Advert

Malta smoking ban fails to stub out heart disease

We are shocked over smoking ban results

The smoking ban may have led to a decrease in the heart disease death rate and hospital admissions in every country where it was introduced, but it has had absolutely no impact in Malta, a medical study has revealed.

We suspect places of entertainment are not ensuring the law is enforced for fear of losing out on business

From Italy, where heart attacks dropped by 11 per cent after it banned smoking in public places, to Montana where the decline was a whopping 40 per cent, every country registered an improvement.

“We were shocked and disappointed with Malta’s results, especially since the island was the second country in Europe to introduce the smoking ban,”cardiologist Robert Xuereb told The Sunday Times.

“Seeing that international studies all showed a reduction in heart attacks and smoking-related deaths, we assumed we’d find a drop in Malta too – to our surprise there was absolutely no change in the figures,” he added.

The findings were recently presented to the European Society of Cardiology Congress, which was held in Paris and attended by a record 32,946 participants from across the globe.

The paper, titled ‘The Smoking Ban: The Malta Paradox’, looked at figures for cardiovascular deaths and hospital admissions due to a heart attack five years beforeMalta introduced the ban in April 2004, and compared these with five years later – there was no change in either the admission or mortality rates.

Dr Xuereb pointed out that, unfortunately, it was public knowledge that the smoking ban in Malta was not properly enforced.

Figures show police have been attempting to crack down on smoking in public places – the number of people charged was just 19 in 2004, but this soared to 2,567 in 2009. However, it is clear not enough is being done and the €233 fine that is slapped on a first offender does not seem to deter smokers from lighting up.

“We suspect owners of nightclubs, band clubs and places of entertainment are not ensuring the law is enforced for fear oflosing out on their business,”Dr Xuereb said.

His argument is backed by an exercise carried out by The Sunday Times in February 2010 when 14 bars in Paceville were visited over two evenings to witness how smoking restrictions were being enforced – revellers were smoking with impunity and on one occasion included a bartender and a police officer in uniform.

This raises the question whether the government’s decision to extend the ban to all public places from 2013 – it will be illegal to smoke anywhere inside a public place, including designated areas – will have any significance for Malta’s premier nightlife district.

Dr Xuereb believes the fear entrepreneurs keep bandying about that business will suffer as a consequence of banning smoking does not hold.

He referred to a study in Italy in 2009 that looked into the impact the smoking ban had on bars, cafes, and restaurants.

It showed 10 per cent of Italians were frequenting these places more often, compared with seven per cent who went less frequently.

This was a clear sign people preferred to be in a smoke-free environment and health authorities had to be made aware of this as businesses tended to pander for just a third of the population who were smokers.

The impact of second-hand smoke is often underestimated. Dr Xuereb referred to a 1992 study by the American Heart Association showing those exposed to environmental tobacco smoke at home had their risk of death due to heart disease increase by approximately 30 per cent.

“Maltese authorities were among the first to introduce the ban in Europe and they deserve a pat on the back for this, but unfortunately, we didn’t get the results,” Dr Xuereb said.

He is urging authorities to take bolder decisions that restrict smoking in places such as cars, in stadiums, public gardens and on beaches.

Were such measures not too drastic? And if there was so much environmental pollution, why was all the focus on smoking?

“True, pollution is a major health risk and action should be taken, but equally we need to reduce the impact of tobacco on non-smokers – smokers are a health hazard to non-smokers,” he said.

Malta will not be the pioneer if it adopts what Dr Xuereb is recommending, and other countries are now more ahead of the game. In May, New York introduced a smoking ban in Central Park, and last year Venice decided smokers could no longer light up at city beaches and parks.

Just last week, the British Medical Association called for all smoking to be banned in cars across the UK to protect people, especially the young whowere more vulnerable, fromsecond-hand smoke.

Dr Xuereb believes the situation in Malta is “very sad”, especially since cardiologists believe smoking-related “heart attacks can not only be prevented but eradicated”.

The team involved in this research include: Sandra Distefano, Neville Calleja, Victor Grech, Kathleen England, Miriam Gatt, Joseph Cacciottolo and Stephen Fava.

The facts

32% of men and 21% of women in Malta are smokers.

Of the smokers, 72% usually smoke 20 cigarettes a day; 20% smoke between 20 and 40; and 2.5% smoke more than 40cigarettes a day.

