Advert

Update 2 - Abuse victims protest outside the Curia

Legal adviser 'disappointed, surprised and disgusted' by Church statement

Updated: Adds lawyer's comments, video -

A small number of victims of clerical sex abuse and their friends held a silent protest outside the Curia this morning to protest over a Church statement saying it bore no legal responsibility for the actions of two priests convicted of abuse.

The men formed a line outside the Curia's main door, carrying posters and placards criticising the Church.

The protest was held before a press conference held there later by the legal adviser of the victims, Dr Patrick Valentino.

The Church said on Thursday that it had legal advice that as an institution, it bore no legal responsibility for the abuse cases. It said, however, that it is setting up a structure to provide psychiatric, psychological and social help to any individuals who proved to be victims of its pastoral functionaries, “as part of her pastoral and spiritual ministry”.

The posters were taken down when Dr Valentino arrived for the press conference.

In his press conference Dr Valentino said the victims will proceed with a civil court case against the Church, the MSSP (which ran the Home where the abuses took place) and the abusers personally, requesting monetary compensation.

Dr Valentino said he was 'disappointed, surprised and disgusted' by the Church's statement, for various reasons.

For one thing, he said, the statement still spoke of 'alleged' abuses when there had been convictions. Secondly it focused on legal arguments instead of the moral responsibility which the Church should shoulder since the children were under its care.

The legal arguments being made by the church, he said, stemmed from the fact that several cases were time barred.

Dr Valentino said the victims were scarred for life and their suffering was not time-barred. Some of them could not work or have normal family life and in today's world only financial compensation could bring a turnaround to their lives and balance out the damage they had suffered.

He noted that the Church in its original reaction to the court case had apologised and asked for forgiveness. Now it had said it would also set up a structure of social workers and other professionals to help the victims. In this way, the Church appeared to be acknowledging responsibility, Dr Valentino said, but at the same time it was using legal arguments to say it did not have to give financial compensation.

He pointed out that abroad, in almost identical cases, the Church had awarded financial compensation, mostly in out-of-court settlements.

Dr Valentino said that the victims wanted this chapter to be closed as quickly as possible and he regretted that they would need to go to the courts again.

Advert

195 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Maryann Borg

Sep 25th 2011, 21:08

I agree with you Brian.

Mr C Busuttil

Sep 25th 2011, 14:41

YOU DID NOT ASK TO BE ABUSED........................... BUT YOU ASKED TO BE MARRIED BY THE ABUSIVE PRIEST
jew haga jew ohra
l-ewwel ma tridx flus imma gustizzja issa f'daqqa wahda trid il-flus

Nahseb ahjar jergaw isiru l-investigazzjonijiet mill-bidu fuq dan il-kaz

PS- Jien anti-klerikali imma fuq din nahseb hemm wisq affarijiet mhux cari u fuq kollox jekk hija jaghmel att kriminali m'ghandiex inhallas jien ghalieh, zball tieghu jiehu dak li haqqu

Mr david debattista

Sep 25th 2011, 19:49

The priest still abuse the victim as a child STOP TRYING TO CONTAMINATE the issue , it could have been you, you son, or your daughter! In Other countries the church made compensations to such people Why not in Malta.

Mr david debattista

Sep 25th 2011, 21:18

You are on Mr Busuttil. First YOU get real .In other countries in the rest of the CIVILIZED world, the church paid compensation to victims of child abuse by priests irrespective of whether you like it or not Mr Busuttil .AND YES THE CHURCH IN MALTA HAS TO PAY. What are we coming too. We trust our children to the church, they end up abused and some hotshot like you tells us that the church should not pay because you see no reason for it . If this is your opinion as far as I am concerned you have every right to it, BUT I will have nothing to do with you or the church you believe in under such situations you shame our people and put to SHAME CHRIST CHURCH and his teaching. . WE all pay for crimes, especially crimes against our children. If you do not believe in the church that is your problem not mine or the victims. What would you have done if it was your daughter who was raped .
This not a question of a relative and me paying for him ,the case is totally different DO NOT TRY TO MISLEAD MR BUSUTTIL we have a case were we trust our children to the church and it is the church's responsibility to see that our children are in the best of hands This after all is what the church is all about .
AS for statements made that he was after justice and not money So what, he had a change of mind. First you must see if the victim was set up to take such action so he ends up being Discredited and if not, so what it is normal as has happened in other countries in the rest of the world that such victims of abuse get financial compensation . Just because you do not agree does not mean that YOU ARE RIGHT AND THE REST OF THE WORLD IS WRONG GET REAL AND STOP TRYING TO MISLEAD, ALTER THE FACTS AND CONTAMINATE THE ISSUE ! WHAT RUBBISH ! ALL FORMS OF CHILD ABUSE MERIT FINANCIAL AND OTHER COMPENSATION AND SUPPORT ! IT IS THE WAY OF THE REST OF THE CIVILIZED WORLD! DO YOU LIVE IN A CIVILIZED SOCIETY MR BUSUTTTIL I THINK YOU DO , THUS IT FOLLOWS THAT IT IS YOU THAT HAS A PROBLEM !

Mr david debattista

Sep 25th 2011, 09:29

If it was one of your children you would have a different point of view Joseph W Galea. Get real !

Mr C Busuttil

Sep 25th 2011, 13:13

@David debattista

If a relative of yours makes a crime you pay for him ?

If it was one of my children surely the abusive priest would not have been the one that married him!!!!!

Besides at the very begining I would have not made statements they I was after justice and not money.

Wake up and Get real

Joseph Magro

Sep 25th 2011, 20:45

U GHAL PJACIRI TAL GISEM ANKIE L-BIZA T'ALLA TMUR

Mr M Borg

Sep 25th 2011, 18:01

@ Lynn Zahra

Do children who are abused be their parents, relatives or friends get any financial conpensation ?

If guilty parties in these cases get a prison sentence without paying any conpensation why should it be any differnet in this case.

Being a lawyer I am sure that you can see that this case is no different ot the others , so why should the church pay?.

Ian Saliba

Sep 25th 2011, 18:03

Forgive me for being so crass Ms. Jones, but on precisely what basis does SNAP intend to bring legal action against the Pope, and moreover, exactly why does it only target the Catholic Church exclusively? I would hope that SNAP is aware that while abuse is a terrible social reality, it is a reality that is manifest in virtually every facet of society. Therefore it stands to reason that to target one organization to the exclusion of all others is actually a form of discrimination. I would suggest that if you wish to target abuse of any form, you may wish to consider adopting a more collaborative, positive and mature approach than to achieve your objectives through the pursuit of mere bigotry. In the interests of fairness and justice, we must remember that that prejudice and discrimination have never brought about positive results in the history of humanity, no matter how noble or righteous those who have chosen to adopt this perspective thought they were. Many are quick to accuse and to condemn (specifically!?!?) the Catholic Church for being unjust, irresponsible, and even discriminatory without realizing that they are often just as guilty of the same judgmental self-righteous attitudes and perspectives they are supposed to be condemning...

G Buhagiar

Sep 25th 2011, 13:07

Sur Camilleri, naqbel ma' hafna mill-punti li ktibt. F'dan il-pajjiz imma, meta xi hadd mis-sacerdoti jaghmel atti moqzieza bhal dawn l-abbuzi, nippruvaw indawwru kontra. Nghiduha kif inhi u nkunu onesti, X'hemm aghar milli tmiss is-safa u l-innocenza tat-tfal?

Imma Alla jbierek, ghal xi whud meta tikteb xi kummenti bhal dawn jghidulek: 'Anti-Klerikali'. Ara kemm qeghdin sbieh f'dan il-pajjiz! Certu nies jitkellmu hekk ghax ma jkunux involuti l-familjari taghhom ghax kieku l-istorja tkun mod iehor!

