Defector considers contesting election on Labour Party ticket
Cyrus Engerer: Liberals feeling uncomfortable in the PN.
Sliema deputy mayor Cyrus Engerer, who resigned from the Nationalist Party on Friday, is considering contesting the next general election on the Labour ticket.
“Yes, there has been talk (with Labour officials) about me contesting the next election. However, in the meantime what is important for me is that I am going to be an active member of the Labour Party and will be working to see a change in certain policies of the party, which, in my view, can be improved,” he said.
In recent days he has spoken with PL party officials and to Labour leader Joseph Muscat, with whom he has a meeting this week. He was also offered a position on the party’s think tank, the Ideat Foundation.
Mr Engerer’s resigned from the PN after calling for the Prime Minister’s resignation in the wake of Lawrence Gonzi’s No vote against divorce legislation on Wednesday.
Speaking to The Sunday Times yesterday, Mr Engerer said the decision has been long coming and pointed out he had told PN administration officials immediately after the referendum he was not feeling “comfortable” with the direction the party was taking, and warned them he would resign if the Prime Minister’s vote “went against the will of the majority”.
However, the idea goes further back to his involvement with the cross party pro-divorce movement Stand Up.
“I worked closely with a number of Labour members and MPs within the Stand Up movement. I spoke with the young people within the Labour Party and it became clear that we have the same aims and the same principles. I was left thinking I don’t get the same feeling within the Nationalist Party,” he said.
“My position is not unique and there are others in the Nationalist Party who share my position. I was contacted by a lot of people as the Prime Minister’s vote approached and can assure you I’m not alone,” he stressed, highlighting it was a difficult decision but one he is “relieved” to have taken.
“A lot of Nationalists have complained that the time when we try to change PN is over because the party does not want to change. It has become a party that is closed and which is becoming more conservative and confessional,” he said.
But although he reported a positive response to his move from family, friends and constituents, many, including online commentators, criticised the sudden switch of allegiance.
Only a few weeks ago at the PN general council, Mr Engerer was criticising Joseph Muscat’s general lack of vision on economic policy among other things.
Mr Engerer said he still disagreed with Labour’s stand not to disclose its economic policies for the time being, but said he had come round after being given briefings about what the party was planning.
“In this past week I have met and learnt what Labour is planning and I really feel comfortable with it. My opinion is still that the Labour Party should discuss these plans with the public and disclose what its policies are,” he said.
Mr Engerer had also criticised Dr Muscat’s comments on Xarabank regarding gay marriage (as opposed to civil partnerships) and the adoption of children by same sex couples.
“I can tell you there is a big team in the Labour Party who believe in full equality and I will be forming part of this team. Joseph Muscat, like many others, has his opinion and it doesn’t mean that opinions don’t change,” he said.
He insisted the PL was already well ahead of the Nationalist Party in its proposals.
“The reality is that you have a Nationalist Party which is dormant on these issues. If you look at what the Labour Party is proposing, not only is there a first step but a very large step forward towards equality,” he said.
Mr Engerer has vowed to remain on the Sliema council as an independent councillor despite calls by PN general secretary Paul Borg Olivier, whom, he said, called on Friday to ask him to step down.
“I will remain loyal to the people who elected me. If you speak to the people and councillors in my village they will tell you I have served Sliema with energy and enthusiasm.”
He said that although he was elected on the PN ticket, people knew where they stood when they voted for him, insisting that the party had changed –not him.
“The Nationalist Party was always conservative. However, in the past at least there was a mix, a collage of conservatives and liberals.
“Today that collage is being painted all in the same colour, it’s becoming much more conservative and much more confessional and the liberal people within the party are feeling very uncomfortable,” he said.
165 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Henry S. Pace
Jul 19th 2011, 19:28
@ Mr Jo Meli
'Sliema is a VILLAGE with an ego of a town !
Even Birkirkara, from where Sliema got its 'independence' is a VILLAGE. '
The meaning of a village according to the Oxford Dictionary is -- assemblage of houses larger than a hamlet and smaller than a Town.
Yes the people of B'Kara call it ir-Rahal. . However B'Kara is the largest town in Malta followed by Mosta and Qormi.
Any other comments are superflous.
MaryJo Camenzuli
Jul 18th 2011, 21:02
CYRUS ENGERER, Kunsill Ġenerali Partit Nazzjonalista, 17th June 2011:
“ Kemm jien kburi li qiegħed nindirizza l-Kunsill Ġenerali, għax matul dawn it-30 sena, il-Partit Nazzjonalista kien il-forza politika li spirat bidla u progress, immodernizzajna l-ekonomija u tajna tama ta’ futur aħjar lill-ġenerazzjonijiet il-ġodda.
“ Ksibna d-demokrazija, u ma waqafniex, għax ridna l-aqwa u l-aħjar u ħdimna biex Malta saret membru tal-Unjoni Ewropea, fejn saħħaħna l-valuri tas-solidarjetà, tolleranza u ugwaljanza…
“Ksibna dan kollu flimkien, u dan is-suċċess ħadd ma jista’ joħodhulna. Qiegħed nirrappreżenta dan is-suċċess anke f’Tas-Sliema. Hemmhekk, bi kburija, kuljum, f’isem il-Partit Nazzjonalista, niddefendi l-valuri tagħna…
“ Bħalma esperjenza l-Partit bosta drabi, kull sfida tista’ tintrebaħ u Malta għandha bżonn lill-Partit Nazzjonalista…
“ Jgħidu x’jgħidu tal-Partit Laburista, u jpinġuna kif jippruvaw ipinġuna, aħna għandna l-aqwa tim li għandu jkompli jiggverna lil dan il-pajjiż. ”
.
Mr leo attard
Jul 19th 2011, 20:36
'flimkien kollox possibli'
money no problem!
Mark Muscat
Jul 18th 2011, 14:27
What do you know about politics and economics if you have just joined politics recently? Your presence wasn't much felt, so with or without you its just the same.
Emma Grima
Jul 18th 2011, 14:04
What I can't understand is how could Mr. Engerer join the party he has been critisizing for quite some time. Also how could a party who has been criticised by this person 'accept him with open arms' Let's put aside the crap and not delve into who is tolerable or not. Doesn't this move from PL's side smell fishy to anyone??? It certainly does to me. Time will tell. PL is NEVER to be trusted.
J Pavia
Jul 18th 2011, 13:47
wasal iz-zmien li Joseph Muscat irid jitkellem car u tond u jiddikkjara minnufih jekk jaqbilx maz-zwieg bejn l-omosesswali.
Mr Charles Falzon
Jul 18th 2011, 07:58
As you can see Cyrus...the friends whom you had within the Nationalist Party (those who consider themselves as Christians more than the Pope himself) x jikkritikawk bl ahrax ghad decizjoni li hadt. But how can one be a member of the Nationalist Party when you read the below comments? In Nazzjonalisti vera intollerabbli. Jew li jghidu huma jew xejn. Cyrus welcome to the Labour Party. I m sure you will succeed. Keep it up!
MaryJo Camenzuli
Jul 18th 2011, 15:58
Criticism = 'hate'?
To see real hate, go into websites specifically setup by Labour sympathisers
to intimidate and dish out gutter dirt on people who criticise Labour
and read the insults and name-calling of Cyrus Engerer...
until he was with the Nationalists.
.
Joe Fenech
Jul 19th 2011, 07:31
Ms Camenzuli
Criticism = hate? You seem to be redefining the concept of criticism !
Mr Charles.C. Brown
Jul 17th 2011, 23:58
One thing is certain, labour cant do worse then what we have seen in the last couple of years by the PN.and thats a fact.
MaryJo Camenzuli
Jul 18th 2011, 15:59
Ask the Greeks, Spaniards, Italians, Portuguese and Irish.
.
Ms L Dimech
Jul 17th 2011, 22:17
What a stupid excuse - if you were a fraction of the man Dr. Gonzi is, you would resign pronto, since you are occupying that seat now under false pretensions - unless you've made yourself believe you've been elected to councillor by the labourites. And you dare criticise Dr. Gonzi - why? have you ever heard him say he's in favour of divorce? Also, please take note that unless a nationalist had the guts to push that through, Joseph Muscat would have just gone one promising and eventually done nothing.
I wonder if you joined the PL how you're going to tackle those matters you don't agree with Dr,. Muscat on or do you hope to join 'factions' like you tried to do now? I can't see you having great days as a politician, actually as nothing at all !
