Advert

PN cracks whip, expects all MPs to vote against motion

PN motion urges Austin Gatt to continue work of improving bus transport network

Transport Minister Austin Gatt leaving the Nationalist Party headquarters, yesterday. Photo: Matthew Mirabelli

Transport Minister Austin Gatt leaving the Nationalist Party headquarters, yesterday. Photo: Matthew Mirabelli

The Nationalist Party’s executive has called on all its MPs to vote against the Labour party’s motion of no confidence in the Transport Minister as pressure mounts on dissenting backbencher Franco Debono to toe the party line.

In a meeting that lasted an hour yesterday, the executive unanimously approved a motion put forward by general secretary Paul Borg Olivier “recommending” that Nationalist MPs vote against Labour’s motion in Parliament.

Dr Debono did not attend the meeting and when contacted confirmed he would abstain in today’s vote.

“I will not be an accomplice with those who will make a mockery of democracy and I will abstain,” he said.

Leaving the meeting yesterday Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi said he did not want to speculate when asked what would happen if Dr Debono abstained.

However, some of Dr Debono’s parliamentary colleagues told journalists outside the PN headquarters that they expected him to vote in line with the parliamentary group.

Rural Affairs Minister George Pullicino, party whip David Agius, parliamentary assistant Beppe Fenech Adami and backbencher Francis Zammit Dimech said Dr Debono should vote according to the party line.

The motion of no confidence in Transport Minister Austin Gatt over his handling of the bus reform will be debated today and a vote is expected this evening.

If Dr Debono abstains the government’s hope of defeating the motion rests with the Speaker’s casting vote.

Dr Gonzi said that during the executive’s meeting on Monday, Dr Debono was given the possibility to propose an amendment to the Opposition’s motion. “This avenue has not yet been exhausted and it remains open until tomorrow (today),” he said.

Dr Gonzi skirted the question when asked whether he considered the motion to be a vote of confidence in the government and insisted the bus reform was an important one which had been promised in the PN’s electoral manifesto. The government took the decision and believed in this reform, he added.

On the issue of time allocation for today’s debate, in which Dr Debono has been given five minutes to speak, Dr Gonzi said all MPs, including the Deputy Prime Minister, were allotted five minutes because of time constraints.

From the government bench it is only the Prime Minister and Dr Gatt who have been allotted more time: 30 minutes and one hour respectively. Dr Gatt did not comment after the meeting.

The motion proposes another meeting of the executive in February to assess the progress of the changes to the bus network that will be introduced next week.

It also urges Dr Gatt to carry on with his work to improve the network and take all contractual measures necessary to ensure bus company Arriva assumes responsibility and provides the necessary buses, frequency, punctuality and efficiency to satisfy the demand.

The motion also notes that Dr Gatt had already shouldered political responsibility for the route changes that caused widespread criticism when he offered his resignation but this was rejected by the Prime Minister.

In the only reference to the widespread criticism the reform has received from commuters, the PN motion notes that the service has not yet met people’s expectations especially on certain routes, at particular times and on the frequency of service.

Dr Debono has insisted all along that he wants Dr Gatt to shoulder political responsibility for the failures that have characterised the new bus service since its introduction in July.

[email protected]

Advert

40 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Alfred Fenech

Jan 24th 2012, 09:22


Sheep, sheep and more sheep.

Mr Duncan Scerri

Nov 4th 2011, 13:10

Wrong. He is pleasing the general public, but upsetting those who seem to equate politics to supporting their football team.

A Member of Parliament is there to represent their constituents. Let's read that again: "to represent their constituents". They are not there to represent the will of Gonzi. They are not there to be sheep to the call of the PN.

FFS, this is so tiresome, but I'll go through it again:

Political affiliations are where you find your views to be close to a general principal. It does not mean you agree with everything. For example, I'm sure that something less than 100% of PN voters agree with the decriminalisation of homosexuality, yet there are gay PN MPs. This is not a paradox, this is how things are.

If you believe that everyone must do as Gonzi dictates (a sort of Kim Jong-Gonzi, as it were) then you should support the dissolution of parliament since this institution would cease to have any purpose, as debating any issue would be irrelevant, since the will of the Great Leader must be obeyed.

However, I (and many like me) prefer to live in a society where our views are represented and those whom we elect to serve (please note that word) us remember that they work for the electorate and only the electorate.

Philip Hili

Nov 4th 2011, 21:45

There is more than the man in the street is aware of!!!!

R Axisa

Nov 4th 2011, 15:19

Ghandek zball - insejt meta rrizenja Charles Mangion minhabba zball tekniku???

robert pace

Nov 6th 2011, 07:23

mela insejt ir rizenja ta Mangion u george abela nahseb ghadek fl-istellel nahseb ridt tghid il Pn qatt u qatt ma kellu xi rizenji wahda minkejja it tahwid u tkissir ta kumpaniji . Staqsi liema u nghidlek jekk trid imma mhemmx ghalfejn , forsi int mux thoss il wega tan nies qieghed komdu mhux imdendel bi xoghol fuq hajta habib. hallina tridx jghaddi zmien ta kulhadd u about time ghax hadd ma jiehu gost jara maltin bhalek issiru dittaturi minkejja it twemin li jkollok trid iccedi u tghid nibni mill gdid ghal zmien ahjar. Tghallem ftit id demokrazija u innutli noqodu nitkelllmu fuq passat ta tletin sena ilu...

Louis Muscat

Nov 4th 2011, 13:39

Dr Franco Debono was elected by people to rappresent them in parliament. He is part of the PN but if he had received complaints from nationalist voters what is he expected to do,ignore them because the party says so?
As a representative of the people, he should take action and try to sort things out, but what does the people gain by asking for Dr.Gatt resignation. For the people, if it's Dr.Gatt or anyone else, doesn't matter, What matters is to have a good service. I think that once Dr.Gatt have started this, he should be left to finish it, after all I think he is the best man to face Arriva. So it is Dr.F.Debono vs Dr. A .Gatt. and nothing else. The only people that gains from his resignation is the PL because they like to see him go, as he had the guts to change many things, were others failed.

victor bonello

Nov 4th 2011, 10:35

From what I read yesterday, by doing so, the PM has put the burden on Franco Debono. Should this vote not pass, it would not reflect solely on Dr Gatt, but on the Governmant that would have to resign.
Malta cannot afford at this momen to go to the polls, it would mean disaster unless this is what Dr. Gonzi wants. Does he want to kick the bucket?

M Farrugia

Nov 4th 2011, 09:26

x'gara minn Adrian Vassallo gfhax ipprova jiftah halqu kontra ir-rieda tal-P>L>

Mr Joe Micallef

Nov 4th 2011, 09:49

Now let's see I am given advice about the Prime Minister and the direction of Castille by President of the EU, David Cameron, William Hague, Hillary Clinton and Charles Sammut! Charles who?

Carmel Garcia

Nov 4th 2011, 09:58

X'ghandu x'jaqsam. jitkellem kif irid imma l-poplu l-pn ivvota permezz tal kandidat.

Charles Sammut

Nov 4th 2011, 10:28

@ MFarrugia,JMicallef,CGarcia.....

to be very honest with you guys..your comments confuse me! But then again, your being part of the flock ( sheep) of aligonzi and his cohorts, one must not attempt to make any sense of your illogical, senseless and partisan comments!
For the umpteenth time...I do NOT subscribe to neither the PL nor to the PN...I am not a blind Blue eyed or Red eyed moron and swallow with gusto and relish whatever lawrence or joseph deem fit to force down my throat for my consumption.
I do not live in the past and the ugly times of mintoff,sant or kmb. I am living in the present and my present is being controlled by gonziPN and his arrogant mates.
I (and you ) are experiencing the arrogance,corruption,unaccountability and "smoke without fire" under the gonzi regime and its parasites.
I believe that the PN needs to remove its prefix gonzi .
I believe that Dr.Mario DeMarco should Caeser lawrence and clean up the PN of the likes of austin and tonio if the PN is to have a chance of reclaiming its credibility and retaining the leadership when the island in the sun goes to the polls in a few months' time!

..and the beat goes on...and the beat goes on.......

Charles Sammut

Nov 4th 2011, 10:43

@ Joe Micallef.....by the way, I am not giving you advice. I simply and purely voice MY opinion without wearing Blue or Red goggles. I can just imagine you and your likes, going to the mass meetings, waving flags,clapping hands and hysterically screaming..."lawrence,lawrence,lawrence!"..think about it ..try and imagine for a few minutes what goes through gonzi's and his mates' minds while they are looking down at the frenzied and out of controlmasses ?

...and the beat goes on..and the beat goes on.....

W Cassar

Nov 4th 2011, 11:15

@ Charles Sammut

You forget Charles that anyone who has blinkers on (Blue or red) has probably been paid or had favours done in the past or hoping to have them done in the future. This is the only reasoning that I can come up with for illogical arguments and plain dumb blindness!

Charles Sammut

Nov 4th 2011, 11:39

@ W.Cassar....

ahhh Mr.Cassar.......but the blinkered ones you are referring to, do not ever make fools of themselves by attending mass meetings and clapping,waving flags and chanting....those favoured ones stay in the background and meet with their "provider" in private ! The plebeians are the ones who attend mass meetings and get themselves in a frenzy as soon as the dribble comes out of their idol's mouth!
This is why mass meetings are called mass meetings.....for the masses!!

....and the beat goes on....and the beat goes on.......

Ms Xaxa Caruana

Nov 4th 2011, 09:37

@Raymond Scicluna

keep up the good work? KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK???? Int bis-serjeta???



X'good work hu lol, zgur mintiex tireferi ghal arriva service, ghax jekk iva ifisser li inti ma tuzax dan is servizz kuljum ghax-xoghol, zgur zgur....mela gej bil keep up the good work. U hallina dalghodu!!!

Joseph J Camilleri

Nov 4th 2011, 11:30

I agree with you. Let Xaxa say what she likes. If it weren't for Dr GATT we would still be stuck in the 19 th century. Dr. Gatt put us in the 21st century long before the new millenium with computerisation, digital systems, digital telephones, ATMs, which he succeeded against all odds and which under the Socialist regime were never dreamt of and thought of as throwing people out of work. The only thing the socialist did about the transport system was only to change the colour of the buses. KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK Dr Gatt.

Jon Vercellono

Nov 4th 2011, 09:35

What's the use of having political parties, might as well have nihilism.

Jon Vercellono

Nov 4th 2011, 09:05

If he wants to be an independent, then he can be an independent. Debono can form his own party. If people want a PN candidate they vote PN; I don't think anyone voted for the F. Debono Party.

M Farrugia

Nov 4th 2011, 09:24

victor ftakkar li min imaqdar irid jixtri.

R ferriggi

Nov 4th 2011, 09:45

to vercellono:

according to your reasoning,,,,,,,,,,,,, european and american as we know it and which we make part of is a flop.

in ALL PARLIAMENTS,,,,, MPS are allowed to disagree with their party line on certain policies!!!!

DONT YOU KNOW THIS??????

THIS WARPED WAY OF DOING POLITICS BLINDLY ACCORDING TO PARTY LINES IS ONLY FOUND ON THIS UNIQUE SPECIAL HOLY ISLAND.

AND MAY I ADD: WHERE RESIGNATIONS DO NOT EXIST.

Advert
Advert