Finance Minister Tonio Fenech this evening asked the opposition to not to continue pressing him for information on the Air Malta restructuring negotiations at this stage because the issue was   sensitive and any information made public could be used against the airline.

Moreover, there was a confidentiality agreement between the government and the European Commission on the process, Mr Fenech said.

He had therefore decided not to answer any parliamentary question – in whole or in part – on Air Malta.

Labour MP Gavin Gulia said his original question on who were the foreign advisers drawing up reports on the national airline. This, he said, was of public interest because the company was government-controlled. The government had loaned it €52 million. The minister said it should not be him to choose which information was commercially sensitive or not.

Dr Gulia said during the last three months more than 20 foreign advisers were asked to draw reports.

Alfred Sant asked whether the sensitivity emanated from Air Malta’s commercial situation or from the EC’s analysis of the state aid the airline could receive. The latter could never be of a confidential nature and the minister should and must give an account to Parliament.

Mr Fenech said that advisers were appointed both on the restructuring report on state aid which must be sent to the commission. Such aspects were technical and specialised and warranted legal advice. There were also aspects related to operational aspects of the airline.

The minister said there was an EC-process how the information received by the commission regarding state aid would be published. If prematurely divulged it could be detrimental to the airline.

Mr Fenech said it was expected that the EC decision would be contested by other foreign airlines. Any information divulged before the process was complete would give a head start to such airlines on the points they should attack the commission when presenting their objections.

Mr Fenech said that he had agreed with  EU Competition Commissioner Joaquin Almunia that they should start the formal process, thus opening the door to objections. The commission could have approved the report risking that objectors would the revert to the European Court of Justice.

 

Sign up to our free newsletters

Get the best updates straight to your inbox:
Please select at least one mailing list.

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By subscribing, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing.