Pledge to save strays
New laws are called for in battle against cruel owners who dump their pets
The Animal Welfare Department works to save animals and only puts them down when there is a health hazard or there is no hope for recovery. Photo: Darrin Zammit Lupi
Animal organisations are not shocked that a quarter of almost 2,000 injured strays taken for treatment are put down.
The problem, they stressed, stemmed from the fact that people were dumping animals and from lack of enforcement of laws such as those providing for micro chipping and neutering.
The Sunday Times reported that in the first nine months of the year 535 of the 1,977 injured strays picked up on the streets by the animal ambulance and taken to the San Franġisk animal hospital in Ta’ Qali were euthanised by vets.
They were suffering from incurable conditions or would not be able to lead a normal, dignified life, the Animal Welfare Directorate said.
“I’m not surprised with the figure because animals that are run over often have horrific injuries,” said Mark Vella Bardon, from Noah’s Ark.
Myriam Kirmond, from Animal Rights’ Group, and Barbara Cassar Torregiani, from SPCA, said it was difficult to judge the San Franġisk animal hospital over the number of stays euthanised.
One would have to see the state of the animal’s health at the time and keep in mind that such animals were taken to the hospital because they were injured and were not healthy pets, they added.
Ms Cassar Torregiani said that when SPCA received government funding for one week to take in and treat strays it too was criticised for putting down animals.
SPCA, and now San Franġisk, ended up doing the dirty work for those who abandoned their animals onto dangerous roads.
“The solution to controlling the stray population will never be just putting down strays,” she said. “It needs to be in conjunction with neutering, micro chipping and enforcement of new animal welfare laws.”
Ms Kirmond agreed that one of the key elements to tackling stray populations was taking action against their abandonment.
Dr Vella Bardon said the question was what happened to animals that survived their injuries?
Janice Chetcuti, from the Animal Welfare Directorate, explained that when a stray left San Franġisk it was taken to the government farm in Għammieri, which currently housed about 200 cats and dogs. While some animals died a natural death there, the majority were homed by the directorate. In fact, about 100 animals a month were homed with the help of the media and through Facebook.
She shared a concern raised by NGOs that, on reading that 500 animals were put down in a year, people might think twice before calling the ambulance for fear that the cat or dog they found would be destroyed anyway.
“If an animal is badly injured, it’s very nasty to leave it on the road... It’s kinder to put it down,” Ms Kirmond said.
Ms Chetcuti stressed that animals were only put down when they had no hope for a decent life or were in pain. “We do not go and take people’s pets and put them down,” she said.
“We are an animal welfare organisation and not the pest control department. We would never dream of putting down an animal because there are too many around. To us, that would not be putting them to sleep but killing them.”
She said that, while the figure of 500 animals being put down sounded big, one had to keep in mind that the remaining 1,500 had been saved. She assured the public that the directorate did all it could to save animals and gave an example of a dog, a rottweiler, that had to have part of its paws amputated due to gangrene and was now living a normal life.
6 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Maria Muscat
Nov 8th 2011, 09:36
and who is 'diagnosing' these incurable conditions?? my cat was diagnosed as havingn lymphoma and i was to;d he would only live a few more weeks and that it would be best i put him down....guess what that was 8 months ago...after taking him to another vet it turns out he only had a small infection which resulted in him losing a bit of weight and being a bit lethargic...so i take it these are the 'cases' they are putting down
Roger Flett
Nov 7th 2011, 12:51
“It needs to be in conjunction with neutering, micro chipping and enforcement of new animal welfare laws.”
I absolutely agree with the Malta SPCA, but I am very concerned to have heard from more than one source, that the Animal Welfare Directorate re-homes animals in their care without neutering them. If this is true then please could someone from the Animal Welfare Directorate explain why this is, since they are contributing to the problem that they were mandated to try and solve?
fleur marie cilia buckett
Nov 7th 2011, 10:22
the govt needs to provide an after care centre ! well said sarah gatt!
Roger Flett
Nov 7th 2011, 09:23
“It needs to be in conjunction with neutering, micro chipping and enforcement of new animal welfare laws.”
I agree entirely with the Malta SPCA on that, however I am very concerned to have heard that the Animal Welfare Directorate is re-homing animals without neutering them. If this is true then can someone from the Animal Welfare Directorate please explain this, since they are contributing to the problem that they have been mandated to solve?
Sarah Gatt
Nov 7th 2011, 08:03
E issa qamu l-animal welfare? Issa niggzithom il-kuxjenza? They should be after animal cruelty cases, instead of sitting in their office eating doughnuts and feeling sorry for the 535 animals put down. In other words, THEY NEED TO MAKE A MOVE, we never hear about *Animal Welfare personnel arriving on the scene* in animal cruelty cases. There are also a few things I would like to say about the San Frangisk Animal Hospital in Ta Qali. First of all, it is obvious that they're going to put down animals for the simple reason that they can't possibly have space for sick stray animals in that tiny hole they have on the side of the road. They try to better their reputation by taking in animals they can't possibly dream of keeping even if they wanted to.
Mario Camilleri
Nov 7th 2011, 15:14
X'tippretendi, trid tagħmel ħoss. Imma sewwa għidt int. Il-Gvern huwa responsabbli bħal ma huma s-sidien. L-NGOs qed jagħmlu li jistgħu fil-limitazzjonijiet sew personali tagħhom u sew minn dak offrut lilhom.