As a contributor said, good riddance ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, let's face it, for a nonentity bad publicity is better than no publicity. Savour this moment, because in whichever camp you'll chose to be, you won't have another publicity build up like now. Enjoy, enjoy. Bye Bye Cyrus.
Alfred Falzon
Jul 17th 2011, 21:52
A drowning man will clutch at a straw!
That's what the story is all about!
So good luck to him and his newly found company!
After all, the PL is made up of anyone who wants to join in the merry making and let's have a whale of a time!
Mind you, the next election could spring a surprise in the wake of what Labour MP Evarist Bartolo likes so much to quote: "A week is a long time in politics!"
And he may be right, after all!
Steve Pace
Jul 18th 2011, 12:33
Your comment "After all, the PL is made up of anyone who wants to join in the merry making and let's have a whale of a time!"
reminds me very much of the attitude some people had towards those labour supporters who during the EU campaign decided to join PN. Who knows , perhaps it was the PN that at the time was giving so much of a false sense of security .
Alfred Falzon
Jul 18th 2011, 15:52
@Steve Pace
When it is a question of a "false sense of security" one has only to recall the marriage of convenience between the PL and Karmenu Mifsud Bonnici's CNN during the EU Referendum campaign, the latter currently actively engaged in playing the apologist for the ruthless Khadafi regime crimes against humanity under cover of a splinter movement made up of a few individuals!
Can you imagine Malta today under such a lackey administration?!
Can you likewise imagine Malta sharing a secret military treaty with North Korea?
Do you call that an authentic "sense of security"?
Maria Vassallo
Jul 17th 2011, 21:05
Cyrus,
Congratulations for resigning from the PN!
You have my backing and blessing!
Indeed, go and join the PL!
It is a vote in favour of the PN!
Good riddance to................
Mr David Farrugia
Jul 18th 2011, 15:35
one can now understand WHY your rants against divorce. It was obviously a political issue for you.
Ms Maria Vella
Jul 18th 2011, 19:20
Am sure now that you have given Cyrus your blessing, he will sleep at peace. am sure he was waiting for it
hallina, tridx
Henry S. Pace
Jul 17th 2011, 20:28
Cyrus Engerer said. “I will remain loyal to the people who elected me. If you speak to the people and councillors in my village they will tell you I have served Sliema with energy and enthusiasm.”
How naive Cyrus could be . He describes Sliema as a village . He fails to distinguish between a village and a Town. Sliema is a town and not a village.
Roderick Spiteri
Jul 18th 2011, 08:27
You really don't have anything to comment about huh!? lolll tut tut
Mr Jo Meli
Jul 18th 2011, 15:40
Sliema is a VILLAGE with an ego of a town !
Even Birkirkara, from where Sliema got its 'independence' is a VILLAGE.
Hallina Henry :)
Alfred Falzon
Jul 17th 2011, 19:31
The saying that nobody can challenge for its veracity: "A drowning man will clutch at a straw"!
What else can one expect?
Alfred Mangion
Jul 17th 2011, 19:12
"Can a party with the Labour party’s history be trusted when its MPs act in this way? I believe that people are intelligent, and although at times listening to Labour Party leader, Dr. Joseph Muscat, might entice some to try something ‘new’, the fact that it is clear that Labour wants a short-cut to power, should result in a ‘blackout’ for Labour itself".
Article by Cyrus Engerer on cyrusengerer.com
My comment: He who has ears, let him hear.
MaryJo Camenzuli
Jul 18th 2011, 16:01
He has been enticed, then, as he puts it.
With what?
.
Mark Galea
Jul 17th 2011, 18:51
Kif kont ktibt xhur ilu, il-Labour qed jipprova jigbor kull element possible biex jirbah l-elezzjoni li jmiss ... u hemm cans li jirbahha, imma wara kif ser tmexxi l-arka ta Noe, sur Napuljun.
alex Borg
Jul 17th 2011, 18:41
We all know what successes PN defectors to the PL did... just like Sandro Schembri Adami for example... any other more successful defector?
jack bristow
Jul 17th 2011, 19:21
Your comment smells like full of hatred...
Can imagine your feelings are all concentrated around the real picture...
That your time is out...
KEEP IT UP MR ENGERER, SHOW THESE "sirs" YOU CAN DO IT & BE PROUD OF YOUR CAPABILITY.
FUTURE BELONGS TO PEOPLE CAPABLE TO CHANGE, LET FOLLOWERS BARK.
Mr l Azzopardi
Jul 17th 2011, 19:36
se tqabbel il-schembri adami ma Cyrus? u hallina!!
J. Schembri
Jul 17th 2011, 19:46
Nikki Dimech and Mario Farrugia Borg.
I wonder where these guys are hidden!
Joseph Borg
Jul 17th 2011, 18:01
Is this some kind of prank? .. are you telling me i voted for a spy in the last election? this is an outrage!
The nationalist party do not need these type of people.... After this it is clear Labour is where you belong... you btrayed the nationalist party and labour betrayed a nation!
Andrew Cumbo
Jul 17th 2011, 17:44
Why all this criticism to Mr. Engerer. I justify Cyrus move 100% when comparing to the speech of Hon Michael Gonzi, when he said he didn’t voted no, because he didn’t want to be a dictatorial. Why all this flare to Cyrus and nobody mentioned the Prime Minister Brother speech? Why don’t you admit that this is another big mistake from the Prime Minister? When it was him that wanted the referendum, and principally it should be him to stand with the referendum result once the people democratically chose the no vote. But again our Prime minister is not feeling the pulse of the Maltese people and on several issues he is heading our country to a total failure.
MALCOLM SEYCHELL
Jul 17th 2011, 17:38
Every honest nationalists knows that Gonzi changed the party. So you all should know who the real traitor of the party is. Surely not Mr Engerer
MaryJo Camenzuli
Jul 17th 2011, 17:51
Do you agree with gay marriage, Mr Seychell?
.
Mr John Azzopoardi
Jul 17th 2011, 18:13
Yes, but you don't change a party because you disagree or do not like Gonzi. YOu have a set of values and it's like to doing a 360 to change what you really believe in. I do believe, the PN will lose in the next election, at that point, the PN can elect a new leader and start the healing process . A party gets stronger, after it gets a dose of reality and lose and electon.
Mr Charles Bayliss
Jul 17th 2011, 18:59
MaryJo
Is it possible that you can read? Did Mr Seychell mention Gay Marriage in the above comment? Or you wanted to be a homophobic ass???!!!
J. Schembri
Jul 17th 2011, 19:51
John Azzoppardi I hope like you do that it will be a 360 degree turn not a 180 .
This is typical PL inteligentia writing!
Mr anna maria xuereb
Jul 17th 2011, 22:00
@ Mary jo camenzuli: what s your problem? you really need to give the keyboard a break and get a life. bitter about the yes vote, and now this! And yes we do want gay marriages because gays have the right to a happy life too! and no it will not lead to abortion and euthanasia so spare us your bitterness please.
Andy Farrugia
Jul 18th 2011, 10:18
@ Charles Bayliss
Since when has asking a question "Do you agree with gay marriage?" come to indicate homophobia? Is this your level of tolerance? Branding other people as "homophobic ass(es)?
@ Anna Maria Xuereb
"And yes we do want gay marriages because gays have the right to a happy life too!" So, according to you a happy life can only be obtained through marriage and those people who do not marry are condemned to a lifetime of unhappiness. Interesting. While we're at it, can you tell us what makes you so sure that abortion and euthanasia will not follow?
MaryJo Camenzuli
Jul 18th 2011, 12:04
Charles Bayliss,
Anna Maria Xuereb,
I was asking Malcolm Seychell whether he agrees with gay marriage.
Can I?
.
Mary Borg
Jul 18th 2011, 12:43
Mr Anna Maria,
"you really need to give the keyboard a break and get a life."
Why don't you mind your own business Mr Anna Maria?
David Seychell
Jul 18th 2011, 15:31
"and no it will not lead to abortion and euthanasia so spare us your bitterness please. "
Abortion and same-sex "marriage" are both slippery slopes towards each other. The introduction of abortion would mean that Society does not care about the natural right of the unborn child to have a life, whilst the introduction of Same-sex "marriage" would mean that Society does not care about the natural right or need of children to have a mother and father.
MaryJo Camenzuli
Jul 17th 2011, 17:18
I presume Cyrus Engerer is saying that if, in future,
a referendum is held about gay marriage
and the majority of electors votes against,
then Mr Engerer must change his opinion and
vote against gay marriage if he is in Parliament.
.
Peter Gatt
Jul 17th 2011, 17:44
well said
Mario Micallef
Jul 17th 2011, 17:52
well done and well said MaryJo
Alfred Mangion
Jul 17th 2011, 19:37
Ms Camenzuli, do not presume anything with the likes of Cyrus Engerer. Just to remind you and others that he is quoted to have said that "the progressive movement led by Dr Muscat represented his principles and values". Does he mean to say that the PL represent the "Demochristian" principles and values, amongst other principles and values, that on the 27 June 2011 when addressing the PN General Council, Cyrus Engerer declared that he was so proud of?
Go and say that to the marines, Cyrus, but ensure that the marines are drunk if you want them to believe you.
Anyone who wishes to realise, if he has not as yet realised, what stuff Cyrus Engerer is made of, he should visit his articles on his website cyrusengerer.com.
Mr C Briffa
Jul 17th 2011, 16:49
On a famous blog which side with the pl they used to call him all sorts of names now they removed the comments. I think cyrus is very short sighted, welcome home cyrus at the pl were you will be used, not trusted as any defector and just in case kindly note rule no.1 of the pl party. This is liberal party so you cannot speak against the the leader or against any policy of the party anything else is permited once you submit yourself to the pl leaders and check your speech.
Very soon after the spotlights will be switched off you will soon get a Taste of their medicine, by the way in the past you allready tasted their medicine.
The pn was so liberal that left you to resign without any conditions
I Bugeja
Jul 17th 2011, 16:42
The past is not a warrant for the future and having politicians struggling to keep on going without real insight of what people want detaches them from any real possibility of representing us people. This mockery of a referendum should not have occured in the first place and it will be pivotal in the next elections for the PL. Further effects will surely be seen. Cyrus' resignation from the PN is one of them; not as a consequence of the NO vote but as a consequence of a government who fails to realise what the people want. We saw this in the past and will see it again. People may allow more taxes, less employment etc but when they are faced with an emotional challenge they will choose those who will not insult their intelligence. People may either decide whether to dig their head under the sand or move on with progress whether or not its convenient for the party!
Mr Charles camilleri
Jul 17th 2011, 16:37
I just heard a recording on You tube of your address to the PN councellors. There you spoke as a staunchly party activist and strongly praise DR. Gonzi.
Now suddenly you switched allegiance on just one count. Have you changed your principles too????????
BY your action you have been added on the list of unreliable persons.. You are no longer credible neither with labour nor with the Nats.
Mr Charles camilleri
Jul 17th 2011, 16:26
Everyone is welcomed on board so long as they can give us a push.
MaryJo Camenzuli
Jul 17th 2011, 17:42
Do you need a push?
.
Alfred Falzon
Jul 17th 2011, 21:31
@Charles Camilleri
Mind you, this Cyrus Engerer who favours gay marriage, might give you too big a push,...and then?
Robert Vella
Jul 17th 2011, 14:38
As I said before in my previous post , many of you are criticizing that which has been done by Cyrus Engeger .
The guy may have moved from one political party to another so what if that what he believed in was put aside by his party why should he stay in a party where his ideas and believes are ignored even though it he has and won the right along with the rest of the General public .
Regarding the comment where someone said that the PL accepts everyone as long as they are anti PN is insulting and unfounded .
To disagree and criticize is one thing, to insult a Political Party is an other I my self look at politics with an eye of regard and I have no party color but that experienced by the actions of Gonzi and his minions in the last months have made me a pillar in the stand for a more Liberal and truly democratic way to run the country which should have much more than this and I believe that right now the wave and the shout of the General public is urging for a long awaited change This because of many reasons which are not discussable in this argument or forum , what I think my self by looking at many hateful and offensive comments towards Cyrus and the PL is that many people have grown in the notion that because they are leading a regular happy life they are completely disregarding those who for some reason or an other are , not comfortable with the current situation on the Island .
I believe that the minorities are to be respected , but at the same time I also think and underline that the MAJORITY of the people should also be respected also so when MR. GONZI voted NO he had no respect for the thousands of Maltese who for years have literally cried there hearts out in favor of the divorce issue and after finally gaining the Majority .
He literally looked at those thousands of people who had faith in him and in the democratic system and said to them " Regardless of what you are crying out for , and even tough it was YOU who gave me the power to be The Prime minister I am still going to ignore what you want what you won and what is yours as a right" and go against the will of the people .
Now with all respects I am open for criticism on this post so go ahead if you believe what you are saying comes from the heart and not from a you being a political partisan .
Thankyou
Kenneth Galea
Jul 17th 2011, 14:12
Cyrus has every right to make an informed decision and listen to his heart. I certainly agree with Cyrus that the Conservative Government of Malta (and elsewhere too) is too Conservative in his views and ought to be more liberal. We are living in 2011 and one must move on according to the times.
Cyrus feels that the Conservative Government is no longer for him because it showed him its true colours. Dr Joseph Muscat is much more liberal for sure and I admire Dr Muscat for taking on board Cyrus. Well done Joseph Muscat for showing your clear and liberal views once again.
MaryJo Camenzuli
Jul 17th 2011, 15:28
Will Joseph Muscat grant gay marriage?
.
MaryJo Camenzuli
Jul 17th 2011, 15:34
I presume you are saying that if, in future,
a referendum is held about gay marriage
and the majority of electors votes against,
then Mr Engerer must change his opinion and
vote against gay marriage if he is in Parliament.
.
Mr Anthony Briffa
Jul 17th 2011, 15:35
Of course everybody can see JM's liberal views. Cyrus will learn at his own expense in due course what a means to an end means. He had better sought Dr. Vassallo's view on democracy and liberalism in the PL under JM before switching, in a short time as he wants us to believe, his allegiance from blue to red.
As the article is rightly calling him a defector, I want to ask Cyrus what did JM promise him on the PL manifesto for the next election. Maybe he has been promised that the either the PL will introduce same sex marraiges or should it win the nect election there will be somebody to introduce a private motion in parliament to that effect. By now we all know that JM/PL are not capable of taking an official stand on anything in order not to upset anybody. Their politics are fence politics.
Andy Farrugia
Jul 17th 2011, 19:22
@ MaryJo Camenzuli
"Will Joseph Muscat grant gay marriage?"
But even if this had to happen, which i doubt, it would not satisfy Mr Engerer. He is after "equality" and that includes adoption rights.
.
Colin Stanley
Jul 17th 2011, 13:49
How can one's principles change from one day to the next, I wouldn't trust him, I remember a long time ago, a pn candidate did the same thing for his personal reason, but he never got elected again not even from the labour supporters. and I ALSO DON'T BELIEVE IT WAS BECAUSE OF DIVORCE.
Mr M Saliba
Jul 17th 2011, 14:59
The politcal parties have the same main principle, they are supposed to work in favour of Malta and the Maltese. You can change party and remain faithful to your principal.
btw Mr Engereris a graduate in European Studies and Communications from the University of Malta, Cyrus obtained a Master Degree in Politics, specialising in European politics, at the College of Europe in Bruges, Belgium, which gave him the opportunity to experience first-hand European Union politics due to the College’s proximity to Brussels. ( from Syrus Engerer website)
Therefore Mr Engerer is very literate in politics, and is seeing things on a different level than us commentators
MaryJo Camenzuli
Jul 17th 2011, 17:20
Mr M Saliba:
He's surely no master in good politics
if he has crossed over to Labour
but wants to keep his seat in the Sliema local council
which he got because people wanted to vote for the Nationalist Party.
If he's a master in correct politics
he should have resigned
and would have gained some respect.
.
Mr M Saliba
Jul 17th 2011, 23:56
Ms MaryJo Camenzuli
You have to respect the fact that Mr Engerer has every right to be a member of a party of his choice. This already happened in Parliament when Wenzu Mintoff left the MLP and kept his parliamentary seat AD representative.
Mr Engerer has a every right to remain a member of the council. In fact the PN direction has shied away from publicly asking Mr Engerer to resign from the Sliema Local Council.
In order to respect the will of the majority of voters in the Sliema local council election , the Sliema mayor ought to be a PN represenatative, but this does not imply that the mayor should always vote in line with party direction. If the interest of his locality is different from that of the party, the mayor ought to follow the people's interest, rather than the party's direction. This also applies to the councillors.
Mr Engerer was elected by the people's vote and, and it is the people in the next local election who will decide if Mr Engerer is to remain a Sliema councillor or not.
jonathan galea
Jul 17th 2011, 13:41
PL will accept anyone and settle for every thing to gain power, but no way they will be trusted by me to run my country, ALWAYS BETTER THE DEVIL YOU KNOW, we survived for 28 yrs even during hard times, no need for change
Mr Jesmond Galea
Jul 17th 2011, 13:32
Wow great...so much for principles! does this move makes him a Socialist from a Christian Democrat?
Carmel Lino Vella Clark
Jul 17th 2011, 13:24
If a man abandons his principles, he is worth nothing. Mr. Angerer knows that the PN principles are those based on Christian Democracy and since he had stood on the PN ticket at the local council elections, he
too held the same principles. Now all of a sudden, because it suites him better, he had thrown over these values and jumped overboard like a rat.
Dr. Lawrence Gonzi showed that these valued principles are not up for sale at any price. After all, one can hardly state that the result of the referendum was a clear cut indication of that the majority of the electorate was in favour, since only 33.7% of the total eligible voters clearly voted in favour of Divorce!!!!!
Lino Vella Clark
Msida
Charles J. Buttigieg
Jul 17th 2011, 17:15
Lino,how many of the eligible voters voted NO?
MaryJo Camenzuli
Jul 17th 2011, 17:22
Charles J Buttigieg:
just facts without comment -
37.7% of eligible voters voted Yes, and
33.2% of eligible voters voted No.
.
Mr anna maria xuereb
Jul 17th 2011, 22:08
@ mary jo camenzuli: and the YES vote won. if the others who didnt vote were dead set against divorce they should have voted no. but thank fully the yes vote won. get over it.
Paul Chetcuti
Jul 17th 2011, 12:46
“I will remain loyal to the people who elected me. If you speak to the people and councillors in my village they will tell you I have served Sliema with energy and enthusiasm.”
He said that although he was elected on the PN ticket, people knew where they stood when they voted for him, insisting that the party had changed –not him.
What a load of rubbish, the people voted for you as you admitted on a PN ticket (policies) and if you now have decided to switch over to PL you should resign and give the PN supports in your village as you call it a chance to re-elect you on a PL ticket (policies) that is real democracy.
Mr M Borg
Jul 17th 2011, 13:58
No one in Sliema will trust him anymore.
He can form his own party if he wants nothing will change. He is finished !!
Lino Fava
Jul 17th 2011, 18:57
In principle when voting in local council election we vote for the best person who can serve at his best his locality. Not for the party. The party that is in government should help the councils to give there best to the local they are serving and help them in anything they ask for. We must never have a council to be a propaganda for any political party. Whats the use then to have a council to be a puppet by politicians which we have much doubt about there output. The politicians that for some of them admitted themselves not to attend because of lack of interest. We and all of good will should make these councils unchained, good and thrust worthy persons which luckily enough we have some.
Mr Hans Borg
Jul 17th 2011, 12:36
Mr Engere's resignation from PN and subsequent decision to join the LP is a clear sign that things have gone havoc for GonziPN.
His 'defection' hit the news because of his high profile within the NP. His decision clearly reflects the discontent other less prominent NP members and supporters are experiencing.
Mrs C Zammit
Jul 17th 2011, 12:35
"Speaking to The Sunday Times yesterday, Mr Engerer said the decision has been long coming and pointed out he had told PN administration officials immediately after the referendum he was not feeling “comfortable” with the direction the party was taking..."
That is not what he said on the TV after the referendum.
Andy Farrugia
Jul 17th 2011, 12:43
"Il-bniedem jevolvi": so much for principles and values.
Mrs C Zammit
Jul 17th 2011, 13:35
Mr Farrugia - that was only a few days ago and I thought principles are principles. So what makes you think he wont change again his principles in a couple of days more. Indeed he seems to like divorce.
Andy Farrugia
Jul 17th 2011, 14:57
Sorry, Mrs C Zammit, therefore if this was only a few days ago, then it was a Damascene conversion, a prodigiously swift evolution.
Mr Richard Curmi
Jul 17th 2011, 12:15
Mr Engerer's decision should be respected. However his honourable next step should be to resign from the local council as he no longer represents those who voted for him.
Noel Abela
Jul 17th 2011, 12:13
Since to day is the feast of St Sebastian I would like to remind all Nationalist Bloggers that once Dr Alfred Sant said he felt like St Sebastian with everyone firing arrows at him. The same thing is happening to Dr Gonzi, with one little difference, instead of arrows those around him are firing Bazucas at him. Face it, Dr Gonzi's days are counted. The sooner you accept this the better.
Carmel Lino Vella Clark
Jul 17th 2011, 13:10
May I remind Mr. Abela that three years ago he and all the PL had written off Dr. Lawrence Gonzi, so much so the the PL Secretary General, Jason Micallef, immediately after the voting of last election, had declared that he was sure that the PL had won the 2008 General Election and immediately after his declaration, all
PL supporters took to the street to celebrate. Yet we all know what happened after!!!!
So let the last soar experience be a lesson - never count the chickens before they are hatched.
Lino Vella Clark
Msida
Mr C Busuttil
Jul 17th 2011, 15:44
Noel Abela
Sant said he felt St. Sebastian was referred to the attacks of Dom Mintoff and the old leader replied "Mela jien minn Hal-Qormi" It had nothing to do with attacks from all sides
Noel Abela
Jul 17th 2011, 18:31
Dream on boy............Dream on
Mr Pawlu Agius
Jul 17th 2011, 12:07
First there was Sandro Schembri Adami
Quoting from the times article: http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20090509/local/schembri-adami-convicted-of-fraud-yet-again.256116, "The former Labour MP became first active in student politics within the Nationalist party's youth movement. In 1998 he failed to regain his seat after falling out of favour with the Labour party."
Then there was Mario Farrugia, Quoting from the Times article: http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20110207/local/muslim-and-former-pn-councillor-converts-to-labour.348995, "After converting to Islam many years ago, former Nationalist local councillor Mario Farrugia Borg yesterday made another conversion public as he addressed the Labour Party’s general conference."
And now we have Cyrus.
Now I understand even better why the labour party has always put Malta backwards, itself being such a magnet to such 'intelligensia'!!!
Mr M Saliba
Jul 17th 2011, 11:57
In this case Mr Engerer is certainly not defecting his country. I believe that all political parties in Malta are doing their best in favour of the Maltese Population.
The word defector reflects the old persistent pitiful vision of two tribal political parties. It seems that Mr Engerer belongs to a new generation of polititians who is seeking the party which is more conducive with his personal ideology. It happens tha Mr Engerer siding with the party who voted in favour of divorce. I consider this as consistent ethical behaviour.
Ramon Mangion
Jul 17th 2011, 11:49
Nawgura lil Cyrus ħidma sfieqa fi ħdan il-Partit Laburista. Ma nafx għala dan it-tgħajjir kollhu, anzi wieħed għandu jammira li Cyrus, għamel dan il-pass hekk kif ma ħassux komdu bid-direzzjoni tal-Partit Nazzjonalista.
Mr Joseph Cauchi Senior
Jul 17th 2011, 11:44
What people like Cyrus Engerer, who become turncoats, are not realising is the fact that the PL would automatically welcome them anytime in its fold; as long as their enemy (PN) is seen to be beaten or ridiculed!
Cyrus, the “enemy” who is now the enemy of the PN, has become PL’s friend!
(The enemy of my enemy is my friend!)
But would people like Cyrus be ever sincerely be trusted by the PL?
I doubt it!
Il-passat hi ‘l-mera tal-futur!
JC.
MaryJo Camenzuli
Jul 17th 2011, 12:18
He has already been found wanting.
If he had an iota of decency
he would have resigned his seat in the local council.
He cannot represent PN voters from the Labour HQ.
.
Mr Joseph N. Attard
Jul 17th 2011, 11:44
The Sliema Labour candidates must be overjoyed that you are joining them. They must already be making arrangements so that you will do well in any future election under the labour Torca.
Mr Joe Borg
Jul 17th 2011, 11:43
PL need real politicians not kids playing politicians.
Tony Caruana
Jul 17th 2011, 11:42
Another reason not to vote Pl.
