Advert

President signs divorce bill - set to become law today

President George Abela has signed the Divorce Bill and it is due to be published in the Government Gazette today, thus becoming law.

The law is expected to become effective on October 1, giving the government time to set up the administrative mechanism needed for people to be able to apply for divorce.

The House of Representatives approved the Bill by a large majority on Monday.

The Bill had been presented as a private member's motion by Nationalist MP Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando in July last year. It was subsequently co-sponsored by Labour MP Evarist Bartolo.

A referendum in May approved the introduction on divorce based on the no-fault concept. Estranged couples must be separated for four of the preceding five years in order to be eligible for divorce, and provision has to be made for the care of the children. Arrangements made in separation contracts are not affected.

Advert

203 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Mr Mike Abbot

Jul 30th 2011, 11:52

"and no true moral civilisation without the true Church."

how exactly is this a fact?

angelo cilia

Jul 30th 2011, 14:14

Popes don't like democracy, it interferes with their control by tyranny.

Raymond Sacco

Jul 30th 2011, 16:10

@gerhard soto:
"It is a proven truth, a historical fact, that there is no true civilisation without a moral civilisation, and no true moral civilisation without the true Church."
what in fact is a proven truth and a historic fact is that when your catholic church ruled europe by it's 'true morals'; terror, persecution and mass murders were the order of the day! so if there is an institution who should lecture us about civilisation, freedom and democracy, the catholic church lies at the very end of the list!

Victor Pulis

Jul 30th 2011, 10:33

It's not shelters we need; it's people who have the 'real' love for the family and the guts to stand up for the family.

Don't worry, we'll still have them. I for one will still love my wife and family notwithstanding the fact that now we have divorce legislation. people will continue to get married, have families and stay together until death do them part. Unfortunately we will also have failed marriages like we've been having these last few thousand years.

Mr M Borg

Jul 29th 2011, 20:53

The passing of this divorce law is no victory for anyone.

Certainly no for us, when we realise that it will be the ruin of many families.

What sort of victory is this ??

Mr Peter Korsten

Jul 29th 2011, 21:45

"What sort of victory is this ??"

A victory for democracy. For some people, that's something that happens in other countries.

Mr John Cassar

Jul 29th 2011, 22:02

M.Borg

It's a victory for those who the church repressed with it's dogma for years. It's a victory for people power over a confessional establishment.


As for Joe Zammit, he will not reply. Rumor has it that he has moved to the Philippines.

Alfred Grech

Jul 29th 2011, 22:22

The guarantee was guaranteed by Joe Zammit and I can guarantee you that he may be vacationing somewhere far away to recover from his shock.

Alfred Gatt

Jul 29th 2011, 23:58

Whether you can equate reason with democracy in the question of divorce is debatable or in any other subject, such as abortion,which is the killing of the inocent. Maybe you are not aware that a strong family unit is the basis for a strong society and it follows logically that a weakened family setup means a weakened society. I wonder if the problems facing German society do not stem from family difficulties.

Mr jon farrugia

Jul 29th 2011, 18:25

Chernobyl was an accident.

Divorce was CHOSEN BY THE PEOPLE FOR THE PEOPLE!!!!!

Victor Pulis

Jul 29th 2011, 18:40

I'm starting to dig my fallout shelter right now!

Joseph Sammut

Jul 29th 2011, 19:58

@ John Farrugia: wrong - low turnout does make The People.

Mr Peter Korsten

Jul 29th 2011, 21:54

"wrong - low turnout does make The People."

Low turnout? At 72%? You need to look abroad. There are many countries where the politicians would have party if actually 72% bothered to show up.

Ramon Casha

Aug 20th 2011, 16:31

Chernobyl? No it's WWIII. No wait, it's Armageddon! The end of the universe! AAAAAGH!!

Mr Joe Borg

Jul 29th 2011, 18:45

If the President did not sign the bill, the divorce law wouldn't go through. On the other hand MPs have the option to vote according to their beliefs as long as the majority votes in favor.

Mr ALBERT FENECH

Jul 29th 2011, 19:09

@ Mr Borg

Via your reasoning, MPs might as well stay away from Parliament because what will be, will be. Maybe that is why so many don't bother and stay away. That is hardly statesmanship and credibility when you are voted by the people and you are being paid by the people to exercise their democratic wishes!

ALBERT FENECH
Qawra

Mr Tommy Vella

Jul 29th 2011, 20:01

If i understood your original comment well: That is the mark of true statesmanship - when you can retain your beliefs but exercise the right of others to have diametrically opposite beliefs. You are saying that every MP should have voted yes.

If so, your second contribution is contradictory, for once the people voted there was no need of a discussion in parliament and hence MPs could have stayed away and the law be declared passed with 65 votes.

Or am I living with Alice in Wonderland?

Mr ALBERT FENECH

Jul 29th 2011, 20:10

@ Mr Tommy Vella

Yes, theoretically ALL MPs should have voted "yes" because that is what the people decided. Government is FOR the people, BY the people. Parliamentary representatives are PAID for by the people. In any case, my second reply was to Mr Borg and not an addendum to my first contribution which was clear enough although perhaps not to you.

ALBERT FENECH
Qawra

Alfred Grech

Jul 29th 2011, 22:33

This President has shown his connection with the people. I stated and will state again that he should be allowed to serve at least a second term. Malta feels relaxed with him as our President - should have said, our Beloved President.

Mr Tommy Vella

Jul 30th 2011, 18:29

@ It seems as if YOU did not understand my point.

You said that via Joe Borg's reasoning MPs might as well stay away from Parliament.

But you accepted my point that is via YOUR REASONING that MPs should stay away from parliament. If all votes should have been yes what point was there in discussing the law? It is only because MPs disagree that a discussion is required.

Mr Joe Borg

Jul 29th 2011, 18:47

Jhekk temmen f'Alla, issa tkun taf meta issejjahlhekk.

Spiro Sant

Jul 29th 2011, 19:45

@Mr Joe Borg,I weep for people like you Seriously,so mass murderers and other really evil people can go to heaven after asking for forgiveness and repenting Divorced no.Sur Borg were there is no love there is no marriage, whether divorced or not.When people divorce, it’s always such a tragedy. At the same time, if people stay together it can be even worse.



Laurence grech

Jul 29th 2011, 17:50

u bhekk gonzi ivvota le..

Mr Lawrence Fenech

Jul 29th 2011, 17:59

Hewitt.

Kredenzjali demokratici qed t'alludi ghal "LE" ta Gonzi, imma xorta ghaddiet b'maggoranza assoluta ta "IVA"

R Abela

Jul 29th 2011, 17:59

Tkomplix iddahhal rasek fir ramel, marriage as we know it ilu li spicca, divorzju u jew le.

Anthony E. Falzon

Jul 29th 2011, 18:34

We are not very far from what you are saying. Many of our youngsters are sort of afraid to get married, but not because of divorce, it is because of modernism and this modernism has been with us quite a long time now. Get a statistic of seperations and you why!!!
Cohabit....LOL

Victor Pulis

Jul 29th 2011, 18:47

Fejn qatt ma qbilna waqt dan id- dibattitiu f'din naqbel mieghek sur Borg. Ma rridux lots of Maltese to get divorce. Anzi ghandna naghmlu minn kollox biex din il ligi tigi uzata kemm jista' jkun mill inqas. Bhal kaxxa tal first aid tajjeb li jkollok wahda fid dar imma taghmel minn kollox biex ma tigix bzonnha. imma jibqa' l-fatt li hemm xi zwiegijiet li sfortunatament ma jirnexxux u din il ligi tista' tkun it triq biex jergghu jibdew hajjithom mill gdid. Issa kulhadd irid jahdem biex kemm jista' jkun ikollna zwiegijiet b'sahhithom.
Il fatt li ghandna l-ligi ma jfissirx li n-nies mhux se jibqghu ihobbu lill xulxin u jaghmlu s-sgrificcji.

R Abela

Jul 29th 2011, 18:00

ghal 1 ta ottubru LOL!

Mr jon farrugia

Jul 29th 2011, 18:22

Malta will always be a Catholic nation but is now being run by a Secular Government. Long may it continue!!!!

John Zammit-Spiteri

Jul 29th 2011, 17:08

very patronising comment, as if you are going to shut anyone up!!!

the kgb has a vacancy!

Mr Joseph Calleja

Jul 29th 2011, 19:03

Mr Zammit Spiteri, the truth always hurt. " as if you are going to shut anyone up!!!" You are very free to speak. How do you know the KGB have vacancies? Are you a member Mr Spriteri?

Mr Tommy Vella

Jul 29th 2011, 21:08

I am not in denial. I know that we have a divorce law but I also know that divorce is not good and nothing can make me say that divorce is good, even if I were the last man standing, to quote someone.

Mr Jo Meli

Jul 29th 2011, 15:39

WAYNEEEEEEEEEEE !!!

Are YOU sound of mind ???

Was it NOT your present Leader, Lorry Gonzi, totally against Divorce (so much so that Lorry Gonzi voted against the Bill in all its stages), as was the Executive and the Partit Nazzjonalista - in toto AGAINST the introduction of Divorce in Malta ??

or you have a habit to jumping from one Universe to a different reality Parallel Universe ?

GRAZZI to Secular Malta in general and to Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando, Evarist Bartolo in particular !!

paul Baldacchino

Jul 29th 2011, 15:57

Nahseb li qed ticcajta habib meta tghid li l-PN taghna ligi tad-divorzju. Kieku ghedt li l-parlamentari liberali fi hdan il-PN u l-maggoranza assoluta tal-parlamentari tal-PL kont tkun izjed preciz. Li kien ghal Prim MInistru u l-fidili ta' madwaru illum dik il-ligi ma tezistiex. U maghhom inzidu l-arci konservattivi fil-kurja ta'Malta. Il-pass li jmiss huwa li tigi amendata l-kostituzzjoni biex tissahhah id-distinzjoni bejn knisja u stat.

Mr J Xerri

Jul 29th 2011, 16:31

Illum ghandna kumment wiehed bhal dan, imma kif bassarna, jghaddu s-snin u l-Partit Nazzjonalista johrog jiftahar li bis-sahha tieghu gie d-divorzju... kif ftahar b'hafna affarijiet ohra li attwalment tkellem kontrihom u illum ghax jaqbel jiftahar li ghamilhom hu.

Nigel Spiteri

Jul 29th 2011, 16:57

Int taf tisthi habib?! Grazzi lil JPO naqbel mieghak, imma tistgha tghidli kif tista tghid grazzi lil PN wara li l-kabinett kollu ivvvota kontra jew astjena??

Mr Lawrence Fenech

Jul 29th 2011, 18:01

@Nigel.

Ghidlu ghidlu. Mi hu ghama ma jarax.

Mr Tommy Vella

Jul 29th 2011, 20:05

Kif qatt divorzju, speċjalment fejn hemm it-tfal, jista' jkun responsabbli. Diġà smajna fl-emendi li għaddew mill-parlament it-taħwid li se jkun hemm bejn id-drittijiet u d-dmirijiet tal-missier (l-omm) naturali u l-missier (l-omm) taż-żwieġ il-ġdid. Dik responsabbiltà!!

Joseph Sammut

Jul 29th 2011, 14:54

Why, you've had enough?

Bernard Mamo

Jul 29th 2011, 14:58

xi hadd kien jikteb hekk:

Join in the battle between God and the devil! Fight the good fight! The victory is ours, it's already guaranteed!

lol dik garanzija!

Mr Joe Borg

Jul 29th 2011, 14:41

If you want you can add my name too.

angelo cilia

Jul 29th 2011, 15:16

No, we will keep it pure and simple.
Victory is ours, it is guaranteed Joe Zammit deserves the honours every July 29th from now on.

Philip Hili

Jul 29th 2011, 15:29

@ angelo cilia

Even mine

Mr Joseph Calleja

Jul 29th 2011, 15:45

Mr Borg and Mr Hili consider it done. Your names will be forever remembered on every July 30th from this day on. You all contributed to the Yes Vote. Oh by the way there a few others I don't want to mention. So to all of you that helped the Yes vote to go through, Thank You. Divorce in Malta has become law, get over it.

Mr M Borg

Jul 29th 2011, 16:55

@ angelo cilia

Let us give it a year or two, only then will we know who will be having the last laugh !

Although , between you and me, I do not think there will be anything to laugh about.

R Abela

Jul 29th 2011, 18:01

LIKE !

angelo cilia

Jul 29th 2011, 18:50

There is nothing to laugh at Mr. Borg, those that unfortunately need a divorce in Malta will be properly served and those who don't need a divorce will no longer interfere in the rights of others that need a divorce.
It is as simple as that.. and it is guaranteed.
Very sweet I say.

Philip Hili

Jul 30th 2011, 00:33

@ Mr Joseph Calleja

Dear Mr Calleja,

You are very much mistaken when you say that I contributed to the Yes vote because I spoke my mind. Maybe you are one of those persons who do not tolerate opinions which differ to yours. Had I remained quite in front of my computer, reading some of your silly comments, you would have kept me in your good books. But because I spoke my mind, and expressed my dismay for this unethical move coming from a member on the government side and behind everybody's back, I am in your bad books! But never mind, drop me a note a year or two later from now or from the 30th July 2011 and we will see who was right in his arguments.

Yes unfortunately it is done but you have to add "with the help of two disloyal Nationalist MPs" because had it not been with their help, non of the Labour MPs were going to speak their mind and bring this subject forward, owing to various reasons!!!

If I have never congratulated the MLP or now the PL for dirty political moves, I must admit that this time I have to congratulate the PL because it did a very good job, that of taking advantage of the situation and leaped on the promoter's move thus the PL got what he wanted - scot-free!!

Finally, may I remind you that the 30th July 2011 will be marked a black day for me and for all my entire family.

Good night Joseph.

Mr Ernest Vella

Jul 29th 2011, 13:58

Guido, taht Gonzi l-EURO dahlet...id-divorzju Joseph Muscat dahlu u sihbu Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando

Mark Galea

Jul 29th 2011, 14:20

@Guido cutajar

Gonzi jibqa msemmi wkoll li halla l-MLP 5 snin extra fl-oppozizzjoni ... x'rimors hux :)

Joseph J. Borg

Jul 29th 2011, 14:28

Iva, attent ghax gej l-ahhar tad-dinja.

Mr Alex Buds

Jul 29th 2011, 14:29

I am in favor of divorce and my conscience would make me remorseful if I wasn't.

But your post is nevertheless amusing ;)

Philip Hili

Jul 29th 2011, 14:46

@ Guido Cutajar

Gwid, mhux Dr Gonzi u l-ghaxar Onorevoli Nazzjonalist li b'kollox huma hdax (11) flimkien ma' l-Onorevoli Dr Adrian Vassallo (PL) ghandhom ihossu ir-rimors li semmejt int ghax dawn kienu r-rgiel bizzejjed anzi zzejjed biex ma ngarrux mal-kurrent kif fil-fatt ippruvaw jaghmlulhom u dak li emmnu fieh stqarrewh. Bl-Ingliz, "They stood up to be counted". AND THEY WERE COUNTED!!!

Ghandhom ihossu r-rimos, min dahaq bil-poplu u welled dan il-gwaj pero' ghandhom ihossu ir-rimors izjed dawk li qaghdu izeffnu l-kuxjenza fin-nofs biex minghalihom jistahbew warajha imma fl-ahhar urewna xi jsarfu. Bijja DARBA DHAQTU, mhux ser tergghu!!!

simeon nechev

Jul 29th 2011, 14:56

U li mar kontra ir rieda tal poplu freferendum, lahwa ma ninsewx li gonzi gej min partit li fl '81 amel xenata shiha ax madditx ir rieda tal maggoranza...

