Murder accomplice claims human rights violation
An inmate who has only served just a few months of a 30-year jail term for being an accomplice in a murder claimed yesterday his human rights were violated when he was not assisted by a lawyer before his police statements were taken.
George Pace, 60, known as Il-Berqa, from Birkirkara, whose jail term was confirmed by the Court of Criminal Appeal in May, said the fact that he did not have access to a lawyer before he released three statements to the police amounted to a breach of human rights.
He was one of three men charged over the killing of Nazzareno Ebejer, 66, at L-Aħrax in Mellieħa on April 10, 1989. Mr Ebejer had been shot in the head and chest at point blank range.
Co-accused Carmelo Sant, 60, known as Ħarbat, also of Birkirkara, had admitted to the murder right before standing trial and was also jailed for 30-years.
The third man, Michael Vella, Il-Fish, died during proceedings aged 67.
Mr Sant could not by law testify against Mr Pace because he had still to be sentenced. That meant that the main evidence against him were the three statements to the police, Mr Pace said in the application to the Constitutional Court.
Mr Pace asked the Constitutional Court to award him an effective remedy.
Lawyer Franco Debono signed the application.
6 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Mr Anton Grech
Aug 27th 2011, 15:16
George il-Berqa was instrumental in depriving his victim, the late Mr. Ebejer, of the most basic of human right - his right to life. He now whimpers that his human rights were violated. What nerve! The Constitutional Court should only consider il-Berqa's case only after he has restored his victim's human rights, that is if he can accomplish the impossible task of raising his victim from the grave. Short of that, il-Berqa should serve his entire sentence like a man, instead of whimpering like a sniveling little boy.. He should be mindful of the saying commonly used in North America - "You do the crime, you do the time."
Claudette Rodgers
Aug 27th 2011, 15:16
Fancy being imprisoned for just a few months now, for a crime commited over 20 years ago. I wonder, how come a small time under aged thief is playing with a prison sentence while 3 murderers are only now starting their jail time, and btw, complaining. One of them lived these twenty years with the public with little or no retribution, dying free.
I think these laws are an incentive for big time criminals, and a warning for petty criminals, saying, "think big, the bigger the crime, the more time the court takes to give you a guilty judgement." Oh, and then you can also say you weren't treated right and go back out!
Only in malta
Joseph Mifsud
Aug 27th 2011, 11:11
The government is to study the problem well and ensure that such criminals do not end up going free
Mr Patrick Zammit
Aug 27th 2011, 09:06
What about the Human Rights of the victim?
Noel Mifsud
Aug 27th 2011, 12:12
kindly note that a bill about victims rights is taking ages to pass through parliament and become law because even here the minister is dragging his feet.
those who suffer breaches of human rights are VICTIMS too.
franco debono has been speaking about victims rights, strenghtening the police and suspoected persons rights.
bu the minister just drags his feet
Mr Peter Agius
Aug 27th 2011, 13:15
The victim is DEAD. He cannot pay the lawyer. He has no Human Rights.