Advert

The basic rights of migrants must be protected to fight any cases of abuse, says EU

Migrants who work irregularly and are exploited by employers should be in a position to seek justice. Photo: Darrin Zammit Lupi

Migrants who work irregularly and are exploited by employers should be in a position to seek justice. Photo: Darrin Zammit Lupi

Irregular immigrants should be afforded data protection to fight exploitation by abusive employers and cheap labour, according to a report by the EU’s Fundamental Rights Agency.

Courts are only being used as a last resort to access justice

Malta was generally mentioned positively in the report as a member state which respects the basic rights of migrants, including those without any sort of regular status on the island.

However, the agency suggests Malta adopt Spain’s example and provide migrants with data protection so that if they are exploited by abusive employers they can claim their rights without the fear of being deported.

The report, Migrants In An Irregular Situation In The EU, was released in Brussels yesterday.

It says Maltese law gives the right to all employees – including those employed irregularly, to be adequately paid, at least up to the level of a minimum wage. However, many immigrants are afraid of reporting abuses for fear they will be prosecuted instead for staying or working illegally.

Spain has a law on data protection, which does not allow the disclosure of personal data to the police, unless the case concerns a criminal offence punishable with imprisonment of more than one year.

Maltese law does not give any effective protection to abused irregular migrant workers even though it recognises their right to be paid adequately and to make claims against those abusing them.

The Employment and Industrial Relations Act in Malta provides a mechanism for claiming withheld pay that migrants, in an irregular situation, may also access provided an employment relationship can be proven. However, other parts of the law make this right difficult if not impossible to obtain in practice.

This situation is similar to the majority of other member states, which according to the agency, is encouraging the abuse and exploitation of irregular migrants as bosses know it is not in the migrants’ interest to report them.

As a response to this anomaly, the agency’s research found that when disputes arise between employers and employees, courts are only being used as a last resort to access justice.

Instead, a common strategy for migrants in an irregular situation is to switch employers and not to report mistreatment, discriminatory or abusive behaviour by employers.

The agency underlined the need for access to justice by irregular migrants to be bolstered by removing practical barriers. Additionally, member states with these anomalies, including Malta, should ensure “where possible, any personal data revealing migrants’ identity or whereabouts are not shared with immigration enforcement bodies when migrants seek redress from abusive employers”.

Advert

9 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Charles Sammut

Nov 23rd 2011, 11:10

@ Ms Al Gatt

Your comprehension of the English language must be 'challenged' to use a politically correct term.

Not only you did not understand what I wrote, but speculated without basis, on what I think.

Ms Al Gatt

Nov 23rd 2011, 12:50

@Charles Sammut: It is you who misread "irregular" for "illegal", not me. And as a master of English language you must realise it makes a whole lot of a difference. They are not staying here illegally, neither is it illegal to employ them in the correct manner. It is illegal to exploit them though.

You are not completely at fault in misunderstanding MY comment though. The Times censored the part of my comment that may have been politically incorrect.

Joseph Calleja

Nov 23rd 2011, 16:32

Ms Al Gatt the term still remains "illegal emigrants" because they entered the country illegally. They came here very uninvited and not very welcome and they know that. (Hmar taqtalu denbu hmar jibqa." If you cut a donkey's tail it still remains a donkey. You can call me Joe, you can call me Schmoe, you know the rest. Ms Gatt you might be right that some employers are taking advantage of the situation but aren't these illegal immigrants doing the same thing to the Maltese people? They are exploiting the system and creating havoc among the Maltese people except in the case of the few sympathizers, or bleeding hearts.. I guess we all have our agenda to follow. Everybody is entitled to their own opinion, that is the democratic way.

Advert
Advert