guido cutajar

Jul 29th 2011, 16:54

Mill l-Indipendenza ghaddew kwazi 50 sena ( 1964 ) . Kien ghawn rebus shih fil pajjiz. Illum 50 sena wara insejna kollox x`kien gara, pero lil missier l-indipendenza, hadd ma insieh u min ma kienx ghadu twieled xorta jaf li kien Dr. Gorg Borg Olivier. Li ridt nghejd jien huwa, li meta gejjin ta warajna, ser jinsew it tahwid li kellna sa ma ghadda id divorzju, u meta ikollhom xi " assignment " fuq id divorzju zgur li ser jghejdu li taht il P.M. Gonzi konna meta dahal. Semmejt ir rimors, ghax naf cert li il P.M. ghex holma ( nightmare ) jara id divorzju jghaddi b`tant maggoranza kbira, barra li tlett kwarti min naha tal gvern ivvutaw kontrih ( Gonzi ). U xorta ghadni ma nistax nifhem kif tghaddi ligi minghajr il kunsens tal P.M. u jibqa hemm. @ Mark Galea...Min qalbi ser nghejdlek.. Ghal gid ta Malta ikun ahjar li il gvern nazzjonalista jibqa hames snin ohra, sabiex jirranga il krizi finazjarja li ghamel huwa stess. Li nixtieq li jinbiddlu xi ministri. Hbieb, jien qatt ma qbilt mad divorzju, imma qatt ma tista iccahhad id dritt lil haddiehor. Issa qeghed hemm, min iridu jiehdu u min ma iridux ihallih hemm. X`inhi il problema?

Mario Grima

Jul 29th 2011, 14:07

That's why you are not a president because you mix religion, personal sentiments and duty together into one pot. In Maltese they call it 'kawlata' and when you are a president yoiu cannot afford a 'kawlata'

Mr Guido Farrugia

Jul 29th 2011, 14:15

Good thing you're not the President!!!!!!

David Caruana

Jul 29th 2011, 14:22

Time won't tell you anything! There is now way you can know how the situation would have been in 10 years' time if divorce was never introduced.

Please remember that Malta (without a divorce law) was following the exact same trends as other countries - marriage breakdown and cohabitation on the rise.

Cohabitation will surely increase in Malta, especially after the referendum saga when every Maltese citizen was given the right to vote on how YOU should lead your conjugal life.

Dr.Gonzi with his referndum stance made the younger generations even more disillusioned about marriage!

Brian Gatt

Jul 29th 2011, 15:02

so with the same reasoning the prime minister and the other MP's who voted against should also resign le !!!!

Philip Hili

Jul 29th 2011, 13:40

@ Kurt Wasching

Who's hidden hand is??

M. Mifsud

Jul 29th 2011, 16:30

Mr. Kurt Wasching Oldenburg,

I would greatly appreciate if you refrain from commenting on our internal affairs. I really don't like the way certain foreigners, who pretend to know it all and to teach us common ignorant and backward Maltese how to live and how to administer our country, does not understand a thing of our culture and our wayb of life and pretend to comment on our internal affairs. I really hate it. I don't comment on what goes on in Germany because I don't know exactly the frame of mind of the Germans and their culture and their way of life. So I would greatlyv appreciate it if foreigners such as yourself refrain from commenting on this delicate internal issue. You have really offended us by your comments.

Mark Galea

Jul 29th 2011, 13:49

@j brincat

if one divorces and has to pay maintenance, and marries another person, who is in his same situation, by some careful tactics they can stop paying maintenance and then do an amicable divorce ...

And we will pay Joe's TAX to the first spouse.

John Zammit-Spiteri

Jul 29th 2011, 13:23

you are right but since I am male I direct to the opposite sex , but really my comments to my wifes weight refers vice versa

With all apologies I am not a sexist but What I say from a male point of view, it really applies to all sexes.

I am fat too :) but she loves me fat :)

Daniel Spiteri

Jul 29th 2011, 12:36

right....and this will all start on October 1st?!

Ms Mandy Abela

Jul 29th 2011, 12:41

What a stupid and ridiculous comment. If people want to leave their spouse capriciously they don't need divorce to do it. You know, there areeople who have been through divorce - for serious and valid reasons. (As some people get annulments for other reasons.) You seem to be upset that the law has gone through. Maybe scared that your spouse will leave you because you have gained weight?

Nathalie Frendo

Jul 29th 2011, 12:43

Mr. Spiteri havent you gained weight? Or is it just the prerogative of women. Besides there is much more than a sexy body for a relationship to carry on. A woman can be sexy even if not a a s thin as a model. To begin with judging from our youngsters few are those men who are marrying a thin girl these days. Let us not be so superfiial.

Mr F J Brincat

Jul 29th 2011, 12:50

Yes, more or less it is what they tell the kids now anyway...don't forget that couples were still separating....

But you see, now mommy can tell daddy to flake off and both mommy and daddy can find happiness with someone else and marry if they so wish. Your daddy will go to the caring well-manicured hands of the secretary and your mommy can find a man who really respects her.

Raymond Sacco

Jul 29th 2011, 12:51

@john zammit spiteri:
and all these thoughts are haunting your mind just because a law was signed?!?!?!?!?! how pathetic!!!!!

Jeremy Gambin

Jul 29th 2011, 12:56

all these comments you are making have happened in Malta for many years and many people have separated for reasons like these- nothing to do with the introduction of divorce; At least Mommy has a second chance to get married to someone more decent.

Dawn Cummings

Jul 29th 2011, 12:57

...gotta feeling this was already happening with separation so far and won't change with the divorce law...so what's your point here John?

Ms D. Borg

Jul 29th 2011, 12:59

If your marriage is not based on love and respect but on frivolous thrings like weight, coffee, smiles and the washing, then I feel sorry for your and more for your wife.

Mr Daniel Vella

Jul 29th 2011, 13:01

And did you need divorce for this?!?!?!?!?!? You should say "At least mommy can now find a guy that really loves her and do away with such rubbish as i was"

Joseph Casha

Jul 29th 2011, 13:02

Sorry kids but mommy and daddy might have second thoughts, you see, daddy has been drinking a lot and he has also started hitting mommy and that is why mommy is full of bruisies and always in pain and sometimes has to go to the hospital. i would like to pretend everything is fine, but see mommy is scared that one of these days daddy might go over the edge and mommy will end up stabbed and lying in a pool of her own blood like that woman a few years back. so see this way at least you still get to have your mommy alive and not dead.......

Open your eyes. if people divorce for getting obese than the problem should have been not getting married in the first place cause love and family are not about appearances. and just because there is divorce it doesn't mean that people never cheated, separated or got their marriages annuled. once again, open your EYES!!!

Lawrence Zammit

Jul 29th 2011, 13:02

Mr. Zammit-Spiteri,

Can you provide me with the telephone number of your secretary please?

Mr M Borg

Jul 29th 2011, 13:08

How very true. A picture of things to come !!

Christina Pace

Jul 29th 2011, 13:08

Hi kids! I have good news! Since daddy started hanging out with the wrong people, he also started gambling. Now that he lost his job he also started drinking and being violent. The other day I found a glass pipe in his pants. We tried and tried to talk it over. He won't listen and is only gonna keep digging a grave. But it doesn't have to be a family grave. Now we can leave and God willing if there is a one last suitable man out there he can become your dad and he will never abuse you or me.

John Zammit-Spiteri

Jul 29th 2011, 13:25

to all those obese ladies whom I might have offended, I am obese too and I risk being dumped too.

I really spoke in sympathy but what I said applies to all sexes.

So bring on those burgers!

Mr david debattista

Jul 29th 2011, 13:34

@ John Zammit Spiteri How prone poor humans like you are, to dam up the minutest remnants of freedom , and build an artificial roof to prevent humanity looking up to the clear blue sky . take a walk !
We are concerned with genuine situations here not some idiot who has embarked on the quest for the ultimate orgasm. If such is the case with you, good luck you will need it , others have other issues as their priority .

Michael Magri

Jul 29th 2011, 13:40

Sorry John... But are you and your likes for that matter, implying that your Fictitious story above, and such inventive suppositions, are going to apply to every family in Malta, Gozo, Commino and `Kemmunett`..??!!??!! Ofcourse NOT John.. Stop scaring the subject matter, i.e. Divorce Law, with such silly inventive SPINS..!! Il-Babaw is a subject Long Gone and FORGOTTEN my friend..

I can assure you all that nothing and no one is going to change or stop family quarrels etc. that Unfortunately, might lead to family seperations.. But at least those involved may now find another Legal way to continue with their seperate lives, as Legal Partners of husband and wife..

That`s All Folks...!!

Victor Pulis

Jul 29th 2011, 13:52

Are you talking about a cohabiting man because this thing has been happening for years in Malta. it will not start now that divorce is obtainable. And the weight issue was brought up by the NO movement to ridicule the matter.

John Zammit-Spiteri

Jul 29th 2011, 14:08

ahhhh sad innit? but truth does hurt!!!

David Caruana

Jul 29th 2011, 14:54

Truth is truth.

What hurts is misinformation and deceit.

But people grew brains since you last checked, Mr.Zammit-Spiteri

John Zammit-Spiteri

Jul 29th 2011, 12:31

i am jealous at your comment

why didnt i think of it !!! grrrrrrrrrrr

Philip Hili

Jul 29th 2011, 12:48

@ Mark Galea,

Le Mark, fejn sejjer b'rasek!!!!!!

Dik hbewwa waqt il-kampanja tar-referendum. Pero' issa dalwaqt titfacca halli jkunu jistghu jiftahru li introducew "servizz socjali GDID". Heq!! kulhadd jaf kemm il-Progessivi jiftahru li intoducew is-servizzi socjali!!! Issa ser ikollhom opportunita' ohra biex izidu ohra mal-kullana ta' servizzi socjali!!!!

PERO' int u jien inhalsu ghalieh dan!!

Alex Cutajar

Jul 29th 2011, 13:07

I like how you look at the future, Maybe people may look at the future on election day.

How many taxes should be named as: 'Wenzu's Tax' or 'Eddie's'? May I ask?

Mark Galea

Jul 29th 2011, 13:47

And that is nothing ...
wait until the new families form legally and spouses refuse to pay maintenance? Will they be jailed? Obviously no. These people will flout maintenance law very easily - just to spite their first spouse. In the name of the new family they can take up loans (which would have been impossible before marrying second time). The intelligent thing is that this second marriage can just be a marriage of convenience. Two (already married) people decide to marry, contract debts, refuse to pay maintenance and then conveniently do an amicable divorce - they may be already with new partners, but just do it to avoid maintenance.

Mr david debattista

Jul 29th 2011, 14:08

That is how it is in the rest of the civilized world ! Good morning Sunshine .
John Zammit Spiteri You did not think about it because you are a poor boy . Not that it makes much sense or any difference really ! Come on get over it ! You should be more worried where we are going to get our drinking water in the near future then this issue .

Philip Hili

Jul 29th 2011, 13:45

@ Chris Giordano

Mhux malajr naghmluhom il-ligijiet fejn irridu, izda kemm tahraqna qalbna biex nahdmu sa tard fil-ghodu, sas-2.00a.m skond kif gie rrapurtat!!! Addio xoghol iehor privat, forzi ftuh ta' xi klinika jew ufficcju legali!!!

