Controversial Mġarr petrol station plans approved by Mepa
A controversial application for the building of a new petrol station outside a development zone near Mgarr was approved by the Mepa board this morning, despite objections from environment NGOs.
The petrol station will replace the one at Mgarr Square opposite the church. The new petrol station will be built on Mgarr Road, Zebbiegh. The owner has also promised to close down a scrap yard close to the existing petrol station and restore the site to agricultural use. The scrap yard had been the subject of Mepa enforcement notices.
The NGOs had argued that the relocation of the petrol station from the heart of the village would relieve one area of an eyesore and health hazard, and inflict it on an outside development zone.
The Case Officer had recommended approval of the application, which provided for a service station and an adjoining showroom and workshop, a car wash, a jet wash and a parking space built over 2,406 square metres of agricultural land.
The Mepa board members voted 6-4 in favour of the development, with chairman Austin Walker saying that it was not ideal that petrol stations were built outside development zones, but all factors had to be considered, including an outline permit granted in 2006.
Many Mgarr residents turned up for the meeting, led by the Mayor, and spoke in favour of the relocation, insisting the main square was not the proper place for the petrol station.
Earlier, the Mepa board approved plans for the building of an air traffic control radar tower off the airport runway, near Hal Far.
99 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Chris J Vassallo
Aug 12th 2011, 18:45
Why should the state waste millions on MEPA when it blatantly disregards fundamental planning principles and its own policies?
In my view, MEPA has reduced the planning process to a cross between a lottery and an auction. MEPA’s track record post reform has not gained any respect; in fact this permit shows that its record on consistency and impartial judgement has gone from bad to appalling.
The mother of all failed reforms is not the transport reform but the MEPA reform; the cost of this failure is far greater, they are irreversible.
Joseph Camilleri
Aug 12th 2011, 13:15
What stinks to high heaven is, in fact, the cushy job of armchair critics! I would bet my botton euro that the song would be different if the shoe were in the other foot.
Steve Zammit
Aug 12th 2011, 14:10
Yawn
Alan Deidun
Aug 12th 2011, 06:33
Next time you note dumping of inert waste or scrap in a field or stretch of garigue, report such an infringement immediately, since that could be the start of much larger things to do - the strategy out there at the moment is: take a prime ODZ site which is fit for your ultimate purpose, degrade it in a piecemeal fashion so as not to attract too much attention and then apply for a development permit (petrol station, pump room, farmhouse, stables, etc, etc) under the ruse that your development will lead to a general improvement in the area
mariella bellorofonte
Aug 12th 2011, 22:57
Well said Mr Deidun, from an eyesore practically they would be replacing it with a less shabby looking polluting machine for our much "respected environment!"
Ms jeneba caruana
Aug 11th 2011, 23:22
makes me sick!!
Joe Fenech
Aug 11th 2011, 23:11
MEPA strikes again!
Mr John Camillleri
Aug 11th 2011, 23:11
Can anyone, please, or the editor, post a photo of the land earmarked for destruction? Are not garrigues, giren and agricultural land the heritage of us all as a nation? Why are we robbed of them for ever? How can this destruction be stopped? Please do something whoever has the power to act effectively!!
Mr twany sciberras
Aug 11th 2011, 19:58
The owner has also promised to close down a scrap yard close to the existing petrol station and restore the site to agricultural use.
So is some thing illegal being justified for a new permit relating to some thing else?
Shame MEPA. Reform ?
Astrid Vella
Aug 11th 2011, 19:51
Steve, The Environment Protection Division (EPD) approved the uprooting of protected trees. The Heritage Advisory Committee were not consulted about the giren and the EPD claimed that this mega-petrol station of 2,500 square metres (two and a half times the size of the refused Arriva Depot) would have "No visual impact"
It stinks - to high heavens!
Joe Brincat-LL.D
Aug 12th 2011, 13:06
Dear Astrid, you mention that there was an opinion that does not cause any "visual impact". It all boils down how you look at it. If it on an architects plan laid on a table, and you kneel down next to the table at the level of the top, I can assure you there will be no visual impact !!!!!
Astrid Vella
Aug 11th 2011, 19:51
Steve, The Environment Protection Division (EPD) approved the uprooting of protected trees. The Heritage Advisory Committee were not consulted about the giren and the EPD claimed that this mega-petrol station of 2,500 square metres (two and a half times the size of the refused Arriva Depot) would have "No visual impact"
It stinks - to high heavens!
Joe Fenech
Aug 11th 2011, 23:13
Why do people like you waste their time with Malta? MALTA IS A HOPELESS CASE and nothing will change it.
Mr Paul Abela
Aug 12th 2011, 07:00
It stinks - to high heavens!
Ms.Vella it really stinks whenever you put your nose in it.
''As usual I am not against removing the Petrol Station from the Mgarr Square BUT,BUT & BUT.''
As usual since you own your own house you don't want others to built theirs.
Carmel Cilia
Aug 12th 2011, 07:22
Miss Vella thanks for what you are doing but you must by now have realised that the hidden hand behind MEPA was and is still there. In Malta hypocrisy is the name of the game. They say that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Twenty five years in power corrupts the most innocent of minds.
Steve Zammit
Aug 11th 2011, 19:29
This is madness
ODZ is and ODZ
Come on this isn't just going to be a petrol station ! It includes a show room, car wash, jet wash and car spaces!! If they really had to built it there, then so be it, but to add a showroom?! What cheek !! And when you consider that just 3 km away there is already a petrol station, near Chadwick Lakes!
Zgur hawn xi haga tinten fin-nofs
I agree perfectly with what Joe Attard wrote below
And what is going to happen to the girna? Is the Carob Tree going to be uprooted too? Isn't the Carob Tree suppose to be a PROTECTED tree? Or is it protected only on paper?
I have lost faith in MEPA
Please take off the 'E' from your name
Mr Victor Laiviera
Aug 11th 2011, 19:23
Three years ago, in his much-trumpeted "reform" of MEPA, Prime Minister Gonzi said that "ODZ is ODZ".
Another pre-election promise gone with the wind.
Astrid Vella
Aug 11th 2011, 19:03
This is unforgivable. No one has argued against moving the petrol station away from the main square, but how in heaven's name can MEPA approve a permit on ODZ land that includes a two protected giren and garigue. Justifying this permit on the grounds of the 2006 Outline permit is totally fallacious since today's permit which includes far more than a petrol station - a vehicle showroom, car wash, and panel beater/mechanic - is two and a half times larger than the original permit! That alone should have given MEPA the grounds to refuse this permit!
This is exactly like the case of Wied il-Ghasel, where the first permit was for a home for the elderly, and then morphed into speculative flats in the second permit which was irregularly accepted. Lo and behold, it was by the same architect!
As we have said all along, until MEPA reform is ruled by ethics, there can be no reform, just two steps forward and one big step back. If MEPA is going to spend the next five years honouring abusive pre-reform permits, then MEPA reform becomes a mockery and environmental criminality wins once again.
We invite all who are outraged by such permits to add their voices to ours and join FAA on http://www.faa.org.mt/become_a_member
Mr Ivan Calleja
Aug 11th 2011, 18:46
The greatest shame we have in Malta is called MEPA!! and hope my comment is not censored as it is always done when i say a word against MEPA!! I am ashamed to be Maltese for another time!! PLEASE, dear DR.GONNZI DISMANTLE MEPA NOW!!!
Julia Cauchi
Aug 11th 2011, 18:45
Listen people you are all commenting about this guy that should have relocated this petrol station to the quarry near by, but I think you missed out one point; Does the owner of the quarry want to sell his land?
Mr Victor Laiviera
Aug 11th 2011, 19:11
The Government has the power to requisition private land when it is required for public purposes, on payment of adequate compensation.
And it makes use of this power very frequently.
Alicia Said
Aug 11th 2011, 17:57
I fully understand the diverging arguments towards this issue.. It is a fact that the Mgarr square was facing dangerous traffic jams due to the current positioning of the petrol station, hence a relocation was needed. On the other hand, I hope that the authorities have taken all the necessary measures to ensure a plausible environmental approach considering that the petrol station is now to be developed in an ODZ.
Also.... I cannot see any correlation between the issue of boathouses and the petrol station!
Paul Borg
Aug 11th 2011, 18:31
Alicia, what 'plausible environmental approach' can be taken by a permit allowing a petrol station plus showroom, plus car wash, plus vehicle showroom in an out of development zone which includes 2 giren, and is just 250m away from the Ghajn Rihana water catchment?
Move the petrol station out of the main square by all means, but to a sensible alternative location, not simply to a ODZ site that the petrol station owner bought cheaply.
Julia Cauchi
Aug 11th 2011, 18:51
Mr Paul Borg, Please note that in the area allocated there are no ''giren'' !!! Do you have a site plan of the new petrol station so you can check it out.... :)
Astrid Vella
Aug 11th 2011, 19:07
Miss Cauchi maybe you should visit the site yourself - the photo on yesterday's article was shot in this field. Patri Mikiel Fsadni featured this picture in his popular book 'Il-Girna-Wirt arkitettoniku u etniku Malti '. on page 69. Another Girna found on this site is featured in the same book on page 74. Shame on everyone involved in this relocation.
Mr Karl Attard
Aug 11th 2011, 21:51
Alicia from an environmental perspective I am at a loss as to how you can 'fully understand the diverging arguments'. Is there even a single plausible argument for relocating to this particular site?
Alan Deidun
Aug 12th 2011, 06:28
I know of a number of Mgarrin who are similarly outraged by the development but are coy about speaking out since the village is still governed by a sort of stigma which befalls anyone who decides to go against the flow - i.e. against the will of the majority - even all the local councillors have to toe such a line since their opposition to the development would certainly mean an end to their political future, and by this I am referring to bi-partisan politics and not to just one faction.
Ms Said - its easy to see the correlation between boathouses and the petrol station - some have said that since the majority of the Mgarr people want the development, then this must happen - I reiterate, if the majority of the Mgarr people want the Gnejna boathouses, should these stay????
Zebbiegh is going down the same lane taken by other former hamlets, like Bahrija, Bahar ic-Caghaq, etc with some , like Bidnija and Wardija, fast catching up - such hamlets are fast being gobbled up by the surrounding urban fabric as their residents, formerly exclusively farmers, clamour for more and more facilities - thus, Zebbiegh is fast looking like a suburb of Mosta.
I agree with those saying that it is a farce that the Mgarr Local Council has its own environmental committee and which simply promotes the planting of trees, the frawli festival, etc, so as not to rock the boat
Alicia Said
Aug 12th 2011, 07:56
@ Karl - I can fully understand the diverging arguments since I am an Mgarr resident and I have an environmental conscience.. As opposed to a number of posts (flawed comments) being conveyed in this thread I have to face the chaos present in the square on a regular basis since a petrol station in the heart of the Mgarr square is not practical at all.. The relocation of the new petrol station will surely impose a visual impact however it will displace the regular turmoil present in the square..
@ Paul Borg 'Plausible environmental approach' - using impermeable matter to prevent any fuel discharge into the Ghajn Rihana water catchment...
Mr Karl Attard
Aug 12th 2011, 14:25
Alicia I grew up in Zebbiegh and my family still lives there.
I don't think anybody is arguing the relocation of the petrol station- I certainly am not- but as a person with an environmental conscience you should be well aware that supporting the development of a garigue area is nothing short of an indictment of one's environmental literacy.
I fear the people in favour of the relocation to Triq L-Imgarr (which isn't a relocation at all but a huge transmogrification) are just thinking in terms of 'L-aqwa li mhux fuq l-għatba tiegħi'.
Joe Attard
Aug 11th 2011, 17:54
Kif qal tajjebIl-Perit Franco Montesin dalghodu waqt is-smiegh"L-applikant ghamel mandra u se nippremjawh".U l-membri tal -kunsill Lokali jcapcpu.Veru ma jistghux jitkellmu fuq ambjent L-aqwa li ghandna L-Kummissjoni Ambjent go L-Imgarr biex inhawwlu s-sigar .Ghan nies ta`L-Imgarr ambjent xi ghalqa frawli jew xi flower arrangement.Art pubblika ta` kulhadd li ntilfet ghal dejjem.L-applikant,kif qal Dr.Deidun,laghab karta u rnexxilu.
Alicia Said
Aug 12th 2011, 08:01
Ma nafx minn fejn gietek l-idea li Kummissjoni Ambjent Mgarr ihawwel is-sigar!!! Ahjar tkun taf il-fatti qabel timplika u tghaffeg fil-kliem!! Barra minn hekk nixtieqek tinfurmani dwar sitwazzjonijiet ta' art pubblika li ntilfet ghal dejjem gewwa l-Imgarr..
Carmel Ellul
Aug 11th 2011, 17:51
All petrol stations sited inside the towns and villages of Malta are simply contributing to poisoning the air around them with cancerogenic VOC's. The old storage tanks in many of them simply leak into the ground and it is impossible to decontaminate. This leached fuel could actually reach the water table with disastrous consequences.
The Mgarr petrol station could have been possibly one such case.
We should all expect that petrol stations are located away from inhabited areas for the safety of all.
These small stations should join up and move out of the built up areas , while the government should declare a time limit for these to move out. This could be done after a comprehensive study is made between Authorities , Regulators , Petrol pump owners, hopefully with both Political parties contributing but not vote counting.
These should be built in ODZ . This is the only way to keep them away from inhabited areas.
Of course ODZ areas should remain ODZ areas for the next 25 years after the stations become operational.
Mr Peter Murray
Aug 11th 2011, 17:45
This new proposal could double as a depot for Arriva-maybe thats the method in their ultimate madness!
Mr Patrick Zammit
Aug 11th 2011, 17:28
What happened to Gonzi's pre electoral promise of "ODZ is ODZ."?
joseph gaffarena
Aug 11th 2011, 17:28
And that state of the art and most safest station in maltas is still being closed .
Im refering to GAFF PETROL STATION IN QORMI.
This station is the most advcanced petrol station in malta.
But because there is a two storey offices ,it is being kept closed by mepa.
But they gave a permit to this new station??????? why????????
Maria Vassallo
Aug 11th 2011, 17:01
Well done, MEPA!
Nature Trust and company should be held responsable for those petrol stations which are still operating in inhabited areas around the island and which are very dangerous because of health and safety issues.
Mr Adrian Borg Cardona
Aug 11th 2011, 18:02
Ms Vassallo: your blind politial comments have been noted - there is no need to show us that you do not even bother to read what others say. Kindly note that the NGOs have said clearly that they are not against relocating the petrol station to outside the built up area - but only to an area which is already disturbed. Of course, your darling government is always happy to see pristine, unused land being used for commercial purposes, right? Because in this country, money comes before anything else.
Mr Ivan Calleja
Aug 11th 2011, 18:48
Ara vera ma tisthix tikteb well done MEPA!!! u takkuza lil Nature Trust!! Missek tisthi!! L-anqas biss fhimt l-argument taghhom!! Biex tara kemm int brava!!! Remove your blinkers please!!
Steve Zammit
Aug 11th 2011, 19:32
Well done MEPA?
Joke of the day
Franco Farrugia
Aug 11th 2011, 21:10
@ Ivan Calleja: Din 'Maria Vassallo' hija l-ahhar zieda fil-grupp ta' apologisti li iktar jaghmlu hsara milli gid!
Charles Micallef
Aug 11th 2011, 16:47
I have full sympathy with the NGO's, but the fact remains that out of all the applications submitted to exploit green belts / odz, moving petrol stations from town centres must be considered a priority, if for no other reason, for safety's sake! I get the shivers when i pass by petrol stations in built up areas or worse still town centres, they served their purpose when they were built with the few cars that there were on our streets at the time, but as we all know things changed!
Paul Borg
Aug 11th 2011, 17:52
Mr. Micallef, while we agree wholeheartedly with your concerns, I'm sure you're well aware of all the disturbed sites on the outskirts of every village in Malta. Surely you agree that they would be a much better location than a green field channeling water to a reservoir, where both protected garigue and giren are to be found.
Mr Adrian Borg Cardona
Aug 11th 2011, 18:03
Petrol statuins should move out - but why add a showroom, etc? Is this a tit-for-tat arrangement between MePA and the petrol station owner? This is what it looks like to me.
Mr Joe Mallia
Aug 11th 2011, 16:17
We heard so much talk that ODZ is ODZ. But the powers that be have a short memory. Keep on destructing what is left of the natural environment.
Mr Jo Camm
Aug 11th 2011, 15:54
Sometimes you are force to choose the less evil.
D M Grech
Aug 11th 2011, 17:05
All the time
Franco Attard Trevisan
Aug 11th 2011, 15:34
1 - the petrol station removed from were it is ..... I AGREE it's surely needed
2 - the existing scrap yard removed ..... I AGREE it's surely needed
3 - building a new petrol station away from the Mgarr center ....... I AGREE it's surely needed
4 - building a showroom, workshop, car wash, jet wash and parking spaces in an ODZ ??????????? ........ WHAT IS MEPA THINKING??????? WHO IS THIS CASE OFFICER??????
Mr david debattista
Aug 11th 2011, 16:03
Make a change , Stop abuse, Save our environment Join the FAA
Mr Joe Gatt
Aug 11th 2011, 17:13
So they will build in an ODZ,
But no one is obliged to use their services, unless one wants to.
