Advert

‘Gonzi said No when country voted Yes’

Transport Minister Austin Gatt had taken all the credit for the public transport reform but disappeared at the first sign of trouble. Arriva had the decency to apologise for the problems caused by the routes drawn up by the authorities but the government did not – Joseph Muscat

Transport Minister Austin Gatt had taken all the credit for the public transport reform but disappeared at the first sign of trouble. Arriva had the decency to apologise for the problems caused by the routes drawn up by the authorities but the government did not – Joseph Muscat

The Prime Minister’s decision to vote against on the second reading of the divorce Bill amounted to lack of trust in the country’s clear Yes vote in the referendum, Labour leader Joseph Muscat said yesterday.

“The people said Yes and, yet, he still hard-headedly voted no. It was a vote of no confidence,” Dr Muscat said in an interview on party-owned One Radio.

Lawrence Gonzi’s vote in Parliament on Wednesday reflected his leadership style, an outdated one, where he closed his ears to what the country wanted, Dr Muscat said. Such leadership led the Nationalist Party into a dead end because he was not reading the signs of the times even though Parliament had voted in favour of the divorce Bill on its second reading.

“We have a situation where Parliament, in a clear majority, voted in favour of a principle to introduce a civil liberty – in this case divorce – but the Nationalist Party’s official stand is still against it,” Dr Muscat said. And he never heard Dr Gonzi say the party would review its stand, he added.

On the other hand, the Labour Party did keep up with up the times and had taken a number of difficult decisions in the past, such as when it changed its stand on the EU in 2004. “It was very hard after all that time to change internally… but the Nationalist Party doesn’t have the courage to say it wants to change,” Dr Muscat said.

The PL also implemented a number of other changes, including to its statute, and realised that the time for partisan politics – and those were associated with blue or red – was over because it was a time for ideas and principles, he said. Dr Muscat publicly welcomed to his party Sliema deputy mayor Cyrus Engerer, who resigned from the PN late last week and was considering contesting the next election with Labour.

He pointed out that there were other people, such as pro-divorce campaigner Deborah Schembri, who had never formed part of the PL but changed their mind.

Turning to public transport operator Arriva, Dr Muscat said Transport Minister Austin Gatt had taken all the merit for the reform while launching the transport service but disappeared at the first sign of trouble.

Arriva had the decency to apologise for the problems caused by the routes drawn up by the authorities but the government did not, he said.

Dr Muscat said he would have had more respect for the government had it been consistent on the issue, which took 18 months to plan and cost about €400,000 in consultancy fees.

Speaking about pensions, Dr Muscat said it was “unacceptable” that Dr Gonzi agreed with the EU to raise the retirement age for the second time in five years without informing anyone. Saying the government’s pension reform had “failed”, Dr Muscat said Dr Gonzi could not be trusted again on such a delicate issue.

The PL believed in increasing women’s participation in the workforce. It also believed the sustainability of pensions was tied to a growing economy, he said.

People could not always be forced to continue working because elderly people were crucial in taking care of their grandchildren, allowing parents to continue working, Dr Muscat said.

Advert

21 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Mr leo attard

Jul 19th 2011, 20:32

ms camenzuli...what can one say, engerer was like the blind mand in the bible ---- I was blind, but now i see! and that is more than i can say for you!

James Camilleri

Jul 20th 2011, 12:56

I read a comment by you Ms MaryJo that you voted PL or used to.

Anthony Roberts

Jul 18th 2011, 17:34

St. Thomas More went against Henry VIII because dear old Henry wanted to marry Anne Bolyn to have an heir not because dear old Henry was wife battering, or abusing his children. Despite St. Thomas more saying no and keeping to his idea of loyalty to God, dear old Henry went on to have Anne murdered so that he could re-marry not once by five more times. How can you compare what happend in those days to what is happening today??????

Mr Tony Camilleri

Jul 18th 2011, 11:38

The mortal sin has been dead so long that it has become a skeleton.

Mr Tony Camilleri

Jul 18th 2011, 10:29

Give us the official figures of the referendum results.
Are you also counting the abstentions?
If so, the same abstentions should also be counted as regards the eu membership referendum.

Mario Camilleri

Jul 18th 2011, 13:01

Why did all this had to go as far as parliament? There was no need for the paramilitaries to vote a second time, whether consultative or abrogative. Each had expressed his/her conscience on Saturdays voting day. So Gonzi and his cabinet shot at their feet. It would have made much more sense to accept the referendum result and move on to legislate in a civil manner. That way none of those who for the first time voted with their conscience at heart would have had to vote neither against nor in favour. And that way the PN would still be friends with his constituents who voted YES. And that way Cirus Engere would still be a Pn candidate. And that way those who voted against the peoples' will would not be called traitors.
All in all this is "logic".

Alfred Falzon

Jul 18th 2011, 14:54

@ Tony and Mario Camilleri

"traitors", "official figures", "abstentions", "dictator"...

What's all this hotchpotch and jumble of third-world mentality terms, as if we are living on another planet?

1. It was former PL Prime Minister Alfred Sant who prouded himsef on the much fewer number of abstentions following the EU referendum, not Dr Gonzi!
2. "Traitors" are those who renegade their party by joining another without deigning to resign from the post to which their constituents had voted them!
3. I have given the official figures: 53% which in truth is only 38% of the total electorate!
4. A "dictator" is one who dictates how one should vote, like PL leader Joseph Muscat did when he wanted all his MPs to vote "yes"! A person who is invested with absolute authority over his peers!

Dr Lawrence Gonzi was democratic enough to bow to the referendum outcome. When the EU referendum results were out, the PL ignored the "official results" (much, much higher than the Divorce Referendum figures) and called its supporters out in the streets to celebrate the "victory", only to gulp down their sheer obstinacy and democratic deficit after the elections, a few weeks later!

Mr Tony Camilleri

Jul 18th 2011, 22:38

Alfred Falzon Dr Muscat said from the evry beginning that he was inn favour of divorce but that he was going to give a free vote to the PL MPs

Advert
Advert