Shaun Camilleri

Sep 24th 2011, 21:11

As an institution, the church also runs for the money!! So why won't the victims?

You do!

David Vella

Sep 24th 2011, 23:13

ohlom

Mr Ernest Vella

Sep 24th 2011, 23:54

Kemm sejjer imqarraq habib

Joseph Sammut

Sep 25th 2011, 06:29

How wrong you are: I shudder at the blind greed that is taking over the human being and not at what the Catholic Church stands for.

Adrian Sacco

Sep 25th 2011, 01:23

Am I alone in finding it disgusting that anyone in a supposedly civilised society should play down the vile crimes of these priests by describing them as "mistakes"?

Emmanuel Vella

Sep 25th 2011, 06:49

Very well said Mr. Busuttil. And after all, these people said, they are not after money!

Alistair Busuttil

Sep 25th 2011, 08:13

Because he was a father figure but he still the abuses were not forgotten,YEs the church has to pay they were representatives of the maltese church.

Mr C Busuttil

Sep 25th 2011, 13:02

@Alistair Busuttil

At the begining of this story the victims said they did not want money but justice.

If your cousin makes a mistake do you pay for his mistakes ?

Adrian Sacco

Sep 25th 2011, 21:01

To belittle a crime is to condone it. And on the moral scale, he who condones is little better than the perpetrator.

To help Mr C Busuttil, as he seems to be a little hard-of-thinking, the analogy of a cousin making a "mistake" is meaningless and irrelevant. In the civilised world, an employer bears responsibility for the "mistake" of his employee. That is why the church must - if Malta and the local church are to have any credibility in the civilised world - bear responsibility and make appropriate reparations.

Mrs Elizabeth Sammut

Sep 26th 2011, 15:32

For the same reasons that a young lady who was abused by her father, lets that father walk her down the aisle on her wedding day. These young men were abandoned by their biological parents and the only humans to show them any love and give them a sense of belonging were these priests. The priests were their fathers and these boys loved these men like they loved no one else, because they had no one else. The priests took advantage of that unconditional love and exploited it to satisfy their disgusting unrestrained instincts. How anyone can make light of the suffering of sexually abused children is beyond me.

mark borg

Sep 25th 2011, 10:01

SUR AVELLINO,Ma nafx ghandex tfal, jigifieri jhekk xi hadd min uliedek jghidlek li qala xeba riga mghand xi Teacher tohoda listess li kieku tkun taf li ghamlu moqzizijiet sesswali fuqhom ???????? Ma nipruvawx nghamlu kif hawn hafna hawn Malta jippruvaw il -hazin ASSOLUT iwadbuh fuq il -VITTMA.Fi ftit kliem l-argument tieghak huwa BAZWI U IRRELEVANTI u ghalxejn tipprova tghatti il hmeieg ta certu cleru ghax mghadniex nghixu fis sittinijiet !

Mr Joseph Aquilina

Sep 24th 2011, 19:53

Actually the Church has not put itself on top of the national institutions since she got legal advice. Now the court will see if that legal advice was right or wrong.

Mr Joseph Aquilina

Sep 24th 2011, 19:55

Why? Because rather then they offered a blank cheque they offered psychological help? Because it is now clear that when these victims say they where effected for life what they really meant was they want a million or two to live the rest of their lives as little millionaires?

Mr M Borg

Sep 24th 2011, 21:12

No shame on the people who always want one thing from the church.

Every kind of help and now money

Mr Ernest Vella

Sep 24th 2011, 23:55

shame on you for judging!!!

Joe Spiteri Gauci

Sep 24th 2011, 16:47

Listen Mr.Aquilina, don't insult our intelligence, as far as I can see here, you are an idiot more than us. Use you brain ....... if you have one

Mr john vella

Sep 24th 2011, 17:01


1. My mind is baffled, why is it that one of these so called victims asked one of these two priests to serve mass during his marriage?
2. Why was there silence before and silence after for all these years?
3. Why after all these years now they are ALL up front and I repeat ALL accusing at the same time?

