Advert

Why Gaddafi reminds me of Labour

Reacting to the liberation of Tripoli on Monday, the Labour Party stated that it was always close to the Libyan people. The truth is that it was always close to Muammar Gaddafi. Right to the bitter end.

Since last February, the PL had pointedly refused to condemn Col Gaddafi even as his forces unleashed a barbaric repression of the Libyan people’s rightful quest for democracy. Instead, the party accused our own government of “rushing” when it recognised the National Transition Council.

This was not surprising for the PL had long been in bed with Col Gaddafi’s regime. During its spell in power in the 1970s and 1980s, it invested heavily in blood-brotherly relations with Col Gaddafi and experimented with some of his authoritarian policies on all of us in Malta as its guinea-pigs.

All this bears recalling. For it is part of our history. No matter how much the PL tries to conceal it.

When Labour took power in 1971, with Dom Mintoff at the helm, our relations with Col Gaddafi’s Libya flourished. Col Gaddafi was Mr Mintoff’s guest of honour at the ceremonies to mark the closure of the British base in March 1979. He was the only head of state to attend the festivities. He came to shower his dubious blessings on Malta in its new role as a non-aligned and neutral state; a superb way of stamping Malta’s neutrality.

For decades, Col Gaddafi exercised a lot of influence on Labour in Malta. At the zenith of his influence in Malta, abundant copies of his Green Book were distributed freely and Col Gaddafi’s portrait, in full military regalia or in traditional tribal dress, often “graced” our public buildings.

Libyan finance played a leading role in the building of the first mosque in Malta, when a Muslim community hardly existed here. Prime property in Valletta, Ta’ Giorni, Rabat, Sliema, Birkirkara and Marsascala was handed over to Libya. Arabic was made compulsory at Maltese schools and feelers were thrown out seeking Arab support for Malta to join the Arab League. And, oh, our passport was green and it displayed a map of the region in which Libya was more pronounced than our own country.

The PL had slowly but surely turned us into “blood brothers” of Col Gaddafi’s regime. And we ended up stuck with a label of a maverick state that was difficult to shake off for years. For Labour had prickly relations with the West but was hopelessly in love with a Libyan dictatorship that sponsored international terrorism and was caught red-handed supplying arms to the IRA.

Labour ministers and – until recently – high party officials, right up to the present Labour leader, frequently visited Libya as guests of Col Gaddafi. And on each anniversary of the September Revolution many travelled on sponsored trips to Tripoli to attend the celebrations as guests of the regime and to listen to Col Gaddafi’s endless speeches glorifying his “revolution”.

This complex association and closeness between Labour and the Gaddafi regime may well explain, at least in part, why, between 1971 and 1987, Labour treated the principle of “one man one vote”, the most hallowed principle in a normal democracy, with such disdain. And why it acquiesced to political violence and thuggish behaviour against its political opponents.

Likewise, it may explain why, when in government, Labour leaned towards state control of education and the media and state-centric economic policies that were rife with corruption and nepotism.

Look no further. That was how Col Gaddafi ran his Libya.

One casualty of the demise of the Gaddafi regime will surely be the spurious Gaddafi International Prize for Human Rights, a dubious award that was granted to Mr Mintoff and to despots of the likes of Cuba’s Fidel Castro and Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez. Some time ago, former Prime Minister and leader of the anti-EU brigade, Karmenu Mifsud Bonnici, travelled to Tripoli to present the prize to Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan. At least this recipient is a democrat.

So it came as no surprise when, bizarrely, Dr Mifsud Bonnici reacted to Col Gaddafi’s imminent downfall last Monday by stating that Col Gaddafi had no option but to fight to the end. To think that our country was ruled by this man and his party.

The end of the Gaddafi regime should induce all countries the world over to undertake a serious self-assessment of why, for years on end, we humoured this cruel dictator. And, yes, that includes us. For even if the last time Col Gaddafi visited Malta was under a Labour Administration, we too retained close relations with Libya until very recently.

But it is the PL that has the deepest soul-searching to do. For the end of the Gaddafi regime brings to the fore a long and inglorious chapter in the history of the Maltese Labour Party.

This may well be a footnote when compared to the immense significance of the Libyan revolution in the broader context of world events. But it is nonetheless a footnote of great significance from a Maltese perspective.

simon.busuttil@europarl.europa.eu

Dr Busuttil is a Nationalist member of the European Parliament.

Advert

75 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Mr M Mamo

Aug 26th 2011, 13:52

Even Sarkozy and Berlusconi shaked hands with Gaddafi ... so? there is a difference between "sleeping in bed with Gaddafi" (inviting him here every year, giving him presents, giving free property etc...) and shaking hands

Paul Camilleri

Aug 26th 2011, 07:10

i think you are very young Mr.Camilleri and can only remember PN governments or otherwise your memory is trapped somewhere else not in Malta

Mr Michael Galea

Aug 26th 2011, 13:15

@ Paul Camilleri
25 years is a Dictatorship !! you can say what you want abut the past! don't forget that Like Gaddafi, Gonzi gives himself a 500euro pay rise while we just get 1.16 euros. So Colin is right.

