Update 2 - Abuse victims protest outside the Curia
Legal adviser 'disappointed, surprised and disgusted' by Church statement
Updated: Adds lawyer's comments, video -
A small number of victims of clerical sex abuse and their friends held a silent protest outside the Curia this morning to protest over a Church statement saying it bore no legal responsibility for the actions of two priests convicted of abuse.
The men formed a line outside the Curia's main door, carrying posters and placards criticising the Church.
The protest was held before a press conference held there later by the legal adviser of the victims, Dr Patrick Valentino.
The Church said on Thursday that it had legal advice that as an institution, it bore no legal responsibility for the abuse cases. It said, however, that it is setting up a structure to provide psychiatric, psychological and social help to any individuals who proved to be victims of its pastoral functionaries, “as part of her pastoral and spiritual ministry”.
The posters were taken down when Dr Valentino arrived for the press conference.
In his press conference Dr Valentino said the victims will proceed with a civil court case against the Church, the MSSP (which ran the Home where the abuses took place) and the abusers personally, requesting monetary compensation.
Dr Valentino said he was 'disappointed, surprised and disgusted' by the Church's statement, for various reasons.
For one thing, he said, the statement still spoke of 'alleged' abuses when there had been convictions. Secondly it focused on legal arguments instead of the moral responsibility which the Church should shoulder since the children were under its care.
The legal arguments being made by the church, he said, stemmed from the fact that several cases were time barred.
Dr Valentino said the victims were scarred for life and their suffering was not time-barred. Some of them could not work or have normal family life and in today's world only financial compensation could bring a turnaround to their lives and balance out the damage they had suffered.
He noted that the Church in its original reaction to the court case had apologised and asked for forgiveness. Now it had said it would also set up a structure of social workers and other professionals to help the victims. In this way, the Church appeared to be acknowledging responsibility, Dr Valentino said, but at the same time it was using legal arguments to say it did not have to give financial compensation.
He pointed out that abroad, in almost identical cases, the Church had awarded financial compensation, mostly in out-of-court settlements.
Dr Valentino said that the victims wanted this chapter to be closed as quickly as possible and he regretted that they would need to go to the courts again.
195 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Mrs Elizabeth Sammut
Sep 26th 2011, 15:42
The Church shares culpability. Worldwide the Church was fully aware of the abuse and did not stop it, but kept transferring the priests to abuse kids at other parishes. The welfare of the innocent was of no importance. The men who run the Church, the very Church that Christ shed his blood to establish, were more interested in hiding the disgusting abuse and saving the Church from the scandal. In the gospel reading in Church this morning, Christ admonished the chief priests that taxcollectors and prostitutes will get into heaven before Them. That admonishment still rings true today. I feel sick to my stomach.
Christina Pace
Sep 26th 2011, 09:25
This is an absolute scandal. At this point the clerical abuse surfacing is old news, and I don't mean to say that it is any less serious but now the priests have been convicted.
The scandal in my opinion is firstly the dismissal of the rape case on a technicality. The courts need to upgrade their protocols and if a crime is proven then there should be a conviction. The place is irrelevant. and if new evidence surfaces that indicates a crime that should be added to the accusation immediately. Having to se the end of the ruling to be able to file a new accusation is waste of time and money the Maltese civil service and courts have precious little of.
Secondly, it is outrageous that the church is choosing to ignore the victims' suffering as it is doing. I agree with the social aid and phychotherapy. As the old saying goes, teach me how to fish and I will never go hungry. However the churche needs to realize that it is too late to repair the social damage done to these people to the full. Sex abuse, expecially in minors, by an authority figure causes such mental hardship on the victims it effects their academic, social, inter- and intrapersonal development. The wretched truth od what happened behind closed doors will haunt them and chase them all their life. Often chasing them out of jobs, meaningful friendships, intimate relationships and successful careers. Basically these victims never stand a chance of being as well adjusted as your average Maltese person. They will never be able to rely on their own means like most of us do.
The Churchg should put its money where its mouth is and fork out the necessary cash so these people can have a future better than the past it reluctantly chose to let them have. The vartican is probably one of a handful of states that has not experienced so much in the way of a recession, so there shouldn't be a problem.
Incidentally, I would like to ask anyone who is informed of law...is it true sex is legal at 12 years old within the vatican or is it just a rumour?
Ms D Galea
Sep 25th 2011, 22:39
Not so long ago , the abuse victims swore that they were not interested in financial compensation but in getting an apology from His Holiness the Pope and the church in Malta and in getting their lives back in track.
They got the apologies, the abusers have been sentences and the church is offering to provide professional services to help them get on with their lives.
Now It is the money that they are after. Either that or else they excommunicate themselves as well.
Spending years in expensive and stressful court litigation is hardly conducive to their earlier claim of symply wanting to heal their psychological scars and getting on with their lives for their sake and that of their dependants.
Further comments are superfluous.
Lawrence Grech
Sep 25th 2011, 15:03
manistax nemen kief qad ghawn nies qadhom lura u jatu il verita
Lawrence grech
Mr Joe Xuereb
Sep 25th 2011, 13:05
'Sow the breeze and reap a hurricane'.
Victims of priestly sex abuse need psychotherapy, I imagine a rare resource in very Catholic Malta given that at the base of the malaise is religion. For this reason alone, victimes of priestly sex abuse need all the money they can get and spend it on healing a deep and festering wound - a wound of a heavily invested soul in people who let them down. Hence the scandal. And collusion and complicity by the Church there has been aplenty. I say this because no, child abuse by a grandad and the guy at the corner shop is shameful but NOT scandalous. Scandalous is when the abuse is commited by a priest because believers invest their whole being in him. Hence the scandal. Hence the shaking of one's soul to the very foundations.
The Church could, indeed must, vet its prospective clergy to make sure they are sexually sound, be they hetero, homo, or paedo. If it does this conscientiously - oh dear! where have all the vowing takers gone?!
Brian Azzopardi
Sep 25th 2011, 08:38
What I suspect is this....... the Church will not give compensation because by doing so it will encourage other persons who were abused to come forward and not stay in the shadows anymore . A lot of sweeping 'under neat the carpet' took place in the past and they are now terrified of taking the carpet off. Again it will fail miserably as what is making more people come forward is not that people are more courageous but mentality has changed and it will continue to change and change will sweep the Church. But as always the Church will change, not by its free will (because history has taught us that the Church always championed ignorance) but because situations will drag and force it screeching and screaming to change.
Up to a few years ago no one dared to speak, than we had some who came forward, now after refusing to say 'mia culpa' it has been forced to utter it ...........in the future it will accept to give financial compensation. What the Maltese Church has done again in this situation is that it has calculated its financial loss first and its moral loss second. Nothing new!
Maryann Borg
Sep 25th 2011, 21:08
I agree with you Brian.
Mr david debattista
Sep 25th 2011, 08:20
I was of the opinion that the sex offenders are responsible for any financial compensation, I STILL DO.
However I now realize that the church has that obligation and responsibility too. As for the charges of rape being dropped on a point of technicality WHAT A SICK JOKE. IF it took place, IT took place and rape is still an internationally recognized crime. Stop all this technical maneuvering it makes all of us SICK. SHAME ON THE COURTS OF MALTA. As for the victims FIGHT ON , YOU DID NOT ASK TO BE SEXUALLY ABUSED !
Give me a break !
Mr C Busuttil
Sep 25th 2011, 14:41
YOU DID NOT ASK TO BE ABUSED........................... BUT YOU ASKED TO BE MARRIED BY THE ABUSIVE PRIEST
jew haga jew ohra
l-ewwel ma tridx flus imma gustizzja issa f'daqqa wahda trid il-flus
Nahseb ahjar jergaw isiru l-investigazzjonijiet mill-bidu fuq dan il-kaz
PS- Jien anti-klerikali imma fuq din nahseb hemm wisq affarijiet mhux cari u fuq kollox jekk hija jaghmel att kriminali m'ghandiex inhallas jien ghalieh, zball tieghu jiehu dak li haqqu
Mr david debattista
Sep 25th 2011, 19:49
The priest still abuse the victim as a child STOP TRYING TO CONTAMINATE the issue , it could have been you, you son, or your daughter! In Other countries the church made compensations to such people Why not in Malta.
Mr david debattista
Sep 25th 2011, 21:18
You are on Mr Busuttil. First YOU get real .In other countries in the rest of the CIVILIZED world, the church paid compensation to victims of child abuse by priests irrespective of whether you like it or not Mr Busuttil .AND YES THE CHURCH IN MALTA HAS TO PAY. What are we coming too. We trust our children to the church, they end up abused and some hotshot like you tells us that the church should not pay because you see no reason for it . If this is your opinion as far as I am concerned you have every right to it, BUT I will have nothing to do with you or the church you believe in under such situations you shame our people and put to SHAME CHRIST CHURCH and his teaching. . WE all pay for crimes, especially crimes against our children. If you do not believe in the church that is your problem not mine or the victims. What would you have done if it was your daughter who was raped .
This not a question of a relative and me paying for him ,the case is totally different DO NOT TRY TO MISLEAD MR BUSUTTIL we have a case were we trust our children to the church and it is the church's responsibility to see that our children are in the best of hands This after all is what the church is all about .