Ara kemm ghandna deputati biezlin!!!!!

U halluna ara ma tersqux biex titkarbu ghal vot!!!!

M Ellul

Jul 29th 2011, 13:26

Partit tal valuri? Liem valuri? Tieghek?

Le.

Mr Charles Bayliss

Jul 29th 2011, 14:54

Imma kemm hawn injoranza f'dan il-pajjiz. Kif tridu thalltu id-Drittjiet taghna l-Gay ma' l-abort jew l-ewtanasja. Taghna barra li hu dritt uman u mezz ta' celebrazzjoni ta' mhabba/hajja filwaqt li it-tnejn l-ohra huma mezz ta' qierda tal-hajja.

Jekk m'inthomx kapaci tiddistingwu bejn wiehd u t-tnejn l-ohra allura nghidilkom imsieken. Mohh maghluq. Jew papri ghax dan il-kliem qalu certu Ministru Demokristjan.

E. Azzopardi

Jul 29th 2011, 12:19

Dak kollu li ghid diga ilu jigri, jekk vera irridu nkunu sincieri maghna infusna, u ma nkunux IPOKRITI. Id-differenza hi li issa ser ikun irregolat. Imma allavolja ma kienx hemm ghalfejn, bir-Referendum ikkonfermajna kemm hawn IPOKRITI jigri mas-saqajn f'dan il-pajjiz Kattoliku.

Matthew P. Zammit

Jul 29th 2011, 13:24

@ E. Azzoppardi

Regolat?! Regolat sakemm irid il-but tal-avukat divozista! L-ipokrita hu min jghid li m'ghandux bzonn id-divorzju ghax dan juzah min ghandu bzonnu biss...bl-istess principju, jekk dil-persuna tigi bzonnu hi ukoll jaqa' l-argument li d-divorzju juzah min ghandu bzonnu biss, ghax il-bzonn ma tafx meta tigi bzonnu.

Ma noqghodux induru mal-lewza wisq. Din l-introduzzjoni ha twassal ghal tibdil fil-mentalita' tal-poplu ghall-mentalita' divorzista u fi ftit zmien ghandu jkollna l-konfermazzjoni ta' dan kollu.

Nittama li m'ghandix ragun, imma bhalma gara f'kull pajjiz iehor - jekk nitkellmu f'termini ta' taxxi, problemi socjali u nuqqas fl-istabilita' tal-familja - ghandna bizzejjed biex jaqqghu l-argumenti favur id-divorzju f'qasir zmien!

Mr Kyle Boffa

Jul 29th 2011, 13:34

int fejn tghix? jekk ghalik dal-affarijiet ha jibdew mill- 1 t'Ottubru.. iftah naqa ghajnejk.

Matthew P. Zammit

Jul 29th 2011, 15:52

L-affarijiet ilhom li bdew...imma issa l-mentalitajiet issahhew u jekk jidhrilna li morna 'l quddiem j'Alla ghall-gid....

Il-problema jekk jibqa kollox f'wiccna sieheb.

Philip Hili

Jul 29th 2011, 12:26

@ Joseph Laus

Dahhaqtna!!!!!

Mary Ann Borg

Jul 29th 2011, 12:28

Dear Joseph Laus...............with or without you (and surely without you) GONZIPN has snatched victory from MLP in 2008 and will again give you a hard time come 2013.

John Zammit-Spiteri

Jul 29th 2011, 12:29

for your info

he did his duty and brought forward the bill. If he really wanted to do without it would not have been brought to parliament. He is a gentleman a true statesman , a man of principle, and he has reputation for being a very strong person in favour to those in need , when it comes to social help.
How dare anyone insult a person who has done nothing wrong but only protected the family being the sound foundation of a healthy society.

Philip Hili

Jul 29th 2011, 12:40

@ Joseph Laus

But the way, Dear Joseph!! with the introduction of divorce, for Prime Minister Gonzi + Eleven Nationalists MPs and Dr Adrian Vassallo nothing has changed.
They stuck to their principle and showed the Maltese that at least there are 12 people (kif ighidu bil-Malta "Tuzzana") that they are trust worthy and deserve to be called "Onorevoli". The rest.........

Albert Ostimani

Jul 29th 2011, 12:56

@Mary Ann Borg Int bis-serjeta? Mela jiehu 500 zieda fil-gimgha, izid id-deficit, dahhal l-Arriva li zgur mhix "state-of-the-art", bena Mater Dei f'ghoxrin sena minflok f'ghaxar snin u hemm inqas sodod mill-isptar San Luqa, wahhal nofs it-toroq f'Malta ghax iddecieda li jirranga uhud minnhom li ghogbuh fi xhin ried meta kulhadd irid imur ghax-xoghol, se jhassar Birzebbuga bl-estenzjoni tal-Freeport, se jhassar l-ambjent taghna bl-estenzjoni tal-Power Station bil-Heavy Fuel Oil, il-gass ghadu l-Qajjenza u suppost ilu li telaq minn hemm snin shah, in-naha t'isfel ta' Malta (Birzebbuga, zejtun, marsaxlokk ecc) dizastru ghax qas jaghti kas, se jwaqqa l-Air Malta ghax issa fetah ghajnejh li kien hemm il-problemi...saqsi iktar hawn halli jsemmulek aktar affarjiet serji...

Dawn Cummings

Jul 29th 2011, 13:02

@Mary Ann: So you are voting for Gonzi PN again, being the biggest hipocrite after he granting himself a weekly €500 pay raise and THEN says his conscience does not allow him to vote in favor of the divorce bill?

Mr M Borg

Jul 29th 2011, 13:11

@ Joseph Laus

Well said.

No one will be able to condemn Gonzi for the state of our marriages and the ruin in our society in the future.

As you pointed out he had nothing to do with it !!

Nathalie Frendo

Jul 29th 2011, 12:36

What does size have to do with marriage continuiity? May I remind you that there some of us women who have been married for over 25 years and still fit well into a size 10. Marriage does not mean letting go of oneself. After all a women still has a responsibility of taking care of her image this is also to keep her husband and children proud of her. So Patrick dear I think that size does not matter here!

Mr A Grech

Jul 29th 2011, 12:37

it would be better to have no married women under size 12 :P

Mr Patrick Zammit

Jul 29th 2011, 16:49

Nathalie

Don't you remember that in the heat of the referendum public debate, a member of the "No" camp (Anna?) said that if divorce were to be introduced, husbands would divorce their wives if they are over size 12. It was not my invention.

Well done to you for keeping to size 10 after 25 married years. Few can boast of that...

John Zammit-Spiteri

Jul 29th 2011, 12:35

prosit to very sad kids whose parents run off with sexier spouses. wish it was you who will grow through that torture

then speak

Mr Ernest Vella

Jul 29th 2011, 12:37

ma tridx li naghtuhom ir-rikonixximent tar-Repubblika wkoll...sal-mewt ghandkom capcip u wara l-kastig.

adrian attard

Jul 29th 2011, 13:07

how emotional Paul... bikkejtni!

Mr M Borg

Jul 29th 2011, 13:14

Only time will tell us if these two deserve a " prosit ".

However if we had to follow the path taken by other countries I am afraid history will not be kind to them

Mr Alex Buds

Jul 29th 2011, 14:31

Ernest Vella: nobody can judge other people.

Maybe the future you portrayed for them is what you will get instead.

Mr F J Brincat

Jul 29th 2011, 12:06

Really? Is cohabitation the way forward?So, no more blithering about the rights of the children when a couple that is cohabitating has children? You're ok with that are you?

No, marriage is not dead and it will never be. If anything it has been given a new life.

Were you always such a drama queen?

Mr David Bezzina

Jul 29th 2011, 12:08

Co-habitation was the way forward even before divorce.
No one gets married in a state of mind that he or she will end up filing for the divorce in a few years.
How narrow-minded can you get ?

Raymond Sacco

Jul 29th 2011, 12:59

@joseph cauchi senior:
so am i right in saying that, according to you, the word commitment only has a value when accompanied with a signed contract?

Victor Pulis

Jul 29th 2011, 14:12

So as from 1st October no marriages will take place. We'll wait and see.

M. Bezzina

Jul 29th 2011, 11:55

Ser taqa id dinja ax dahal id divorce!!!!!!!

Kenneth Cassar

Jul 29th 2011, 11:57

Oh yes, the end is near! Give all your possessions to the poor...you'll be raptured soon.

Mr Charles Bayliss

Jul 29th 2011, 12:02

If you are married and your marriage is strong - you do not need to worry as it is not a disaster at all for you. JUSTICE IS BEING SERVED.

Carmel Bayliss (568760(M))

Mr F J Brincat

Jul 29th 2011, 12:11

Oh my goodness! It is a catastrophe of cataclysmic proportions! So, when are you divorcing then?

Lolita Lija

Jul 29th 2011, 12:18

Carm hi ,GEJJIEN IT-TLETT IJIEM TAD-DALM.LOL

John Zammit-Spiteri

Jul 29th 2011, 12:25

@ carmel bayliss

I would plan well any relationship I get into. I feel responsible for my kids and if you know what marriage really means , it really means that your life is given totally to the other person and your children. Married couples give up their lives for the ones they love. It is useless trying to excuse your mistakes and trying to make us feel sorry for you . Eat your own mess. Carefull planning brings about serenity. Marriage is about love and sacrifice not adventure!

Alex Cutajar

Jul 29th 2011, 13:10

Us and the Philippines should have the best society till 1st October..

LOL

Lawrence Zammit

Jul 29th 2011, 11:33

Only if you are wearing very dark glasses which do not allow you to see the truth for what it is.

Mr FRANS H SAID

Jul 29th 2011, 11:43

It is a memorable day for democracy aginst extreemists

Ray Gatt

Jul 29th 2011, 11:45

May be a BLACK DAY for you but not for me who needs it. After all you don't have to use it. Now I suggest you get over it as it's there to stay.

Mr Joe Borg

Jul 29th 2011, 11:53

agree.

Matthew P. Zammit

Jul 29th 2011, 12:08

I just hope for a better country now that divorce has been introduced...I'm sure will have an answer in a couple of years time.

Will it be a positive outcome? Absolutely, No high hopes for that!!

Philip Hili

Jul 29th 2011, 12:30

Yes, it is!!
Let's everyone change his ID card to an address somewhere in the tenth district!!!!!! because the time for reckoning is approaching.

Mr Kyle Boffa

Jul 29th 2011, 13:32

le.. ibqa rraguna hekk ha timxi l quddiem

Mr D Galea

Jul 29th 2011, 13:06

Ftakar waħda ħabib: MAJORITY IS NOT ALWAYS RIGHT!