Mr Robert Tagliaferro

Aug 25th 2011, 11:59

Sur Borg, jekk taqra l-artiklu ta' Simon sew, ma qalx li l-appeasement tar-regim Libjan gie min-naha tal-PL biss. Izda bla dubju tal-Labour qatt ma ittolera ebda kritisizmu ta' Gaddafi. La ikkwotajt artiklu tat-Times, ha nikwotalek artiklu tat-Times jien ukoll (minbarra il-hmerijiet li qal KMB).
U aqra naqra dan l artiklu pls
http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20100313/local/muscat-calls-for-unilateral-action-if-libya-visas-dispute-persists.298030
Possibli ragel INTELLIGENTI bhalek tara biss li jaqbel lillek u titkellem u ssemmi biss dak li jidhirlek ha jaghmel deni lill-PN.

Joseph Borg

Aug 25th 2011, 12:52

Ghaziz Sur Tagliaferro jidher li jew ma qrajtx, jew ma fhimtx jew ma ridtx tifhem il kumment tieghi.....jiena ghedt "Ha niccara l affarijiet: minhix nghid li il PN ghamel hazin li kellu relazzjonijiet tajba ma Gaddafi ...pero tant iehor l anqas l MLP. Li jkollok relazzjonijiet tajba mal pajjizi girien tieghek hija importanti u hekk ghandu jkun u allahares ma jkunx hekk!"

so ma nafx min fejn gibtha li jiena li ghedt biex naghmel xi deni lill PN

Mr Lawrence Fenech

Aug 25th 2011, 13:44

@Joseph Borg.

Prosit ta' l-artiklu iddettaljat u interessenti li wiehed ikun jafhom. Pero, il-kelma "INTELLIGENT" kienet zejda ghax min ikun hekk ma jiktix l-artikulu li kiteb Simon gewwa Brussels li suppost qed jipprappresenta lil-Malta u imhallas min but il-Maltin. Issa drajnieh kollox kontra il-PL.

Victor Gelfo

Aug 25th 2011, 17:51

its really a shame Mr Borg to speak this way about a murderer who has killed his own people FOR 42 YEARS, a tyrant assosiated in international terrorism, and when offered a way out of the mess he created he preffered bloodshed than leaving peacfully.
Are you happy with 'gaddafi given money to pay civil servants'! I will prefer to die of hunger than take from that blood stained money.
How can you confuse international affairs with petty local partisan politics!!!

Dominic Fisher

Aug 25th 2011, 12:33

But are you actually going to address the argument he has made?

Mr Lawrence Fenech

Aug 25th 2011, 13:46

@Edgar Azzopardi.

Hear hear, I agree with you 100% prosit.

Edgar Azzopardi

Aug 25th 2011, 16:01

@Dominic Fisher

What argument, pray?

Busuttil's so called 'opinion piece' is an exercise in mud slinging, no more no less. I am even sorry I am bothering to dignify his piece with my comments.

If you see the photo of EFA clutching on to dear Gaddafi's arm in utter show of reverence during EfA's visit to Libya, , you would soon realise how much Gaddafi reminded the PN of Labour !

If Mr Fisher is detecting any 'arguments' in Busutiil's piece, then he has as vivid an imagination as Busutiil himself .

Mary Mills

Aug 25th 2011, 21:20

"Totally pathetic article". Spot on!
Could, instead, have told us if he's heard any Belgian jokes, lately - couldn't he?!

Mr Joseph Carmel Chetcuti

Aug 25th 2011, 03:01

Perhaps this unity should also be shown by you and Simon Busuttil.

Philip Hili

Aug 24th 2011, 17:22

@ Mr Joseph Grima

Mr Grima, one important thing you have failed to mention. If my reply is address to Mr. Joe Grima the ex. Labour Minister, then let me remind Mr. Grima that it was Gaddafi, the person whom you are praising and even dare to say that the Maltese benefited from Libya who ordered his gunboats to approach the Italian oil-rig "Siapem II" and threatening the crew that if they do not stop drilling for oil in an area awarded to Malta, they will open fire on the rig. May I remind Mr Grima that the area in question was part of the continental shelf the International Court awarded to Malta and therefore the rig was drilling in the Maltese territorial area.
If my reply is not addressed to Mr. Joe Grima the ex Labour MP, then my reply applies to everyone who all along sees only through RED-TINTED GALSSES.

Randolph Peresso

Aug 24th 2011, 14:10

Ok, he mentioned nothing about these last 25 years. But did he in, some way or another, lie about the MLP's very close relationship with the Gaddafi regime?

Philip Hili

Aug 24th 2011, 18:28

@ Jimmy Magro

Hello Jimmy!
Were you the genral secretary of the Malta Labour Party at the time the gun-boats of Gaddafi were ordered to open fire on the Italina oil-rig -"Saipem II" which was drilling for oil in the Maltese continental shelf?

