Juan Ameen
Ħondoq complex ‘should not get permit’
Mepa’s environment protection unit says there is no justification for the project
Development at Ħondoq ir-Rummien, one of Gozo’s most beautiful bays, should be kept free of even small-scale development, according to Mepa’s Environment Protection Directorate. Photo: David Schembri
The proposal to build a €120 million tourist complex at Ħondoq ir-Rummien, one of Gozo’s beautiful pristine bays, is “objectionable” and a permit should be refused, according to the planning authority’s Environment Protection Directorate.
The planned complex and marina was a proposal for a major urban type development outside scheme “in an area which should be kept free from even small-scale urban development,” the directorate said in its recommendations to the Malta Environment and Planning Authority.
There was no overriding justification for the project in terms of environmental improvement or public benefit. Instead, various negative impacts “are expected”.
The directorate’s 45-page report was uploaded yesterday on the planning authority’s website and includes its conclusions based on reports – including an Environment Impact Assessment – submitted by the applicant.
Inspired by the hanging garden effect of villages dotting the Italian Amalfi Coast, the proposal is for a five-star hotel, 285 flats and villas, 731 underground parking spaces, 10 shops, five restaurants and a marina for 150 boats.
The application, filed by Gozo Prestige Holidays in 2002, drew instant harsh criticism from environmental groups and was recently slammed by the Church’s Environment Commission.
The directorate said it could not accept one particular report which was unduly biased towards the choice of site and presented it as a “foregone conclusion”, using expressions such as “the site cries out to be developed”. This ran counter to other nationwide studies, it said.
The unit also criticised the results of the EIA, saying some impacts were not studied in enough detail or depth and that some proposed mitigation measures were “not realistically implementable” or would create unacceptable impacts.
In fact, the directorate disagreed with a “superficial” proposal to build a new, temporary road in a scheduled area of untouched land to mitigate the impact of increased traffic flow during construction.
Creating this route represented an unacceptable environmental impact outside scheme, with major impacts which could create a “dangerous precedent” for similar undesirable development in agricultural and natural land.
Restoring the road “to its pristine state” would be less plausible than claimed, making the impact significant and permanent.
Another report did not provide “sufficient comfort” in excluding any impacts on priority habitats listed in the EU Habitats Directive. “The development would potentially give rise to significant impacts and bearing in mind that the project cannot be considered of overriding public interest within the spirit of the Directive, the proposal cannot be considered further,” the directorate said.
Also, the impact study “unreasonably claims” that major impacts could be minimised by measures “even though local experience leaves much to be desired in mitigating environment impacts”.
Despite these mitigation measures, there would still be major negative short-term impacts such as dust, change of landscape, noise and air pollution. Others had not been identified because they were either insufficiently addressed or downplayed through unrealistic conditions.
The marina’s excavation and operation was also of particular concern because of the impacts on nature, the directorate said.
It pointed out that any claimed benefits of the project could be brought about without the need for new development, such as by removing the accumulated quarry debris, distillation plant, concrete quay and coastal debris, and regenerating the former natural habitats through afforestation.
At the height of the controversy over the proposal, Tourism Parliamentary Secretary Mario de Marco had warned that authorities could not afford to make any mistakes concerning development in the pristine bay, saying it was a matter of weighing the advantages of a marina against the impact on the environment, marine life and the bay.
In 2002, the Qala local council held a referendum in which 85 per cent of the village residents voted to keep Ħondoq ir-Rummien bay free of development.
When contacted, Paul Buttigieg of Moviment Ħarsien Ħondoq, which has lobbied fiercely against the proposal, said his group were very pleased and agreed with the conclusion of the report that the area should be for the public’s recreation.
Popular Stories
Update 3: Woman found dead in car,...
Updated: Woman dies in car crash
Carm Mifsud Bonnici resigns after...
Part of Dwejra 'Azure window' collapses
The end of the bar that ‘never closed’
Bundy does not know whether to...
Updated - Jason Micallef demands...
This WAS the night - Kurt makes it...
'No need for early election if PM's...
In Discussion
Updated - Jason Micallef demands...
Gozo tunnel could take 5-7 years to...
CABS remote controlled aircraft shot...
Carm Mifsud Bonnici resigns after...
Joseph Calleja condemns portrayal of...
Updated: Labour would give...
CABS drone shot down
Second group of migrants arrives
Adrian Vassallo in scathing...
31 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Jonathan Camilleri
Apr 11th, 15:46
"The application, filed by Gozo Prestige Holidays in 2002, drew instant harsh criticism from environmental groups and was recently slammed by the Church’s Environment Commission."
Does it take environmental groups, a referendum, and, the Church's Envrionment Commission to cover MEPA's big behind and decide in favour of preserving the environment?
With all due respect, if nobody controls the pace of the developers, Malta and Gozo will end up looking like Sliema and all its dust, fumes, pollution and parking problems at the expense of...the honest taxpayer.
It must also be pointed out that some developers are unbelievable when they claim they are in "recession". Of course the banks would know a bit more about their finance, although they are not obliged to disclose them, but will Malta remain at the mercy of property developers for the next 100 years, given the large "assets" held in property all over the island? Doesn't Malta diversify or try to create new business models, other than tourism? Are these business plans reviewed by economists, in view of financial and environmental sustainability?
Ken Oliver
Aug 4th 2011, 23:27
This is definitely the way forward for Gozo- preserve what is special about the island- that is what visitors come to see and enjoy. No one would suggest that everything should stay the same forever but if the core of the unique atmosphere and environment is destroyed it will be a step backwards not forwards.
Mr leo attard
Aug 3rd 2011, 20:25
congratulations to paul buttigieg of SOS hondoq and to all other organizations and bloggeers and letter- writers whose determination and work have so far saved hondoq from the wolf
Ms Lesley Kreupl
Aug 3rd 2011, 18:09
Many, many thanks to Moviment Harsien Hondoq and especially to Paul and Carmen Buttigieg for their unending hard work to save this bay.
I sincerely hope that MEPA does not renege on this decision in the future.
Mr Alexander Pace Gouder.
Aug 3rd 2011, 17:14
Well done. Keep it up. Alexander Pace Gouder PRO Balluta Residents Association.
Francine Wood
Aug 3rd 2011, 11:42
Well done Paul Buttigieg,Oala Residents and Mepa.
We are with you all the way.
Francine & Patrick Wood
Anna Borg Cardona
Aug 3rd 2011, 11:35
EXCELLENT decision Mepa! The natural beauty of Hondoq needs to be preserved for future generations. Tourists do NOT want 5 star hotels in a place like this but they do want to be able to appreciate its beauty as it is. Hey Gozo! The minute you ruin your natural beauty your tourists will not bother with you any more!. There are lots of other places in the Mediterranean they can go to!.
Mr Michael Mercieca
Aug 3rd 2011, 10:53
What Hondoq needs is a rehabilitation plan! For those who argue that we are passing by an opportunity for business, I say, Gozitans have a right to enjoy the few untouched bathing places remaining in Gozo.
Mr Joseph Cauchi Senior
Aug 3rd 2011, 10:18
A) “The proposal to build a €120 million tourist complex at Ħondoq ir-Rummien, one of Gozo’s beautiful pristine bays, is “objectionable” and a permit should be refused, according to the planning authority’s Environment Protection Directorate”.
B) “Inspired by the hanging garden effect of villages dotting the Italian Amalfi Coast, the proposal is for a five-star hotel, 285 flats and villas, 731 underground parking spaces, 10 shops, five restaurants and a marina for 150 boats”.
Reading the above two quotations, one tends to question what the hell are we doing and ask are we for REAL?
Thanks to MEPA, this project seems to be shelved!
Aren’t we lucky today that we have a city called Valletta as otherwise what would one have imagined if during the Knights of Malta’s time there existed a MEPA; and today we are still enjoying “Mount Sceberras”?
Malta’s geographical size is what it is and one has to maximise the whole potential that the Maltese archipelago provides.
Certain decisions have to be compromised for the overall benefit of the general public and if Malta wants to continue on its path to progress and compete with other neighbouring nations for the lucrative tourist market.
Otherwise we might kill the goose that lays the golden egg; and for what?
JC.
Mr edward ciantar
Aug 3rd 2011, 16:02
Meaning what, more rape of our island?
forget it mate. enough is enough. sometimes you have to sacrifice progress to enjoy a breath of fresh air.
Michael de Marco
Aug 3rd 2011, 10:13
Wonderful news that preserves this jewel in its beautiful natural state. Let us now complete the loop by tidying up Hondoq ir-Rummien to the highest standard it deserves.
Mr l. theuma
Aug 3rd 2011, 10:08
This is an excellent decision taken by MEPA's environment protection unit. Well done MEPA! It is welcomed by the general public with flying colours. It is of a great advantage for Eco-Gozo. Not only the residents of Qala hail such a decision but all Gozitans and Maltese alike who go and relax there in direct contact with nature.
Gozo, short of beaches, cannot afford losing any more. It has already lost "Iż-Żewwieqa"and "ll-Hawlija" close to Imgarr.
This decision should be, also, considered a long term asset for Gozo tourism. Tourists coming over to Gozo would like to be in contact with nature. They enjoy seeing the busy bees on thorns with blossoms and flowers along the country streets collecting pollen and nectar, something the could 'nt enjoy seeing in Europe's big cilties such as London, Paris, Rome, Madrild, Hamburg or Berlin, or other cities of the world.
Long live Ħondoq ir Rummien in its pristine state. It is an asset for Gozo. One can even notice tourists residing in Marsalforn or Xlendi bathing there.
J. Mizzi
Aug 3rd 2011, 09:50
A step in the right direction! Let's hope the MEPA board abides by the conclusions of the planning authority’s Environment Protection Directorate. In Gozo, hotels are being pulled down and apartments are built instead. Andar Hotel, Atalantis Hotel, Imgarr Hotel.... all three have vanished.
This project is an excuse to build apartments and villas. Who will benefit from these? For sure not the hundreds of families and youths, be they Gozitans, Maltese and tourists, that flock to Hondoq ir-Rummien everyday to enjoy the pristine water and fresh air.
Hondoq has been raped and then abandoned for a long time. This project won't heal the wounds but will be the last blow to ruin this bay. On the other hand, if the area is turned into a natural park, the scars can be removed and we'll have another spot on our island that can be enjoyed by everyone all year round,
Mr edward ciantar
Aug 3rd 2011, 16:07
Agree with you 100%. This tourist village/complex is all but a smoke screen. It will end up as a private beach for the apartments full stop.
It mepa approves the people will never forgive with the rape of the Maltese & Gozitan countryside.
Stanley Vassallo
Aug 3rd 2011, 09:42
Just seeing the photo attached to the article is reason enough to motivate ensuring the area stays protected.
David Ryder Richardson
Aug 3rd 2011, 09:41
Well! For the first time in my life I find myself in a position where I must praise MEPA for a stand that they appear to be taking. The suggested development of Hondoq would never be anything but a half-completed White Elerphant and would destroy the whole vicinity. Let us hope that MEPA continue with this stand and are not tempted to change their minds or be put under pressure so to do. David RR, Ghajnsielem.
Andrea Camillieri
Aug 3rd 2011, 09:29
This is nothing but stalling the development of the Island! We have very little to offer to the tourists and finally when someone comes up with an idea; the reply is "should not get permit".
The effort should be put into convincing these ppl to build something that goes hand in hand with the nature!
Ms C Galea
Aug 3rd 2011, 09:52
Go to Mepa `s site to see why Mepa recomended refusal
Ms Alison Bagley
Aug 3rd 2011, 10:27
Please believe me, tourists come to Gozo for the peace & tranquility of one of the last unspoiled places on earth. To do anything to spoil this haven would be disastrous to the tourist trade. Who would want to swap an ancient & naturally beautiful shoreline for a bunch of boxes to accommodate a few, rich, people for a short time?
Albert Ostimani
Aug 3rd 2011, 10:37
Nature is more important than land development. And tourists love nature too. We need to preserve our nature and environment not steal it.
Carlos Espinal
Aug 3rd 2011, 10:38
You have pristine bays a beautiful landscapes to offer... not cheap resorts for holiday package tourists.
Michael de Marco
Aug 3rd 2011, 10:48
A somewhat blinkered outlook! Malta and Gozo have ample to offer and happily there will also always be a Hondoq ir-Rummien preserved in its natural state for tourists and locals alike to admire and enjoy.
Malcolm Borg
Aug 3rd 2011, 10:55
I'm sorry but I believe Mr Camilleri is sorely mistaken. Malta and Gozo are unique destinations for travellers as a consequence of our mixed Mediterranean and British Colonial Heritage. Our small size is a double edged sword. Whilst enabling tourists to travel easily around the islands and get alot done in a relatively short holiday it also requires us to be particularly careful about the environmental and aesthetic impact of everything that is built. The last thing that this country needs is another mega project like the proposed hondoq project. I believe after decades of architectural blunders we should be focusing on the preservation of any natural areas left to us and seriously considering the aesthetic and environmental impact of everything that is built to maintain an architectural harmony in keeping with our historic and mediterranean identity. On a recent trip to Salina, one of the Aeolian islands I stayed at a lovely boutique hotel situated in a refurbished townhouse. This had absolutely no impact on the surrounding area and enabled the refurbishment of this wonderful house. This I believe is the future of the hotel industry in our country.
My heartfelt thanks goes to Paul Buttigieg for his efforts to preserve what is undoubtedly one of the most beautiful areas in our islands.
Julian Mompalao de Piro
Aug 3rd 2011, 09:29
Wise decision at last.
How about the improvements suggested in paragraph 16 of the article?
Bernard Storace
Aug 3rd 2011, 11:01
I second that suggestion....and may I add that hopefully this is the final and end of any discussion to invade the privacy of Hondoq which is enjoyed by hundreds and hundreds of Maltese, Gozitan and foreign visitors alike. Let all ODZ sites remain untouched by the developer sanctioned by a MEPA Board that sometimes appears NOT to have the savvy and /or guts to say No once and for all.
Paul Xuereb
Aug 3rd 2011, 09:27
Hurrah! This is one of the best pieces of environmental news I have read for some time. Hondoq is not only a beautiful place but also a people's place. To reduce it to an area for privileged people out to make money would be disastrous. Following this report, I expect that permission be refused.
Ms Alison Bagley
Aug 3rd 2011, 09:13
This is Great news!
Any development which deprives us, ordinary, folk from, freely, enjoying Hondoq is morally wrong. But to encumber this naturally beautiful Bay with the proposed buildings would be tantamount to Rape.
I'm sure There will be many happy people, worldwide, as a result of this report.
Thank you to the Environment Protection Directorate
Ms C Galea
Aug 3rd 2011, 08:50
Great News
Let`s hope that Mepa`s board will give it the final nail in this absurd application.
Well done to Moviment Harsien Hondoq for their ongoing campian to save this pristene bay
Please save this bay
Charles Sammut. (NY)
Aug 3rd 2011, 08:39
It looks like common sense has finally prevailed though I do not know why it should take all these years for this just conclusion to come about. After all a clean and popular bay enjoyed by so many should not be threatened for extinction because speculators gambled on selling a bill of goods to Mepa. If it is not broken you don't fix it and Hondoq the way it is now might not be perfect but it is a lot better than if the developer had gotten his way. Hopefully these ODZ areas are respected and preserved and not become a goldmine for greedy speculators that have no respect for preservation of Gozo's natural assets. After all Gozo does not need any more flats and villas. Plenty of empty ones around wherever you look.
Jane Carr
Aug 3rd 2011, 08:25
This is great news. Thank you to Paul Buttigieg, who over 9 years has acted as a catalyst for the people power which will hopefully save Hondoq Bay.
Thank you to EVERY individual that sent an SMS, an email, a letter to the papers, signed an on-line petition, made a phone call, attended a meeting, made a donation – made their voice heard in their protest against the unwarranted development of Hondoq.
Maybe one voice can not be heard by itself, but when we all shout together – we can all, individually, make a difference.
Peter Sutton
Aug 3rd 2011, 17:18
Good comment, Jane. Just one more voice can not only help swell the total, but also introduce a new thought.
For instance I protested against the commercial exploitation of Hondoq, estimating the large number of extra people it would crowd into that small space. This would place an enormous extra strain on the sewerage, electricity and water supply systems in the Qala area. I wonder how many people took that into account.
Well done all who protested and MEPA Environmental protection unit. Also, thanks to the effective Mario de Marco for having advised caution. What a positive difference he has made to our tourism industry.