One has the option not to use their services, if one objects.
Simply boycot businesses that are built in ODZ.
Spend your money where the business respects the Environment,
Marie Claire Vella
Aug 11th 2011, 15:23
Il ''petrol station'' li hemm vera mhix pratika u safe... il kju tal karozzi jispicca jigi fil main road ... inti u taqbez il kju biex tkompli sejra ghal wara il knisja, tistenna li issib xi karozza ohra gejja mil genb, ma wiccek !! jien ukoll nipreferi nohrog mil imgarr ghal petrol ... naqbel mad decizjoni.
Mr Mike Farrugia
Aug 11th 2011, 15:56
Two wrongs don't make a right. ODZ from all places?
Mr david debattista
Aug 11th 2011, 16:05
Make a change , Stop abuse, Save our environment. Join the Faa
Mr Carmel (Nenu) Aquilina
Aug 11th 2011, 15:18
Prosit għall din l-inizjattiva ambjentali u ħarsien tas-saħħa tal-poplu fl-Imġar Malta!
Dawn il-petro stations fl-abittant għandhom jiġu rilokati kollha barra l-abitat.
Dawk kollha huma ta' periklu kbir għas-saħħa tal-bniedem mill-fumes kontinwament ħerġien, speċjalment lir-residenti ġirien tal-pompi tal-petrol.
Alla veru jħobbna li qatt ma ġrat xi waħda kbira u mietu partita nies.
Allura mhux aħjar isir pjan bis-serjeta u dawn il-pompi tal-petrol jitneħħew mit-toroq u l-pjazzez ta' l-ibliet u l-irħula ta' Malta u għawdex darba għall-dejjem mill-anqas żmien possibli qabel ikun tard wisq.
Kuraġġ Sinjuri ħudu din id-deċiżjoni verament favur is-saħħa tal-poplu Malti u Għawdxi!
Mr Jowey Brownie
Aug 11th 2011, 16:18
Yes that's right what about the petrol station in the middle of the square at Naxxar
Steve Zammit
Aug 11th 2011, 19:40
Re: ''Dawn il-petro stations fl-abittant għandhom jiġu rilokati kollha barra l-abitat. ''
Ok so lets also relocate the small petrol station found in the main square at Haz-Zebbug
Make sure its built in an ODZ, preferably in prisitne unspoilt land, destroying a girna and some Carob Trees in the process. Whilst you are at it, also include a show room, a workshop, a car wash, a jet wash and parking spaces too. When ready, make sure that an olive tree or some palm trees are planted, so one can say that the environment was taken into consideration! Oh give us a break
I'm not against the moving of the petrol station. But to built it in an ODZ, and on pristine land is pure madness, all this when the closest petrol station is just 3 km away. Why cant they use any other disused warehouse or space in Mgarr itself instead !?!
Emma Balzan
Aug 11th 2011, 15:16
With all due respect Mr Deidun, you don't know what you're saying. I live in Mgarr and i will use all facilities offered by this petrol station.
Farmers due use petrol, diesel and more. By any chance do you think that the farmers travel with the carts and a hourse. Don't you know that they too have a car !?!?!
Steve Zammit
Aug 11th 2011, 15:40
Emma I think you are not getting the point ! Alan Deidun is not against the re-locating of the petrol station. I think practically everyone agrees on that. What he and others like myself are trying to point out is why should virgin land be sacrificed when the petrol station could be easily built in one of the abandoned existing depots and construction scraps instead?
ODZ is an ODZ...whats the point of having an ODZ and one can still build in it? Why can't we build in the existing perimeter? Why do we always have to expand?
Come on, it isn't just a petrol station !! + ''showroom and workshop, a car wash, a jet wash and a parking space'' and its built on ''2,406 square metres of AGRICULTURAL land.''
Get it?
Alan Deidun
Aug 11th 2011, 16:07
Good for you ms balzan. Next time you are happily splashing round in the new car wash to be developed, just spare a thought for the ghajn rihana catchment area and reservoir, just 250m and down the slope from the approved site. Experience teaches us that local authorities lack the resources and manpower to monitor compliance with permit conditions on a continuous basis. Siting a petrol station and workshop just 250m from a water catchment area is tantamount to throwing oil at ta kandja. My house is at least 3km from the nearest petrol station. I will start thinking of petitioning my own village MEPA sub committee to get me a station just outside the village, since each village seems to want to have mepa powers delegated to itself. The owner twisted mepa ARM perfectly by illegally expanding the scrapyard close to the square and then only agreeing to clearing everything if he was given an alternative andc BIGGER site. Chapeau, you have been conned mgarr by this sleight of the hand
Christian Sciberras
Aug 11th 2011, 15:06
Let's forget the station for a bit and focus on the development zone.
Now go look at the latest footage from Tripoli.
In case you're not sure where I'm going to, the development zone looks more like no-mans-land than under-construction.
Who's fault is it? The developers and MEPA. The earlier do whatever it takes to build anything cheaply, while the latter fine irrelevant irregularities. The epitome of excellence...NOT.
Alan Deidun
Aug 11th 2011, 14:24
u hallina David - there are numerous other sites in Mgarr, currently being used as depots of construction debris and scrap, with the blessing of some farmers, where the petrol station could have been sited - are the farmers going to use the petrol station's car wash facilities too????????????
David Battistino
Aug 11th 2011, 14:52
Mr Deidun, who is so naive to hand out his depot to somebody else to build a pumping station on it?
if they know that a permit may be issued they would keep it for themselves.
I agree with you that you were 'the one to successfully push for the eviction of the caravans from Gnejna bay' (I know, as you well know, that I was with you all the way about it) but does that mean you are always right in your envirolmental opinion?
I rest my case and leave it to the competent authorities.
Mr Victor Laiviera
Aug 11th 2011, 15:48
Sadly, Mr Battistino, the authorities involved seem to be singularly INcompetent - or worse.
Mr John Portelli
Aug 11th 2011, 16:21
Mr. Battistino,
Your comment is very unfair on Dr. Deidum. He has always worked in the interest of all. What I cannot understand, and I do not know if you have any interest in it all since you are from Mgarr, why should one that has been in breach with the law, since 1996 get rewarded to the porkerija that he inflicted in the area.
Though you might have an explenation?
David Battistino
Aug 11th 2011, 18:25
@ John Portelli - I was not going to reply but since you have or may implied that I 'have any interest in it all since you are from Mgarr' I had no other option.
1. My sole interest today is like all Imgarr residents as you well pointed out, no more and no less. Today life has changed and the traffic flow entering the picturesque village square doesn't help that bit the environment. Like it was pointed out during today's MEPA meeting (to which I was present) visiting tourists and Maltese residents, point out to the environmental eyesore that we have next to a green protected area unique in Malta. I don't want to go into the merits of who permitted such to happen but surely something had to be done.
2. When I was in a position to decide (having served for 9 years as a member of the Mgarr Local Council) I did vote against structural upgrading (a canopy) above the petrol pumps situated in the village square -and this is minuted.
3. If you had been at the MEPA meeting, you could have heard the Chairman's statement that an outline development permit was already issued in 2005 and 'that one cannot go back in time and change things'.
All I am seeing is, that today a balance has been struck, between the environmental gain in the core village area and that being lost on the periphery. That the developer's right to his private business covered by a valid Licence, has been met and last but not least that the Imgarr residents will be served better.
Mr R ferriggi
Aug 11th 2011, 14:03
number 1 ; the petrol station as it was ,,, was not acceptable.
number 2 ; the zebbiegh road close to the buildings has some parts of it which were degraded. i do not see anything extraordinary for a petrol station ( WITH ALL STANDARDS ADHERED TO....) to be built.
if someone said ; the road to golden bay,,, i would agree that it is not good.
even the BUQANA petrol station is out of place there!!
but to build it close to built-up area,,,, nothing worng. all in all.
AND IF ALL CONDITIONS ARE STRICLTY ADHERED TO.
Paul Borg
Aug 11th 2011, 17:58
And since when are all conditions even imposed in Malta, let alone adhered to?!
Claudia Azzopardi
Aug 11th 2011, 13:38
"The owner has also promised to close down a scrap yard close to the existing petrol station and restore the site to agricultural use."
Cannot the owner use this as a petrol station instead of ruining more agricultural land? From the photo above it looks as if there is enough space and it also has an adjacent road for access.
Emma Balzan
Aug 11th 2011, 13:30
I would like to thank MEPA. Finally one gd decision! I comletly agree with Mr Mark Galea the Mgarr people know whats best for them.
Re. Mr Deidun you clearly dont want the petrol station, is it maybe that you have something towards the owner and not the location. I think you might as well sleep on the doorsteps of MEPA and complain for each every permit they issue to build apartments.
Alan Deidun
Aug 11th 2011, 14:22
how paternalistic and blinkered - the people of Mgarr know what's best for them - yeah, this reminds me of the MEP campaign over 2 years ago when, during a visit to the village, I was confronted by a contractor who was illegally using his fields to dump scrap and rubble of all sorts - if it were up to some residents of Mgarr, the village would be overcome by dumping and construction sites of all sorts. What's the opinion of the Mgarr people about the Gnejna boathouses? Do they condone them as well, especially since most of them are occupied by individuals from the locality?
May I remind you that I was the one to successfully push for the eviction of the caravans from Gnejna bay
Regina Muscat
Aug 11th 2011, 12:57
Come on people, Mgarr is a very small and run down area, and some would say undeserving of such debate about where to put the petrol station... does it really matter where? The village could be neither improved nor degraded in my opinion.
Franco Farrugia
Aug 11th 2011, 16:11
I think you have very feeble opinions, for all you claim to be 'very educated' whatever that entails. I have already criticised you yesterday over the news item on dead birds that were found. I have a feeling that you are trying to tell us that these things are not important. Please, put that nose of yours down and see the things that are extremely important for the natural environment.
Mr Peter Murray
Aug 11th 2011, 12:45
Reform ,Reform whereforth art thou -Reform !Surprised are we?
Albert Ostimani
Aug 11th 2011, 13:11
You remind me of Master Yoda (Star Wars) :)
Mr Peter Murray
Aug 11th 2011, 17:42
And here was silly me thinking it was a car!
Mr Joseph Cauchi Senior
Aug 11th 2011, 12:43
May I ask a question, please?
Why does MEPA always pass CONTROVERSIAL permits in the middle of August?
Is there a specific reason why?
Just curious!
JC.
Mr Darby Allen
Aug 11th 2011, 14:15
Perhaps they think no one will notice, it being the height of the holiday/tourist season!
Mr Adrian Borg Cardona
Aug 11th 2011, 18:08
Because it's the height of the silly season!
D BORG
Aug 11th 2011, 12:25
MEPA is Malta's worst bulldoser, Simply a newer and legalised version of Lorry Sant and his friends.
Mark Galea
Aug 11th 2011, 12:11
If the local people agree, I do not see why people from other places should complain. It is Imgarr people that have most interest in the issue ... and they want relocation.
(PS - I am NOT from Imgarr, nor live nearby)
D Borg
Aug 11th 2011, 12:51
the issue is not about getting the fuel station away from the main square .....(practically everyone agrees on that)
the issue - and MEPA's (i.e. government's own spineless stand) - relates to so called 'development' on a supposedly 'hands-off' ODZ.
Fuel stations should be stationed at the periphery of some villages/town and (preferably) adjacent to industrial areas/garages.
David Battistino
Aug 11th 2011, 13:52
@ D Borg - exactly that is what has been approved a petrol station at the PERIPHERY of the village. Still reachable by the 119 Full time (largest group of full time farmers in Malta) and 357 Part time farmers without having to travel at least 5km to the nearest petrol station each time they have to fill the agricultural machines with fuel (you may well know that it is illegal to store fuel at one's own premises) . It is also to be noted that if the developer has a valid licence to operate a petrol station he should not be penalized by not permitting him to reallocate if the current site is no longer appropriate by today's health and safety standards.
Victor Pulis
Aug 11th 2011, 13:52
The people of Mgarr agreed that the present petrol station should be removed from its present position and they seem to have stopped there. The protest is about the relocation to an ODZ.
D Borg
Aug 11th 2011, 14:33
Mr. Battistino
I do not live in Mgarr but I pass through it twice daily....
I trust you know that there are areas WITHIN the periphery of the village (but NOT ODZ), that can be used as a fuel station.....
Adrian Cardona
Aug 11th 2011, 12:07
A showroom? A jet wash? Parking space? workshop? Is this a relocation or a new development? A clear conscience is definitely in short supply over at MEPA
Franco Farrugia
Aug 11th 2011, 11:52
Do we really need such large petrol stations in Malta and Gozo? Take a look at the grotesquely-huge petrol station, toghether with amenities that are not in the least ancillary, on the road near Targa Gap, limits of Mosta/Mgarr: pristine land has been wasted, destroyed, raped, just for a petrol station. Admittedly, the EU regulations are very meticulous insofar as petrol stations are concerned, but such regulations should not apply for a country with limited area such as ours.
