Ex-MP gets two years for fraud
A file photo of former MP Sandro Schembri Adami who was yesterday jailed for two years after failing to comply with a court order to repay victims he defrauded.
A former MP who was given six suspended sentences was yesterday jailed for two years after failing to pay back victims he had defrauded of about €6,500.
Sandro Schembri Adami, 48, from Valletta, was in July 2010 ordered to pay back nearly €74,000 to 16 clients. After failing to comply, two of them filed a complaint that led to his imprisonment.
Dr Schembri Adami had been given a two-year jail term suspended for four years for keeping for himself money he had collected from clients as duty on property transfers.
The court had opted to suspend the jail term because he had argued that in jail he would not be able to pay the victims back.
Then last year, Dr Schembri Adami asked the Court of Criminal Appeal to revoke the order to pay the €74,000 back, arguing that he could not work as a notary and had no assets.
However, then Chief Justice Vincent De Gaetano, who was presiding over the appeal, said Dr Schembri Adami should have been put behind bars and not given a suspended sentence, particularly if he was not in a position to pay the money back.
Victor and Carmela Borg subsequently filed an application in court complaining that they had not been paid the €6,500. Dr Schembri Adami had replied that he would be in a position to pay them only if he found a job.
Mr Justice Michael Mallia decreed yesterday that Dr Schembri Adami had failed to abide by the court’s order and so he brought into force the suspended jail term and imprisoned him for two years.
2 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Joseph Vassallo, (Bugibba)
Nov 24th 2011, 12:41
So... we expect the church to be held responsible for the activities of pervert priests because it should keep a beady eye on all those whose trustworthiness it has declared to its congregation... BUT...
Nothing is said about the need for a watchdog to monitor the activities of those whom the government has declared as trustworthy by giving them a warrant.
Is there an equivalent in Malta of the UK Law Society?
Mr Joseph Carmel Chetcuti
Nov 25th 2011, 06:28
There is a major difference between a Law Society and the Church. The Law Society does not claim to be a State. It also does not take the high moral ground. Most law societies require solicitors to have insurance. That certainly is the case in Australia. If a solicitor were to run away with his client's moneys, the Law Society would pay up. By the way Law Societies can only judge a person on the basis of what he is at the time of the application to be admitted to the bar. Law Societies are not prophets.