Archbishop asks for forgiveness
Criminal proceedings against Fr Sciberras would have been time-barred – victim’s lawyer
Archbishop Paul Cremona addressing journalists after meeting with the victims of clerical sex abuse at his residence in Attard, yesterday. Photo: Matthew Mirabelli
A week after two priests were found guilty of sexually abusing boys in their care, Archbishop Paul Cremona yesterday met most of the victims and asked for forgiveness for the suffering they endured.
“I asked for forgiveness on behalf of the Church for the suffering they went through and I also asked forgiveness for the long time it took (the Response Team) to investigate the cases,” Mgr Cremona said, visibly moved by the meeting at his residence in Attard during which the victims recalled what they went through.
For more than an hour, Mgr Cremona met eight of the 11 victims, who were accompanied by their lawyer, Patrick Valentino, and also prayed with them.
Speaking to the media alone, Mgr Cremona said that Dr Valentino asked for a specific meeting to discuss financial compensation for the victims. This will be held on Wednesday.
Quoting the late Pope John Paul II, Mgr Cremona said covering up mistakes would only lead the Church to commit the same mistakes. “It is only when the mistakes come out in the open that the healing process can start,” Mgr Cremona said.
The Maltese Church, he added, had passed on its findings into investigations on sexual abuse by a fourth priest, Fr Conrad Sciberras, to the Vatican for its decision. The Curia’s Response Team had confirmed that abuse allegations against Fr Sciberras were founded and the case was also investigated by a Church Tribunal.
The Vatican has already defrocked Carmelo Pulis and is looking into the case of Fr Francesco Scerri, known as Godwin, after analysing the conclusions of the Church Tribunal.
Mr Pulis and Fr Scerri were found guilty by the Magistrates’ Court, which sentenced them to six and five years in jail respectively. They filed an appeal yesterday.
A third priest, Bro. Joseph Bonett, who was also facing criminal proceedings died in January.
Mgr Cremona said he understood the emphasis placed on this case because priests were involved but urged the media to focus on child abuse in general because there were many more children who suffered abuse.
Speaking on the steps of the Archbishop’s residence just after the meeting ended, Dr Valentino said criminal proceedings against Fr Sciberras were never taken because the charges would have been time-barred.
He said Archbishop Cremona apologised for all that happened, more so because the abuse took place in a Church home.
“The Archbishop apologised for the time taken by the Response Team to investigate the cases and said the Church was changing the way allegations of abuse are investigated, including the setting up of two committees to conduct investigations,” Dr Valentino said.
Financial compensation to the victims, he added, would be discussed at a meeting with the Church authorities next week.
One of the victims who has fronted the group, Lawrence Grech, said the meeting was positive. “When the Archbishop personally apologised I told him he had nothing to apologise for because he had done nothing to us. I want an apology from Fr Pulis,” he said.
Mr Grech said the abuse they had suffered was wrong but insisted the victims did not want to tarnish all priests.
During the meeting, other matters were also discussed, such as the lack of adequate structures in the country to cater for 18-year-olds who would have left orphanages but had nowhere to live.
One of the victims also raised the issue of fostering and insisted it was important to place unwanted children with families rather than leave them in orphanages.
When asked for his reaction to the sex abuse scandal, a spokesman for Gozo Bishop Mario Grech submitted a list of quotations on the subject from various homilies and statements made by the Bishop since 2006.
In the latest declaration made last week during a meeting of the College of Parish Priests, Mgr Grech asked parish priests to urge people who allege sexual abuse of minors to report their case to him and to the police.
Mgr Grech unreservedley condemned abuse of minors, especially that perpetrated by priests, and described them as “ugly scandals” that destroyed the Church’s credibility.
The spokesman also clarified that Mgr Grech was not a member of the Curia’s Response Team in the 2003 case that acquitted Mr Pulis, then a priest, of sex abuse after being caught in a compromising position with a 15-year-old boy by a careworker.
“However, Bishop Grech was on the Response Team when the case was presented again. In the course of this second inquiry, Bishop Grech resigned from his post in November 2005 when he was nominated Bishop,” the spokesman said.
11 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Elena Borg
Sep 26th 2011, 20:10
No way money will help them to recover worst they will think over and over again, I think so is better that the church take more actions such things will not happen again. They have to find a way to choose the right priests. These things happen not only in the church even out we never know what think the person next to us everywhere we go.
Dennis Zammit
Aug 16th 2011, 12:45
Mr Archbishop,
I admire you alot but in this case, I strongly believe that the solution can NEVER be in monetary terms. If you give someone something, then everyone will come up with a request and the alleged cases or abuse will explode.