MaryJo Camenzuli
Jul 17th 2011, 11:36
Another Sandro Schembri Adami.
.
Mr Henry Mifsud
Jul 17th 2011, 11:44
Here we go again, Ms. Camenzuli is irked!
But then it seems she has nothing else to do except seeking vengeance of some sort from those who are anti-PN.
Wish you luck MaryJo!
MaryJo Camenzuli
Jul 17th 2011, 12:22
I remember Sandro Schembri Adami
being extolled as some kind of saviour in 1991
when he shifted to Labour
a few months before one of the worst Labour defeats.
.
Mario Aquilina
Jul 17th 2011, 11:33
Prosit Mr Engerer, inti wiehed mill-hafna li inqaghad ma moviment li ried jara il -gid tal pajjiz. Barra minn hekk il-Pn miss il-qiegh u il -poplu se jaghtih telfa kbira hafna.
Dennis Zammit
Jul 17th 2011, 11:18
HA HA HA
Mr Engerer . . . . sorry, Master Engerer (too young to be a Mister) left the PN because the Prime Minister voted NO against the vote for Divorce and his so called 'liberal' culture was alleged offended.
WHY CAN'T THE PM REPRESENT ME AND THOUSANDS MORE IN PARLIAMENT. We voted against the introduction of divorce in Malta and Cyrus Engerer expected that HE is represented and WE NOT !!!
Aren't you selfish?
If the Labour Party is building his future on these people, then good luck. Yesterday they where PN, tomorrow maybe MLP and by the time of the election who knows what.
Mr JOSEPH ZAMMIT
Jul 17th 2011, 10:55
A simple comment: Well done Mr Engerer for your decision. I do not want to be misunderstood that I am a PL supporter. In my voting life i have voted for all parties, PL; NP and Alternattiva. I take offence if anyone calls me red, blue or green because I am more than that.
I urge all people of sound intelligence to be always open and choose the party not for life but according to the circumstances at that time. We vote for MPs so that they work for the country. This mentality of going bananas after the village saint--or whoever--or after red or blue or green must stop.
Are we Human, or are we dancing????
david jenkins
Jul 17th 2011, 14:25
you, my friend, are the only logical one in here. the others speak emotionally but illogically.
gone are the days when you're born "coloured", marry your same colour, multiply to have "same coloured children" and die of the same "colour"... and god forbid if one of your children dares to contradict or ask why.
I am NOT saying that I approve this instant turn of events, but I guess he does have the right to change his mind,allegiance and what not !
JOE ZAHRA
Jul 17th 2011, 16:40
Well done from an old man ,the future in politics belong to you and your age .Mr Engerer you are a brave man, I been Labour all my life and a menber of the party WELLCOME.
.
Mr V Caruana
Jul 17th 2011, 10:52
Cyrus ilu ħafna mhux komdu fil-PN. F'intervista mill-perit Mesumeci fuq Smash, Cyrus wera d-dwejjaq tiegħu li l-PN qatt ma ddiskuta l-gays u m'għandux policy fuq is-suġġett. Biex ibenġilha ma qabilx bil-moviment li għandu l-PL rigward il-gays. Għalhekk jidher li dak li kien qed jagħmel Cyrus kien sforz zejjed biex jiġi aċċettat fil-PN. Il-baqra ma ħartitx! Messu li ilu li telaq.
Cyrus ma waqax fil-magna tal-PN li PN huwa RELIĠJON u l-idolu tagħha Dr. L. Gonzi. Fl-aħħar kunsill ġenerali rajna li ħafna kelliema jduru fuqu u jindirizzawh personali. Ħsibt li l-ktieb Inservik qalbu movie!
Iżda li Cyrus daħal daqshekk malajr fil-PL hija għaġġla żejda. L-ewwel qabel kollox irid ikun KONVINT.
BTW Cyrus welcome on board.
Mr Denis Pace
Jul 17th 2011, 10:41
Next on the agenda:
Gay marriages
John Borg (mlh)
Jul 17th 2011, 13:11
Good point.
Recently on Xarabank, Dr. Muscat expressed his views on this subject and was very clear on certain points concerning same sex marriages.
It will be interesting to see how Cyrus reacts if and when he and his leader do not agree.
Ken Cowan
Jul 17th 2011, 14:09
And what if gay marriage WAS next "on the agenda"?
Have you no conception of the word "equality"?
Are gay people not PEOPLE?
Are THEIR emotions, THEIR loves so completely bizarre to the HUMAN construct that such a thing as "gay marriage" should be refused out of hand?
Your comment says more about your own bigotry and blinkered intellect than it does about anything being "wrong" about gay marriage.
Coda comment: Canada, Spain, , Belgium, and seven other countries have now had gay marriage for an average of five years - Holland for ten; in all that time, there has been absolutely NO reason to believe that the "institution" of marriage has been harmed in any way. SO WHERE IS THE PROBLEM?
What is it about gay marriage that creates such blind, knee-jerk opposition?
Ignorance? Intolerance? Stupidity? Plain meanness? Lack of empathy or compassion?
An ENORMOUS capacity to judge others - all the while spouting "Christian values" - but completely forgetting that Christ himself said "Judge not that ye be not judged"?
The most important "value" here is HUMAN... what ARROGANCE to be opposed to two people loving each other and wishing to marry .
BY the way, almost every argument that has ever been used against gay marriage are the exact same ones trotted out 50 years ago against different races marrying in the USA. Well, has the sky fallen since THAT bigotry was ended?
David Seychell
Jul 17th 2011, 17:24
@Ken Cowan
The institution of Marriage is about a specific type of relationship and commitment that the State wants to recognize and promote because it's in the best interest of children and society in general. The institution of Marriage is about promoting and encouraging the formation of a nuclear family (mother+father+offsprings). Marriage seek to strengthen the union of a man and a woman who love each other in order to encourage procreation within a children-friendly envirenment and to create long term stability that children needs. Same sex relationships have absolutely nothing to do with Marriage.
Are gay people not PEOPLE? Are THEIR emotions, THEIR loves so completely bizarre to the HUMAN construct that such a thing as "gay marriage" should be refused out of hand?
Marriage is not just about PEOPLE and LOVE. A brother and sister or uncle and niece or a Muslim man and six woman are also about PEOPLE and LOVE but that doesn't mean they can marry each other. I know a woman who never got married. She lives alone with her dog. She loves her dog and her dog loves her. They take care of each other, jifirhu b'xulxin, are committed to each other, live in the same house, sleep in the same bed and are loyal to each other. For her, this dog is all her family. All this, however, doesn't mean that she should have a right to marry her dog.
"Coda comment: Canada, Spain, , Belgium, and seven other countries have now had gay marriage for an average of five years - Holland for ten; in all that time, there has been absolutely NO reason to believe that the "institution" of marriage has been harmed in any way. SO WHERE IS THE PROBLEM?"
All these countries also have abortion and they say "there has been absolutely NO reason to believe" that children or babies were "harmed in any way."
Yeah sure.
Robert Vella
Jul 17th 2011, 10:36
I'm pleased that as a young open minded person Cyrus Engeger chose what he felt is the right way that the country is aiming towards the more Liberal and open minded are now taking there stand .
A new wave of change is soon to be up on us , we are more happy of the stand that Mr Engeger has made towards the Nationalist party its clear that the only motivation for the heart and sole of the party now its to regain the confidence of the people which unfortunately is not doing in a very good way and rather than pulling them towards the party they are pushing the young open minded people at the parties border,
leaving to them no alternative but to choose something and some one a party with real inspiration guided by true ideas in the face of reality and respect towards the general public .
As you stood behind Deborah Schembri trough out the IVA campaign you realized those who truly respect you Cyrus and those who are willing to listen to your ideas .
We are proud to have an active member which is truly guided by motivation , and enthusiasm .
To those commenting against Cyrus on this page I have a couple of words , The guy has definitely more balls than all of you criticizing him . He took a stand and stood besides his ideas and you are ignoring that which is now obvious to the rest of the General Public that is that the stability and credibility in the Nationalist Party are slowly crumbling like the acropolis in Greece soon they will be nothing more than a pile of rumble .
Thankyou
Mr James Rizzo
Jul 17th 2011, 10:36
...sakemm ma jaqbilx f'xi haga mal-labour u jiddeciedi li jmur mal-Alternattiva.
Good luck labour.
Mr Jo Camm
Jul 17th 2011, 11:17
Dak ghazel il-Labour ghax dawk jaccettaw kollox. L-AD ma tantx huma boghod mil-Labour.
Mario Agius
Jul 17th 2011, 10:35
Nixtieq inkun naf x'qatt ghamel dan Engerer ghall-partit. Ma rridux nies bhal dan fil-PN. Minghalih li mal-PL ha jsib il-'liberal'??
Joseph Sammut
Jul 17th 2011, 11:44
Jien ikolli naqbel mieghek. X'ghandu xjuri Cyrus, qeghdin inpinguh qisu xi politikant kbir, fil-polikita ghadu halib ommu fi sninu - xi hadd jista jmerija din? Tela fil-kunsill locali b-habi tal-life style tieghu, min vici sindku irid jghid lil-kap tal-partit tieghu w l-prim ministru ta pajjiz x'ghandu jghamel, jitkellem fil-kunsill generali kontra l-PL meta issa qed ghid li din li ghamel ilu jikkunsidra - xhem xi tghid iktar? fd
Roberta Sciberras
Jul 17th 2011, 10:34
Wake up and smell the coffee. Cyrus Engerer happens to be a very public figure but you may rest assured that there are hundreds of people like Cyrus who don't publicize their thoughts and actions but who will be doing exactly like he has done.
Being in denial about this is not going to help one bit.
Mr N Zahra
Jul 17th 2011, 11:08
Hear hear! You can say that again!
Mr C Galea
Jul 17th 2011, 10:20
Mr Engerer you are on the right track. keep up you hard work.principles are very important as long as one is honest about them.
Joe Diacono
Jul 17th 2011, 10:09
This gentleman has every right to his opinion, just like us who have every right to disagree. Looking at how Mr. Enger got to the Sliema Local council makes me wonder. Why the sudden change of heart? As they always say," There is more to it than reaches the eye."
I really wish him the best of luck as he really is somebody one can really reason out with. Cyrus, politics is a dangerous game, and although you are now being hailed a hero, rocking the boat is what people will remember you for.
Also not forgetting those who had voted for you and have now been let down.
Time and time alone will give us the reply to all of this, however history speaks for itself.
Joseph J Camilleri
Jul 17th 2011, 16:12
Even the Prime Minister has a right to his opinion and values.
j brincat
Jul 17th 2011, 10:05
Welcome on board Mr Engerer.
To All PN apologists:
- why is Mr Engerer bothering you so much?
Could it be that the writing is clearly sprawled all over the wall?
(jb)
Ms Rudi Mcbeal
Jul 17th 2011, 10:34
Why should those you call PN apologists be bothered by Mr Engerers actions? Pray, tell. In my opinion something like this is a very positive thing for the PN.
Which writing, J Brincat? One bit of advice - don't count your chickens before they hatch. It could save you great disappointment.
Mario Grima
Jul 17th 2011, 11:00
@ Ms. Mcbeal
'Pray, tell. In my opinion something like this is a very positive thing for the PN'.
Is that so? Since when is the fact that the hardliners are deserting the PN considered positive? Mr. Brincat is not counting any chickens (did he mention the PL will win the next election?) but stating real facts, but as always real facts tend to cut deep in the flesh. Perhaps we might also see you joining the new PL, you are more than welcome!!!
Ms Rudi Mcbeal
Jul 17th 2011, 15:23
It is positive and how, Mr Grima. The PN is getting rid of opportunists and those who are not willing to stick to the party's principles. THAT in my opinion is a very positive thing for the party, even if they lose the next general elections.
Sorry to disappoint you but I greatly fear excessive liberalism. Excessive liberalism makes me cringe because I have witnessed its results on certain societies. That is apart from the fact that I am not in the least convinced that your leader would make a good PM either. So no, no chance of the new PL getting my vote, let alone joining your party. Thanks, but no thanks.
Joseph Sammut
Jul 18th 2011, 07:49
Make sure you read all the writing on the wall!!
Mr Victor Calleja
Jul 17th 2011, 09:56
Leave the man alone. He has every right to do what his conscience tells him. Somebody else voted according to his conscience even though the majority told him otherwise.
There are hundreds of others like Cyrus doing the same thing, not necessarily joining the PL as members but are going to vote for modern ideas and not for old still in the past way of thinking.
Good luck Cyrus even though I don't share 100% your ideas about homosexuality.
Mr Henry Mifsud
Jul 17th 2011, 09:55
As a Sliema resident may I humbly ask :
what is really happening within the Local Council, up to recently represented by the PN?
First we had the Nikki Dimech saga backed by Sandra, and now Cyrus Engerer.
And another question to those Sliemizi who have nothing to do but ridicule Cyrus for his decision:
Is this a reflection of what is happening within the PN in general?
People in glasshouses should never throw stones!
Mr Victor Calleja
Jul 17th 2011, 09:58
Prosit Mr Mifsud.
MaryJo Camenzuli
Jul 17th 2011, 11:43
Cyrus Engerer wants the Prime Minister to resign
but he has kept his own seat on the Sliema local council
even though he has now crossed to Labour.
Iħobbu s-siġġu Cyrus.
.
Mr C Busuttil
Jul 17th 2011, 16:06
L-ewwelnett SLIMIZI mhux sliemizi.
Who was one of the main actors in removing Dimech?
Who opposed Dimech from the begining, therefore making the council not functional?
What achievements Engerer can speak of since he and others voted Dimech out?
Nothing, the council hardly meets and really with a quorum.
Mr Ernest Vella
Jul 17th 2011, 09:53
Grazzi li tlaqt...ghamiltilna pjacir...nispera li issa jitlaq JPO u Michael Falzon ukoll...ghax x'jiswa li tghid li int nazzjonalist u ticchad it-twemmin tieghek...jew li qabel l-elezzjoni tghid mod u wara mod iehor. Postok f'dan il-kaz huwa mal-Partit Laburista...il-Partit tal-U Turns.
Mr Victor Calleja
Jul 17th 2011, 09:56
Miskin
R Abela
Jul 17th 2011, 10:26
Miskin +
j camilleri
Jul 17th 2011, 10:27
Sur Nestu Vella, ghalinqas U-Turns u mhux Ghall gol-Hajt !
Mr Wally Vella-Zarb
Jul 17th 2011, 10:38
Kemm hu qares dan l-għeneb!
Chris Camilleri
Jul 17th 2011, 12:16
Mr Vella,
Hemm eluf kbar ta' nies li fl-elezzjoni tal-2008 ivvutaw PN u li fir-Referndum tad-Divorzju ivvutaw "IVA", skont int dawn ghandhom jitlqu wkoll u jmorru mal-Labour? U jekk jitlaq JPO mill-PN ma jaqax il-Gvern prezenti!! X'tahseb?
Mr Andrea Gatt
Jul 17th 2011, 09:46
Jekk hassejt li ghandek tamel hekk, sewwa ghamilt, u hadd ma ghandu jindahalek, u jghidlek xghandek tamel, nammira l guzz tieghek cyrus
Mr G Mangion
Jul 17th 2011, 12:03
@ Andrea Gatt
Agree 100%
Imma allura li ghedt int ma japlikkax ghall P.M ???
quote ( u hadd ma ghandu jindahalek ) !!!
G. Mangion.
Mr Jo Meli
Jul 17th 2011, 09:45
I have known Mr Cyrus Engerer as a decent, hardworking and valuable person. His move to the Partit Laburista has NOT depreciated my opinion of him.
Having done the same thing in 2001, I can reassure your readers, Mr Editor, that I have encountered MORE Nationalists, an by Nationalists I mean people who put Malta First and Foremost, in the Malta Labour Party / Partit Laburista than in the so called partit nazzjonalista, small caps intentional.
I cannot understand the word in your heading of this article "defector"
Was Mr Engerer OWNED by the so called partit nazzjonalista, small caps intentional ?
Or was Mr Engerer exercising his DEMOCRATIC RIGHT in doing what he has done ?
The CRASS IGNORANCE and COMPLETE LACK of Political mechanics by people self described as "democratic" has resulted into the insults and personal insulting abuse towards a person who has exercised his DEMOCRATIC RIGHT in a so called Maltese Democracy !
Cyrus, one slogan you need to live by ... Malta FIRST and FOREMOST !
E. Vassallo
Jul 17th 2011, 09:58
Are you still in the PL?have you tried Lowell, AN or Ad? Because I think you were PN, MLP and AN?
