MPs discuss step-parents’ obligations
Step-parents would also have maintenance obligations and other duties towards their stepchildren in particular circumstances, while the rights of the natural father and mother will be respected, according to the Bill introducing divorce.
This and other outstanding issues were discussed yesterday by the Parliamentary Committee for the Consideration of Bills at an informal meeting at the Attorney General’s office before being presented at committee stage by Nationalist MP Francis Zammit Dimech and Labour MP Owen Bonnici today.
The law would provide for instances when a person acted in loco parentis but the step-parents’ obligations would be set by law if the natural parent had either died, was absent from Malta, or was unknown, Dr Zammit Dimech said. In layman’s terms, “if a man marries a divorcee, who has children, and their father is dead, absent from the country, or unknown, the husband cannot say they are not his and, therefore, not part of the new family that is being formed”.
The step-parents’ legal obligations are a reflection of the importance of the children’s integration into the new family, Dr Zammit Dimech said.
“Of course, we do not want to go to the extreme that the natural father becomes a non-father just because his former wife has remarried. He is still the father and that can never be changed, even if his obligations cannot be realistically fulfilled,” he said.
A stepfather’s legal duties, as defined in the divorce legislation, would always be without prejudice to the rights of the natural parent because an unknown father could become known and an absent father could return, he explained.
Other issues discussed yesterday included the definition of rules of maintenance and how they apply to spouses, as well as to parents and children.
“We did not want to distinguish between the maintenance duties when a couple separates, or divorces, and if the marriage is still ongoing,” Dr Zammit Dimech said.
The discussion also tackled children’s rights – not just of separated and divorced couples – to “reinforce” their protection, Dr Bonnici said, adding that the law would strengthen the right to receive maintenance.
The meeting discussed how maintenance should be calculated by the courts, and the Divorce Bill would address abuse in the calculation of social benefits, Dr Bonnici said, referring to a practice that has taken root, whereby the parties to a separation case struck an agreement in order to be able to receive social benefits they were not entitled to.
He said the law would also enunciate the main principles related to the pensions of divorced spouses and further amendments would be made to various laws.
The setting up of a technical governmental committee was proposed. Its mission would be to analyse every other law that could be influenced by the Bill to render it “divorce compliant”, given that it was agreed it would have an impact on other laws, particularly those dealing with social security and pensions.
The committee, chaired by the Justice Minister, would have to prepare a report on the impact of divorce legislation on other laws by the end of February. The minister would have until the end of June to make whatever amendments are required in other laws, which could then be brought into force by means of a legal notice.
Three clauses were discussed at yesterday’s meeting over about four hours, with about the same number of clauses still to be addressed, Dr Bonnici said, adding that, while progress was registered, the committee was not rushing through the Bill. “They are so important that we spent more than an hour on each clause, inspecting every word,” he said.
The meeting, which involved the participation of Attorney General Peter Grech, was “constructive and not political”, focusing on the purely technical, with both parties acting bona fide, Dr Bonnici said, adding that “we forgot where we come from and tried to draft the best law possible”.
The remaining clauses will continue to be discussed before they are presented to Parliament next Monday, when a final vote will be taken.
8 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
D M Grech
Jul 18th 2011, 14:19
Why is this issue of parental responsibility being discussed in conjunction with the divorce bill?
Divorce is about the legal termination of a marriage "contract" and MAYBE about a new marriage contracted by a divorcee but CERTAINLY NOT about (single, married or divorced) parent's legal obligations towards their (natural, adopted or acquired) children.
Mr john vella
Jul 18th 2011, 13:08
Please! Please!
Do not continue to be more wise than those who have been tried!
Get advice from those that are in the pot. Surely new found experts on this subject will not be able to form laws just for the sake to have a law.
Call those who experienced this situation, call those tried, before you continue with this mess.
How on earth bachelors or come lately politicians become experts on family problems to the extent they become competent to form new laws?
From the outside everyone have ideas how to do things better. Will it be better in the end?
Ms Gillian Snook
Jul 18th 2011, 11:36
Not everyone who divorces and then remarries has a football teams worth of children. Therefore in most cases there should be no problem with the ruling. I for one would welcome to be legally responsible for my future stepdaughter after all the years we have been together.
Joe Brincat-LL.D
Jul 18th 2011, 10:35
I have tested this proposal with someone with enough common sense but no legal background.
This is a big disincentive to remarry after divorce. Cohabitation will prevail.
Imagine the scenario of a husband, who gets a divorce because his wife ran away with another, and he has two children from that marriage. Now we remarries, and this time with a woman who has two children, father being unknown. The new couple have their own child. Is that husband going to be bound to supply maintenance to 5 children (legally also in the case of the two children who are not his).
Do you remember that Doris Day commedy, "Mine, Yours and Ours" ?
Mr George Calleja
Jul 18th 2011, 12:53
I agree with Dr.Joe Brincat's argument. This issue was also raised during the run up to the referedum but unfortunately was discarded by the pro-divorce movement. Now it is again being raised. Is it too late ?
Mr john vella
Jul 18th 2011, 15:06
In a scenario of a foreigner with four children legally divorced in his country of origin and want to take a Maltese for the sole scope to gain Maltese citizenship, and has two children from his second marriage, and divorce after he gain his citizenship. (1) What happen then if he want his first wife and children with him live in Malta to form what by right is his 'a family' and by contact with the other family? (2) What happen to the second wife and children? (3) What proportion of his income go to his first wife and to his second wife and for him to live on?
These are the order of the day and no rules by the book will solve down to earth happening in today's Malta.
Mr C Briffa
Jul 18th 2011, 09:21
More amendments on the way, in a few days time I think if another referendum will be held the Yes will not manage to get 40%. Remember when they told you that divorce should not be for the rich, so who can afford with these conditions. The No movement was right when they said that the maintenance will create problems.
Austin Farrugia
Jul 18th 2011, 09:11
well done for the hard work to both parties