Romina Borg
Aug 11th 2011, 11:52
Proset ! - Misshom ilhom li hadu din id-decizjoni. Ma stajniex inkomplu sejrin kif konna bil-pjazza msakkra b'serp karozzi kulhadd jistenna specjalment is-Sibt filghodu. Rhula ohra minn pajjizhom jinqdew u ma nistax nifhem ghalfejn jiena residenti l-Mgarr andi nohrog sar-Rabat minhabba fuel.
Grazzi.
Alan Deidun
Aug 11th 2011, 12:02
tohrog sar-Rabat? 3km away you have a spanking new petrol station at Ta' Buqana near Chadwick Lakes - with such an approval, you will have a traffic and accident hazard, not to speak of further uptake of ODZ land - Mgarr is fats becoming the wild west in terms of planning in Malta, with all the fields used for the dumping of construction debris and plonking of heavy machinery - the village is literally peppered with alternative disused sites where the petrol station could have been housed - lets wait to see how well and truly the present site is cleared of all the scrap and junk
Romina Borg
Aug 11th 2011, 14:15
Kuntenti l-Imgarrin kuntent kulhadd f'dan il-kaz nimmagina? Huma jafu xinuma il-prioritajiet tagghom.
Albert Ostimani
Aug 11th 2011, 15:58
Skuzi ta, il-prijoritajiet taghhom jistghu jaghmlu hsara lill-ambjent Malti u l-ambjent dinji. l-prijoritajiet ta` kulhadd insomma.
Romina Borg
Aug 11th 2011, 16:57
Tajjeb ukoll, mela postijiet ohra jistaw jsiru dawn il-bidliet imma min joqghod l-Mgarr hemm bzonn li johrog barra mir-rahal ghal fuel? 3km,5km, hemm kemm hemm... mhux l-ewwel darba li smajna b'ahbar bhal din go dil-gzira, u xorta baqaw addejin bil-prioritajiet taghhom ehe.
Paul Borg
Aug 11th 2011, 18:04
As long as the Mgarrin are content you say? Have you bothered to think of the effect of petrol residues in the water you drink from at Ghajn Rihana? Does that make you content? As usual we can't see beyond our noses. We could have moved the petrol station to a site where it would not have harmed anything but the main thing is that the abuser and his architect got their way.
Dennis Zammit
Aug 11th 2011, 11:48
The photo is misleading. The readers should also be shown the images of the road and junk yard just behind the petrol station with a view of the square.
Apart from all the junk around, one must also take note of the extremely close vicinity of the kids' playing fields (bandli) just below the hazardous fuel station.
Doreen Rizzo
Aug 11th 2011, 13:28
Bandli !!! What bandli ??? Hemm missu mar is-Sindku. Ma kellux boghod, kemm jaqsam it-triq. It-traskuragni u l-periklu li hemm huma tal-biza'.
Eric Frendo
Aug 11th 2011, 11:47
Most probably the eyesore will remain an eyesore, the only difference will be that it will not be in use.
Steve Zammit
Aug 11th 2011, 11:45
Well done guys, keep on building up the little we have left
2,406 square metres of PRISTINE UNSPOILT Land to be built up
We have petrol stations dotting the whole island. It isn't like cars were stopping on the way to Mgarr due to empty fuel tanks...come on !! And all this when Mgarr have a petrol station already. Was there really the need for new unbuilt land to be used? Couldn't they have used some other abandoned already degraded area in Mgarr itself instead???
Mepa reform my foot
Mr Ernest Vella
Aug 11th 2011, 11:43
inkomplu neqirdu l-ambjent...jekk kien hemm bzonn missa l-pompa tnehhit biss u mhux tpoggiet f'post iehor. Imma nsomma 6/4 - sinjal li mhux b'mod unanimu u ghalhekk hemm element negattiv qawwa. Ir-ragun ma jridx forza imma la huma jiddettaw, fuq kuxjenzithom tibqa din.
Steve Borg - Marsascala
Aug 11th 2011, 12:28
X'kuxjenza?
Mr Michael Buhagiar
Aug 11th 2011, 11:41
why should this petrol station be controversial? Where it was sited in the first place should have been controversial and NOT where it is NOW being sited. Far away from dangers. MEPA did the right thing.
Mr Tony Camilleri
Aug 11th 2011, 11:39
Can anyone blame the people for believing, whether it is true or not, that corruption is rampant in MEPA?