Furthermore, there are various other types of abuses by priests and religious. Many are often verbal abuses or threats and therefore, should these also be included in a financial settlement?
Mr Saliba Francis
Aug 14th 2011, 05:57
This surfeit of apologies from the Church authorities for sins committed against its teaching by lapsing members has now reached dangerous proportions. It fuels the lie that in some way or another the Church connived in this abuse. The lie that priests have been moved away from their victims in order to prey on potential victims elsewhere has been repeated much too often in the hope that some of the mud will stick.
Kenneth Cassar
Aug 16th 2011, 08:12
It is a mark of a true leader when he is humble enough to apologize for the misdeeds of members of his staff.
As for the lie that "priests have been moved away from their victims in order to prey on potential victims elsewhere", I don't think anyone ever suggested that.
Mr Joseph Carmel Chetcuti
Aug 16th 2011, 09:52
It has been going on for centuries, Mr Saliba. Try the 16th century for a start: see page 150 of Queer Mediterranean Memories.
Joseph Grech Attard
Aug 13th 2011, 13:17
"... focus on child abuse in general because there were many more children who suffered abuse..." How very true. These incidents are probably the tip of the iceberg, and are followed by such a big audience because a lot of priests think of themselves as infallible and special, when they are as human as anybody else, and are only different when they are performing certain sacraments. What worries me is that is it possible that no girls were ever defiled? Why is it that victims denounce priests and not other lay people? Is it because of the possibility of compensation by the Church? Why does the archbishop (a saintly man, contrary to some who surround him) have to ask for forgiveness and not the accused? Judgement apart, can the accused, as ordained persons, for life, really plead not guilty if they are guilty? What is the truth?
Mr Peter Barbara
Aug 13th 2011, 16:14
Whilst condemning such despicable acts by so called priests, it is an open secret, that the majority of such abuses in families are carried out by......trusted family members. ie uncles, aunts, grandparents.....and horror of horrors.......parents themselves on their own children!
I hope the people recognise this, instead of attacking the Church, left, right and centre for whatever hidden agenda they may have.
Mr Joseph Carmel Chetcuti
Aug 16th 2011, 09:45
Peter, you are partly right. There is abuse by other people in many otehr situations. Yes, families do sweep such crimes under the carpet. But the family does not conduct review teams. It does not appoint a retired judge to head such a team with what appears to be a deliberate intention to confuse the public on whether or not such reviews are being conducted by the state or the church. It makes no determination on the guilt or othherwise of the offender. It does not require those abused to sign confidential documents. It does not masquerade as a State and have documents forwarded to the Vatican so that they cannot be 'discovered'.
Mrs Carmen J. Serracino Inglott
Aug 13th 2011, 12:21
I wish to know how long this business is going to carry on as these people how say have been harmed mentally, have been asked forgiveness by the Archbishop, then by the Pope, they later finalized and won the case against the ex-priests, the bishop asks pardon again. Has money always been on their mind because I don't see this case as a matter for compensation. Why don't they thank the Missioners of St Paul for taking them into their care as probably these people came from unhappy homes. It could very well be that they were even abused of at home. Let's put a finale to the whole business and forget the money and try to find forgiveness in your hearts.
C.J. S. Inglott
Mr Joseph Calleja
Aug 13th 2011, 19:53
Mrs Serracino Inglott, yes everybody from top to bottom has apologized to the men but the two guilty pedophile priests have not, and I don't think they ever will, because if they apologize to these men they will be admitting to committing the crime of abusing these men. No lawyer in his right mind is going for that to happen. So that is the last missing part of the puzzle. No apology is going to satisfy these men except that of the abusers and as they say "Hoss fl-ilma".
Mr Saliba Francis
Aug 13th 2011, 21:44
@ Mrs Carmen J Serracino Inglott.
How right you are! The Catholic Church from His Holiness the Pope down to the humblest priests in Malta have apologised interminably for the sins committed by others, not by themselves nor by the Church, but by individual priests who, being frail human beings like all of us, lapsed from the standards set by Christ and his Church. The regret of the Church authorities for the errors of that small minority of priests has been amply demonstrated. These people, their supporters and their lawyers are not seeking mere apologies. They want cash. They do not want it from the guilty party from whom any settlement could possibly be due. They want it from an innocent Catholic community that donates money so that their Church and the MSSP would be able to carry out its mission of mercy among the needy. The Catholic congregation does not support the Church financially so that their money would be squandered in financial rewards to those who, for many years, never deigned to report the crime to the civil authorities but only woke up from their slumber after the stench of filthy lucre reached their nostrils.