AS for statements made that he was after justice and not money So what, he had a change of mind. First you must see if the victim was set up to take such action so he ends up being Discredited and if not, so what it is normal as has happened in other countries in the rest of the world that such victims of abuse get financial compensation . Just because you do not agree does not mean that YOU ARE RIGHT AND THE REST OF THE WORLD IS WRONG GET REAL AND STOP TRYING TO MISLEAD, ALTER THE FACTS AND CONTAMINATE THE ISSUE ! WHAT RUBBISH ! ALL FORMS OF CHILD ABUSE MERIT FINANCIAL AND OTHER COMPENSATION AND SUPPORT ! IT IS THE WAY OF THE REST OF THE CIVILIZED WORLD! DO YOU LIVE IN A CIVILIZED SOCIETY MR BUSUTTTIL I THINK YOU DO , THUS IT FOLLOWS THAT IT IS YOU THAT HAS A PROBLEM !
Andrea Giallombardo
Sep 25th 2011, 03:48
Get over it already, you aren't the only ones with problems. Justice was served and now let it be! They're asking for too much now! If only people with problems as bad as this or worse (and mind you, there are so many more worse problems in the world) can get compensation and make a scene about them as much as they are!
C Muscat
Sep 25th 2011, 03:20
He pointed out that abroad, in almost identical cases, the Church had awarded financial compensation, mostly in out-of-court settlements.
In Malta these victims and their consultants managed the media in a way that their financial request was based on the PR created and not negotiated. It will be wrong with the church to compensate these victims at such a late stage of the court proceedings; first of all the case is still sub judice and these went only to the criminal court when in most cases the victims will commence civil case and in this part of justice that could have been negotiated.
I have seen some information in a case or two and it has been a lot different from these; the money paid most of it did not go to the victims but to other sources.
I have had seen the dead priest working so actively throughout his life (before being removed by these allegations) and so many youths benefitted from his work to have our youths involved in sports and not on drugs and other bad habits that in my opinion our society lost a lot of good effort from someone that dedicated his life for the good of so many. The good die young; maybe the good like everyone makes some mistake.
From my remarks. From day one I said that this case was being build up for the money compensation. I conclude that any money used (directly or for professional services for all victims) should be available to all including victims that have been abused by relatives and friends.
If the victims wanted the chapter to be closed quickly they should have worked from day one for the money and not to create hatred for the church.
Joseph W. Galea
Sep 25th 2011, 01:04
And if they are all given money, all the 'scars will automatically go away'. It's all about the money.
The Church should stand fast and when sued, they should demand witnesses to the accusation.
Actual, on the spot verifiable witnesses.
Mr david debattista
Sep 25th 2011, 09:29
If it was one of your children you would have a different point of view Joseph W Galea. Get real !
Mr C Busuttil
Sep 25th 2011, 13:13
@David debattista
If a relative of yours makes a crime you pay for him ?
If it was one of my children surely the abusive priest would not have been the one that married him!!!!!
Besides at the very begining I would have not made statements they I was after justice and not money.
Wake up and Get real
Mr Joseph Carmel Chetcuti
Sep 25th 2011, 00:27
The MSSP has a nice place in Royal parade Parkville Victoria. Take it off them!
Mr Ernest Vella
Sep 24th 2011, 23:54
ghal flus anke l-misthija tmur!!!
Joseph Magro
Sep 25th 2011, 20:45
U GHAL PJACIRI TAL GISEM ANKIE L-BIZA T'ALLA TMUR
Ms Lynn Zahra
Sep 24th 2011, 23:49
@Clive Aquilina Spagnol:
Clive, comments arguing against compensation for these victims are expected from people who do not have a legal background, but from you, a lawyer, I expected much better.
Mr M Borg
Sep 25th 2011, 18:01
@ Lynn Zahra
Do children who are abused be their parents, relatives or friends get any financial conpensation ?
If guilty parties in these cases get a prison sentence without paying any conpensation why should it be any differnet in this case.
Being a lawyer I am sure that you can see that this case is no different ot the others , so why should the church pay?.
Judy Jones
Sep 24th 2011, 23:44
These victims are very brave for not giving up to expose the truth, get justice, and protect kids.
Click the link to read the 80 page complaint which SNAP "Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests" and the CCR turned over to the "International Criminal Court", at the Hague in the Netherlands on Tuesday, Sept. 13th.
We urge anyone who has knowledge, or has been harmed by clergy, teachers, volunteers, employees, within any diocese to speak up,, contact police and turn over any evidence or documents to the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court.
The sex abuse of children and the cover up of these crimes within the catholic system is still going on today. Children will never be safe until the church officials and leaders are held accountable for enabling, empowering, and protecting predator clergy.
We are hoping the ICC will take our case against the pope and 3 high ranking Vatican officials for committing crimes against humanity.
This is the only way for victims to see justice, expose the truth, and therefore protect kids today.
Judy Jones, SNAP Midwest Associate Director, USA, 636-433-2511
snapjudy at gmail dot com
"Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests"
snapnetwork dot org
Ian Saliba
Sep 25th 2011, 18:03
Forgive me for being so crass Ms. Jones, but on precisely what basis does SNAP intend to bring legal action against the Pope, and moreover, exactly why does it only target the Catholic Church exclusively? I would hope that SNAP is aware that while abuse is a terrible social reality, it is a reality that is manifest in virtually every facet of society. Therefore it stands to reason that to target one organization to the exclusion of all others is actually a form of discrimination. I would suggest that if you wish to target abuse of any form, you may wish to consider adopting a more collaborative, positive and mature approach than to achieve your objectives through the pursuit of mere bigotry. In the interests of fairness and justice, we must remember that that prejudice and discrimination have never brought about positive results in the history of humanity, no matter how noble or righteous those who have chosen to adopt this perspective thought they were. Many are quick to accuse and to condemn (specifically!?!?) the Catholic Church for being unjust, irresponsible, and even discriminatory without realizing that they are often just as guilty of the same judgmental self-righteous attitudes and perspectives they are supposed to be condemning...
Judy Jones
Sep 24th 2011, 23:40
These victims are very brave for not giving up on exposing the truth and protecting kids.
Once again the pope is doing his PR tactic to make it look like he cares about victims and children. He feels 'deeply shaken" but he still takes no action to hold church officials accountable for covering up crimes against kids, so the abuse still continues today.
Click the link to read the 80 page complaint which SNAP "Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests" and the CCR turned over to the "International Criminal Court", at the Hague in the Netherlands on Tuesday, Sept. 13th. http://nationbuilder.s3.amazonaws.com/snap/pages/795/attachments/original/FINALSNAPWORD.pdf?1315913668
We urge anyone who has knowledge, or has been harmed by clergy, teachers, volunteers, employees, within any diocese to speak up,, contact police and turn over any evidence or documents to the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court.
The sex abuse of children and the cover up of these crimes within the catholic system is still going on today. Children will never be safe until the church officials and leaders are held accountable for enabling, empowering, and protecting predator clergy.
We are hoping the ICC will take our case against the pope and 3 high ranking Vatican officials for committing crimes against humanity.
This is the only way for victims to see justice, expose the truth, and therefore protect kids today.
Judy Jones, SNAP Midwest Associate Director, USA, 636-433-2511
snapjudy@gmail.com
"Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests"
http://www.snapnetwork.org/
David Vella
Sep 24th 2011, 23:32
When I was young, was often beaten up by a teacher infront of rest of classmates!! Whom do I have to sue?????
John Cassar
Sep 24th 2011, 22:27
The church is shirking away from its legal duty of care. Remember these children were placed in the church's care.
The church in Malta never misses an opportunity to miss an opportunity.
Mario Camilleri
Sep 24th 2011, 21:14
Meta naqra ċerti kummenti ninnota kemm hawn faqar fil-mentalita, arroganza u ppokrezija.
Nistaqsi, li kieku dawn il-vitmi kienu huma jew uliedhom, jitkellmu bl-istess ton? Jiddefenduha l-istituzzjoni tal-knisja? Jew kulħadd jiġbed lejn xawwatu?
L-ipokrezija tirrenja f'dan il-pajjiż Kattoliku Ruman li jemmen li jrid jgara l-ġebel avolja ma jkunx jaf għalxix qed igara. Imma allaħares tġara lilu!!
L-istituzzjoni tal-knisja m'hix responsabbli ta' xi uħud għal għemilhom hekk qalet il-kurja.
Mela l-membri reliġjużi jistgħu jagħmlu li jridu għax m'hemm ħadd fuqhom. Imbagħad lil Parti Mark waqfuh milli JGĦID u mhux JAGĦMEL dak li jħoss. Qassin oħra li qażżu lil kuħadd bil-kitbiet maħmuġin u moqżieża tagħhom u oħrajn li għamlu sfreġju politiku kif ukoll oħrajn li riċentament indaħħlu fejn ma jsaħhomx billi għamlu repetizzjoni tas-60 ijiet, imberek Alla jitħallew iħanżru. Skont dan li qed jingħad mill-kurja huwa li jistgħu jagħmlu dak li jħossu u mhux kulħadd xortih tajba jitħalla jgħid dak li jidhirlu li huwa tajjeb jew aħjar dak li verament ikun sewwa.
