Former Indian PM Gandhi's killers to hang
India's president has rejected mercy pleas from three men convicted of the 1991 assassination of then prime minister Rajiv Gandhi, paving the way for their execution, an official told AFP.
The appeal, sent to President Pratibha Patil by the men -- Murugan, Santhan and Perarivalan, all known by single names -- was their last hope of escaping the hangman's noose.
All three belonged to Sri Lanka's Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) militant group, which was accused of plotting the May 21, 1991 murder of Gandhi by a female suicide bomber.
Gandhi had become India's youngest ever prime minister after his mother, former premier Indira Gandhi, was assassinated in October 1984, and ruled until losing an election five years later.
The shredded clothes and the shoes he was wearing when he was killed while on an election tour in the southern of the country 20 years ago remain on display in a museum in the Indian capital.
"The rejection (of the clemency petitions) happened last week after the president returned from a foreign tour," presidential spokeswoman Archana Datta told AFP.
Although the Supreme Court upheld the original death penalty verdict for the three convicts it later commuted the capital punishment to life in prison for Nalini Sriharan, an Indian Tamil woman who was also convicted.
The three men had sought a presidential pardon after the top court's verdict.
The LTTE, wiped out by Sri Lankan forces in 2009 following a bloody offensive by government troops on the island, always denied its hand in Gandhi's assassination.
But the militant group's now-slain leader Velupillai Prabhakaran went on to honour the assassin's father as a "great person who contributed to the Tamil cause."
Gandhi's killing was seen at home as retaliation for a 1987 Indian government pact with the Sri Lankan government to disarm the guerrillas, who had been trained and armed by New Delhi in the early 1980s.
After that pact, the LTTE fought Indian troops deployed to the island by Rajiv Gandhi's government to supervise the accord. India withdrew its troops after 32 months in which it lost 1,200 soldiers at the hands of the rebels.
Ten Indians and nine Sri Lankans sentenced to death by a lower court for their involvement in Rajiv Gandhi's assassination were freed after they were acquitted by the Supreme Court in 1999.
The last execution in India was in 2004 when a 41-year-old former security guard was hanged for the rape and murder of a 14-year-old schoolgirl in Kolkata city.
An anti-death penalty lobby group condemned the rejection of the clemency petition.
"It has been well established that capital punishment does not help to reform society," said Kirity Roy of the privately-run South Asia Network Against Torture and Impunity.
"If India wants to portray itself as a civilised nation and aspires to fulfil its obligations to international norms then it must abolish the practice," Roy told AFP by telephone from Kolkata.
"There were 12 rapes almost immediately after the guard's hanging and so it proves the death sentence is not a deterrent," argued Roy, urging President Patil to re-think her decision.
In May, Patil rejected a mercy petition from a murderer in the northeastern state of Assam, leaving the state scrabbling to find a hangman.
Many of the small number of known hangmen nationwide have either died or retired in recent years.
6 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Mr Kurt Waschnig
Aug 11th 2011, 22:24
Rejecting mercy pleas from three men convicted of the 1991 assassination of then prime minister Rajiv Gandhi by the President of India must be strongly condemned.
India is called the "biggest democracy" on earth and up to now India has stable and working democratic institutions.
A democracy shall not carry out executions.
The death penalty should not have any place in a civilised country and the history of the death penalty has shown that it does not work as a deterrent.
The last execution carried out in India was in 2004.
Hanging people is gruesome and a crime against dignity and humanity and Kirity Roy is right: " "It has been well established that capital punishment does not help to reform society."
Especially Christians shall fight peacefully against the death penalty. No society and institution has the right to sentence others to death and to carry out executions.
Nations who call themselves civilised, democratic and liberal shall apply the criminal law and sentence criminals who commit severe crimes like murder etc to a lifelong imprisonment but the death sentence should be avoided.
I feel glad that the death sentence does not exist within the European Union any longer.
We as European shall be proud to live in democractic and liberal and secular societies with independent judiciaries and a criminal law that does not contain the death penalty.
I hope that India will abolish the death penalty only then it can fulfil its obligations to international norms.
The world needs an India without corruption and without the death penalty.
Best regards
Kurt Waschnig Oldenburg Germany
Charles Sammut
Aug 13th 2011, 10:37
HANG 'EM HIGH!!!!!
Mr Joseph Calleja
Aug 11th 2011, 18:39
I have just one question to people against the death penalty. They say it is a cruel and unusual punishment. So what do they say to the victim? It seems we give more of a damn for the killer than the victim. No my friends and sympathizers, let those murderers get the justice they deserve, and that is a public hanging. Since when has the murderer become more dignified than the victim. If the death penalty is not a deterrent it sure guarantees that those convicted of murder will never get the chance to do it again. Why not ask the family's victim how they feel after one of theirs has been innocently murdered? I guarantee you that the bleeding hearts will think different. Min igarrab ikun jaf. Cruel and unusual punishment is taking the life of an innocent victim. A life for a life sounds fair to me.
Mr Peter Korsten
Aug 11th 2011, 19:53
Somebody has to stop the killing. Somebody has to be civilised. It's not going to be the killers, but we can choose to be.
Killing is wrong. Period.
Mr Edward Muscat
Aug 11th 2011, 21:45
Two wrongs don't make a right. You don't solve an issue by something more negative. And besides, history is full of innocent victims given the death penatly. Mr. Calleja, please come forward to the 21st century...
Mr Kurt Waschnig
Aug 11th 2011, 22:58
Dear Joseph, you argue about the death penalty emotionally. Only an unbiased discussion and arguments are helpful.
Liberal constitutions, an independent judiciary, stable and working democratic institutions, an independent press, freedeom of the media and speech, liberal constitutional rights and a secular nation help citizens to life in dignity and freedom and they are protected by a criminal law that does not contain the death sentence.
Aplying the criminal law in the right way has always shown that murderers were sentenced to long imprisonment.
Our liberal rights are protected. Every death penalty carried out is a danger for democracy and we as citizens shall defend our liberal rights.
The Criminal law works in most European countries successfully without the death penalty.
Best regards
Kurt