When someone convince me otherwise I say yes justice must be done. Until then it is all staged, as one of them is quoted to have said 'he want WAR' and I dare add 'or money', how interesting?

Mr Lawrence Fenech

Sep 24th 2011, 17:15

@Aquilina
Agreed 100%.

Maryann Borg

Sep 24th 2011, 17:18

You are so right Mr Aquilina!

Ian Saliba

Sep 24th 2011, 17:52

Sure thing, Mr. Aquilina! First, because the European Court will surely solve all of the world's problems, and second, because a few million Euros from well intentioned people who support the Church will definitely do justice. You call Church institutions "holier-than-thou", and yet in the very same sentence you harshly condemn them by calling shame upon them. You condemn the Catholic Church as an institution, without even considering or acknowleding that despite the failures of some of its members, that others within this fold have contributed to the greater good of humanity. You may have your reasons, but I suspect that perhaps your harsh words are rather unfair and uncharitable...

c p agius

Sep 24th 2011, 17:14

In your imagination ofcourse....The biggest looser in this ordeal is the church herself who accepted moral responsilbility yet refrained from shouldering legal responsibility...... The longer this drama lasts the bigger the losses.....

Mark Amaira

Sep 25th 2011, 07:58

Il-Knisja fid-dmir li toffri sapport morali, anke meta ma taħtix. Allura f'dal-każ li għadu sabġudiċe, il-Knisja lesta li toffri dil-għajnuna minn issa. Tagħmel sew.

Iżda dawk in-nies - jien ma ninsiex - li jmorru quddiem it-televixin u jgħidu li qed jagħmlu dan kollu biex issir ġustizzja u mhux għall-flus, vittmi kemm huma vittmi għalija tilfu kollox.

Carmel Cilia

Sep 24th 2011, 16:56

So what if it has; li xkubetta fiha il-grillu u kulhadd jaghmel li jaqbillu- hekk kienu jghidu missirijietna; forsi il-knisja mhux hekk qeghda taghmel meta tistahba wara il- legalita u fl-istess hin tipriedka il-moralita. Il knisja il-lum trid tifhem li ma ghadhiex taghmel u tghid li trid u fl-ahhar anke go din l-art mitt sena lura ta missierna San Palw beda jidher id-dawl.

Ian Saliba

Sep 24th 2011, 17:26

You said it perfectly. I couldn't agree more, Mr. Huber.

c p agius

Sep 24th 2011, 17:17

Moral responsibility : YES
Legal responsibility :NO

Rob Camper

Sep 24th 2011, 21:05

"These people"are still victims by the way!!!!

Ian Saliba

Sep 24th 2011, 17:32

Ok then, so surely this means that the people who have contributed to the Church from the goodness of their hearts must have had bad intentions, right?

Philip Hili

Sep 26th 2011, 18:58

@ Voctor Caruana

What a poor, miserable idea you have of the church in Malta!

Vic, if, according to your comment "The hardest thing to do in Malta is to make the church pay out" are YOU paying for the:-
1.) Dar tal-Providenza,
2.) Ursoline Creche,
3.) Little Sisters of the Poor,
and many other Church institutions?

Hallina Man!! Tparlax qabel tkun taf l-affarijiet. Mhux ghax suppost ma tafhomx ghax nahseb li fuq din il-pjaneta qieghed tghix!!!

And, by the way, can you explain to the readers what do you mean by "ill gotten wealth"?

Mr Joseph Calleja

Sep 24th 2011, 15:58

"Is the Church in cahoots with the PN again?" I never remember it any other way, do you?

Philip Hili

Sep 24th 2011, 16:04

Poor Alber Gauci Cunningham!!!!!
What a feeble comment!!!
Are you commenting on the issue of financial compensation from the church to the victims or your comment is a hidden agenda?

Mr Edgar Gatt

Sep 24th 2011, 16:30

This ex Nationalist has really become a true Labour man. Why the hell did he have to mention the PN in this case. This is something between the Curia and the victims of the abuse and keep the PN out of it.

Mr Albert Gauci Cunningham

Sep 24th 2011, 16:40

@Mr.Hili--Hidden agenda?? The comment I left speaks for itself. There's no hidden agenda. I stated a recent fact, which you might, in all your political intellect, think is feeble. Fair enough. You think it's feeble I think it's pertinent to this and other discussion re; the Church and the Curia. Now can someone assure me that after the divorce issue and the sexual abuse issue the Curia and all its Dinos will not be embarking on a behind-the-scenes campaign (using RTK and its new Nationalist-to-the-core Head of News in the process) to pay the PL Leader back for being a main cause for a YES (for Divorce) victory by ensuring a PN victory at the polls or by ensuring the "Catholic" vote goes towards Pieta!

Mr Albert Gauci Cunningham

Sep 24th 2011, 16:56

Mr. Edgar Gatt---Because I felt I had to mention it.

Mr Angus Black

Sep 24th 2011, 17:45

There is no worse than a renegade.

Why, do tell us, would RTK be in cahoots with the NP? Or vice-versa for all that matters.

You sure are a 'good convert' to Mintoffianism, because you are also ascribing to the idea that the PN was in cahoots with the Church in the famous Interdett time. As a former Nationalist you should know better and in fact it was Borg Olivier's scariest nightmare.

The NP does not need any other voice other than its own. When the NP speaks, it is in a clear fashion, even clear enough to people like yourself whose consience is jabbed every time but who chooses to shut your ears because that's what Joseph wants you to do.

Get a life MR. Albert.

Marcel Avellino

Sep 24th 2011, 18:05

as usual Gonzi has be a part of everything that happens in this country. Next week we are going to have rain....tort ta Gonzi!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mr Joseph E Briffa

Sep 24th 2011, 18:06

And shame on you Gauci Cunningham who is always ready to vent your spleen on the church and PN. What changed you into a turn- coat. It would be very interesting to let us know, maybe we will sympathise with you.

Giovann Demartino

Sep 24th 2011, 20:19

Even YOU, Mr Gauci, have to do miracles to win back YOUR credibility. Ma nafx kif ma tisthix tidher quddiem in-nies!

Charles J. Buttigieg

Sep 25th 2011, 08:14

Albert, it will never win back its lost credibility as far as I'm concerned. It had been given other opportunities to make good for its past mistakes to no avail. Enough is enough.

E. Vassallo

Sep 25th 2011, 10:35

The victims' p[light was given prominence by none other than Lou Bondi. If you think that Lou Bondi is in cahoots with Labour then...You always seem to try and smear all negative affairs by linking them with PN related affiliations. and to think that your new found home-the MLP-is more conservative than the PN!!!

Maryann Borg

Sep 24th 2011, 17:22

There are so many unused Church owned buildings. These can be sold. It is a worthy cause if it helps stop the abuse, and the cover up of abuse!

Philip Pace

Sep 24th 2011, 15:29

Everything you see, smell, hear, touch is money, the everlasting most adorable god of humanity, Mr.Fenech!

Mr Joseph Aquilina

Sep 24th 2011, 16:00

Do you think that offering psychological help will come free of charge? The question is not the money spent, but how is spent? The moral issue here is not related with the Church, but it is related on whether these “Victims” or at least some of them … have come out in order to make justice, or have come out just to make some money!! If it is the latter, then these victims have lost all reason for anyone to feel sorry for them since there actions where based on the amount of money they felt they would make by coming out, rather then to help make sure that others to not suffer their own faith. Indeed it is the Church which seems to have done all that is possible in order to ensure the latter point!!

G Buhagiar

Sep 24th 2011, 15:41

I don't think that it's all for money... maybe a compensation would help them morally as well. The fact that they need psychological help and the Church will provide this it is important for the victims.

I wonder how the Church still uses such words like: 'allegations', when one of the ex-priests, was defrocked by the Pope and found guilty from the Maltese Courts! Unbelievable!

Does this statement concern you, Mr Aquilina?

Joe Busuttil

Sep 24th 2011, 20:05

If the church lost most of its financial resources back in the 70s and 80s how come it gave so much money to the anti divorce movement? The money ,by the way ,was given to the church by the faithful over the years,and often represented the life savings of those who thought that they were going to buy a one way ticket to heaven. ( that's why they are called 'fidili,) This often left the children without any inheritance at all. If you want to hurt the church,touch its pocket.

Philip Hili

Sep 24th 2011, 15:52

If you feel that these persons should be compensated, why don't you put your hands in your pocket and give them what they are after?

Joseph Sammut

Sep 24th 2011, 15:45

How do lawyers get paid - a nominal fee or a percentage of takings?

Mr Joseph Aquilina

Sep 24th 2011, 16:26

So you are ashamed of a Church who offers to help, but you are not ashamed of people who when offered help (after saying they only want help to continue their lives), they say no thank you we want MONEY!! Wow!!

Philip Hili

Sep 24th 2011, 16:13

There might be the promoters of this issue, those who air the soap-opera every friday!!

Joseph Sammut

Sep 24th 2011, 16:00

Lynn, it would suit him better if Mons. Cremona , our Bishop, learns to play shark games that most of us normally play.

Andy Farrugia

Sep 25th 2011, 17:40

And i am absolutely sure that you know what you're talking about Ms L Zahra.

Mr Ernest Vella

Sep 24th 2011, 23:59

Sur Vassallo...zlaqt fin-nixef issa...il-flus johroghom il-poplu...ferkaz ibda int tihom il-flus ha naraw kemm int galantom...Jien mhux ser naghtihom flus ghax ma abbuzajt lil hadd...Nahseb huma qed jabbuzzaw...mill-pacenzja tieghi u ta ohrajn li jahsbuha bhali

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH hux!!!

Philip Hili

Sep 26th 2011, 19:54

@ J. Vassallo

Ma tantx trid tkun gharef jew attendejt xi Universita' ta' Harvard biex tkun taf ghala l-knisja ma tridx u jien u hafna ohrajn bhali nghidu MA GHANDIEX thallas!!!!

Mr Zeppi Borg

Sep 24th 2011, 12:32

I bet if you were one of them you will just refuse any compensation of the damage they did to them.

Ara vera ma fadalx min jisthi fdan il pajjiz!! For the divorce referendum we had a lot of money but we are not going to give a penny for these victims........

Joe Grima

Sep 24th 2011, 12:33

Yes, the chose to be abused for the money, Your comment is spot on!

Ms M Mifsud

Sep 24th 2011, 12:36

In other countries victims can (and in my opinion should) sue for damages. What's the issue here? Just because it's the Church shouldn't make any difference. If a person is permanently injured at work, he gets monetary compensation from whoever was responsible for the accident. These people are permanently scarred by what was inflicted on them and their pain isn't comparable to, perhaps, an amputated limb. Time heals physical injuries but doesn't necessarily heal those of the soul. I believe that yes, compensation would at least give a sense of moral justice to the victims.

FRANS H SAID

Sep 24th 2011, 13:11

You'd better believe it

Fran Abela

Sep 24th 2011, 13:32

Yes, seems like it. Can someone tell me in all honesty, how being compensated financially is going to rid the victims of their trauma ??

John Zammit

Sep 24th 2011, 13:51

with the Church its always about the money... name me another business that's been around for 2000+ years

Elizabeth Isabelle Borg

Sep 24th 2011, 15:02

seems like it!!!

Mr Charles camilleri

Sep 24th 2011, 15:07

There is no doubt it was from the beginning about money. No other excuses.

Mr GEORGE S DARMANIN

Sep 24th 2011, 14:54

Vera siehbi. Ghax kulhadd jitlob ghal flus flok ghal Grazzja t'Alla.

Joseph Sammut

Sep 24th 2011, 12:23

one would be hasty to judge one church over another because all churches/creeds have the same basic principles - to keep their followers in ignorance, in fear of God and out of pocket. At least with Christianism, one is not killed for freely critising it in the media.

Mr Charles Spiteri

Sep 24th 2011, 14:00

For sure way better that Islamic compassion which all it consists off is eye for an eye compassion. X'tahseb?

Mr GEORGE S DARMANIN

Sep 24th 2011, 14:52

If you have a car accident with a young 20 year old man whose car is not insured, do you think that if you sue his parents you have right for compensation from them? No you don't. Compensation should be sought from the perpetrators.

E. Vassallo

Sep 24th 2011, 12:15

The church should make amends with the abuse victims. This abuse was rampant and the victims should get their right compensation. Money or not, they deserve it.

Mr Zeppi Borg

Sep 24th 2011, 12:36

If the money was the aim who are you to judge them? The 2 priests aim was abuse from this people and there is nothing wrong if the victims aim is to sue them..... Like all the world do!!

Joseph Magro

Sep 24th 2011, 12:41

taf kemm ghanda artijiet il-knisja,habib?

FB Aquilina

Sep 24th 2011, 13:09

Your post is simply disgusting Mr Said. These individuals are asking for "compensation" as is their right. What's wrong with that? Is it because they are addressing their claims against the Church and it irks your "Catholicism". I agree with you that they (and all of us who belong to the Catholic Church) ought to campaign for the removal of certain prelates who seemingly and I stress seemingly have covered up these (and may be similar) cases. But on the other hand they HAVE A RIGHT TO ASK FOR COMPENSATION. They are no Judases - the only Judases involved are those who have VILIFIED their sacred ministry by abusing vulnerable young people in their care and - IF PROVEN - those prelates who have protracted the hand of justice from striking at them.

Joseph Magro

Sep 24th 2011, 13:15

INT TAF FEJN MARRU CHILDREN'S ALLOWANCE TA DAWN IL VITTMI?

Mr Romeo Busuttil

Sep 24th 2011, 13:26

Prosit Mr Said!!...So you say that "The curia cannot, and will not be allowed to dip its hands in other’s properties" but then you state "You can also insist with the Govt to set up an ad hoc fund for ALL victims, irrespective of the perpetrators".
So according to your reasoning the church should not pay anything while I, as a taxpayer, should pay for the abuse committed by the church ministers. U hallina trid!!
I don't give a damn where the riches of the church came from, they belong to the church and if need be used to pay for anything, and whether the church is rich or not is irrelevant, when someone is ordered by the court to pay compensation to his victim the court does not distinguish between who is rich and poor. Same is to be applied in this case if the court does award compensation. If your church is so important to you and you feel so much a part of it you should be the first to feel that you should contribute if it comes to that, and not offload everything to other citizens who might not even be part of your church at all.

frans camilleri

Sep 24th 2011, 14:02

Kristu qal "hallu hwejjigkom u imxu warajja" l artijiet u il bini li ghanda u li kella il knisja kolla haditom lill poplu u kullhadd jaf kif. dak iz zmien l infern kien miftuh berah

Joseph Sammut

Sep 24th 2011, 12:16

Kemm inti bravu! Imma r-rejba ghall flus kullimkien qeda.

FRANS H SAID

Sep 24th 2011, 13:09

Other diocese had plenty of funds. In malta all church funds have been taken by the state.

David Caruana

Sep 24th 2011, 14:43

Believe me, it's the Curia that is shooting itself in the foot.

We'll be able to see in full the results of today's action in 10 years time. You wait and see!

FRANS H SAID

Sep 24th 2011, 13:08

The life of children was destroyed, you say.

The life of children was saved from the streets and given an education. Why do you only see the nagitive side of the problem. The abuse was made by certain individuals and the civil courts should stop dragging their feet and punish the,

Mr M Borg

Sep 24th 2011, 13:28

MY, MY you really love the Catholic church.!!

Did you ever form part of it, or are you just happy to be able to show your hate towards it ??

Andy Farrugia

Sep 24th 2011, 14:04

Thus spake the Oracle of Delphi, which has translocated to Oldenburg. Your gross generalisations about the Catholic Church and priests just shows you up, Herr Waschnig.

Mr ALBERT FENECH

Sep 24th 2011, 14:46

This should not be classed as "compensation" but more appropriately as "blackmail". The individual clerics who committed the crimes are despiccable and shallow but, is money going to put that right? If the abused individuals keep pressing and protesting to be paid money, then they are doing a grave dis-service to the community because it could be interpreted that their only motivation for bringing such matters to light was to make money out of the crimes that were committed against them.

The Roman Catholic Church is not responsible; the criminal perpetrators of the offences are responsible. To hold the Catholic Church responsible is as stupid as blaming the whole German nation for the atrocities of the Nazis.

ALBERT FENECH
Qawra

joe cutajar

Sep 24th 2011, 12:34

well said mr calleja

Mr Zeppi Borg

Sep 24th 2011, 12:38

They are already healthy to live there own life thats way they had the guts to talk about it!!

Pio Sultana

Sep 24th 2011, 12:51

fil-waqt li mhux se nidhol fil-kwistjoni jekk it-talba ghal kumpens hix gustifikata, M farrugia, dawk huma misjubin hatja u mhux allegati......furthermore ma kontx nistenna l-curja tiehu kenn wara il-legalita minflok il-moralita. Allura il-knisja qeghda tghid li mhix se thallas ghax legalment mhix obligat u mhux ghax moralment ma hix. Sew heek. Sa fejn naf jien il-Knisja ghandha tkun hi l-ewwell li taqdi d-dmirijiet morali. L-ezempju u l-azzjoni u mhux il-paroli.

David Caruana

Sep 24th 2011, 14:39

Propoganda kontra l-knisja?!?!

Hux kont tissimpatizza maghhom?! Int tissimpatizza BISS mal-awtoritajiet tal-Knisja!

Jalla la int u hadd vicin tieghek ma jkollhu jghaddi minn dak li ghaddew dawn l-irgiel.

FRANS H SAID

Sep 24th 2011, 13:06

both are wrong. The church made a huge mistake to be involved, money wise, in the divorce debate.

Dishing out more money will not solve the problem

Mr Ernest Vella

Sep 24th 2011, 13:12

David, kont taf li l-Knisa ghalkemm il-maggoranza qablet mad-divorzju, il-Knisja ma tirrispettax dik id-decizjoni u d-divorzju huwa att ikkundanat, u min jiddeciedi li jiddivorzja jkun qed jikser ukoll l-istess 6 Kmandament...il-pedofilija u d-divorzju huma dnubiet mejta kontra 6 kmandament...tiskanta hux...nehduha kontra l-Knisja ghax ma taghtix il-flus....mela l-istat kemm irrid jaghti lil poplu talli ha jippermetti lit-tfal jibdew jigu abbuzati b'mod psikologiku mill-genituri taghhom minhabba d-divorzju.

Mr Joseph Aquilina

Sep 24th 2011, 14:23

@David
Do you thing providing psychological help is free? The Church is still going to spend money, but in a way that really helps those that "claim" where damaged for life. It is now clear that some of these victims only came out because of what they felt they where going to get back, and not because they wanted to make justice and make sure that no other suffers there same fate!!

joe cutajar

Sep 24th 2011, 12:36

yes they are my frend

Giovann Demartino

Sep 24th 2011, 14:55

Exactly!

Advert
Advert