David Philip Farrugia
Jul 17th 2011, 12:02
why 2001? so you were enticed by Alfred Sant visionary?
Mr Jo Meli
Jul 17th 2011, 14:20
For the attention of Mr. E. Vassallo
I consider Political Parties as a TOOL to serve La Patria, and hence, if the Political Party in Power became blunt or does not represent the need of the People, I would vote it out of Power - or at least I did my part in doing so.
I have never been an Alternative member, although I have many friends at AD, including fellow EX pn Assistant Secretary General Carmel Cacopardo.
As for AN, Azzjoni Nazzjonali BETRAYED its promises, at the Foundation Launch, during the course of its pityful existance.
Noman Lowell is the ONLY Political beast that did NOT lie to the People. He is blunt, at times cruel, at times sound like a crazy person, never-the-less he NEVER lied to the People. HISTORY in the long term will prove him RIGHT !
As for Mr. David Philip Farrugia, look up my reason for dumping the Once Glorious Partito Nazionalista on this link please :
http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.145431095517268.28447.100001511355825#!/photo.php?fbid=145442198849491&set=a.145431095517268.28447.100001511355825&type=1&theater
and here
http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.145431095517268.28447.100001511355825#!/photo.php?fbid=145449612182083&set=a.145431095517268.28447.100001511355825&type=1&theater
or on Face Book under Jo Meli - no need to add me up as all contents are available to EVERYBODY.
Thank you
DVX
Lawrence Attard
Jul 17th 2011, 15:02
Mr Meli, having a democratic right to do something does not equate to that something being admirable.
I have a democratic right for instance to go out and gamble all my money and drink myself silly every night, but does that mean you would find it an admirable or confidence-inspiring quality in me?
I agree with you about Malta first and foremost, but the question is whether Mr Engerer is seeking the "national interest" or just a party who will accomodate his agenda.
Mr Joseph Galea
Jul 17th 2011, 09:43
@all PN commentators: I am really baffled. You all hint out that you don't care what Cyrus (the nonentity) did, but obviously you all came here fuming against his decision. It seems that the truth is far from what you are saying in here. The truth is that you are very angry and disappointed that your party is bleeding from all parts and that you cannot accept the fact that people cross sides and publicly speak the truth about your expired party.
Charles J. Buttigieg
Jul 17th 2011, 09:35
I appreciate that in days to come Cyrus will be very active in promoting minority groups right and no doubt gay rights would be on top of his agenda. I would have no problem with that; moreover I will be one to support his campaigning. Nevertheless Cyrus and other gay activists have to appreciate also that the question of same sex marriage and adoptions is a red hot issue and they will be facing strong opposition within.
I am a firm believer that the law has to provide a legal framework to protect the rights and assure obligations of all couples who willingly decide to share their lives together irrespective of their gender and sexual orientations. I, however, would oppose the idea of using the term marriage when the union is between same sex partnerships.
I am as liberal and progressive as they come, nonetheless, I am also a conformist when it comes to the basic laws of nature and marriage and child bearing are the essence of that law. Marriage is for a male and a female with the primary intention to procreate and raise a family. Mother Nature does not provide the required coordinates to a same sex partnership.
Mr Charles Bayliss
Jul 17th 2011, 10:51
I think that the definition of marriage in Malta is that of a church marriage which is inaccurate. There is also the state marriage, the one that us gay people are looking at. But we do not call it same-sex marriage but MARRIAGE EQUALITY because as Maltese Citizens. Because we have to be equal in our responsibility to the state, we seek to be equal also in marriage.
Charles J. Buttigieg
Jul 17th 2011, 14:12
Charles,you can't be equal to something different. Marriage,State or Church,is a natural bond between a man and a woman and between a male and a female in the animal world also. I repeat myself by stating that any two persons have the right to form a union between them and the State should protect and provide the legal framework accordingly. I would,however,refuse to call it marriage and giving it the same standing like a legal union between a man and a woman.
Joseph J Camilleri
Jul 17th 2011, 16:27
Yes definitely, marriage is between a male and a female, a man and a woman. I am all out for equality between same sexes but not marriage. Marriage was never meant to be between beings of the same sex. That is the only naturalbond as God intended it to be.
Mr Charles Bayliss
Jul 17th 2011, 16:38
Mr Buttigieg, call it what you may. You are doing like what AD did, promising Civil Union WITH FULL RIGHTS AS HETEROSEXUAL COUPLES, but they refuse to call it Marriage Equality. I cannot understand why we don't call a spade a spade?
Perhaps because we are in a "Catholic" Malta (sic)? There are 7 European countries, 2 South American countries and South Africa that have Marriage Equality. Btw Portugal and Spain are both Catholic Countries with the latter more Catholic then Catholic Malta. In fact, 66% of their population were in favour of Marriage Equality, even though their church was saying no to Marriage Equality.
Admitting it or not, we know that many Maltese base their judgement on religious beliefs and not on civic believes. Shame, we are Maltese Citizens and not Roman Catholics Citizens !!!!!
Charles J. Buttigieg
Jul 17th 2011, 17:36
Charles,as far as I'm concerned religion has absolutely nothing to do with this. If my view was inspired by religion I wouldn't be able to condone same sex unions can I? As to call a spade a spade you are the one who is calling a spade a shovel. Marriage stands for multiplication and it takes the two different sexes to multiply. And please don't hold that against me,you may try to blame it on whoever created nature not on me.
David Seychell
Jul 17th 2011, 17:41
Mr Buttigieg made a valid point here. A time may come for the gays within the LP to campaign in favour of civil partnership or something else within those lines that would legally recognize those who are partners in life. However, they should avoid mentioning gay marriage or gay adoptions, unless they want to scare the electorate. If you aim to high, you risk ending up with nothing.
David Seychell
Jul 18th 2011, 04:31
@ Mr Charles Bayliss
"But we do not call it same-sex marriage but MARRIAGE EQUALITY because as Maltese Citizens."
"Marriage equality" is a contradiction in terms.
The purpose of the institution of Marriage is NOT to put all different sexual/emotional relationships on an EQUAL level. On the CONTRARY, its purpose is to encourage and promote a specific type of relationship and commitment which is in the best interest of children and society in general. Ideally, children should be the result of the love between their mother and father who are seriously committed to each other(wedlock) and thus creating long term stability that children needs. THAT is the basic aim of Marriage. "Marriage Equality" is just a politically correct term behind which one tries to hide the real intention, which is to hijack the main purpose and function of the institution of Marriage.
C. Mifsud
Jul 17th 2011, 09:33
I have no doubt that the Labour Party will accept you Mr. Engerer. It is another great opportunity for PL to grab more new votes for the next election to be back in power. But do you really think that once the PL wins the general elections, they have the minimum intention of sharing the long awaited power with you Mr. Engerer? Do you really think that they will hear you then? I have my doubts.
Also, I can fully understand your action of resigning, but the fact of changing from blue to red all of a sudden shows that you are just doing this move as an act of revenge and this only shows that you are not a reliable political person.
Anyways good luck....
Mr Stephen Borg
Jul 17th 2011, 09:55
Did Lawrence Gonzi hear Mr Cyrus Engerer and those 52 percen which voted Yes in the 28th May referendum when he voted No for divorce in Parliment? I think not.
C. Mifsud
Jul 17th 2011, 10:26
In my comment I said that I fully understand his resignation. I just think that it was not a very intelligent political move to change party in 24hrs.. and IMO it makes him unreliable. that's all.
David Spiteri
Jul 17th 2011, 09:33
Can Sliema residents confirm if Mr Engerer has truly been working for the locality, or does he have his own agenda?
Mr J Tonna
Jul 17th 2011, 09:31
Cyrus....you've lost it.
Mario Grima
Jul 17th 2011, 11:11
Cyrus stood up to be counted not like Gonzi who shifted the responsibility of the divorce issue upon the electorate by calling a useless referedum. With the majority ignoring the PN's call for a 'No' vote he chickened out by voting 'No' in the 2nd reading of the divorce bill. What kind of leader does that to his people and to those PN members of parliament who voted 'yes' in parliament.
Ian Bugeja
Jul 17th 2011, 09:30
I hope that this is a joke
Lawrence Attard
Jul 17th 2011, 09:30
When I first read Mr Engerer's statements in response to Dr Gonzi, I respected him for having the guts to stand up for what he saw is right or not, rather than simply towing a party line as most politicians do.
