Ambassador found Labour comments on PfP 'troublesome'
"The PL, Dr Vella indicated, had come to the conclusion that PfP membership was not contrary to the neutrality clause of Malta's constitution"
Former US ambasador Kmiec
US Ambassador Douglas Kmiec found comments by Labour foreign affairs spokesman George Vella on Malta's participation in Partnership for Peace as 'troublesome' a US embassy cable issued by Wikileaks today shows.
The cable was sent to the State Department and other Washington offices after the then Ambassador had his first meeting with then newly-elected PL leader Joseph Muscat and Dr Vella, a former foreign minister.
"During a November meeting with U.S. Ambassador to Malta Douglas Kmiec, Labor Party leader Joseph Muscat and former Labor government FM George Vella declared that the country's reactivated membership in PfP was invalid, as it failed to comply with Malta's Treaties Act. Though expressing a willingness to accept PfP membership, Muscat's and Vella's comments also signaled Labor's continuing opposition to membership in NATO and make Labor Party acquiescence to any Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) doubtful.," the cable said.
"The party leaders did express their hope for improved Labor Party relations with the U.S. and the embassy.
"A subsequent question by the Ambassador concerning the GOM's (government of Malta) ability to support President Obama's invitation for nations to contribute to peace and stabilization in Afghanistan has ignited public debate over the meaning of "neutrality" in the Maltese constitution and prompted the GOM to suggest a small step forward in our efforts toward closer security cooperation and a Status of Forces Agreement."
The cable says that Dr Muscat welcomed the Ambassador warmly, saying it was important for the PL to improve relations with the U.S. Embassy and with the US government, adding that any reservations he had harbored had been "wiped away" by the new U.S. administration's multilateral approach.
During the conversation, the question of whether PL members would be allowed to participate in an International Visitors Program (IVP) visit to NATO HQ on the subject of Mediterranean Dialogue and other NATO-sponsored programs arose. At this point, Dr Vella announced that the PL considered Malta's current participation in the Partnership for Peace (PfP) to be invalid, since Labor had withdrawn from PfP in 1996, and the current government had no way to rejoin PfP without parliamentary approval. Dr Vella added that since the PL government led by then-PM Alfred Sant had executed a "complete unconditional withdrawal" from PfP (Vella claimed to have himself approved the letter to NATO in his capacity as Foreign Minister), it would have been improper for NATO to have characterized the action as a suspension, and the current Nationalist Party (NP) led government could have had no basis for "reactivating" Malta's membership in PfP.
Dr Vella lamented that the current Nationalist Party (PN) government had "circumvented" Malta's Treaties Act, which required either a resolution or other act of Parliament to ratify any international agreement.
"The PL, Dr Vella indicated, had come to the conclusion that PfP membership was not contrary to the neutrality clause of Malta's constitution, and would have been willing to work with the government to rejoin. The PL, however, remained silent following the government's declaration of renewed membership, Dr Vella said, because of that belief. It did not mean that they accepted the act as valid, however.
Dr Muscat, who, the Ambassador wrote, had taken a clear second seat to Vella in the discussion, added that while PL was ready to change, it could not accept politically being "taken for granted" or "humiliated."
In his comments, the Ambassador said opposition to NATO membership was a long-standing position, based on Labor's interpretation of the neutrality clause in Malta's constitution.
"However, Vella's statements that Malta's PfP membership is invalid are unexpected and troublesome, particularly in view of his acknowledgment of the PfP's intrinsic value and its consistency with Labor's goal of neutrality. It appears to presage continuing PL efforts to focus on partisan advantage without reference to broader national security objectives. Hopes for Labor's buy-in for a SOFA agreement - whether PfP or bilateral - may be a casualty of this attitude.
"The meeting," he added " lso raises the issue of how secure Joseph Muscat's position as PL leader is. At 35, ex-TV and radio personality Muscat is the youngest person to have served in his position. He was elected as leader following PL's defeat in 2008 General Elections, replacing long-time leader Alfred Sant, who served from 1992-2008. Muscat's ceding the lead in this discussion of Malta's national security policy to old-line Labor politician Vella may suggest that he has some way to go to consolidate party control."
The cable says that subsequent to this meeting, Ambassador Kmiec used a public presentation at the Mediterranean Diplomatic Academy (MEDAC) to ask the question: "What does Malta mean by Neutrality?" The Ambassador queried: "neutral as to what?"
He speculated that some might see this language as precluding direct military assistance to the ISAF forces in Afghanistan, but urged that it "certainly ought not be construed to say Malta is neutral as to the cost of terrorism." He concluded by asking, "Will Malta answer the President's call or not? Will Malta supply humanitarian assistance or technical assistance in the form of agricultural training or instruction in the organization of governance?"
Later, in an email communication with the Foreign Minister (Borg), Ambassador Kmiec urged the Maltese government to take steps to make it possible for the U.S. Navy to come to a Maltese port by signing the PfP/NATO SOFA which is an expected step for PfP participants.
"While the Nationalist Party-led government had no immediate formal response, the Prime Minister's Defense Advisor and effective Defense Minister, Vanessa Frazier said the PfP/NATO SOFA can't be signed without parliamentary approval, and opined that the PM could not deliver that. Frazier suggested that the best course would be to execute the SOFA incrementally by means of dip notes, and indicated she would contact the Embassy with a proposal (which would have the approval of the PM's Chief of Staff).
The Ambassador said the dip note offer could be a useful interim step for Malta as it would reacquaint Malta with the value -- economic and associational -- of ship visits. This approach would also be compatible with a memorandum prepared by Admiral Stavridis' staff following Ambassador Kmiec's visit to EUCOM in October 2009 requesting that EUCOM agree to grant SOFA waivers for scheduling at least 5 or 6 ship visits to keep the matter alive while good faith SOFA discussions were ongoing.
The Ambassador also noted that the "outing" of the neutrality issue seemed to have been a watershed moment. "There has been positive editorial commentary noting the Ambassador has raised an issue necessary for Malta to decide. Significantly, PL leader (Joseph Muscat) is quoted as saying that the constitution requires "modernization" going forward, though he then took away some of the significance of this by proclaiming the need to act only multilaterally.
28 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Mr Pat Hobson
Sep 2nd 2011, 16:33
By the looks of it the US of A are already fishing for a puppet come next elections. Are we Independent, A Republic and Neutral or not? Isn't this foreign interference in the political affairs of a country? It has always been the same under a PN government. The MLP wants really independent and neutral, and out come the PN and now we're an EU colony with its Master the US of A pulling the strings! This month the PN will celebrate Mock Indepence, for independent we are not!
Mr john vella
Sep 2nd 2011, 18:24
Sorry my friend I have some slight correction.
1. The U.S. of A. is financially broke and all she has done and still do is help others with money and with blood of her youth fighting for freedom. I suggest you go to one of the Allied Cemeteries where you see acres and acres of crosses with the remains of American soldiers buried in foreign land.
2. The E.U. is not a colony of the U.S. in fact bailouts in the E.U. are covered by German Euro. Yes what Germany did not win with guns she is doing with treaties and to bail out Greece she is taking all here assets (as an example).
3. MLP wanted really independence and neutrality but please forget those times, New Labour Progressive have even the party colours replaced, so far all I hear is divorce, gay, and all faith alliance coming from this leader and nothing on independence.
4.The U.S. of A. is pulling no body's string, in today's world China, India, Brazil, Germany and others can control markets but not independence. We are living in a too small a world.
Mr Tony Camilleri
Sep 3rd 2011, 11:20
1. Mr john vella enjoy how the USA helps other people and countries.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-14745941
US court case reveals CIA rendition details. With this help who needs enemies.
http://www.reprieve.org.uk/press/2011_08_31_rendition_documents/
Huge stash of rendition documents reveal how the CIA covered its tracks
http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-files/Guardian/documents/2011/06/13/court-verbatim-rendition.pdf
Court Verbatim report
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=IM-PRESS&reference=20090218IPR49768&language=EN
Extraordinary renditions: EU Member states are also responsible, MEPs say
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7257574.stm
Miliband's apology over 'rendition'
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10532563
Q&A: UK torture inquiry
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/story/2011-08-31/Court-case-lifts-lid-on-secret-post-911-flights/50209908/1?csp=34news
Court case lifts lid on secret post 9/11 flights
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/billing-dispute-reveals-cia-rendition-flights-044924518.html
Billing dispute reveals CIA rendition flights
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/8734317/US-aviation-dispute-lifts-lid-on-CIA-rendition-flights.html
US aviation dispute lifts lid on CIA rendition flights
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/268547/Rendition-flight-details-revealed/
RENDITION FLIGHT DETAILS REVEALED
2. As for the eu being a USA colony yes it is. Otherwise it will not follow the USA diktat to engage in illegal wars and invasions on false pretenses like they did in Iraq.
3. NO we shall not forget those times. The fact that he USA is wary of the PL means that it is better suited for Malta to look after our interests and not be an obsequious lackey to the USA diktat like the present government.
4. Thank God that China and other countries are emerging and that the USA is going down down down.
victor caruana
Sep 2nd 2011, 16:33
Well, we are not there to satisfy the US interests. When we are nuclearly armed we might rethink it.
Mr Carmelo Micallef
Sep 2nd 2011, 14:38
Eurovision 2013 - Little Joe and the Dinosaurs
Mr Victor Laiviera
Sep 3rd 2011, 08:27
What about AlibabaPN & The Forty Thieves?
Victor Gelfo
Sep 2nd 2011, 13:50
There is only one way forward for our country:
Scrap the outdated by more than 20 years neutrality clause, which has caused nothing but harm and humiliation to our brave nation, and put her place were it rightly belongs.
I wonder how this clause, which entered the constitution by a sort of political blackmail is still there.It renders our constitution a joke.
We all can see what NATO did for the Libyan people.
Mr Tony Camilleri
Sep 2nd 2011, 23:07
Victor Gelfo killed thousands of Libyans and used by the USA to get at Libya's oil.
http://euobserver.com/24/113500
Libya war is Nato conquest of oil-rich south, Russian diplomat says
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-14745941
US court case reveals CIA rendition details
http://www.reprieve.org.uk/press/2011_08_31_rendition_documents/
Huge stash of rendition documents reveal how the CIA covered its tracks
http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-files/Guardian/documents/2011/06/13/court-verbatim-rendition.pdf
Court Verbatim report
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=IM-PRESS&reference=20090218IPR49768&language=EN
Extraordinary renditions: EU Member states are also responsible, MEPs say
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7257574.stm
Miliband's apology over 'rendition'
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10532563
Q&A: UK torture inquiry
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/story/2011-08-31/Court-case-lifts-lid-on-secret-post-911-flights/50209908/1?csp=34news
Court case lifts lid on secret post 9/11 flights
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/billing-dispute-reveals-cia-rendition-flights-044924518.html
Billing dispute reveals CIA rendition flights
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/8734317/US-aviation-dispute-lifts-lid-on-CIA-rendition-flights.html
US aviation dispute lifts lid on CIA rendition flights
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/268547/Rendition-flight-details-revealed/
RENDITION FLIGHT DETAILS REVEALED
Mr Julian Borg
Sep 2nd 2011, 12:26
We don't need a current Ambassador to comment. What we have here are the confidential briefing notes filed by the then US Ambassador. It only goes to show that it is not only the PN that think that Joseph Muscat is not up to it. The PL have a marketer as a leader - devoid of substance or leadership. Obviously the elves will now come out to defend their dear leader and denigrate the US Ambassador - but without substantive arguments.
Fact is he is a lightweight who is easily led and has not policies on anything - and he will turn Malta into a laughing stock on the international scene if and when he is elected PM.
Mr Joseph Aquilina
Sep 2nd 2011, 13:05
Indeed, only those whose brain has been too much brain washed with Labout propaganda believe that Joseph Muscat is able to do anything apart smiling and inventing the next big finger pointing meeting!!
Mr Joseph Aquilina
Sep 2nd 2011, 12:19
From the article one can understand that PL (and most of its supporters) have only one policy, one aim ... not the good of Malta ... but not accept politically being "taken for granted" or "humiliated.". Indeed, they always get the opposite. The article shows what a laughing stock PL and its leadership has done in front of the US ambassador - that is the US. One can only wonder who PL next friend will be now that their Gaddafi is out of the picture!! I can't imagine how the US will trust such people!!
Mr Victor Laiviera
Sep 2nd 2011, 12:37
Is the approval of the US the only thing that matters to you, Mr Aquilina? Do you have such an acute inferiority complex?
Mr Joseph Aquilina
Sep 2nd 2011, 13:03
Mr Victor Laiviera, Indeed no, but I prefer Malta to be considered a western country!! PL never cared for Malta, all they care about is being in power, and to be able to achieve such a thing they where happy to make "secret" deals with Gaddafi and who knows who else ... just shows how much they should be trusted!!
Mr B Grech
Sep 2nd 2011, 13:31
When the first terrorist attack occurs on our soil, and it will come if our government keeps steering us away further and further from our neutrality stance, I d like to see what your comment will be. The US's one and only concern was that a PL government would hinder their military operational activites in the Mediterranean. If you can't see that then I really feel sorry for you.
Mr Joseph Aquilina
Sep 2nd 2011, 14:29
Mr B Grech, Under PN Malta is really keeping itself neutral by only joining UN sanctioned causes!! Under PL we where doing agreements with dictators and terrorists!! I wonder which one of those two is worse!! Malta under PN has won international recognition not only from the US, but also from countries like Palestine, why do you think that happened? The answer is simple, because Malta, under PN, has really become a country which sponsors dialogue between nations, which does what has to be done ... and not only what will make us look good with Gaddafi!!
Mr Tony Camilleri
Sep 2nd 2011, 23:08
Mr Joseph Aquilina I prefer to consider Malta as an independent country and not kowtowing any other country especially the USA and its pax americana.
Mr Tony Camilleri
Sep 3rd 2011, 11:29
Mr Joseph Aquilina mela m'għadkomx tgħidu kontra l-Palestinjani?
Mela jekk il-gvern tiegħek jobdi biss lill-Ġnus Magħquda, għalfejn għadu ma ħelisx il-flus tal-Libjani imma qed jistenna l-ordni mill-ue?
Gvern mill-iktar lagħaqi tal-barrani iktar minn Gvern Nazzjonalista Alla għad irid joħloq.
John Zammit-Spiteri
Sep 3rd 2011, 22:04
Ghandek 100% ragun tony... Il PN ma raqadtx ma gaddafi u tah l'unuri ghax kien habib tal qalb tal partit fil gvern!!! Uhh kemm ghandek ragun!
Mr Victor Laiviera
Sep 2nd 2011, 12:12
How did Douglas Kmiec find time to write this between his praying and his religious ranting?
I would take anything written by an Ambassador who was made to resign with a very large pinch of salt.
Mr Pat Hobson
Sep 2nd 2011, 11:40
It has always been for the PL that "Malta comes first and foremost" Now we have proof.
Mr Joseph Aquilina
Sep 2nd 2011, 12:11
NO PL comes first and foremost!! If you read the article you have seen that all PL want is not to be "humilated"... and in line with this they are ready to not even follow the ideology of the party ...
""However, Vella's statements that Malta's PfP membership is invalid are unexpected and troublesome, particularly in view of his acknowledgment of the PfP's intrinsic value and its consistency with Labor's goal of neutrality."
??? One can only wonder the value of leadership within PL and their real goals!!
Karl Abela
Sep 2nd 2011, 12:30
You meant to say:
It has always been for the PL that "Votes comes first and foremost" Now we have proof.
Mr john vella
Sep 2nd 2011, 13:40
Pat Hobson
Just a slight correction!
It has always been the Malta Labour Party that said and meant 'Malta comes first and foremost' Now we had prrof.
This New PL still have to prove himself?
Mr joseph saliba
Sep 2nd 2011, 10:48
What would have Dr G. Vella say should he find out that Dr Gonzi signed a 'secret' military agreement with the US. Some people should have resigned a long time ago.
FRANS H SAID
Sep 2nd 2011, 10:53
The same when a similar secret treaty was signed with North Korea.
Mr Joseph Aquilina
Sep 2nd 2011, 12:13
@Mr joseph saliba
Definitely not the same things when Labour (as a party) signed agreements with Gaddafi!!!
You know what the problem is ... we have prove that labour did Libya's bidding for the good of the party (not Malta), while you have no proof that Gonzi actually did what you suggest!!
Mr Julian Borg
Sep 2nd 2011, 12:22
What secret agreement did Dr Gonzi sign?
Mr A. Mizzi
Sep 2nd 2011, 10:22
EX-Ambassador !
Is there currently an American Ambassador to comment?