Advert

Malta is ‘safest place on earth’

Low exposure to natural disasters

Malta and Gozo share the coveted top position for safest countries in the world, according to a UN report. The photo by Chris Sant Fournier shows one of the villages in Gozo.

Malta and Gozo share the coveted top position for safest countries in the world, according to a UN report. The photo by Chris Sant Fournier shows one of the villages in Gozo.

If you want to avoid becoming a victim of a natural disaster or of climate change, you could do no better than to live in Malta or Qatar, according to a new United Nations study which says these two small countries are the safest in the world.

An earthquake of the same magnitude can have different effects in two different countries

The World Risk Report for 2011, conducted by the UN’s Institute for Environment and Human Security, is based on an index related to the exposure of countries to natural hazards and climate change, as well as social vulnerability.

It rates the island of Vanuatu in the Pacific as the most dangerous place in the world, with very high exposure to natural disasters and high social vulnerability.

If you lived on this island, your risk of falling victim to a natural disaster would be 32 per cent.

At the other end of the 173-country league of risk lie Malta and Qatar. Both have very low exposure to earthquakes, floods or rising sea levels and their societies and infrastructure are well-prepared to tackle such events, according to the report.

In Malta, the risk of becoming a victim of a natural disaster is 0.72 per cent while that of Qatar is just 0.02 per cent.

While Malta is the safest place in Europe, the Netherlands is the most exposed. However, Europe is generally a very safe place as despite being highly vulnerable, particularly to floods, its most vulnerable country is still classified as the 73rd risk-prone country worldwide, as it is highly prepared to cope in such situations.

Jorn Birkmann, scientific head of the project, said extreme natural events do not necessarily cause disasters because risk not only depends on the hazard but is very much determined by social and economic factors.

“This means that an earthquake of the same magnitude can have different effects in two different countries,” he explained.

The report shows that disaster risk has two components: exposure to natural hazards and climate change on the one hand, and social vulnerability on the other.

It clarifies that disasters cannot be attributed to meteorological or geological phenomena only but that they are determined also by social structures and processes within a society, such as level of education, extent of poverty, food situation or functioning of governmental institutions.

“For example, the Netherlands and Hungary are relatively highly exposed to natural hazards and climate change but due to their social, economic and ecological situations, they have a comparatively good ranking in the risk index,” one of the researchers explained.

“Similarly, the earthquakes of Haiti and Japan strongly demonstrate this relationship. While 28,000 people died in the Japan earthquake (9.0 on the moment-magnitude scale), 220,000 people died in Haiti in a much weaker earthquake measuring 7.0 on the moment-magnitude scale.

“This was because although Japan’s earthquake was stronger, the country could cope better. Its buildings and infrastructure was more resistant,” he said.

The study shows that after Vanuatu, the world’s most disaster-prone countries are Tonga, the Philippines, Solomon Islands, Guatemala and Bangladesh.

Advert

93 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Mr Sean Swain

Sep 16th 2011, 19:09

Are you seriously trying to compare the one day Marsa gridlock to a natural disaster? Do you understand what they mean by natural disaster? I'd love to hear you debate your point to the thousands of people who lost their loved ones and homes in Japan, Haiti, Australia, New Zealand and all the other major natural disaster prone countries. A valid point indeed.

Melvin Tonna

Sep 15th 2011, 13:37

Perfect comment Mr.Sean!

Mr Ben Harper

Sep 15th 2011, 13:51

Very well said Mr. Swain.

Unfortunately all these sad Maltese gem gem never spent time working or living abroad. Therefore, they can never appreciate the positives and benefits Malta has. They just want to lead a miserable life, and if it makes them happy then let them be.

Mr John Micallef

Sep 15th 2011, 17:40

Perfect, to the point and 'fil-laham il-haj'!! Can't agree with you more.

All those not happy in Malta are very welcome to try out various other countries. They may start by going a few hundred miles south, for example...

Victor Pulis

Sep 15th 2011, 08:45

What a sensible argument! So if someone asks whether Malta is prepared for a major earthquake he is being negative. We all remember the incident of the Marsa bridge. A truck dislodged a piece of concrete from a bridge...It did not bring the bridge down mind you. It just hit it. And all Malta came to a standstill with traffic jams and detours all the way to Jamaica! And you feel safe because some foreign entity said so.

Mr Sean Swain

Sep 15th 2011, 10:40

@ Victor Pulis

Ian's argument (if I understood it correctly) wasn't so that we shouldn't be prepared in case of a disaster, his argument was that we NEVER have natural disasters. We are ill prepared in case of natural disasters because although it is always good to be prepared, it is not a high priority in this country. Japan suffers earthquakes on an almost DAILY basis, hence they are prepared, and of course nothing could have prepared them for a massive 9.0 but the point is that if you live in a country that is well prepared it is because they NEED to be.

On another note, if you don't trust the 'foreign entity' then how about conducting a study of your own and sharing your results? I'm quite sure that you are likely to come up with similar results.

Joe Gatt

Sep 15th 2011, 18:05

Mr Sean Swain

Just wait and see things change, when the rain season sets in.

Mr Aaron Vella

Sep 14th 2011, 23:16

Yes, and what is the probability of a natural disaster hitting Paceville only? This study shows how safe a country is when a natural disaster (if any) takes place, not how much complaints are filed with the police.

Mr Henry Mifsud

Sep 14th 2011, 20:15

I started reading the comments and had to stop here. Am I on the right page?

Malta must be the safest place on earth and for anyone who hasn't realized why, here is the answer:

MALTA IS THE CENTRE OF THE WORLD! or so we would like to think :)

Mr Angus Black

Sep 14th 2011, 23:42

Albert, you would probably be more accurate had you added a comment such as "Malta would be paradise of all the moaners and prophets of doom and gloom put a sock in it and stop looking at a half full glass and declare it as half empty.

Inane comments are so boring.

Alfred E. Zahra

Sep 14th 2011, 16:57

Yes and the glass is half empty.

David Xuereb

Sep 14th 2011, 15:38

AGREE

Charles Vella

Sep 14th 2011, 14:20

...waiting for joseph muscat to be Prime Minister for the volcano you mention to errupt!

Joseph Camilleri

Sep 14th 2011, 14:26

When you say arrogance, you are right... the PN are very arrogant, however you cannot say that when or if Joseph would be PM the situation will get better. By logic and common sense, Malta will only get worse for the fact that the Labour mentality still hasen't changed, and with the lack of experience from not only Joseph Muscat but the whole Labour Party, Malta will loose alot if they are elected. Apart from that, they have no idea of what to do when in government, therefore I cannot see how one can vote blindly. Unfortunately mostly Labour vote because it's their favourite party or football club, however I think that the games with the floater don't go that way.

Phil Humphries

Sep 14th 2011, 16:05

lol - Thank you :)

cettina portelli

Sep 14th 2011, 18:12

thank God we are in a "safe" country....if we had to wait for a bus to take us from a dangerous area to a safer one, then we wouldnt stand a chance! ARRIVA ARE YOU LISTENING?

Mr Charles Falzon

Sep 14th 2011, 12:01

Imnalla ta....ghax kieku kellu jigri xi haga ma nafx x naghmlu basta ghandna STATE OF THE ART HOSPITAL!!!!!! Imma biex tmur tghamel operation trid tkun lucky li ma tilhaqx tmut.

Mr G Mangion

Sep 14th 2011, 12:17

@ Mr Charles Falzon

Sewwa STATE OF THE ART HOSPITAL Tant hu Hekk li Kullhadd Inqeda Bih u hargu Sodisfatti ghall Grazzja tal - hanin Alla, ghax anke min Maqdru fih mar u inqeda bi Professional way mil - Aqwa...
Nahseb li taf.................!

G. Mangion

Mr Wally Vella-Zarb

Sep 14th 2011, 14:16

@ Mr G Mangion

Trid iddaħħaq sieħbi? Kien hemm ukoll min, għal operazzjoni ĦAFNA izgħar, ipprefera li jmur l'Amerika. Naħseb li taf......!

Simon Cassar

Sep 14th 2011, 14:21

@ Mr Mangion

Int bis serjeta???!!!! Jidher li ghadu qatt ma kellek appuntament li sptar!... Jien x jiswa li jkolli waiting room sabiha bil fan u siggu komdu meta imbaghad inqatta nofs ta nhar nistenna ghalxejn!!

Alfred E. Zahra

Sep 14th 2011, 16:52

@ Simon Cassar. I go to Mater Dei regularly for treatment. I am given an appointment and am seem within 15 minutes. A relative of mine recently had a knee replacement operation and he is very satisfied with the treatment and care he was given. From your comments it is very obvious that u have never been to Mater Dei.

Ms Anna Caruana

Sep 14th 2011, 11:10

ahjar naghmlu l-qrun!

Mr Dominic Chircop

Sep 14th 2011, 11:46

There is another reason which no scientific study will ever bring to the fore.

God, in his infinite wisdom, does not punish us with natural disasters. He kows well enough that we have two political movements which are quite capable of causing as much havoc between them !

Mr Peter Barbara

Sep 14th 2011, 11:03

So what do you propose ? some people are really hard to please....!!

Ms M Sciberras

Sep 14th 2011, 11:04

your first sentence is priceless :)

Charles J. Buttigieg

Sep 14th 2011, 10:10

Giovan jesagerahom,mill bqija gie li jaghmel sens. Lili ma jdejjaqni xejn ghax naqtalu it-tara.

Charles J. Buttigieg

Sep 14th 2011, 10:07

Joe,the political divide is a good thing to have. Keeps the government under control. Mela kif kienet il- Libya kullhadd ibaxxi rasu ghall Gaddafi.

Paul Giordimaina

Sep 14th 2011, 09:43

I agree with you Charles.

Paul Giordimaina

Sep 14th 2011, 09:56

I agree

Mr W Cassar

Sep 14th 2011, 11:20

They didn't calculate the risk of a brainwashed population.

Grow up!

marc pace

Sep 14th 2011, 12:03

lol tajba chalie!!!! they surely dnt calculate tht risk ax jekk jitla il labour mux politikal violence ikun hawn imma gwerra civili
jekk taraw wikileaks lamerica qed tibza mil labour u ir relazzjonijiet li andu ma certu pajjizi barranin

Mr Carmelo Micallef

Sep 14th 2011, 11:59

Well said Helen - the other comments (presumably by Maltese largely) listed herein seem to try and outdo each in the bile, ridicule and contempt they pour on our country - how sad we can be.

Mr Carmelo Micallef

Sep 14th 2011, 12:02

PS Helen, prior to any comments being posted to this article I sent links to friends in: USA, Canada, England, Germany, Cyprus, Russia and China ..... ..............

Edward Camilleri

Sep 14th 2011, 08:48

Really now.

henry spiteri

Sep 14th 2011, 08:56

EZATT kif qal SAN PAWL 2000 sana ilu

victor caruana

Sep 14th 2011, 09:01

specjalment meta jkollok par idejn sodi u xejn ma jigri kumbinazzjoni.....

Christian Sciberras

Sep 14th 2011, 09:08

Gosh, you must be right!

Malta's geology must somehow affect criminal minds and terrorists to avoid it!

</sarcasm>

By the way, Libya is a place like no other. As is North Korea.

Pano Aroditis

Sep 14th 2011, 09:13

I commend you on your logical clarity. Are you being literally metaphorical, or metaphorically literal? Come to think of it, when did you have this epiphanic revelation?

Mr Andrew Grech

Sep 14th 2011, 09:28

@ Mr. Demartino:
now that's a nice comment! :^)

Mr B Grech

Sep 14th 2011, 09:33

Except for Qatar ofcourse. Nonetheless the point of the article is that Malta is very safe with respect to natural disasters. Ofcourse all it takes is a moderate earthquake to turn the statistics on their head. What with our location being only a few score miles off from the boundary between the Eurasian and African plates, a major earthquake is not exactly an unlikely scenario.

Mr M Cachia

Sep 14th 2011, 09:41

It never ceases to amaze me how depressive people are - The poor man made a complement about our Country, appreciate it for God's sake!

Mr John Azzopoardi

Sep 14th 2011, 10:41

Mr Demartino, did you ever leave Malta. In the past there were no jobs, so maltese in their thousands and thousands had to leave the shores of these beautiful island and emigrate abroad.........legallly that is. And they discovered another world out there.

Giovann Demartino

Sep 14th 2011, 11:24

@Mr Azzoppardi. Yes I know. In fact labour governments created the Minister for Emigration and used to send a band to accompany the thousands of Maltese who were forced to leave Malta under labour governments. And up to this very day, thousands of Maltese housewives need not go to work to make both ends meet. I have relatives in Australia, in Canada, in the USA and in the UK. Whenever they come for a holiday they all agree that there is no place like Malta. Why they don't come back? For the very simple reason that they have their families there and wouldn't dream of leaving their granchn behind.

Advert
Advert