead to “a maximum decrease of €4 per €100”.
How can he come to this conclusion when the public does not know whether Enemalta has not published its audited accounts since 2008 and this is supposed to be a legal requirement?
Can he confirm or otherwise whether he has on hand the audited accounts for Y 2008, 2009 & 2010. If in the affirmative who audited these accounts? What is the bottom line? Are there any qualifications?
(jb)
Aaron Vella
Nov 27th 2011, 10:14
Reality will hit labourites hard on their faces when JM is a Prime Minister...
John Attard
Nov 28th 2011, 14:30
Unfortunately, the whole country will have to pay the price... I vowed not to vote for Gonzi's government as personally I do not like the way does things, however it seems that the PL are always finding a way to remind me not to vote for them.