Philip Hili

Jul 29th 2011, 13:52

@ Mr D Galea

Not "MAJORITY IS NOT ALWAYS RIGHT!" , what majority!!!

Labour sympathisers who contributed to this majority, in this consultative referendum were they prepared to vote PN had the PN introduced the question of divorce in its electoral manifesto???

Mr F J Brincat

Jul 29th 2011, 11:49

So, when are you going to divorce then Mr Mifsud? You make it sound like you are going to be dragged to the lawyers' office and made to sign off half of your life savingst...so...when is it going to be?

Philip Hili

Jul 29th 2011, 12:14

@ Mr Henry Mifsud

Is the Constitutional Court functioning??
I think that you remember that there were times when this court was not functioning during the dark days of the socialist regime!!

Nobody has the guts to challenge this law due to the fact of Article 2 Chapter 1 speaks for itself ?

Mr. President, it is not the divorce law that it is questionable, but the way this law is going to be entranced.

Will it not be more proper to consult both parties so that they reach an agreement in order to amend the Constitution and them entrance the divorce bill? Or are you going to do the other way round, first you entrance the law and then seek consultations with the parties concerned?

Sorry for my humble opinion but as things stands, I think that there is something wrong at this point in time!

Mr Henry Mifsud

Jul 29th 2011, 15:30

@ FJ Brincat. Normally I ignore such arrogant questions but in your case I won't. From what you wrote it is quite evident that you are well experienced perhaps because you have already been had and are paying dearly for the consequences. For your information I have been happily married for the past 34 years and hopefully I shall keep to my word up to the day I die. But God forbid should for any reason I would have to resort to divorce, rest assured that finances would be the least of my worries. Now back to business i.e. mind your own business.

@ Philip Hili. Your humble opinion speaks volumes and in a way you are agreeing to what I've stated. The only exception is that I can hardly see your suggestion taking shape as long as Gonzi & Co are still around. It might conflict with their conscience!

Philip Hili

Jul 30th 2011, 00:55

@ Henry Mifsud

Yes I agree with what you have said as regards to Article 2 chapter 1.
Sometimes I am at a loss and I must say that you are right in your conclusion!!

Mr FRANS H SAID

Jul 29th 2011, 11:44

very funny

Mr Erin Ciantar

Jul 29th 2011, 12:04

Not exactly more European. In fact just like all the other European states. Actually make that global states. (Barring one fanatically religious state who are also discussing the introduction of divorce)

Mr Charles Falzon

Jul 29th 2011, 12:23

Mr John Zammit-Spiteri......cause we are still waiting for Austin Gatt's party....forsi flok il party li kellu jamel jekk ma jaddix id divorzju jghamel wiehed tas success tal Arriva forsi!!!!!

Ms C. Dimech

Jul 29th 2011, 11:02

your comment shows an extreme lack of respect for all those who voted for or against and for the whole process that the country went through.

Kenneth Cassar

Jul 29th 2011, 11:13

"just get one overseas should one want a divorce !".

And what makes you think it would be quicker that way?

Carlos Espinal

Jul 29th 2011, 11:18

Wooohooo!!!! next stop! GAY MARRIAGE!

hahahaah

Kenneth Cassar

Jul 29th 2011, 11:59

@ Carlos Espinal:

Why not?

joe Grima

Jul 29th 2011, 10:57

exactly !!

aldo Attard

Jul 29th 2011, 11:08

Arriva, Arriva; do not forget.

Stephen Koludrovic

Jul 29th 2011, 11:09

The circus has only just started.

Mark Galea

Jul 29th 2011, 11:13

Mr Buttigieg ... the effects of divorce are considerable ... such an impact on society is very large indeed ... so I would not think it is fair for those who opposed it /agree with it to shut up now (do not forget that a large minority voted against).

Divorce law has been enacted today so you should be happy. But those who oppose/agree with it always have the right to dicuss it further ... in the future it may need changing, adjusting or even, who knows, removal if nobody marries any more.

Ray Gatt

Jul 29th 2011, 11:47

@ Mark Galea - those who opposed it don't have to use it. Punto e basta.

Mr Anthony Pace Gouder

Jul 29th 2011, 12:00

@Mark Galea Since the outcome of the Divorce Result , I have had the chance to meet old friends and family relatives etc. whom I found mostly had voted against . Mainly the Reason given was because of their Religious belief !!!!!!!!!!

John Zammit-Spiteri

Jul 29th 2011, 13:17

@ a pace gouder

I voted against it not from a religious point of view, but from a social point of view! Church's social teachings walk hand in hand with society needs. From day one some clever ones tried to picture divorce as a means to weaken the church and to free us from its net!!! There was never any net, there was only protection. This has absolutely nothing to do with the church. Those who are faithfull to the church and its religious teachings will continue to do so , but those who have no respect to human welfare will start taking advantage of this new expiry by date marriage and lets get on with the next wedding! This is a disaster day for Malta considering that Malta ranks as lowest of the low where it comes to social values.
This will bring about a chain of events and I wish to hear anyone complain that taxes have increased and crime is on the rise! These will increase not thanks to people like me , but thanks to people who felt we are ready to join all the states who at least were prepared. Never in the history of our polical laws has a law been passes so swiftly.

The Family has been dealth a blow and this brings pain and more. This Divorce mess has nothing to do with religion, only with commitment and responsibilities and carefull planning. Thanks to ignorance and selfishness we are going to be burdenend more with taxes which we dont need.

Advert
Advert