Li niskanta jien hija li l-knisja fejn jidħlu l-flus tinqasam f'dipartimenti u tara kif tagħmel biex ma tiżloq u tiżgiċċa mill-obligi finanzjarji tagħha. Imma jekk il-knisja tibda titlef mill-parruċani hemm issir "Dar t'Alla".
Jien nemmen f'Alla għax dak huwa sidi, il-knisja għalija m'hija xejn għajr ISTITUZZJONI finazjarja u b'saħħitha.
Kieku Ġesu Kristu kellu jiġi llum fid-dinja jispaċċa waħdu ma terz tal-popolazzjoni. Il-kumplament jgħidilhom "fariżej" u joħloq infern għalihom.
G Buhagiar
Sep 25th 2011, 13:07
Sur Camilleri, naqbel ma' hafna mill-punti li ktibt. F'dan il-pajjiz imma, meta xi hadd mis-sacerdoti jaghmel atti moqzieza bhal dawn l-abbuzi, nippruvaw indawwru kontra. Nghiduha kif inhi u nkunu onesti, X'hemm aghar milli tmiss is-safa u l-innocenza tat-tfal?
Imma Alla jbierek, ghal xi whud meta tikteb xi kummenti bhal dawn jghidulek: 'Anti-Klerikali'. Ara kemm qeghdin sbieh f'dan il-pajjiz! Certu nies jitkellmu hekk ghax ma jkunux involuti l-familjari taghhom ghax kieku l-istorja tkun mod iehor!
Shaun Camilleri
Sep 24th 2011, 21:09
Greedy church!!! All it wants is money for this, money for that, and it give nothing in return to these poor fellows!!
Charles J. Buttigieg
Sep 24th 2011, 20:30
Where there's blame there's a claim.
Mr francis darmanin
Sep 24th 2011, 20:24
Some years ago there was a poor chap who had spent three years in prison and driven to the point of insanity and only decades later he managed to get monetary compensation...nobody seemed to have opposed this although it was the Government that forked out the money.
If I recall the same with those two victimes of terrible crimes, one who was shot in a PN club and the other killed by a parcel bomb. Asking for financial compenation is nothing to be ashamed of. I can think of more trivial matters for requesting financial compensation such as having a holiday hotel near a building site which I have witnessed local companies fork out money for to tourists. And after all during mass what does that guy who comes around with the plate before communion, isn't it for money?
Victor Gelfo
Sep 24th 2011, 20:20
This case is smelling more fishy with time. I can smell that the intentions of the so called victims are being known now. Why have the victims asked compensation from the Church and not from Pulis and Scerri who commited the crimes? This is a pertinent question. Is it because the Church can offer more than Pulis and Scerri?
I am starting to doubt the sincere motive of these people!
Mr Robert Callus
Sep 24th 2011, 20:03
Blaming the victims is utterly disgusting. If you think the church doesn't have an obligation to pay - with which I strongly disagree - fair enough.
But to minimize the suffering these people went and are still going through, or accuse them of doing it for money is literally shameful.
And most of you will be flocking to the church tomorrow, maybe spare a prayer for all the people who are suffering. Ignoring the suffering you are inflicting.
A. Farrugia
Sep 24th 2011, 19:54
Wise words those spoken by V. Cassar.
What he says I understand to be the exact position taken by the Church authorities...
while the Church is offering to pay (expensive!) psychological, psychiatric and social work services for anyone who suffers abuse through its functionaries, any claim for monetary compensation needs to pass the test of Civil Courts.
Why should Laurence Grech and his friends be above the Law?
After all the criminal case is still to be decided according to law, since there is an appeal (which makes the matter 'sub judice' for now). If they ought to be financially compensated then the Court will see to it that they will be... all they need to do is ask it: ie 'open' a Civil action like every other citizen in this country can do.
Of course the Church would want this nightmare to be over as quickly as possible, but it is shameful for some to try to attract popular sympathy to put pressure on the Church to divest the money it channels towards the most needy in society towards those who demand a payoff to shut up and let go.
Claire Busuttil
Sep 24th 2011, 19:42
interessanti.....il knisja hawn, qeda tibza li kull min garrab xi abbuz min xi membru taghha, titlob kumpenz finanzjarju.....u allura ikun riskju sejru, li il knisja titneza, mil gid u rikkezzi li ghandha!!
jekk ma tridx tatijhom kumpenz finanzjajru, tal anqas, toffrilom servizzi ta counselers.
Mr Clive Aquilina Spagnol
Sep 24th 2011, 18:22
The more I read and hear about the victims, the more I will start siding with the Church. Now they want money...everybody likes ready made pappa!!!
Shaun Camilleri
Sep 24th 2011, 21:11
As an institution, the church also runs for the money!! So why won't the victims?
You do!
Mr J. Bonnici
Sep 24th 2011, 18:22
There's no way the Curia is going to win this one. By the time the issue is settled the Church would be left to lick its wounds whilst people of goodwill would shudder at the thought that they once formed part of this institution.
David Vella
Sep 24th 2011, 23:13
ohlom
Mr Ernest Vella
Sep 24th 2011, 23:54
Kemm sejjer imqarraq habib
Joseph Sammut
Sep 25th 2011, 06:29
How wrong you are: I shudder at the blind greed that is taking over the human being and not at what the Catholic Church stands for.
Mr C Busuttil
Sep 24th 2011, 18:13
This story has always been about money, the church should not pay for the mistakes of individuals.
PS- Can somebody tell me how a priest that abuses you as a young boy is the same priest you choose to marry you?
Adrian Sacco
Sep 25th 2011, 01:23
Am I alone in finding it disgusting that anyone in a supposedly civilised society should play down the vile crimes of these priests by describing them as "mistakes"?
Emmanuel Vella
Sep 25th 2011, 06:49
Very well said Mr. Busuttil. And after all, these people said, they are not after money!
Alistair Busuttil
Sep 25th 2011, 08:13
Because he was a father figure but he still the abuses were not forgotten,YEs the church has to pay they were representatives of the maltese church.
Mr C Busuttil
Sep 25th 2011, 13:02
@Alistair Busuttil
At the begining of this story the victims said they did not want money but justice.
If your cousin makes a mistake do you pay for his mistakes ?
Adrian Sacco
Sep 25th 2011, 21:01
To belittle a crime is to condone it. And on the moral scale, he who condones is little better than the perpetrator.
To help Mr C Busuttil, as he seems to be a little hard-of-thinking, the analogy of a cousin making a "mistake" is meaningless and irrelevant. In the civilised world, an employer bears responsibility for the "mistake" of his employee. That is why the church must - if Malta and the local church are to have any credibility in the civilised world - bear responsibility and make appropriate reparations.
Mrs Elizabeth Sammut
Sep 26th 2011, 15:32
For the same reasons that a young lady who was abused by her father, lets that father walk her down the aisle on her wedding day. These young men were abandoned by their biological parents and the only humans to show them any love and give them a sense of belonging were these priests. The priests were their fathers and these boys loved these men like they loved no one else, because they had no one else. The priests took advantage of that unconditional love and exploited it to satisfy their disgusting unrestrained instincts. How anyone can make light of the suffering of sexually abused children is beyond me.
Marcel Avellino
Sep 24th 2011, 17:56
Meta kont l-iskola, xi 38 sena ilu, qlajt xebgha 'ruler' minghand ir-rettur ghax kont imqareb. Dalwaqt infittex l-iskola ghas -sofferenza li hassejt!! u nahseb ha nitlob kumpens ta miljun ewro!
mark borg
Sep 25th 2011, 10:01
SUR AVELLINO,Ma nafx ghandex tfal, jigifieri jhekk xi hadd min uliedek jghidlek li qala xeba riga mghand xi Teacher tohoda listess li kieku tkun taf li ghamlu moqzizijiet sesswali fuqhom ???????? Ma nipruvawx nghamlu kif hawn hafna hawn Malta jippruvaw il -hazin ASSOLUT iwadbuh fuq il -VITTMA.Fi ftit kliem l-argument tieghak huwa BAZWI U IRRELEVANTI u ghalxejn tipprova tghatti il hmeieg ta certu cleru ghax mghadniex nghixu fis sittinijiet !
Mr Vincent Cassar
Sep 24th 2011, 17:46
Well,what can one expect. The sense of lawlessness and superior sense that local institutions are above the law is symptomatic in Catholic Malta. At the end of the day it should not be the victims or the church do decide whether they should get a compensation or not. The church is no more important than other institutions and should not be given any preferential treatment. Both parties should go to a civil law court and let it be decided there in the most rational and impartial mode as possible. What a civil law court decides will bind both parties. This is a secular country, or should be, and the church has no right to decide for itself when another party is involved.
Mr Joseph Aquilina
Sep 24th 2011, 19:53
Actually the Church has not put itself on top of the national institutions since she got legal advice. Now the court will see if that legal advice was right or wrong.
Rosalind Agius
Sep 24th 2011, 17:38
Shame on the church.
Mr Joseph Aquilina
Sep 24th 2011, 19:55
Why? Because rather then they offered a blank cheque they offered psychological help? Because it is now clear that when these victims say they where effected for life what they really meant was they want a million or two to live the rest of their lives as little millionaires?
Mr M Borg
Sep 24th 2011, 21:12
No shame on the people who always want one thing from the church.
Every kind of help and now money
Mr Ernest Vella
Sep 24th 2011, 23:55
shame on you for judging!!!
Maryann Borg
Sep 24th 2011, 17:28
The Church has AGAIN lost an opportunity to show that care and charity are more important values than money. I am saddened by the image the Church continues to give itself...faux pas after faux pas!
By doing the right thing a powerful message could have been given that the Church condemns abuse and will do all it can to heal the hurt, and make sure Church institutions do not habour abusers.
Now it will be shamed internationally and nationally.
Steve Mizzi
Sep 24th 2011, 17:16
An organisation is responsible for the actions of it's employees especially when you have a case like this when just a few months before being charged, one of the convicted Priests was absolved by the "Response Team" and sent back to do his dirty deeds with the ironic statement "Go and be a good father".
Since you cannot put an organisation itself in prison, the only remedy left to a victim is to seek monetary compensation.
Whatever the case, the strategy being employed by the Curia is incompatible with the Christian philosophy as laid down in the New Testament.
All the comments stating that they sympathized with the victims up to the point in time that monetary compensation came to the picture indicate to me that the people posting such comments are suffering from a warped case of jealousy were they feel good feeling sorry for someone less fortunate then themselves, but the claws come out the moment that that same person is in a position to maybe improve his/her lot.
David Caruana
Sep 24th 2011, 17:11
The Curia has put out its faithful hounds to discredit Lawrence Grech and Co.
Those who's got brains know well enough that financial compensation is their right.
Don't give up Mr.Grech!
Joseph Zammit
Sep 24th 2011, 17:10
If these victims have been wronged - and I believe they have been - then
they should be compensated. There is no way that one can undo a
wrong and so financial compensation is usually resorted to. This is recognized by all Courts in democratic countries where damages are
payable.
Then there are also moral obligations, apart from legal ones, and the Church is an authority on morality.
Truly, I thought that the wind of change was blowing through the Maltese
Church since we are no longer living in the 20th century. Perhaps we need a hurricane!
c p agius
Sep 24th 2011, 17:09
Why did the church appologise in the first place? Isn't it sending double messages by acceopting moral responsilibity yet shrugging off legal responsibility...........The chuirch is shooting in its own leg.
Unless the Maltese church considers the financial aspect of this ordeal as its major concern, it should follow in the footsteps of other dioceses around the world and refrain from further emberrasing herself
Mr carlos ellul
Sep 24th 2011, 16:49
To one who strikes you on the cheek, offer the other also, and from one who takes away your cloak do not withhold your tunic[a] either.Give to everyone who begs from you, and from one who takes away your goods do not demand them back. Luke 6 29-30
I guess that part of speech was reserves to the poor plebs and in well selected arguments like illegal immigration. God forbid that the Malta church abide to that.
Mr Carmelo Aquilina
Sep 24th 2011, 16:32
All you idiots who insist that this was all about money know nothing about the damage done to these people - and if asking for money is wrong then why do other Catholic churches elsewhere pay money ? Is our holier-than-thou Church the only special case in the World where abuse is self-investigated in secret and grudging apology is followed by mealy mouthed offers of 'help'. Shame ! The people who are abused should take this all the way ot the European Court and we will see its decision will tallyw iththe suprisingly convenient legal advice the church has been given.
Joe Spiteri Gauci
Sep 24th 2011, 16:47
Listen Mr.Aquilina, don't insult our intelligence, as far as I can see here, you are an idiot more than us. Use you brain ....... if you have one
Mr john vella
Sep 24th 2011, 17:01
1. My mind is baffled, why is it that one of these so called victims asked one of these two priests to serve mass during his marriage?
2. Why was there silence before and silence after for all these years?
3. Why after all these years now they are ALL up front and I repeat ALL accusing at the same time?
When someone convince me otherwise I say yes justice must be done. Until then it is all staged, as one of them is quoted to have said 'he want WAR' and I dare add 'or money', how interesting?
Mr Lawrence Fenech
Sep 24th 2011, 17:15
@Aquilina
Agreed 100%.
Maryann Borg
Sep 24th 2011, 17:18
You are so right Mr Aquilina!
Ian Saliba
Sep 24th 2011, 17:52
Sure thing, Mr. Aquilina! First, because the European Court will surely solve all of the world's problems, and second, because a few million Euros from well intentioned people who support the Church will definitely do justice. You call Church institutions "holier-than-thou", and yet in the very same sentence you harshly condemn them by calling shame upon them. You condemn the Catholic Church as an institution, without even considering or acknowleding that despite the failures of some of its members, that others within this fold have contributed to the greater good of humanity. You may have your reasons, but I suspect that perhaps your harsh words are rather unfair and uncharitable...
David Caruana
Sep 24th 2011, 16:27
Don't take care of the nonsense in the comments below, Mr.Grech
Monetary compensation is YOUR RIGHT and it does not make your case any less genuine.
Most of us are behind you on this, and remember to keep your head high!
Philip Hili
Sep 24th 2011, 16:10
To Mr. Lawrence Grech - the spokesman of the victims.
Now you should be ashamed and hide your identity because although through out the whole issue you seemed to be a genuine person so much so you convinced almost ALL Malta and Gozo that you are fighting a just cause, you have LOST all credibility.
c p agius
Sep 24th 2011, 17:14
In your imagination ofcourse....The biggest looser in this ordeal is the church herself who accepted moral responsilbility yet refrained from shouldering legal responsibility...... The longer this drama lasts the bigger the losses.....
Mark Amaira
Sep 25th 2011, 07:58
Il-Knisja fid-dmir li toffri sapport morali, anke meta ma taħtix. Allura f'dal-każ li għadu sabġudiċe, il-Knisja lesta li toffri dil-għajnuna minn issa. Tagħmel sew.
Iżda dawk in-nies - jien ma ninsiex - li jmorru quddiem it-televixin u jgħidu li qed jagħmlu dan kollu biex issir ġustizzja u mhux għall-flus, vittmi kemm huma vittmi għalija tilfu kollox.
Kevin Camilleri
Sep 24th 2011, 16:01
This has ALWAYS been done for money!
Carmel Cilia
Sep 24th 2011, 16:56
So what if it has; li xkubetta fiha il-grillu u kulhadd jaghmel li jaqbillu- hekk kienu jghidu missirijietna; forsi il-knisja mhux hekk qeghda taghmel meta tistahba wara il- legalita u fl-istess hin tipriedka il-moralita. Il knisja il-lum trid tifhem li ma ghadhiex taghmel u tghid li trid u fl-ahhar anke go din l-art mitt sena lura ta missierna San Palw beda jidher id-dawl.
Mr Joseph Huber
Sep 24th 2011, 15:57
I fully supported the plight of these victims and am firmly convinced nothing is going to really alleviate completely the psychological and social harm done to them and their families. However these last actions have made me change my mind completely because it has become clear that their aim is no longer mental and moral healing but purely materialistic interests. Not to mention that I have a hunch that behind all these moves there is some hidden agenda!!!
Ian Saliba
Sep 24th 2011, 17:26
You said it perfectly. I couldn't agree more, Mr. Huber.
Mr Angelo Vassallo
Sep 24th 2011, 15:48
Now I am 'disappointed, surprised and disgusted' with the way these gentlemen are behaving. As I have said before, all they want now is the "pound of flesh" and nothing else. What they really want is vengeance and not justice, although justice has already been done.
Philip Hili
Sep 24th 2011, 15:48
One of the posters carried by the victims reads:- "APOLOGIJA U PASTIZZI MHUX BIZZEJJED"
It would had made more sense had this poster was:-
"Apologija, Pastizzi U KUMPENS mhux bizzejjed"
Stick to your legal advice Mgs Cremona. Now all Malta and Gozo are aware that these people were and are after easy money. No financial compensation from the Curia's side is going to heal their grievances. Now let the pushers who used them compensate them.
What would had been the reaction of some blogers had the church issued back dated bills for the services they received while they were in her custody?
c p agius
Sep 24th 2011, 17:17
Moral responsibility : YES
Legal responsibility :NO
Rob Camper
Sep 24th 2011, 21:05
"These people"are still victims by the way!!!!
victor caruana
Sep 24th 2011, 15:45
The hardest thing to do in Malta is to make the church pay out and loose some of its ill gotten wealth.
Ian Saliba
Sep 24th 2011, 17:32
Ok then, so surely this means that the people who have contributed to the Church from the goodness of their hearts must have had bad intentions, right?
Philip Hili
Sep 26th 2011, 18:58
@ Voctor Caruana
What a poor, miserable idea you have of the church in Malta!
Vic, if, according to your comment "The hardest thing to do in Malta is to make the church pay out" are YOU paying for the:-
1.) Dar tal-Providenza,
2.) Ursoline Creche,
3.) Little Sisters of the Poor,
and many other Church institutions?
Hallina Man!! Tparlax qabel tkun taf l-affarijiet. Mhux ghax suppost ma tafhomx ghax nahseb li fuq din il-pjaneta qieghed tghix!!!
And, by the way, can you explain to the readers what do you mean by "ill gotten wealth"?
Michel Bencini
Sep 24th 2011, 15:33
It is impossible to put a financial estimate on moral wrong doing. Would it be fair to charge 30 pieces of silver or 330? How much does it take to ensure that the punishment fit the crime? And if enough pecuniary compensation were to be meted out would it satisfy or assuage the moral barometer? Is this about the profit and loss sheet of a non profit orgainzation or about coming to terms with deep seethed evil in some individuals and its impact on unfortunate victims? Who has the answer? Is there an answer?
Vincent Farrugia
Sep 24th 2011, 15:32
Xi darba kont nisimpatizza imma issa li lewwel tlabtu ghall gustizzja u issa qed titolbu kumpess dan idahhali dubji serji ghax il-verita hargest mhux gustizza imma flus sorry il-lobgha taghkom mitlufa u irtiraw acettaw ir-realta. Laghbtu bil-kliem u bin-nies anzzi jien tqarraqt. STOP ghax tliftu l-argumenti kollha.
Mr Albert Gauci Cunningham
Sep 24th 2011, 15:31
the Church has a lot to do if it wants to win back any credibility. What about the latest news of fervent Nationalists taking over RTK news?? Is the Church in cahoots with the PN again? Is RTK to become a voice of Gonzi?? If the Bishop or politico-priests want the PN to win again they had better spit out their agenda now before they dig into their "Grave" even further! Shame on the church and shame on the Curia!!
Mr Joseph Calleja
Sep 24th 2011, 15:58
"Is the Church in cahoots with the PN again?" I never remember it any other way, do you?
Philip Hili
Sep 24th 2011, 16:04
Poor Alber Gauci Cunningham!!!!!
What a feeble comment!!!
Are you commenting on the issue of financial compensation from the church to the victims or your comment is a hidden agenda?
Mr Edgar Gatt
Sep 24th 2011, 16:30
This ex Nationalist has really become a true Labour man. Why the hell did he have to mention the PN in this case. This is something between the Curia and the victims of the abuse and keep the PN out of it.
Mr Albert Gauci Cunningham
Sep 24th 2011, 16:40
@Mr.Hili--Hidden agenda?? The comment I left speaks for itself. There's no hidden agenda. I stated a recent fact, which you might, in all your political intellect, think is feeble. Fair enough. You think it's feeble I think it's pertinent to this and other discussion re; the Church and the Curia. Now can someone assure me that after the divorce issue and the sexual abuse issue the Curia and all its Dinos will not be embarking on a behind-the-scenes campaign (using RTK and its new Nationalist-to-the-core Head of News in the process) to pay the PL Leader back for being a main cause for a YES (for Divorce) victory by ensuring a PN victory at the polls or by ensuring the "Catholic" vote goes towards Pieta!
Mr Albert Gauci Cunningham
Sep 24th 2011, 16:56
Mr. Edgar Gatt---Because I felt I had to mention it.
Mr Angus Black
Sep 24th 2011, 17:45
There is no worse than a renegade.
Why, do tell us, would RTK be in cahoots with the NP? Or vice-versa for all that matters.
You sure are a 'good convert' to Mintoffianism, because you are also ascribing to the idea that the PN was in cahoots with the Church in the famous Interdett time. As a former Nationalist you should know better and in fact it was Borg Olivier's scariest nightmare.
The NP does not need any other voice other than its own. When the NP speaks, it is in a clear fashion, even clear enough to people like yourself whose consience is jabbed every time but who chooses to shut your ears because that's what Joseph wants you to do.
Get a life MR. Albert.
Marcel Avellino
Sep 24th 2011, 18:05
as usual Gonzi has be a part of everything that happens in this country. Next week we are going to have rain....tort ta Gonzi!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Mr Joseph E Briffa
Sep 24th 2011, 18:06
And shame on you Gauci Cunningham who is always ready to vent your spleen on the church and PN. What changed you into a turn- coat. It would be very interesting to let us know, maybe we will sympathise with you.
Giovann Demartino
Sep 24th 2011, 20:19
Even YOU, Mr Gauci, have to do miracles to win back YOUR credibility. Ma nafx kif ma tisthix tidher quddiem in-nies!
Charles J. Buttigieg
Sep 25th 2011, 08:14
Albert, it will never win back its lost credibility as far as I'm concerned. It had been given other opportunities to make good for its past mistakes to no avail. Enough is enough.
E. Vassallo
Sep 25th 2011, 10:35
The victims' p[light was given prominence by none other than Lou Bondi. If you think that Lou Bondi is in cahoots with Labour then...You always seem to try and smear all negative affairs by linking them with PN related affiliations. and to think that your new found home-the MLP-is more conservative than the PN!!!
Mr M Mamo
Sep 24th 2011, 15:16
SO when they are compensated all their wounds will heal because that's all they are protesting for ... whilst condemning the abuses, I am now starting to believe all this is aimed for the money!
Kenneth Abela
Sep 24th 2011, 15:14
Since Church accounts have adequatly showed that Church funds have become limited, who would fork out the money if a settlement is made ? Presumably the faithful would be then expected to pay from their own pockets for the abuse of the few ( a few too many) priests. I doubt the faithful would be willing to do that.
Maryann Borg
Sep 24th 2011, 17:22
There are so many unused Church owned buildings. These can be sold. It is a worthy cause if it helps stop the abuse, and the cover up of abuse!
Mr B. Fenech
Sep 24th 2011, 14:54
So it's all for the money ehh? 'Wounds' are kept open, just for the money.
Philip Pace
Sep 24th 2011, 15:29
Everything you see, smell, hear, touch is money, the everlasting most adorable god of humanity, Mr.Fenech!
DAVID D. PACE
Sep 24th 2011, 14:33
Well amazing how for the anti-divorce campaign it seemed 'money no problem' but for such damaging cases from church clergy members in its own institutions, the church chooses to shoulder responsibility......Kif tista' ma ccempilx???
Mr Joseph Aquilina
Sep 24th 2011, 16:00
Do you think that offering psychological help will come free of charge? The question is not the money spent, but how is spent? The moral issue here is not related with the Church, but it is related on whether these “Victims” or at least some of them … have come out in order to make justice, or have come out just to make some money!! If it is the latter, then these victims have lost all reason for anyone to feel sorry for them since there actions where based on the amount of money they felt they would make by coming out, rather then to help make sure that others to not suffer their own faith. Indeed it is the Church which seems to have done all that is possible in order to ensure the latter point!!
Nathan Azzopardi
Sep 24th 2011, 14:31
Of course, a fat cheque, not making sure that the two individuals who abused you - and the institution that had put its trust in them - get what they deserve (now that they are appealing), is a fool-proof way of ensuring closure.
Mr Joseph Aquilina
Sep 24th 2011, 14:27
"Dr Valentino said the victims were scarred for life and their suffering was not time-barred. Some of them could not work or have normal family life"
Which is why they need psychological help!! Or maybe Dr. Valentino thinks that buying material stuff (ex: a new car, a second house, etc) will help them?
G Buhagiar
Sep 24th 2011, 15:41
I don't think that it's all for money... maybe a compensation would help them morally as well. The fact that they need psychological help and the Church will provide this it is important for the victims.
I wonder how the Church still uses such words like: 'allegations', when one of the ex-priests, was defrocked by the Pope and found guilty from the Maltese Courts! Unbelievable!
Does this statement concern you, Mr Aquilina?
Joseph Borg
Sep 24th 2011, 14:27
Just sue the priests personally!!
Michael Seychell
Sep 24th 2011, 14:26
Quote "He pointed out that abroad, in almost identical cases, the Church had awarded financial compensation, mostly in out-of-court settlements".
Dr. Valentino who made the above statement, should keep in mind that the Church in Malta cannot be compared to the Church in the USA or even Ireland where its members are counted in millions and not in less than a quarter of a million church-goers.
Furthermore as already stated by Mr. F.H.Said the Church lost most of its financial resources back in the seventies and eighties, and today most of the Church institutions make ends meet only through the generosity of the few, thus any financial payment on this issue may mean that institutions like Dar tal-Providenza and many others may be hit very negatively if not become mortally wounded.
As I said before the victims should stand with their first argument when they went public about their horrible experience, when they had claimed that they were not after financial gain.
Michael Seychell
Tal-Pieta
Joe Busuttil
Sep 24th 2011, 20:05
If the church lost most of its financial resources back in the 70s and 80s how come it gave so much money to the anti divorce movement? The money ,by the way ,was given to the church by the faithful over the years,and often represented the life savings of those who thought that they were going to buy a one way ticket to heaven. ( that's why they are called 'fidili,) This often left the children without any inheritance at all. If you want to hurt the church,touch its pocket.
Charles J. Buttigieg
Sep 24th 2011, 14:25
Apologies are free,financial compensations mean 'put your money where your mouth is'.
John Spiteri
Sep 24th 2011, 14:25
I regret that certian doubts that I had about all this charade seem to have been justified!
Gustav Svensson
Sep 24th 2011, 14:25
SHAME ON THE CHURCH. Unbelivable and spineless.
Philip Hili
Sep 24th 2011, 15:52
If you feel that these persons should be compensated, why don't you put your hands in your pocket and give them what they are after?
Mr Joseph Aquilina
Sep 24th 2011, 14:21
It seems that Dr Valentino does not know the saying "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime"!! Unlike what he is saying, the Church is shouldering its moral obligations by providing the psychological help that the VICTIMS claimed they needed!! Now things are becoming clear, what these victims wnated was not justice, but an easy buck!! They would not have said anything unless they thought they where in to get something back! and that is very said!
Joseph Sammut
Sep 24th 2011, 15:45
How do lawyers get paid - a nominal fee or a percentage of takings?
Mr A. E. ABELA
Sep 24th 2011, 14:20
Oh just take the guilty verdict to an international court. Locally they run the show and it seems, in the current situation, the church is omnipotent so getting compensation is like trying to draw blood from a pebble.
Victor Pace
Sep 24th 2011, 14:14
I feel ashamed of the Maltese church's treatment of these abuse victims. Throughout, it has been minimalist, ungenerous, legalistic and short sighted. It has tried to ignore the issue, and been very slow to respond, and now this. Why would they want to avail themselves of the Church's counselling support when they have ben treated so badly?
There is an undertone in many responses on this news item that actually the victims were somehow to blame. The Church may not be legally accountable under Maltese law, but surely it is morally accountable, and make a generous at last? In the sermon of the Mount, Jesus said, "if someone wishes to go to law to have your tunic, let him have your cloak as well". (Matthew 5, 40). We are being far less generous tothose who have suffered under our institutions than Christ asks us to be to those who are querelous for no reason.
Mr Joseph Aquilina
Sep 24th 2011, 16:26
So you are ashamed of a Church who offers to help, but you are not ashamed of people who when offered help (after saying they only want help to continue their lives), they say no thank you we want MONEY!! Wow!!
Ian Saliba
Sep 24th 2011, 14:12
O I see -- so this merely boils down to an issue of financial compensation? Unamused...
Mr Anthony Borg
Sep 24th 2011, 13:57
Last time I checked St.Joseph home in St.Venera was owned by the Church in Malta.
Its personnel (catholic priests) administered their various functions through the Church.
Therefore the Church Curia is responsible – notwithstanding the legal loopholes that lawyers try to twist away from.
Mr Joseph Calleja
Sep 24th 2011, 13:56
This is a matter for the courts to decide. The church is not going to volunteer to hand out money to these victims. They spent most of it on the anti divorce campaign, almost 200,000 euros of it. And the church who is not responsible for the deeds of it's pedophile priests spent thousands for their defense. As I recall even Bishop Scicluna agreed that these victims are entitled to monetary compensation. Now comes the truth and the Curia is saying that they don't owe the men anything except psychological care. So let the courts decide if these men are entitled to any monetary help. The church in Malta is still very powerful religiously and politically and Dr Valentino cannot go by what the church did outside of Malta. The church outside of Malta does not dictate to governments, unless it is a third world country where the church is the government. Where else would two convicted pedophiles be kept out of prison pending their appeal? Maybe this case has to go all the way up to the EU courts after all?
K. Vella
Sep 24th 2011, 13:54
Money, money, money and only money will overcome their pain and not the justice.
From the start, the intention was to go for the money.
Why don't the victims go to get the money from those who abused!
Mr Joseph Cauchi Senior
Sep 24th 2011, 13:53
Many are commenting that these “victims” are only after the money!
I wouldn’t blame them, because how are they going to pay their legal advisers ?
Is it perhaps the American way, i.e. a cut from the compensation money that these “victims” were led to believe to be theirs?
This situation could be a “slight” problem to the attornies, perhaps!
JC.
Philip Hili
Sep 24th 2011, 16:13
There might be the promoters of this issue, those who air the soap-opera every friday!!
Mr J Busuttil
Sep 24th 2011, 13:41
Yes it's all about money you just lost you credibility.
Alex Falzon
Sep 24th 2011, 13:40
So if monetary compensation is rewarded to victims.... do these so called victims forget about their past as if nothing happens? I believe that these victims can earn their wage at the end of the month as they did so far...
The church is right not to give compensation... abusers should give them
Marianne Tabone
Sep 24th 2011, 13:28
Jien nistaqsi u l-flus se jfejqulhom il-wegghat li sofrew? Biex dawn ifiqu jew l-ugiegh jitnaqqas mhux flus ghandhom bzonn imma ghajnuna! Il-Knisja qeghda toffri din l-ghajnuna. Ghaliex din ir-rieda li jithallsu? Ma nistax nifhem issa.
Ms Lynn Zahra
Sep 24th 2011, 13:28
Mons.Cremona , it is sad to see you, our bishop, playing Mind games that lawyers normally play.
Joseph Sammut
Sep 24th 2011, 16:00
Lynn, it would suit him better if Mons. Cremona , our Bishop, learns to play shark games that most of us normally play.
Andy Farrugia
Sep 25th 2011, 17:40
And i am absolutely sure that you know what you're talking about Ms L Zahra.
Guy Mahoney
Sep 24th 2011, 13:08
I fully support the stand the church is taking. Whilst I fully appreciate the plight of those abbused and condemn those that inflicted these abuses I cannot sympathyise with their intentions to demand compensation from the church itself. If anything they should seek compensation from those who abused them.
If a lay person (just an ordinary person) abuses a child and is found guilty can the vicitm claim compensation from the state because he is a citizen of that country?
Some contributors mentioned the possibility of some hidden agendas. This might be true but if so I suspect that this hidden agend is not by the victims but by others who are trying to manipulate them.
There is no doubt that there are several people who would find the church as an obstacle to what they want or want to achieve and it is up to the faithful to speak up and make their voices heard.
I repeat that I fully condemn the abuses inflicted upon these victims and the law should see that the appropriate punishment is given to those found guilty.
C. Attard
Sep 24th 2011, 13:08
Shame on you Archbishops of Malta and Gozo
Shame on the lawyer who gave you such advice
Look at this article, open up your eyes what is happening in other catholic dioceses around Europe
http://www.monstersandcritics.com/news/europe/news/article_1642422.php/Belgian-bishops-approve-compensation-for-church-sex-abuse-victims
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/8408229/Jesuits-pay-166m-compensation-to-sexual-abuse-victims.html
http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2011/09/22/irish-catholic-church-may-tap-parishes-for-pay-for-sexual-abuse-claims/
Your statement that the Catholic Church in Malta does not have any responsibility to compensate sexual
abuse victims, keeps lapsed catholics away from the Church......
jekk il-knisja ma ghandix flus....
tbiegh id-dehbijiet, il-fidda, ir-rikezzi l-ohra
jekk hemm bzonn thott il-knejjes tal-gebel
u tibni l-knejjes tal-laham.....
Mr Ernest Vella
Sep 24th 2011, 13:07
Min fejn tippretendu li l-Knisja ggib il-flus li jippretendu dawn in-nies? Jekk iridu l-flus, il-Knisja tatihomlom anke jekk jehtieg twaqqaf is-servizzi taghha bhal ma huma d-Dar tal-Providenza, Il-Creche ta l-Ursolini, id-djar tat-tfal, djar ta l-anzjani, il-festi u tant hidma ohra f'Malta li sal-lum il-Knisja tmexxihom bit-telf hafna drabi. Dawn qed jimmaginaw li l-Knisja hija sinjura, meta ma jafux li r-rikezzi li hemm fil-Knisja huma tal-Knisja kollha, cioe ta' kull min hu nisrani...u l-ebda isqof m'ghandu l-jedd ibiegh dawn l-affarijiet ghal kumpens ta dawn in-nies.
Il-Knisja ghaliex ghandna terfa r-responsabilta meta huwa l-hati li jrid jaghmel dan. Din bhal kaz ta l-hekk imsejjha vittmi politici...b'liema jedd il-Gvern kien qabad il-flus tal-poplu u taghhom lil familjari tal-vittmi meta il-poplu ma kienx jahti ta l-atti li saru kontra l-istess poplu.
Imbaghad x'missier hu dak il-missier li jhalli lil persuna li kien abbuza lilu ibieriklu z-zwieg u jghammidlu lil uliedu. Missier responsabli ibieghed lil uliedu mill-periklu u mhux ihallih imiss lil uliedu. Din ta l-abbuzi m'hi tikkonvincini xejn...wisq izjed issa li qed jehduha b'akkaniment ghal flus. Dawn iridu jaghmlu hsara lil Knisja imma f'wicchom ha jibqa.
Joe Camilleri
Sep 24th 2011, 13:07
They may have been abused and that is very bad but abusing the church is equally bad. The church is made up of the faithful who cannot be kept responsible for the acts of individuals.
By the way, does money heal wounds?
Pio Sultana
Sep 24th 2011, 12:56
i thought that the curia always taught us that moral obligations prevail on legal ones. How come curia now is seeking refuge behind legality?? I guess the singer does not always go by his song does he?
On the other hand, the victims should offer their compensation to charity if they want to prove their genuineness
pio sultana.
Josef Ebejer
Sep 24th 2011, 12:55
What it has to do compensation with a child abuse!!!!! I cannot understand this myself…..……justice is more then enough. Perhaps you do not agree with me ….But I wish to air my personal view.
Our Bishops offer was more then enough.