However now that he has opted to defect, he has lost my respect . When a politician changes side just like that, meaning he is overnight shifting from one political ideology to another, it says that his motives are beyond that ideology, and that its more about the position or personal sentiments than anything else. Its hard to trust a politician, but when such a defection happens, even more so. The same applies also to the party that so willingly accepted this miraculous overnight change of ideology.
I was already decided a long time ago that I will not be voting for either of the two major parties this election, doing so would be to insult my own intelligence. Incidents like this only serve to convince me even more.
B Gauci
Jul 17th 2011, 17:08
This comment needs a huge LIKE button.
Gerry Cowie
Jul 17th 2011, 09:23
And if he decides he no longer likes Labour will he then move on to another party?
Mario Mifsud
Jul 17th 2011, 09:30
No No Mr Cowie. First he gets a divorce from the PN, marries PL, the gets another divorce from PL and joins another party. That's how it goes now. Ask Mr Engerer, he is an expert.
Mr Charles Bayliss
Jul 17th 2011, 09:51
Sur Aquilina
Ahna nafu li inti min ta' gewwa fil-PN u probabli paxxut. Flok tattaka lil Cyrus, ahjar iddur dawra madwarek u tara x'inhu jaghmel I-partit! Fejn hu l-partit li bran EFA? Fejn hi l-inklussivita' li darba kien ihaddan il-PL? Inthom tant sar ghandkom ghanbut li mhux taraw 'l barra min imnihierkom. Qed titilfu hafna nies, fisthom lili. Sa ftit tal-jien ilu kont bi hsieb li nqatta' l-vot, imma tant qed nara affarijiet fosthom arroganza li gegheltuni niddeciedi li ghall-ewwel darba nitfa' l-vot fuq l-ahmar. Qatt ma kont nimmagina li se naghmel hekk.
Meta rbahna ir-referendum ta' l-EU konna ghajjarna lil Alfred Sant anti-demokratiku ghax ma riedx ma riedx jaccetta I-verdett tsk-poplu. Issa li l-verdett tal-poplu hu dak li hu fuq id-Divorzju ghaliex Gonzi bil-vot tieghu fil-parliament kien anti-demokratiku. Ftakar li meta rebah l-Iva hu hareg jghid li Il-Verdett tal-Maggoranza ghandha tigi rrispettatha. Imma bl-agir tieghu jidher bic-car li tefa' l-bahar dak kollu li suppost jen en bih - Id-DEMOKRAZIJA. Barra li urta numru kbir ta' MPs, insomma din mhux l-ewwel darba li ghamilha. Iona nisimghu stejjer fil-media indipendenti.
Jien nixtieq riposte ghal mistoqsija li gejja: Johnny Dalli u Louis Galea inghataw il-karigi fl-Ewropa ghax
Kien haqqhom Jew biex jitwarrbu min-nofs? Ahna l-poplu nafu l-verita' kollha ghax il-hajt ghandu widintu unl-qazba ma ccaqcaqx ghalxejn.
Mr Carmel (Nenu) Aquilina
Jul 17th 2011, 09:18
@Sur Engerer,
Kif telgħalek għal-rasek ħabieb, Fittex iddeċiedi li toħroġ mal-PL, issa dik l-unika triq li fadallek x'tgħażel.
Imma ftakar dejjem li qed tbus l-id li kont tixtieqa maqtgħuha barra.
Tgħid għad jaħfruilek u javdawk tal-PL?
U ftakar ukoll li inti ittradejt lill-votanti slimiżi li appoġġawk, ma dawn inti għandek dejn kbir xi tħallas.
U infakrek ukoll li jiena kieku laborist ma nafdakx, għax dak it-tradiment li għamilt lill-partit Nazzjonalista, tista terġa tgħamlu lill Partit Laborista, issa .garanzija ta' lealta ma tantx tista tofri,Sur Engerer.
Għallura issa għoqqod tpaxxa bil-popolarita li akwistajt bil-qasma li qsamt.
Issa għoqqod tpaxxa li tniżżilt f'dak il-Guinness book of records bħall-akbar raddiena ta' l-Imqabba, għax fi ftit sigħat irreżenjajt minn partit, dħalt f' Partit ieħor, bdejt taħdem f'partit ieħor u ser toħrog mal-partit ieħor, jekk dan m'għandux jitniżżel f'dan il-ktieb bħall-ikbar raddiena,x'jista jitniżżel.
Saħħa Sur engerer, tinsiex titlobhom ingravata ħamra lill-tal-PL.
Ms Maria Abela
Jul 17th 2011, 09:13
Does anyone really care what this little fellow does?A political nonentity as far as i am concerned who never did anything for Sliema. He wants to try his luck else where that is what turncoats do.
Brigid Garroni
Jul 17th 2011, 08:50
Is Mr Engerer referring to the conservative Nationalist Party which brought Malta into the 20th and then the 21st centuries, after it had been taken back to the pre-cold-war age in the couple of decades previous to the Nationalist Party's re-election in 1986?
Some people will do and say anything to acquire power for themselves, it seems to me.
Daniel Goggi
Jul 17th 2011, 10:47
Well said Ms. Garroni! Well said!
E. Vassallo
Jul 17th 2011, 08:48
I hope that Joseph Muscat gives you what you are really aiming for..I very much doubt coming from a party of yes man who opposed EU and do not dare to go against their leader.
Ms Lina CARUANA
Jul 17th 2011, 08:45
Mr. Engerer are you sure that the PL will change to your convictions if the PN did not ? Tell us exactly what made you change views whether it was politics or personal interest .
Charlie Borg
Jul 17th 2011, 08:40
I am no longer interested in ANY political party, so what I have to say has no bearing on a move from PN to PL. It could well have been the contrary - from PL to PN.
I can accept someone leaving the PN and stop there.
But to leave the PN and within a minute, move to the PL and be accepted as a member, stinks!
There's no other way to express it.
This was no sudden decision - it is my belief that Engerer must have made his move BEFORE yesterday, when it was formally announced. You do not just resign from one Maltese 'partit' and go over to the other one without first having made your ground work.
I have never been particularly impressed by Engerer - seating himself as he did, always behind his guru, Gonzi, so that he would be continually caught by camera. Well, now, we can imagine who will be sitting right behind Muscat, very much soon.
And it was reported to me that Engerer in fact participated actively and praised Dr Gonzi to the heights in his speech in the last General Council meeting. Were those empty words, then?
I mean, how can any Nationalist or any Labourite REALLY trust Engerer?
Remember the time of that Baldacchino chap who crossed the floor in Parliament and moved from the PN in Opposition to the MLP in government? Where did it take him? Was he trusted enough by Labour to be elected on their ticket? Not a hope! All he got was a couple of directorships and a villa near the sea.
And in which district would Engerer be contesting from, under Labour? Surely he's not expecting to oust Evarist Bartolo, now, is he?
I really doubt what the intentions of Engerer were, on this move. That he likes cameras, is a fact. That he likes being mentioned, is a fact. That he is an opportunist per excellence, is also fact.
Serves the PN right, for making use of people like Engerer for their own ends.
And now, over to Engerer, as we listen to him speaking about that which up to yesterday was his political party! There's no shame, in some people. At least, try to act like a gentleman if you are not one.
Simon Scerri
Jul 17th 2011, 08:38
Cyrus ghandu jirrizenja mil Kunsil tas-Sliema ghax in-Nazzjonalists ghan-Nazzjonalist ivvutaw u mhux ghal doppji facci .
Lina Ghirxi
Jul 17th 2011, 09:53
F'Tas-Sliema ivvutaw lil Cyrus ghall-Kunsill kemm Nazzjonalisti kif ukoll Laburisti. Kienu jafu li kien wiehed mill-ftit kontestanti għall-Kunsill li jwassal lehen ir-residenti u jahdem dwaru. U hekk ghamel bla distinzjoni ta' kulur politiku. Għalhekk fl-opinjoni tieghi m'ghandux jirrezenja mill-Kunsill. Alla hares ma kienx hu ghal tas-Sliema!
MaryJo Camenzuli
Jul 17th 2011, 13:56
Biex ikun raġel,
għandu jirriżenja mill-Kunsill ta' Tas-Sliema.
Imma jħobbu wisq is-siġġu,
għalhekk ma jirriżenjax.
.
Please choose the reason of your report below: