Advert

CIA files depict Malta as Libyan terrorist hub between 1988-1991

­­Lockerbie campaigners unimpressed

Abdelbaset al Megrahi who had been found guilty of the Lockerbie bombing, with Saif al-Islam Gaddafi, one of the sons of the Libyan leader, after arriving back in Tripoli. Mr al Megrahi was released from the Scottish prison on August 20, 2009. Photo: AFP

Abdelbaset al Megrahi who had been found guilty of the Lockerbie bombing, with Saif al-Islam Gaddafi, one of the sons of the Libyan leader, after arriving back in Tripoli. Mr al Megrahi was released from the Scottish prison on August 20, 2009. Photo: AFP

Malta was a “primary launching point” for Libyan intelligence and terrorist teams transiting Europe, according to a recent compilation of declassified CIA cables dating between 1988 and 1991.

But campaigners for justice in the Lockerbie bombing case have slammed such claims, describing the CIA’s main informant as a “money-grubbing fantasist” who led the CIA by the nose.

The informant quoted extensively in the 255-page document (taken predominantly from declassified CIA cables released in 2008 and compiled by an international organisation) is Abdul Majid Giaka, whose testimony, as an informant, was pivotal in convicting Abdelbaset al-Megrahi for the Lockerbie bombing, despite the court having cast doubts on Mr Giaka’s credibility and reliability as a witness.

According to Lockerbie campaigner Robert Forrester, the recently compiled cables are so heavily redacted that any effort to corroborate the veracity of intelligence is impossible.

“Giaka was showered with US tax dollars in return for nothing of substance,” he told The Times.

Mr Forrester – who forms part of a group of Lockerbie victim family members who believe Mr al Megrahi was wrongly convicted – also criticised the CIA for showing no indication of having tried to independently corroborate any of the “so-called intelligence”.

“It really does look like [the CIA] swallowed it all, hook, line and sinker, until it finally dawned on them that he was worthless,” he said.

“These additional papers detailing the CIA’s relationship with Mr Giaka, add little to what is already known and to the doubts which have always hung over this case... Malta has absolutely no reason to think that these documents taint the island’s good name any more than it has been.”

However, he added that it is up to the Maltese government to take “concrete steps” to lift the cloud of Lockerbie which hangs over the island.

“The evidence is there which proves that there is no evidence to support this conviction.”

The connection with Malta and subsequently with Mr Al-Megrahi was made when police recovered from the wreckage items of baby clothing bearing the label ‘Yorkie’ made by a Maltese company. The clothing, traced to a Sliema shop, was found in the suitcase believed to have been carrying the bomb. Though the courts decided that the bomb left from Malta, another theory was that it had been placed on board a London-bound plane at Frankfurt airport before reaching the Pam Am jet that was bound for New York. Some still believe Iran, and not Libya, was behind the bombing.

Mr Giaka, the informant who is also referred to as “P/1” in the intelligence reports, was a Libyan working for Libyan Arab Airlines in Malta who decided to cooperate with the CIA in 1988 because he wanted to be relocated and given money to start a new life with his Maltese wife.

In return for months of information gathering and supplying intelligence, he got the CIA to help him get mock-surgery to exempt him from military service back in Libya.

One of the intelligence reports claims that Maltese immigration and airport officials helped Libyan intelligence agents “monitor suspected Libyan oppositionists” in exchange for regular gifts. (Names are not being published for legal reasons.) They were “especially helpful” in helping officials and contacts of Libya’s External Security Organisation (ESO) travel from Malta to Libya without a trace, it was claimed.

Meanwhile, a Libyan living in Malta was used as a conduit to “Maltese Labour Union (a likely reference to the Labour Party) leaders and influential members of the Maltese Nationalist Party”.

The CIA first described Mr Giaka as “intelligent, serious and fairly well composed” as well as committed and capable of passing terrorist-type intelligence on a timely basis.

But the CIA later began to question Mr Giaka’s commitment, saying his financial situation became a major motivating factor in meeting. “[His] procrastination beyond reasonable limits is testing patience,” one report comments.

In his meetings with the CIA, Mr Giaka spoke about the visits to Malta of Mr Al Megrahi and other suspicious Libyan agents. He also speaks about orange-coloured explosives which arrived in Malta while Mr Al Megrahi was here, which were kept stored in a drawer at a Valletta apartment.

In 1991, he was described as “shattered”. He is quoted as having bluntly noted that the Maltese would do anything for money and those at the top of the current government would gladly turn him over if it meant making some cash.

Ultimately, Mr Giaka is described as “a defector from a sensitive position who has served faithfully since his walk-in in 1988” and the CIA concurred that staying in Malta would be very dangerous.

The cables also quote an anonymous Libyan businessman who says the Libyan intelligence presence in Malta would increase significantly in 1989, including personnel within both the ESO and the Libyan military intelligence service. The ESO had recruited a Maltese national employed as a vendor at Luqa airport to assist in acquiring information on persons of interest to the Libyan service, according to the cable.

“This individual prepares biographic and assessment information on personnel of interest to the ESO and forwards his reports to ESO headquarters in Tripoli via a Libyan Arab Airlines courier.”

Advert

41 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Francis Attard

Sep 14th 2011, 17:45

An interesting video about the subject is "The Maltese Double Cross".

Mr James Tyrrell

Sep 14th 2011, 21:03

Out of the mouths of babes Martin! A good question from a 5 year old. A bit like finding the remains of one of the supposed hijackers passports at ground zero!

Mr Peter Korsten

Sep 15th 2011, 00:06

One thing you could advice your nephew, or niece (it's not entirely clear), is not to take any English lessons from you.

Mr Tony Camilleri

Sep 14th 2011, 23:58

add when the temperature would be some 5000 degrees celsius.

Mr JOSEPH ZAMMIT

Sep 14th 2011, 14:53

That's right! In fact when I arrived to that part of the "reliable" informant, I stopped reading the rest and gained some "would-be" wasted time.

Lil min tafu issaqsiex ghalih!!!

Mr Jeffrey Mallia

Sep 14th 2011, 12:18

Yes Mr Brincat, it was Mintoff's fault, because if he did'nt give his seat to KMB, Labour would have won the election, so the terrorists would have been here in labour's rule !!!!!! I't's never ever the PN's fault..........ma taraaaaaaaaaax !!!

John Zammit-Spiteri

Sep 14th 2011, 13:08

dream on !!

some people are just hopeless

Andre Cilia

Sep 14th 2011, 13:45

Have your really read the article (jb)??

Jon Vercellono

Sep 14th 2011, 10:51

I'm pretty certain that many of the prisoners taken off the streets and out of circulation do not benefit only the U.S. but Malta and other countries as well - would you rather they be out and about travelling around? They counter terrorism to make the world a safer place for other countries.

Edward Camilleri

Sep 14th 2011, 12:18

These are the same people who run one of the world's major intelligence agencies, so I'd be guarded in my criticism.

David Doublesin

Sep 14th 2011, 15:11

Actually it was the other round Mr Montebello, US missiles were supplied to IRAN not to Saddam..... But, I'm
letting facts get in the way of your argument.

Ms Emma Falzon

Sep 14th 2011, 17:53

@ David Doublesin.. I'm sure reports say that the US furnished Iraq with weapons, as, at the time, Iraq was seen as a lesser threat than Iran.

Same as, I believe, the US had supplied the afghan mujahideen, who later evolved into the taliban.

I stand to be corrected on both counts.

Mr Peter Montebello

Sep 14th 2011, 19:16

Mr Doublesin, the USA sold military ware to Iran when there was still the SHAH Pahlavi, since it considered him to be their friend. Then there was the revolution and, of course, the USA changed sides and encouraged Iraq to fight Iran. The USA supplied the arms necessary to Iraq and its leader, Saddam Hussein. Later, once more, the USA changed sides and began supporting other Arab countries against Saddam. And created a "hollywood story" to attack him and bring him down. These are the facts.

David Doublesin

Sep 14th 2011, 20:53

@Emma Falzon and P. Montebello

As I said US missiles were supplied to Iran during the Iran – Iraq war (Iran/contra affair). The US did NOT supply SADDAM with major weapons be they missiles, battle tanks, combat aircraft or warships. Iraq was supplied mostly by the then USSR and included main battle tanks like the T72, missiles like SCUD and SAM 6 and combat aircraft like the MIG23.

Mr Evarist Saliba

Sep 14th 2011, 12:58

What dirt about our leaders does this item reveal?

Mr Angus Black

Sep 14th 2011, 14:40

Yes, but the other half is so terrible that the history makers of that era are fanatically trying to rewrite history and telling us to 'forget the past'.

I wonder why.

Mr Jo Camm

Sep 14th 2011, 10:31

There is a very easy reply to your query: The CIA Files had not as yet been updated that the people you mentioned are no longer in power in Malta. Q.E.D.

Mr Wally Vella-Zarb

Sep 14th 2011, 11:54

That's a good one! Hahahahaha! Is that the best that you can come up with, Jo Camm? It is said that a drowning man clutches at a straw. "Q.E.D."

Mr Joseph Aquilina

Sep 14th 2011, 12:05

It takes time to clean the mess left behind by those you mentioned!!

D. A . Agius

Sep 14th 2011, 12:19

JO Camm, read this:

http://www.foia.cia.gov/docs/DOC_0001518838/DOC_0001518838.pdf

marc pace

Sep 14th 2011, 12:25

MI6 not M16

Advert
Advert