RAF Tornado in airport emergency - temporarily blocks runway
The Tornado seen on the runway at MIA.
A Royal Air Force Tornado bomber made an emergency landing at Malta International Airport this evening after suffering hydraulic problems.
Informed sources said flames were seen around its landing gear due to overheating during the landing.
The plane stopped safely on the runway at about 9 p.m., blocking it until it could be towed away. Fire engines were deployed.
A Primera Air flight from Stockholm to Malta was diverted to Catania because of the blocked runway. Other aircraft used the secondary runway.
The Tornado was involved in an operation over Libya.
60 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Alfred Falzon
Sep 24th 2011, 10:05
Where are all the LP apologists and zealous upholders of the so-called "Neutrality clause" to explain to us aspects of the secret treaty that was signed in1982 between Malta and rogue country North Korea, where people die of hunger in exchange for arms and nuclear warheads?!
Was Malta "neutral" at the time when dictator Kim il-Sung promised to donate weapons to the Labour Government of Malta and dispatched military instructors (martial arts experts) to train and teach local military personne? These could be identified by their badge of the "Great Leader" on the lapel of their jackets or shirts and could be seen strutting proudly in many Maltese Government departments! Their salaries, transport, etc were paid from Malta's public coffers!
Come on, out with it, mighty defenders of indifference, sitting on the wall...! Watching other nations burning!
Acknowledge that your buzz word "neutrality" has today lost its true meaning in an ever-changing geo-political world and that you can never use it any more as a scarecrow to keep sparrows away!
Mr Jesmond Farrugia
Sep 24th 2011, 02:41
The government of Malta is legally obliged to allow military forces to operate "in pursuance of measures or actions decided by the Security Council of the United Nations"
Constitution of Malta IV. 1987.2.
Roy Schembri
Sep 23rd 2011, 14:07
What all the fuss about ? The RAF or NATO can do as they please. As has been witnessed this year they can land when they wish wherever they wish !
No point in raising a white neutrality flag as the Government here (who can't even run a bus service) appear to have vacated some time ago. As for the Opposition? Can anyone imagine Joseph (even in a technicolour raincoat) standing up to NATO and telling them 'hey you can't land we're neutral' ?
Err no ! Like it or not we rather depend on certain countries so we all know whether PN or PL, nice meek principles of that sort just fly conveniently out of the window when it comes to trade and money.
And one final point. Are those on here objecting to this Tornado landing seriously saying they would have denied it landing in this emergency? Best think again.
Kenneth Galea
Sep 23rd 2011, 14:03
@R Bartolo
KARMENU MIFSUD BONNICI believed in Malta being a Sovereign state and in our neutrality clause because he never intened to sell Malta to the foreigners. Our country is being sold piece by piece by this Government to the detriment of the Maltese citizens. It is dangerous to welcome these war planes on a small island like ours. And what did the English do for Malta? Thank God it was for Mintoff who terminated their contract in Malta. The English occupied the best places in Malta and Mintoff wanted to give their 'wealth' to the Maltese people. Folks we should all take our hats off to the great Karmenu and Mintoff.
The quicker this RAF tornado is expelled from Malta is the better.
Ms Elizabeth Aquilina
Sep 23rd 2011, 15:48
Your comments are funny... they remind me of Monty Python's 'Life of Brian'...... "Reg: But apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, the fresh-water system, and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?
PFJ Member: Brought peace?
Reg: Oh, peace? SHUT UP!"
Guess you belong to that genre!
Anthony Farrugia
Sep 24th 2011, 10:11
"and Mintoff wanted to give their "wealth" to the Maltese people."
What comes to mind is the Raffles night club (was it the former Australia Hall ?) to the sons of a prominent Labour minister who has reinvented himself after various somersaults into a member of Joseph's kitchen cabinet.
Mr Peter Borg
Sep 23rd 2011, 13:17
Will the British authorities compensate Malta for the use of our facilities as well as for the costs involved in diverting the Stockholm flight to Catania ? What about the tourists on board the same flight ? Will they be paid compensation ?
J Goffin
Sep 23rd 2011, 15:07
Yet again Mr Borg i think you fail to understand the word EMERGENCY !!!!!!!
Tell you what next time your in charge lets just let the plane crash and the pilot lose his life, at least there will then not be any compensation due to anyone... but then again there wont be any tourists coming either...
Ms Elizabeth Aquilina
Sep 23rd 2011, 15:33
Does it say anywhere that the Tornado landed here for a holiday break??? This was an emergency landing.. isn't that enough explanation for you???
Ms Maria Vella
Sep 23rd 2011, 16:59
What compensation??? It was an emergency DUHHHHHH
M. Bezzina
Sep 23rd 2011, 13:05
/meta kemm il darba gejna mfehmin li Malta ma tikser l ebda regoli tal kostizzjoni taghha....allura meta nara in nies jeqirdu u jsemmu l kostituzzjoni bilfors nghid li certu nies halli ma nghidx il poplu Malti (ax mhux sew niggeneralizza)huma injornati pessmi!!!!!!!!
Stephen Koludrovic
Sep 23rd 2011, 11:30
Once he's here,might as well stay for the Air show.
Michael Gamble
Sep 23rd 2011, 10:27
Any aircraft, military or civilian can land with priority at any suitable location once it has declared an emergency and informed the nearest location to it's intentions to land there.
The onus then lies with that location/airport to ensure a safe and secure enviroment for the aircraft to land. The consideration of which runway the location would prefer to be used is not normaly a consideration, getting the aircraft on the ground as quick as possible is!
As for the conspiracies banded within these comments, incredible! Do you really think that the presence of a RAF fighter plane signifies a full scale invasion by the British hoping to reclaim the Island for a new British Empire or even its presence will outrage the Lybians into a full scale assault on the Island due to the presence of a military aircraft making an emergency landing? Please, grow up!
Kenneth Galea
Sep 23rd 2011, 10:26
@Bloggers contradicting the German plane fighters
In June the German war planes were blocking part of the runway because the German foreign Ministry was on his way to Benghazi with his officials. I can distinguish well between flags of different countries.
So yes I got my facts right before I posted my comment on here. Otherwise I would not have wasted my energy to do so. I did not say that they were involved in the NATO bombing.
The neutrality clause is being flawed and abused and these war planes are a receipe for disaster if we allow them to land in Malta anymore.
If we still have the hero Karmenu Mifsud Bonnici or Mintoff they would have told the tornado where to go and would not have allowed them permission to land.
Mr R Bartolo
Sep 23rd 2011, 12:00
"If we still have the hero Karmenu Mifsud Bonnici or Mintoff ..."
I have no doubt that this is where all the negative commentators are 'coming from'.
Perfectly sure that if Labour were in Govt. you would be the first to applaud the humanitarial gesture of helping all in need, and no mention of neutrality or similar, a concept which you undoubtedly have very little understanding of in any case.
How very boringly predictable, and what a waste of space.
Mr Henry Spiteri
Sep 23rd 2011, 13:12
@ Kenneth Galea
There where no German fighter planes in Malta this year.
J Goffin
Sep 23rd 2011, 13:34
Mr Galea,
"If we still have the hero Karmenu Mifsud Bonnici or Mintoff they would have told the tornado where to go and would not have allowed them permission to land."
your comments do a great deal for an Island that depends on it tourism and Foreigners actually coming here.
Mr Mario Zammit
Sep 23rd 2011, 10:26
Ghalek tajbin il-Maltin biex ingergru biss. Hobby Nazzjonali sar il-tgergir. Kif qall Mr. Charles Sammut tkelmu bill-Malti halli ma tkomplux twaqqaw isem pajjizna ghaz-zufjett quddiem id-dinja. Gerger Malti-Ja kattiv tieghek innifsek.
j brincat
Sep 23rd 2011, 10:05
Quote:"Charles Sammut
"Min irid joqghod igorr ghandu jkollu d-dicenza li jgorr bil-Malti biex tal-inqas ma nirriklamawx l-istupidagni u njoranza mad -dinja kollha. Dnub li m'hawnx suq ghal istupidagni u njoranza ghax kieku Malta l-aktar art ghanja fl-Univers".
Who knows how many millions all over the world can read Maltese?
You do not seem to be very tolerant. I note that you write in Maltese (in an English blog). Perhaps you do this on purpose so that you are understood only by the locals.
(jb)
Mr Tonio Mallia
Sep 23rd 2011, 09:44
I'm a tolerant person but I swear, some of the people writing on this comment board are the limit!! All these conspiracies and declarations of broken neutrality. Can anyone of you conspiracy theorists come up with a valid argument to prove that , apart from this case, all other emergency landings were fake and sinister forces were at work? There have been thousands of sorties over Libya and comparitively the amount of emergency landings in Malta are negligible. These were due to technical issues or lack of fuel. A jet consumes large amounts of fuel and most sorties involve air to air refueling which is no easy feat even in calm weather. It involves keeping two aircraft of very different performance flying in near perfect formation whilst a fuel line is aimed and attached to the jets fuel probe. Throw in some severe turbulence or a problem with the probe or fuel nozzle and forget the refueling. Therefore the only remedy is to land at the nearest airport for emergency refueling. As regards technical issues you don't need to have a fire on board for the emergency to be real! A modern jet is a complex machine which depends on countless systems to keep it flying. Suffice it to say that most jets would be unflyable if their flight control computers fail. Hence if the pilot has an indication of any sort his obligation is to land asap before the situation deteriorates. So Please , whilst you have every right to express your opinions, do so only after you have watched some documentaries about modern military jets or read some articles on the subject. National Geographic and Discovery channel are a great start.
Mr R Bartolo
Sep 23rd 2011, 10:47
Mr Mallia,
All the people with negative comments have an agenda which they are not declaring when they comment.
Hint - If these aircraft were landing while the current opposition were in Government, there would not be a whimper of protest.
Logic or anything else has nothing to do with it. After all these people have reasoned illogically for all their voting lives, what more do you expect.
Gianluca Falzon
Sep 23rd 2011, 13:02
Mr. Bartolo,
You have successfully described an immoral selfish PL fanatic successfully in just a few lines. I'm surprised this could be done, but then again the disgusting character of such people doesn't need much description either. I applaud and concur.
Mr Joseph Micallef
Sep 23rd 2011, 09:27
May I remind all those talking about neutrality that our Constitution says that we are not anymore bound by it when the UN Security Council issues a resolution / directive etc. Nato are in accordance with such a resolution - so had the Government chosen to participate in some way it would not have been breaking the Constitution.
Charles Sammut
Sep 23rd 2011, 09:21
Min irid joqghod igorr ghandu jkollu d-dicenza li jgorr bil-Malti biex tal-inqas ma nirriklamawx l-istupidagni u njoranza mad -dinja kollha. Dnub li m'hawnx suq ghal istupidagni u njoranza ghax kieku Malta l-aktar art ghanja fl-Univers.
Kemm ser induma ma nitghallmu li l-klawsola tan-newtralita' ma tapplikax fejn ikun hemm rizoluzzjonijiet tal-Gnus Maghquda? U li ajruplan mhux bil-fors irid jikkraxxja jew jiehu n-nar biex ikun f'sitwazzjoni t'emergenza?
j brincat
Sep 23rd 2011, 08:41
Not newsworthy anymore!
(jb)
Paul Giordimaina
Sep 23rd 2011, 09:42
How come Mr Brincat,You run out of critesizing the goverment.
Kenneth Galea
Sep 23rd 2011, 10:32
Exactly, the Government is abusing our neutrality clause. The current GonziPN is turning Malta into a hub of NATO war planes and also there is a danger that we could well be dragged into a senseless war.
Can Karmenu Mifsud Bonnici hold the Government to account? This is simply abuse.
Ms Xaxa Caruana
Sep 23rd 2011, 08:39
Mela nahseb dik kienet ir-raguni li ajruplan ta Airmalta dam idur fuq nhawi ta Valletta hsibu xi training jien.
Heq emergenza hija emergenza ,mhux ahjar hekk milli Alla hares qatt waqa x mkien.
Anthony Pace
Sep 23rd 2011, 08:31
I don't understannd why the Tornado could not have used the secondary runway and allowed commercial aircraft to land on the main airstrip. Commercial flights take precedence over military flights.
Kenneth Cassar
Sep 23rd 2011, 09:53
Emergencies, by definition, always take precedence. As for using another runway, the safety of both passengers of commercial flights, and the military jet's crew, always takes precedence to any minor inconvenience such as a flight delay.
Duncan Sant
Sep 23rd 2011, 09:59
When an aircraft (any aircraft) declares an emergency, it has the priority. The pilot also has the choice to choose the runway he prefers, depending on how familiar the pilot is with the airport, weather conditions, wind direction and speed, etc...
Given that this aircraft had hydraulic problems (probably affecting the flight capacities of the aircraft) it is only normal that it was given priority and used the longer runway so that the pilot could negotiate the landing safely.
D Pace
Sep 23rd 2011, 23:36
ermmmmm Hydraulic problem, this would effect the braking system hence a longer runway being the obvious choice.............and besides being an emergency a longer runway gives more chance of survivability.
charlo' sammut
Sep 23rd 2011, 08:11
gem gem ja Malti gem gem !!!!!!
Joseph Borg
Sep 23rd 2011, 08:10
Milli qed nifhem dan veru kien kaz ta emergenza u ghamilna sew li tajna l ghajnuna ghax wiehed mil ftit ajruplani li nizlu li veru jidher li kellu problemi. Pero ftakkru kemm il darba nizlu ajruplani habba emergenzi tipo "run out of fuel" so ma nehodiex bi kbira li jkun hawn min xorta ha jgorr.
Il kelb il mismut kull ilma jahsbu mishun jghid il Malti.
Kenneth Cassar
Sep 23rd 2011, 08:27
Kien x'kien il-kaz, dan l-inqas li stajna nghamlu biex ghallinqas taparsi qed nghatu sehemna ghall-helsien tal-Libja.
Jew biex nippuppaw sidirna u nippretendu relazzjonijiet tajba mill-gvern Libjan gdid biss tajbin?
Karl Demicoli
Sep 23rd 2011, 07:47
Who needs the airshow?! We've had one all year!
Mr Joseph E Briffa
Sep 23rd 2011, 07:41
@ Kenneth Galea....haven't you ever been taught that emergency cases take priority?
Kenneth Cassar
Sep 23rd 2011, 08:25
Egoists don't care. They think they are the only priority.
Maria Muscat
Sep 23rd 2011, 06:58
ara this looks like the first genuine case of an emergency landing all year!!!!
James J. Patton
Sep 23rd 2011, 00:20
So many years have passed since WW2 and The Maltese Islands are still playing the roleof the peacemaker, no wonder the George Cross was bestowed on this great nation, little has changed since then as the current expressions of leadership and willingness to assist when required are as ever, there in abundance.
Nothing great was never achieved without enthusiasm and Malta has never shied away from that.
J Goffin
Sep 23rd 2011, 13:38
Mr Patton,
Let me congratulate you on a fantastically unbiased opinion. This great Nation of Malta has been the Rock of many countries and in my humble opinion deserves another medal for its heroic efforts since WW2.
It is a sham however that some of the people that comment on here do not feel the same way about Their COUNTRY !!
Kenneth Galea
Sep 23rd 2011, 00:06
I would have cursed the damn tornado if I was on a flight and it was diverted because of it.
Well it looks to me that we lost our neutrality clause.
I was delayed on a flight back in June because two German war planes were partially blocking the runway.
We don't want to be involved in this sensless war in Libya.
Mr Stephen Borg
Sep 23rd 2011, 07:37
There never were any German war planes participating in the NATO lead operation to protect INNOCENT civilians in Libya,
Mr robert micallef
Sep 23rd 2011, 07:47
i suppose Kenneth is referring to the German raid in 1941 !
Kenneth Cassar
Sep 23rd 2011, 08:23
@ Kenneth Galea:
I would have cursed the damn Kenneth Galea if the Tornado would have crashed after being refused permission to land, just so that you do not have to wait a few minutes to take your flight.
As for describing the Libyan uprising a "senseless war", please speak for yourself and your amoral (or immoral) friends.
Andrea Giallombardo
Sep 23rd 2011, 09:22
The Germans were never involved in the war. Get your facts right before you speak!
Alfred Falzon
Sep 23rd 2011, 09:52
@ Kenneth Galea
Neutrality clause my foot!
Ask the Labour Party what really happened when Malta struck a secret military treaty in the 80s with none other than North Korea, the rogue country where people die of hunger under heaps of munition and nuclear warheads imported/manufactured by their ruthless one-party Government!
Come on, accept the challenge and we SHALL broach the subject of betrayal more at length!
Andre Cilia
Sep 23rd 2011, 10:36
Mind you a secret military treaty is constitutionally illegal on its own right (that is even if the neutrality cause didn't exist)
Mr Joe Cardona
Sep 22nd 2011, 23:38
Xejn. Kelma wahda nghid. Ergajna sirna laqin tal-barrani. Kulhadd jaghmel li jrid nizlin u telghin qishom qeghdin f'xi ajurport militari minn taghhom. Dawn jafu li ahna NEWTRALI jew illa u ahna kontra il-forzi militari?
Issa meta issir xi dizgrazzja bhal kif sehh Haz-Zabbar noqghodu neqirdu u nghidu imsieken ara x'garalhom dawn. Mhux ahjar indahhlu ftit sens go mohhna u ma naccettawx imbarazz ta' haddiehor.
Mr Stephen Borg
Sep 23rd 2011, 07:28
This aircraft declared an emergency and landed here because it had no other option. We form part of a planet called earth and when some one needs assistance we give it to them. If you had an incident in the UK would you like the British authorities to help you out? Stop it please you are not making any sense at all
Ivan Fenech
Sep 23rd 2011, 07:49
Wow, this logic from Joe Cardona really adds a new angle to the term neutrality.
Malta is neutral (or is it neutered?) because it doesn't want any airplanes crashing over it.
Next thing you'll be sending in the lyrics from Gensna to remind us how we "mietna ghal xejn, mietna ghall-barrani".
Kenneth Cassar
Sep 23rd 2011, 08:19
Le, sur Cardona. Ahna m'ahniex newtrali rigward il-hajja tal-bniedem. X' mentalita' neolitika!
Mr H. Meilak
Sep 23rd 2011, 08:48
X'taghmel Mr. Cardona, dejjem hekk konna. Il-"Peak" ilhaqnieh meta Gaddafi kien jigi u jaghmel li jrid haw' Malta fit-tmeninijiet. Dik newtralita'......illa.
Gianluca Falzon
Sep 23rd 2011, 09:33
Mela xi tridu jaghmel? Jinzel fil-bahar ? Ghid hekk lill-Prim Ministru Ngliz ghidlu, "Sur Cameron, skuzani imma nixtieq li darb'ohra l-arjuplan li jiswa miljuni fuq miljuni jaghmel emergency landing fil-bahar". Kontx tajdlu ukoll biex ma jinzilx fl-ibhra maltin imma fl-ibhra tal-Libja jew l-Italja?
Li kieku ahna KONTRA il-forzi militari kieku f'dan il-pajjiz lanqas forzi armati ahna ma kien ikollna, li mhux ilu hafna baghtu numru zghir ta' suldati ta 'C' coy is-Somalja. Dik mhux gwerra kontra terrorizmu? Ghaddafi ma kienx terrorist lejn il-poplu tieghu? Mela tivvintax ghax li tkun newtrali ma jfissirx li tkun kontra forzi militari. L-isvizzera newtrali imma qeghdin bil-lieva, u ghandhom armata b'ekwipagg tajjeb hafna, sinjal li huma favur ta' forza militari b'sahhitha.
Haz-zabbar involva bomber Vulcan li difficli timmanuvrah meta jitliflek il-kontroll. Tornado huwa hafna izghar u it-two man crew huwa iktar kapaci jmexxi l-ajruplan u jnizzlu fuq airfield jew ghalmenu f'ghelieqi. Tibzax, mintix l-uniku wiehed li ha into account dawn ic-chances. L-RAF hadithom qablek.
Ms D Galea
Sep 22nd 2011, 23:02
Fejn huma il-conspiracy theorists?
Victor Vella
Sep 22nd 2011, 23:19
Rieqdin joholmu li il PL rebah l elezjoni
Stefano C.
Sep 22nd 2011, 23:39
They are probably asleep right now wait till tomorrow then it'll start flooding with conspiracies as usual.
M Cassar
Sep 23rd 2011, 06:38
aghtihom cans...
J Pavia
Sep 23rd 2011, 07:11
dawk ikunu pronti jharbxu erba kelmiet biex taparsi jimressjonawna bl-intelligenza taghhom, ghax tghidx kemm faqsu esperti f'kull suggett
Charles J. Buttigieg
Sep 23rd 2011, 08:26
@ Ms D Galea.
Malta is a Neutral State and our neutrality is guaranteed by an amendment in our Constitution which had the support of practically all members of Parliaments. Under no circumstances our Constitution allows Government to involve us in any military action except on humanitarian grounds.
One doesn’t need to be a Labour conspiracy theorist to realise that most of the other landings were fake emergencies while this one looks genuine. Common sense tells me that if one can tell a genuine incident equally they can tell a manipulated fake incident.