Meaningless Grade I scheduling by Mepa

The Chamber of Architects has very good reason to be concerned that the Grade I scheduling of Manikata church “may have come too late”. As the one who first raised the alarm about the misinformed and insensitive permit for the storage and catechesis...

The Chamber of Architects has very good reason to be concerned that the Grade I scheduling of Manikata church “may have come too late”. As the one who first raised the alarm about the misinformed and insensitive permit for the storage and catechesis facilities, I feel in duty bound to join in its concern. Unless the permit is rescinded, the Grade I scheduling will be meanigless. I speak with the hindsight of the person who, in the early 1990s, was responsible for the first drafting of the then planning authority’s scheduling criteria. A Grade I building means that its architectural integrity (and this includes the building and its footprint) can in no way be compromised. My absence from the island when the Malta Environment and Planning Authority scheduling of the building took place prevented me from commenting earlier. The “significant amendments to the original design” mentioned by Mepa chairman Austin Walker are still within the church’s footprint, which is an essential part of its architectural integrity.

Sign up to our free newsletters

Get the best updates straight to your inbox:

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By subscribing, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing.