WasteServ explains waste situation
The waste situation at the Infetti area in Mriehel. Photo: Pierre Tonna
Whenever WasteServ suspected that information provided by the contractors responsible for the collection of the waste was not correct, it informed the local council, which is the client of the contractor collecting the waste.
Labour environment spokesman Leo Brincat has called for a "serious investigation" into reports that a recyclable-waste collector inflated its figures to be eligible for an eco-contribution refund.
WasteServ said it submitted the information it collected to the authorities and councils that requested it.
"WasteServ issues wastes processed at the Sant Antnin Plant for sale each month and the prices are published.
"This waste generally consists of a number of fractions which include paper, cardboard, different types of plastic, metal, aluminium, glass and other recyclable materials.
"The award process is conducted by WasteServ in the presence of representatives of the two schemes and after there are no objections from them to conclude the sale.
"It is estimated that about 60 containers (40-foot) loads of recyclable material are exported every month from the Sant Antnin Plant.
"It is of great satisfaction to see how much void space is being saved at the landfill through separation of this waste by local residents."
WasteServ said that collection of waste was a privatised service and not part of WasteServ's responsibilities. Even the management of Bring-in Sites had been passed on to Councils so that together with the scheme chosen, they could benefit from the contents of these containers.
"Whoever collects waste and deposits it at WasteServ's Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) must declare the origin of the waste and the scheme on behalf of which he works.
"Part of the process is that the waste is weighed and detailed records are retained.
"The contractor remains obliged to pay the fees due to WasteServ as established by LN 128 of 1997 as amended. WasteServ's auditing process is applicable to the waste managed within the plant," it said.
2 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Michael Scicluna
Aug 2nd 2011, 22:48
WasteServ what Serve Waste. WasteServ set up the Bring In Sites and was not able to manage them properly so they were passed on to the Local Councils, who still do not manage them well if not worse. When are these Bring In Sites going to be effective for recycle material only and teach the people that they are not to be used as a rubbish dump. See picture above and there are many like that all over Malta and Gozo. See FB Bring in Sites of Shame.
Joseph Attard
Aug 3rd 2011, 08:48
Teaching the public is a very correct statement. The public mentality and perception that Bring In Sites are a dumping site needs time to change. A quick change only requires eavy finesby those caught. In the UK dumping next to a bring in Site carries a maximum finw of GBP 50, 000.
In an area where a CCTV was set up to monitor the site, 13 abuses were caughton live footage over a fifteen day period. These abuses are being processed. In one instance an owner of a vehicle dumped a whole truck load next to the site at 2 am in two consecutive weeks. The footage is clear. We hope justice will be done with such abusers. Only when such abuses arefined hevilywill there be a mentality change. This has happenned in the past with seats belts and parking.....weneed to go the next step.
Andno one can point fingers at Wasteserv or Schemes. Both have cleaners employed round the clock and still after a site is cleaned, two hours later it is abused. Those that are not abused are those that are very close to the communityin general.