Passive smoking is highest in entertainment places (28%),followed by the workplace/school (24%) and at home (20%).

The proportion of 15-year-olds who smoke in Malta is higher than that of countries such as Italy and England – 10% of boys and 14% of girls.

Source: The 2008 European Health Interview Survey.

Advert

106 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

John Scerri

Nov 28th 2011, 09:36

The actual price is tax payers money of over 5000 euro per patient for medicines and procedures to deal with smoking related deseases so the higher the price of cigarettes goes the better .

I would also suggest that those who smoke are obliged to pay more insurance contributions during the period in which they smoke , hence being more prone to heart and lung deseases.

Mr Sandro Cremona

Nov 28th 2011, 09:23

You are so right !!!! enforcement is a joke to the detrement of non smokers. But that is normal in Malta. I learnt to live with it. The par idejn soda is round my neck!!

James McIntosh

Nov 28th 2011, 06:57

Absolutely right mr Gibson, a visit to just about any bar will find smokers who do not give a hoot for the law with the complicity of the bar staff.
All the other countries have witnessed a remarked drop in bar trade since the ban was implemented and I wonder if the bar trade in Malta would rather risk prosecution (maybe) or risk loss of revenue (for sure)

H. J. Grech

Nov 27th 2011, 19:28

Dear Mandy, we can say that tobacco is a legalized drug ... or something near to it!

Ms. P.M Graham

Nov 27th 2011, 19:50

Surely then the answer is NOT to go to Hugos....... I really don't understand the problem.

Gordon Farrugia

Nov 27th 2011, 22:39

NO - that's what the bar security people want you to do. It is illegal to smoke in bars so there should be no persons smoking. It is the persons smoking who have no business being inside. And Hugos is one example - most are like that - there is that other underground bar that opens late at night and is so filled with fumes that its absolutely disgusting.

BAR OWNERS WHO BLATANTLY FLAUNT THE LAW AND ALLOW THEIR PATRONS TO SMOKE INSIDE THEIR BARS SHOULD BE SLAPPED WITH HEFTY FINES. I'm quite sure that will help solve the problem.

Mario Martinelli

Nov 27th 2011, 23:27

AGREE 100% AND CAN WITNESS THE PLACES MENTIONED TOO

C Cassar

Nov 27th 2011, 17:36

The taxes collected from cigarette sales are a drop in the ocean compared to the enormous medical burden that smokers put on all other tax payers. Smoking will eventually be eliminated. Unfortunately still too many uneducated people around who think that it woin't affect their own health but only of others. Still too many heads buried in the sand.

Gordon Farrugia

Nov 27th 2011, 22:41

the solution is to slap those bar owners flaunting the law with BIG FINES.

Charles Sammut

Nov 27th 2011, 16:11

LOL !!!
So how come in other countries, the impact of the smoking ban has been seen straight away??
LOL!!

C Cassar

Nov 27th 2011, 17:32

the smoking ban has been in place far longer in most other EU countries. They have seen a drop after several years into the ban. Do some research before making unqualified comments.

James McIntosh

Nov 28th 2011, 07:26

The government has the opt[on of a solution.
Form an inspectorate to visit clubs, bars and other public places in plain clothes to gather evidence, on video if possible, then present the evidence in court for prosecution of the owners and then remove the licences of those offending establishments. It is the only language that these irresponsible idiots understand. At the same time, prosecute the individual offenders with really hurtful fines, name them as being responsible for the loss of the venue to others, the backlash would be instant.
No license, no income , problem solved in that establishment, move on to the next one and do it again.
The word would soon spread that breaking the no smoking law would NOT be profitable.
The question must be asked, is cronyism affecting the enforcement process, do people in high office have financial interest in the big clubs and bars, are the police actually enforcing the ban or nipping into these establishments themselves for a quick smoke whilst on duty.
This is essentially a Health and Safety Issue and places an unnessary burden on a stretched Health Service

Vicki Azzopardi

Nov 27th 2011, 19:31

I myself being asthmatic find it very hard to find a bar, especially Sunday morning, when I can go and enjoy a drink as everywhere I go there are many smokers. I cannot understand why police do not go and check on them and fine the barman who lets these patrons smoke to their hearts content and to our lungs discontent.... Shame on the authorities..... who know what is happening and ignoring it.

M Cachia

Nov 27th 2011, 12:38

And you base this allegation on what study? or is it just the wild ramblings of the uninformed? Contrary to what you may think it is a well known medical fact that any first year medical student can point out , that cigarette smoke (especially second hand as this is unfiltered) results in a number of effects which significantly increases the risk of cardiac problems.

Mr A. Mifsud

Nov 27th 2011, 17:52

@M Cachia

...well if you google 'smoking ban facts' you'll find multiple articles to this regards. An interesting one is the one by RAND corporation. I'm not saying that smoking does not harm one's health, but don't believe unprolonged (and repeat unprolonged) second hand smoke could lead to serious health issues.

I'm not a smoker myself and I think that the smoking ban in public places legislation was one of the most important and beneficial laws ever introduced.

M Cachia

Nov 27th 2011, 21:27

Your response is misleading. Your original statment was not that the link between lower heart disease and smoking ban was unproven but that second hand cigarette smoke is not linked to heart disease. I again ask you to provide evidence to this fact, and by that I mean peer-reviewed journals not random ramblings on the internet.
Oh and just for your information, my own research identifies that harmful changes in the airway epithelium (structural and physiological) occur after a cumulative period of 24 hours exposed to passive cigarette smoke.

D. Xerri

Nov 27th 2011, 12:53

The same thing can be seen in Malta too with plastic tents everywhere enclosed in Plastic - Not only they are taking away the pedestrian pavement BUT turning this plastic tent into a cloud of smoke - I have seen it so many times yet the authorities are either naive about it or dont want to move a finger !

Patricia Saliba

Nov 28th 2011, 17:40

Is it true that in New York people are not allowed to smoke in the streets?

william staines

Nov 27th 2011, 12:12

I hate to admit it but I completely agree with Emmanuel but you have to take into consideration that Malta is on the periphery of European thinking, what you see here is akin to what you see a hundred odd miles further south. I'll say no more.

john engles

Nov 27th 2011, 14:08

Do Smoking Bans Reduce Heart Attacks?

“In contrast with smaller regional studies,” says a RAND Corporation study, “we find that smoking bans are not associated with statistically significant short-term declines in mortality or hospital admissions for myocardial infarction [heart attack] or other diseases.”
In fact, “An analysis simulating smaller studies using subsamples reveals that large short-term increases in myocardial infarction incidence following a smoking ban are as common as the large decreases reported in the published literature.”
In other words, although heart attacks do decline in some places with smoking bans, there are just as many places where they rise. On average, the difference between jurisdictions with smoking bans and jurisdictions without smoking bans is essentially zero.

http://healthblog.ncpa.org/do-smoking...
...

G G Debono

Nov 27th 2011, 12:15



"Could it be that the root cause of heart disease in Malta is mainly due to the quality and amount of food..."

Probably more a question of "...the root cause of heart disease in Malta is mainly due to the quality OF OUR AIR and the amount of POLLUTION. in the sense that any gains from a decrease in smoking have been cancelled out by increasing pollution from traffic.
".........

Franco Ebejer

Nov 27th 2011, 13:41

Exactly G G Debono. Could it be that some youngsters modifiy their cars with Turbo and strait pipe exaust and they leave a black cloud behind them....or all the old trucks and vehicles there are, but this is because the new cars here in Malta cost nearly from 3 to 4 thousand more then in other EU countries and practicaly we are forces to buy scrap from GB and pay a lot of tax too. Barra min hekk ma nsemmux ir-rubish ta fuel li ninpurtaw, power station se taqa bicciet, VRT fuq karozzi ta 6 jew 7 snin irrinfurzat u fit ttriq jghaddi truck ta 20 sena ilu hu anqas tibqa tara min warajh!!! Pajjiz tal Mickey Mouse...jekk m'ghamel xejn sewwa J Bandi hargilna diska appropjata!

M Cachia

Nov 27th 2011, 12:32

Simple answer: Money! Money from taxes, money from tobacco companies to political parties and so on. Glory be the day when all tobacco is declared illegal.

Charles Sammut

Nov 27th 2011, 13:52

...any comments from Commissioner Rizzo ....or his boss Lawrence ??!!......we are waiting.....

..and the beat goes on...and the beat goes on......

Ms Lucia Davies

Nov 27th 2011, 10:44

well said

charles muscat

Nov 27th 2011, 12:21

absolutely right

Advert
Advert