I quote “that it is setting up a structure to provide psychiatric, psychological and social help to any individuals who proved to be victims of its pastoral functionaries, “
God knows what they have gone through these two priests throughout these 20 years years…and surve them right !!!!! …justice is enough and I do not pity them in no way…...when ordinary men abuse of children do they ask compensation out of them……justice prevails….…did we copy this issue from abroad for compensation? …I knew before long that this issue was to end up with a profit?
I know of a different version of abuse this time with a particular nun…who bless her soul wherever she is ….this happened more then 20 years ago…(perhaps that is why one cannot ask for compensation) where which two elderly brothers never accepted Gimpel the fool ….….but because this young brother was feeble the nun in question used to tag him with a note on his back “stupid” and takes him around different class rooms. Is this not another way of child abuse. And this guy was me….Thank God these things are over now….
To my opinion our bishops have done more then enough to these abused victims. Dr. Valentino do not be “disgusted” with the church….if you believe in it….one cannot generalize after all. Only you can say how many different cases you defended on different aspects.
Joseph Calleja
Sep 24th 2011, 12:51
the action of the Church is well in order.
it is shouldering responsibility for setting up funds that help these victims and their families in what they need: psychological and social, and I believe also educational. So the responsibility is there and it is taken. It is still alleged since there is an appeal still standing and since we live in a democracy, that is a right and needs to be observed.
whoever thinks that Mount Carmel forensic unit is preferential treatment, should go and assess for him/herself what it is like to be there.
this was all about money from the start and the whole hype has ow become truly disgusting.
saying that there was money for divorce and not for abusers is an insult to all those who during the years (including the victims) lived on Church funds and donations received.
J Vassallo
Sep 24th 2011, 12:46
ma nafx alfejn il knisja qed tara bi kbira biex thallas !!
jintefqu tant flus fuq paganizmu u tizjin fil knejjes. u jekk tinkiser xi ligi dejjem ikun emm multi u jek ma thallasx tehilom habs!
Mr Ernest Vella
Sep 24th 2011, 23:59
Sur Vassallo...zlaqt fin-nixef issa...il-flus johroghom il-poplu...ferkaz ibda int tihom il-flus ha naraw kemm int galantom...Jien mhux ser naghtihom flus ghax ma abbuzajt lil hadd...Nahseb huma qed jabbuzzaw...mill-pacenzja tieghi u ta ohrajn li jahsbuha bhali
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH hux!!!
Philip Hili
Sep 26th 2011, 19:54
@ J. Vassallo
Ma tantx trid tkun gharef jew attendejt xi Universita' ta' Harvard biex tkun taf ghala l-knisja ma tridx u jien u hafna ohrajn bhali nghidu MA GHANDIEX thallas!!!!
Mr George Calleja
Sep 24th 2011, 12:45
From the look of things these people have lost credibility . They are all after money and are discarding the Church' s help. If they think that they were abused they should ask compensation from the those who abused them ONLY. The Church never abused them. On the contrary it offered free shelter and love which should have been given by their parents.
Mr Robert Callus
Sep 24th 2011, 12:34
It's incredibly disgusting that some people here are accusing the VICTIMS for asking for financial compensation. Even implying it's all about money!
No amount of money in the world will give back to these victims what was taken from them. But it's the least one can do.
adrian attard
Sep 24th 2011, 12:33
With such poor arguments, you will have very few admirers... similar to Bondi+ programme!
Mario Busuttil
Sep 24th 2011, 12:31
Kulma jmur dejjem nara li hemm xi tip ta' agenda ohra wara dak li qed titolbu... l-ewwel tistqarru li qed titlobu gustizzja u xejn flus... u issa tharsu biss lejn il-flus li l-argument ghaliex triduhom ma hu konvintenci xejn.
Alfred Fenech
Sep 24th 2011, 12:16
pay up like others did. If there was money for NO AGAINST DIVORCE < then there should be more money
in the curia's pocket. Aghmel tbissima fuq wichom.
Joe Naudi
Sep 24th 2011, 12:13
I am disgusted to read that the Catholic Church in Malta that it had legal advice that as an institution ( the childrens' home) it bore no legal reponsibility for the abuse of cases. Why not than close all the churches. So now the church can do what they like and get away with it, I just do not believe. God will surely condemn the church in Malta the way it is run. Anyone who abuses children whether it is the church or not should be held responsible, whether it is an institution or not. I think the church in Malta have lost their marbles.
Joe Naudi
P Borg
Sep 24th 2011, 12:10
Was this all about the money?
Mr Zeppi Borg
Sep 24th 2011, 12:32
I bet if you were one of them you will just refuse any compensation of the damage they did to them.
Ara vera ma fadalx min jisthi fdan il pajjiz!! For the divorce referendum we had a lot of money but we are not going to give a penny for these victims........
Joe Grima
Sep 24th 2011, 12:33
Yes, the chose to be abused for the money, Your comment is spot on!
Ms M Mifsud
Sep 24th 2011, 12:36
In other countries victims can (and in my opinion should) sue for damages. What's the issue here? Just because it's the Church shouldn't make any difference. If a person is permanently injured at work, he gets monetary compensation from whoever was responsible for the accident. These people are permanently scarred by what was inflicted on them and their pain isn't comparable to, perhaps, an amputated limb. Time heals physical injuries but doesn't necessarily heal those of the soul. I believe that yes, compensation would at least give a sense of moral justice to the victims.
FRANS H SAID
Sep 24th 2011, 13:11
You'd better believe it
Fran Abela
Sep 24th 2011, 13:32
Yes, seems like it. Can someone tell me in all honesty, how being compensated financially is going to rid the victims of their trauma ??
John Zammit
Sep 24th 2011, 13:51
with the Church its always about the money... name me another business that's been around for 2000+ years
Elizabeth Isabelle Borg
Sep 24th 2011, 15:02
seems like it!!!
Mr Charles camilleri
Sep 24th 2011, 15:07
There is no doubt it was from the beginning about money. No other excuses.
Mr A. Mizzi
Sep 24th 2011, 12:05
Knisja li veru tixraq lil-Pajjiz tal-Mickey Mouse.....fl-istess nifs illi l-Papa Benedettu li ltaqa mal-vittmi Maltin ABBUZATI MILL MINISRI TIEGHU STESS qieghed jiltaqa' ma vittmi ohra abbuzati fil-mawra tieghu il-Germanja!
Ghandha ghal fejn tibki il-Madonna!
Mr GEORGE S DARMANIN
Sep 24th 2011, 14:54
Vera siehbi. Ghax kulhadd jitlob ghal flus flok ghal Grazzja t'Alla.
Mohabf Fahmi
Sep 24th 2011, 11:53
it's truly amazing how the church never seems to shoulder any responsibility. whilst it's there to care for the souls of men, it also seems to specialize in intricate methods of putting them off! so much for Christian compassion!
Joseph Sammut
Sep 24th 2011, 12:23
one would be hasty to judge one church over another because all churches/creeds have the same basic principles - to keep their followers in ignorance, in fear of God and out of pocket. At least with Christianism, one is not killed for freely critising it in the media.
Mr Charles Spiteri
Sep 24th 2011, 14:00
For sure way better that Islamic compassion which all it consists off is eye for an eye compassion. X'tahseb?
Mr GEORGE S DARMANIN
Sep 24th 2011, 14:52
If you have a car accident with a young 20 year old man whose car is not insured, do you think that if you sue his parents you have right for compensation from them? No you don't. Compensation should be sought from the perpetrators.
FRANS H SAID
Sep 24th 2011, 11:53
STOP WANTING MONEY
The idea that the church is rich is false. The treasures in parishes do not belong to the curia. They belong to the faithful of the respective churches. At one time the church might have had tangible funds but then Mintoff had taken over all lands and buildings. Now the church struggles to support Id-dar tal-Provvidenza and other important humane activities.
The curia cannot, and will not be allowed to dip its hands in other’s properties.
If you want your pound of flesh insist:
A That Criminal action be taken against ALL those who were allegedly involved in the cover up, including Archbishop Cremona.
B. Insist that all those involved should resign with immediate effect, even if the Vatican does not accept their resignations.
C. You can also insist with the Govt to set up an ad hoc fund for ALL victims, irrespective of the perpetrators.
D. You should insist that the Courts act with speed and not drag their feet.
E. Insist that the perpetrators be sent to prison until they die and not receive preferential treatment or be sent to Mount Carmel.
Your actions have shown clearly that you want money. Are you ready to pay for the services you received while you were in St Joseph Home? What have happened to you if you were not taken care of?
You can also ask for a national contribution campaign so that each can contribute as he/she deems fit.
You can also campaign that all Paedophiles and abusers should be (chemically) castrated.
But whatever you do, the more you want money the more it has become apparent that money was you aim from day one and not justice.
E. Vassallo
Sep 24th 2011, 12:15
The church should make amends with the abuse victims. This abuse was rampant and the victims should get their right compensation. Money or not, they deserve it.
Mr Zeppi Borg
Sep 24th 2011, 12:36
If the money was the aim who are you to judge them? The 2 priests aim was abuse from this people and there is nothing wrong if the victims aim is to sue them..... Like all the world do!!
Joseph Magro
Sep 24th 2011, 12:41
taf kemm ghanda artijiet il-knisja,habib?
FB Aquilina
Sep 24th 2011, 13:09
Your post is simply disgusting Mr Said. These individuals are asking for "compensation" as is their right. What's wrong with that? Is it because they are addressing their claims against the Church and it irks your "Catholicism". I agree with you that they (and all of us who belong to the Catholic Church) ought to campaign for the removal of certain prelates who seemingly and I stress seemingly have covered up these (and may be similar) cases. But on the other hand they HAVE A RIGHT TO ASK FOR COMPENSATION. They are no Judases - the only Judases involved are those who have VILIFIED their sacred ministry by abusing vulnerable young people in their care and - IF PROVEN - those prelates who have protracted the hand of justice from striking at them.
Joseph Magro
Sep 24th 2011, 13:15
INT TAF FEJN MARRU CHILDREN'S ALLOWANCE TA DAWN IL VITTMI?
Mr Romeo Busuttil
Sep 24th 2011, 13:26
Prosit Mr Said!!...So you say that "The curia cannot, and will not be allowed to dip its hands in other’s properties" but then you state "You can also insist with the Govt to set up an ad hoc fund for ALL victims, irrespective of the perpetrators".
So according to your reasoning the church should not pay anything while I, as a taxpayer, should pay for the abuse committed by the church ministers. U hallina trid!!
I don't give a damn where the riches of the church came from, they belong to the church and if need be used to pay for anything, and whether the church is rich or not is irrelevant, when someone is ordered by the court to pay compensation to his victim the court does not distinguish between who is rich and poor. Same is to be applied in this case if the court does award compensation. If your church is so important to you and you feel so much a part of it you should be the first to feel that you should contribute if it comes to that, and not offload everything to other citizens who might not even be part of your church at all.
frans camilleri
Sep 24th 2011, 14:02
Kristu qal "hallu hwejjigkom u imxu warajja" l artijiet u il bini li ghanda u li kella il knisja kolla haditom lill poplu u kullhadd jaf kif. dak iz zmien l infern kien miftuh berah
Joseph Sammut
Sep 24th 2011, 11:46
Money solves all. Somehow, it dents credibility.
Anthony Pace
Sep 24th 2011, 11:37
Only in Malta there is no compensation by the church. SHAME!!! SHAME!!! SHAME!!!
Joseph Sammut
Sep 24th 2011, 12:16
Kemm inti bravu! Imma r-rejba ghall flus kullimkien qeda.
FRANS H SAID
Sep 24th 2011, 13:09
Other diocese had plenty of funds. In malta all church funds have been taken by the state.
Michael Seychell
Sep 24th 2011, 11:30
I believe that this time the Victims shot themself in their feet - no wonder that the posters where taken down when their lawyer arrived on the scene!
Michael Seychell
Tal-Pieta
David Caruana
Sep 24th 2011, 14:43
Believe me, it's the Curia that is shooting itself in the foot.
We'll be able to see in full the results of today's action in 10 years time. You wait and see!
Kurt Waschnig
Sep 24th 2011, 11:29
Protest peacefully outside the Curia and do never give up to inform the public what Catholic priests did with you all.
Pressure must be put on the Curia peacefully and the outcry of the public shall never stop till victims of clerical child abuse get their rights.
Clerical child abuse was covered up by the Church in Malta and the announcement by the Church not to grant financial comepensation is cynical.
The life of children was destroyed by Catholic priests and therefore the Church has the moral obligation to do everything to help the victims.
To see the victims, the poor, the needy that is what Jesus wants.
Best regards
Kurt Waschnig Oldenburg Germany
FRANS H SAID
Sep 24th 2011, 13:08
The life of children was destroyed, you say.
The life of children was saved from the streets and given an education. Why do you only see the nagitive side of the problem. The abuse was made by certain individuals and the civil courts should stop dragging their feet and punish the,
Mr M Borg
Sep 24th 2011, 13:28
MY, MY you really love the Catholic church.!!
Did you ever form part of it, or are you just happy to be able to show your hate towards it ??
Andy Farrugia
Sep 24th 2011, 14:04
Thus spake the Oracle of Delphi, which has translocated to Oldenburg. Your gross generalisations about the Catholic Church and priests just shows you up, Herr Waschnig.
Mr ALBERT FENECH
Sep 24th 2011, 14:46
This should not be classed as "compensation" but more appropriately as "blackmail". The individual clerics who committed the crimes are despiccable and shallow but, is money going to put that right? If the abused individuals keep pressing and protesting to be paid money, then they are doing a grave dis-service to the community because it could be interpreted that their only motivation for bringing such matters to light was to make money out of the crimes that were committed against them.
The Roman Catholic Church is not responsible; the criminal perpetrators of the offences are responsible. To hold the Catholic Church responsible is as stupid as blaming the whole German nation for the atrocities of the Nazis.
ALBERT FENECH
Qawra
Mr Lawrence Calleja
Sep 24th 2011, 11:08
So, after all, the truth has finally come out. All these persons wanted is compensation in money. The Curia should only pay money for psychological treatment that these victims require.
joe cutajar
Sep 24th 2011, 12:34
well said mr calleja
Mr Zeppi Borg
Sep 24th 2011, 12:38
They are already healthy to live there own life thats way they had the guts to talk about it!!
Mr M Farrugia
Sep 24th 2011, 11:07
qazzistuna issa. Jiena wiehed milli kont nissimpatiza maghkom sa ftit ilu imma issa qed nibdel il-fehma tieghi u qed nahseb li hemm agendi ohra. Wiehed mill-posters jghid abbuzati mill-qassisin u issa mill-Isqifjiet. Nahseb dan il-poster huwa libbeluz ghax sa issa hadd qatt minnhom li kien hemm xi Isqof li abbuza minnhom. Hbieb nirrispettaw l-awtoritajiet tal-Knisja u niftakru li dak li huwa allegat li sar minn individwi mhux dak li qed isir fil-Knisja. Ftakkru li l-quddiem tridu taghtu kont quddiem Alla bhal ma irid jaghtu dawk li huwa allegat li abbuzaw. Fil-kaz taghkom tridu taghtu kont l-alla tal-hsara li qed taghmel bul-propaganda kontra il-knisja.
Pio Sultana
Sep 24th 2011, 12:51
fil-waqt li mhux se nidhol fil-kwistjoni jekk it-talba ghal kumpens hix gustifikata, M farrugia, dawk huma misjubin hatja u mhux allegati......furthermore ma kontx nistenna l-curja tiehu kenn wara il-legalita minflok il-moralita. Allura il-knisja qeghda tghid li mhix se thallas ghax legalment mhix obligat u mhux ghax moralment ma hix. Sew heek. Sa fejn naf jien il-Knisja ghandha tkun hi l-ewwell li taqdi d-dmirijiet morali. L-ezempju u l-azzjoni u mhux il-paroli.
David Caruana
Sep 24th 2011, 14:39
Propoganda kontra l-knisja?!?!
Hux kont tissimpatizza maghhom?! Int tissimpatizza BISS mal-awtoritajiet tal-Knisja!
Jalla la int u hadd vicin tieghek ma jkollhu jghaddi minn dak li ghaddew dawn l-irgiel.
P. Vincenti
Sep 24th 2011, 11:05
It is not clear as to how financial compensation will help these people?
It is understandable that they were hurt by the abuse and that those who abused them should be brought to justice. But how financial compensation is supposed to make everything go away is a mystery?
Are they barking up the wrong tree here? Should not those who abused them be the target of their request for compensation?
David Caruana
Sep 24th 2011, 11:00
"So much Euros for the divorce campaign and for the abuse victims nothing?"
Well said!!
The stand that the church is taking on this issue will result in further damage to itself, just like the divorce campaign resulted at the end of the day.
Go ahead Curia! Keep shooting yourself in the leg. We all love it when you do that!
FRANS H SAID
Sep 24th 2011, 13:06
both are wrong. The church made a huge mistake to be involved, money wise, in the divorce debate.
Dishing out more money will not solve the problem
Mr Ernest Vella
Sep 24th 2011, 13:12
David, kont taf li l-Knisa ghalkemm il-maggoranza qablet mad-divorzju, il-Knisja ma tirrispettax dik id-decizjoni u d-divorzju huwa att ikkundanat, u min jiddeciedi li jiddivorzja jkun qed jikser ukoll l-istess 6 Kmandament...il-pedofilija u d-divorzju huma dnubiet mejta kontra 6 kmandament...tiskanta hux...nehduha kontra l-Knisja ghax ma taghtix il-flus....mela l-istat kemm irrid jaghti lil poplu talli ha jippermetti lit-tfal jibdew jigu abbuzati b'mod psikologiku mill-genituri taghhom minhabba d-divorzju.
Mr Joseph Aquilina
Sep 24th 2011, 14:23
@David
Do you thing providing psychological help is free? The Church is still going to spend money, but in a way that really helps those that "claim" where damaged for life. It is now clear that some of these victims only came out because of what they felt they where going to get back, and not because they wanted to make justice and make sure that no other suffers there same fate!!
Joseph Calleja
Sep 24th 2011, 10:57
please do not tell me that these are after money
joe cutajar
Sep 24th 2011, 12:36
yes they are my frend
Giovann Demartino
Sep 24th 2011, 14:55
Exactly!