Philip Hili

Aug 24th 2011, 18:05

@Dane Cauchi

What I am going to say is not to defend Dr. Simon Busuttil, but to put things clear.

No, Dr Busuttil was not living in a cuckoo land when the Malta Labour Party brought Muammar Gaddafi in Malta and asked him to address the Labour supporters in Pretty Bay - Birzebbugia. Maybe Dr. Busuttil was still a young student at that time and it may be that he was not interested in politics due to his studies.

Mr michael catania

Aug 24th 2011, 16:40

Mr. Borg talk to any non conservative in Malta and highly likely will say the same thing about the Conservatives in goverment.

Joseph A Borg

Aug 24th 2011, 11:12

great post marlene

Joe Busuttil

Aug 24th 2011, 13:21

Agree with you Marlene. Now if Simon is so know it all,as he thinks he is, why does he not say what he would have done if he were in Mintoff's shoes when he inherited the usual"hofra" from the previous PNers.



Michael Seychell

Aug 24th 2011, 10:05

Mr.A.L.Ganado - In my view it is more pathetic to try to include the Malta LP in the prudent and successful approach to the Libyan crisis, when as stated by Simon in 'Since last February, the PL had pointedly refused to condemn Col Gaddafi even as his forces unleashed a barbaric repression of the Libyan people’s rightful quest for democracy. Instead, the party accused our own government of “rushing” when it recognised the National Transition Council'

I may add that no Malta LP Leader or senior member of this Party has up to this day have condemned Col. Gaddafi for killing of his own people, and nor have appealed to the ex Libyan Leader to go, if not for any reason, at least to stop further the ongoing blood bath.

On reading your comment one can conclude that you either skipped reading unintentionally the above quoted statement, or worse you chose to totally ignore it.

Michael Seychell
Tal-Pieta

David Philip Farrugia

Aug 24th 2011, 10:05

its the third day of tripoli siege and there is still no sign of joseph muscat and the only communication from pl came from George Vella who in the beginning of this liberation saga associated the rebels with al qeida!

Mr Joseph E Briffa

Aug 24th 2011, 10:45

@Albert Leone Ganado .....I cannot understand why you include MLP. As far as I know, Labour has not to this day ever condemned Gaddafi, they never said that Gaddafi should go. The statement by George Vella is nothing else but a force majeur and is just a feeble attempt to convince the NTC that MLP was always very close to the Libyan people, unless GV had Gaddafi and his close entourage in mind. Furthermore, the statement was not issued by the party's leader and was made public only yesterday after Gaddafi and his family went underground. For six whole months there was only long silence about the events in Libya. Labour as usual sat on the fence and waited for the outcome of the crisis before they pronounced themselves. And the way the statement was couched seems to suggest that Labour was not particularly delighted by the outcome.

Mr Tommy Vella

Aug 24th 2011, 11:29

It’s a fact that there are many things that SB could have written about. He could have written about cabbages or kings. But that fact does not make what he wrote any less true. And just in case some may think that this was just a case of opportunism on the then MLP’s part, it was not. The PL always seems to have a penchant for tyrants, their ilk and their methods. We all remember the secret agreement with Kim il-Sung of North Korea aswell as their praises for the then Europe of Cain while denigrating the Europe of Abel, not to mention the Labour government’s shenanigans at the Conference for European Security in Helsinki in the 70s or its behaviour towards those who opposed its policies.
Some might say that this is history and they would be right were it not for the fact thta PL is still riddled with MPs and persons in positions of influence who were very active back then. Not to mention certain recent utterances about how we should use our veto to bring Europe round to what we require, or how Malta should not contribute towards Greece’s second bailout if it did not ratify the protocol necessary for the addition of the extra MEPs.
Come election time I would dearly love to be able to vote for a change in government, because the alteration of power is something very healthy for democracy, but I would say, not under these circumstances.

Victor Gelfo

Aug 24th 2011, 08:56

Mr Piscopo you are really pathetic compairing Malta with LIbya! If you were in Libya you will soon be a

rrested, tortured and maybe even killed.

Mr Joseph E Briffa

Aug 24th 2011, 10:33

@ Mark Piscopo........I would refer to your drastic comment and point out that (1) drastic taxes are introduced for the benefit of having free excellent health and education services, decent salaries in the public sector, pensions. children's allowances, allowances for single mothers and other social benefits; (2) despite the drastic taxes on fuel, the average annual fuel bill in Malta works out at a mere Eur500 which is less than 3% of the average income and some 6% of the minimum wage. That's way the roads are chockful of cars and the Maltese purchase no less than 12 000 cars every year; (3) the wages in private industry can only go up marginally; private industry is there to make profits and they can only make profits through the exports of their products and for this, one has to be competitive. Sharp rises in wages in the private sector would result in a drop in exports with its attendant job losses.(4) the income of MPS does not affect people's lifestyles. People have to manage on their own income, which is not affected in any way by what MPs or anybody else earn.

Advert
Advert