Advert

Muscat promises 'possibly controversial' decisions for job creation in Gozo

Labour leader, PM raise Objective One funds issue

Labour leader Joseph Muscat said today that a Labour government was prepared to take controversial decisions to ensure that sustainable jobs could be created for the Gozitans in Gozo.

In an address during a Labour activity in Gozo, Dr Muscat said the cornerstone of the PL's policy for Gozo was the creation of jobs but he did not indicate the decisions he was refering to.

Gozo, he said, should not depend on leftovers. It could contribute to the national economy and should have the environment and incentives to do so.

Dr Muscat said Labour would be prepared to take tough, possibly controversial decisions, in the interests of job creation. The status quo was not good enough. Gozo's environment had to be protected because that was an attraction in itself, but nonetheless, decisions for sustainable job creation needed to be taken in the interests of the people of Gozo.

The PL, he said, wanted to bring about a change of direction within the context of stability because stability was important for private enterprise. Gozo, he said, was witness to a very long list of promised projects which had not been realised Indeed, the capital investment on Gozo was a fraction of what was supposedly planned.

At present, Dr Muscat said, the country was seeing inertia from the government, and even the European Commission had noted this, as its recent comments on SmartCity showed.  It was indicative that Austin Gatt and Mepa were blaming each other for the SmartCity delays. The bottom line, however, was that the promised jobs had not been realised. It Minister Austin Gatt needed to be held to account, as did the prime minister.

It was also an eye-opener of the government's attitude how Dr Gatt had said SmartCity had not cost Malta anything, when the  prime site had been given up for the project and, it seemed, investment in the infrastructure did not count.

The government's failure, and that of Dr Gatt, was also evidenced in the hundreds of thousands of euros in taxpayers' money spent on consultants for new bus routes which did not work. But the governemnt was not interested in recovering this money.

FINANCIAL POSITION

Dr Gatt noted the government's nonchalance could be seen in the way how  the debt since 2010 was up 25% (€31 million)

It was also revealed last week that hospital contractor Skanska was paid €344 million, which was €7 million more than the figure given by the prime minister in 2004 when the prime minister announced a final agreement on the building of the new hospital.

Financial discipline was important, Dr Muscat said. At the same time the government should not continue to bleed the economy dry, but incentive those who wanted to work  and grow the economy.

Dr Muscat said he could not understand how the prime minister had not reacted to a declaration by a European Commissioner that Malta would not qualify for Objective One assistance because its economy had improved.

Dr Muscat said the figures for the Maltese economy had improved only in the context that EU averages were down because poorer countries had joined. In truth, Malta was not better off, but the government was keeping silent and not defending Malta's corner to ensure it got the maximum amount of funds possible, the Labour leader said.

PM'S REACTION

Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi, speaking in a recorded interview on Radio 101, concidentally a few minutes after Dr Muscat's comments, said that the Commissioner's comments belied those who claimed that Malta was not making progress.

The commissioner had visited Malta, seen various econmic figures and praised Malta for the way how, since joining the EU, the Maltese economy had grown and Malta was now no longer at the bottom of the EU's scorechart.

All this was good news for Malta, Dr Gonzi said.

Dr Gonzi said, however, that he was not convinced yet that Malta was not eligible for Objective One status and Malta was arguing that at least it should be eligible for transition funds - meaning that any reduction of funds would be gradual.

Advert

43 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Jurgen Farrugia

Oct 25th 2011, 09:04

HAHAHAHA you just hit the nail on his head Mr.Vella!!! hehe

Carmel Cilia

Oct 23rd 2011, 18:42

@J.Portelli you give your vote to him who ruined the south east coast of Malta to build a smart city employing nobody.

James Tyrrell

Oct 23rd 2011, 19:25

Where exactly did he say that? I noticed the mention of sustainable development and he also said that Gozo's environment had to be protected because that was an attraction in itself, but I saw no mention whatsoever of degrading the environment or pouring concrete. Please enlighten us!

Joseph M. Saliba

Oct 23rd 2011, 23:13

Kull il-gebel u s-sigar issa Sur Portelli. Mur tas-Sliema u ara dan il-sgvern x'ghamel bl-ambjent.

E Gatt

Oct 23rd 2011, 15:24

That's because doctor Joseph has not come out with one single proposal. Hot air - the only thing available on the Labour menu.

Peter Bonnici

Oct 23rd 2011, 15:32

We'd criticise the message if there was one.

Joe Scerri

Oct 23rd 2011, 15:48

It's obvious that "They have nothing solid to criticize on", because there is nothing SOLID in anything he says. BTW I do not fall under the PN apologist category, just one of those who votes using my mind with allegiance to no one.

Pat Hobson

Oct 23rd 2011, 16:39

How about criticizing Dr. Gonzi's Propositions, of course if there are any!!! I haven't yet heard one coming out his mouth! Or we'll be hearing them prior to the election, and after the election, everything goes with the wind as happened in this legislature?

Andre Cilia

Oct 23rd 2011, 18:29

What dire straits? All of the Bugibba front restaurants full up? I don't really call that dire straits...

pat muscat

Oct 23rd 2011, 16:55

Is.nt the astronomical debt of nearly 5 billion euros bestowed by PN large enough to give you palpitations?

George Azzopardi

Oct 23rd 2011, 14:23

Are you referring to the promised list by PN before the election .. or the letters sent by Dr.Gonzi to so many groups and organizations and then did quite the opposite!

Peter Bonnici

Oct 23rd 2011, 15:33

Time to speculate on some land in Gozo.

Aaron Vella

Oct 23rd 2011, 14:38

Trid tistenna hi, ghax inkella GonziPN jikkupjawna!

Anthony Farrugia

Oct 23rd 2011, 19:39

What's more "concrete" than some unbridled building and development permits !

joseph saliba

Oct 23rd 2011, 13:01

Dr Gonzi's interview on 101 was recorded on Saturday. He spoke of his convictions of objective one. About the loan to Greece you don't seem to follow what's said in parliament. Or you only listen to one side.

James Tyrrell

Oct 23rd 2011, 14:19

James there is an election coming up soon and if Joseph was to make public at this time his solutions to the present problems don't you think it would simply be playing into the hands of the PN by giving them time to counter any such suggestions?

James Dimech

Oct 23rd 2011, 17:12

Mr Tyrell if these proposals are really good then PN will not be able to butcher them for him. Its either a case of Muscat bluffing because he has no proposals at all (with Karmenu Vella taking care of policy I would not be surprised at all) or else of Muscat who does not believe in his policies and is hiding them

Neil Dent

Oct 23rd 2011, 20:00

@ J Tyrell - So in the next election, which is coming up soon you say, on what criteria are we to base our vote, if we are to consider Labour as an option? On their obviously brilliant, however top-secret policies? This is a minimum (supposedly) 5-yr term of running the country we're talking about here - are you (if you even have a vote) really willing to adopt a 'suck it and see' strategy, considering the possible ramifications?

I, for one, am not!

J. Schembri

Oct 23rd 2011, 20:43

James Tyrel : at the rate we’re going we’ll have a bigger book than the last MLP electoral program which the voters had to buy and never had time to read !
We want to know , what his solutions for today are , now !
If he truly loves Malta he should come up with his solutions , if they are good they may be implemented by the PN but he will win the electorates confidence.

Advert
Advert