Mepa, FAA clash over Wardija broiler unit
The planning authority has denied a claim by Flimkien Għal Ambjent Aħjar that it had approved an industrial chicken broiler unit in Wardija.
It said the permit in question only approved the change of use of an existing building to a manure clamp and the addition of two cesspits, holding tank and water reservoir to an existing broiler farm.
A request in the application for the sanctioning of two illegally developed structures servicing the existing farm was refused and their demolition ordered as a condition to the permit.
Mepa said it also ordered a revised landscaping scheme to mitigate the impact that the existing farm may have on the visual amenity.
The authority said the Department of Agriculture had confirmed in the course of the proceedings that the applicant has been registered with it and at the same location since 1988. Aerial photos taken in 1988 and 1994 identified the main structures of the broiler farm.
“The impression given by the FAA, that Mepa recently approved an industrial chicken broiler unit for 14,000 chickens, when such farm already existed, is therefore totally false and incorrect.”
Furthermore, an investigation was carried out by the Audit Officer Perit Joseph Falzon as in terms of Section 17C of the Development Planning Act concluded that the proper procedures as established by law were adopted in the assessment of this development application.
FAA reacted by saying that while the permit was related to the erection of a manure clamp, cesspits and the sanctioning of a hut, the contested issue was the legality of the broiler unit itself, which the applicants did not seek to sanction, claiming it was in place in 1988 and therefore did not need a permit.
The FAA claimed that the Mepa aerial photos did not show any such building on this site in 1988 but still, the Environment and Planning Commission accepted a certificate that it had existed, and granted the permit for the manure clamp and cesspits which made it possible for the broiler unit to continue to operate. Without the manure clamp and cesspits the chicken farm would not have been viable.
“FAA cannot understand how the EPC could request an assessment of the landscaping scheme and ask the Environment Protection Directorate to assess the survey of hydrology and watercourse related ecology after approving this permit in a Natura 2000 site,” the NGO added.
It also noted comments made by hydrologist Marco Cremona that at the time of its construction, the broiler farm intercepted a natural watercourse.
3 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Astrid Vella
Jul 15th 2011, 14:15
This above is the ancient farmhouse which shows on MEPA's 1988 plans and is being claimed to be a plant capable of producing 14,400 chickens!
Given that this is a Natura 2000 site and Special Area of Conservation of International Importance, the least one would imagine would be a report by MEPA’s Natural Heritage Advisory Unit and an on-site visit to identify the small structure showing up on the 1988 photos.
This area was designated by MEPA itself as a Tree Protected Area stating that “the population of holm oak (ballut) in these woodlands probably represents the oldest oak trees in the Maltese islands. These trees form one of the four Maltese forest remnants that date back more or less 1,000 years ago.”
MEPA’s own Case Officer had strongly recommended refusal of this permit requiring illegal excavation of Blue Clay - had the EPC upheld this recommendation, the area could have been returned to its original state before the farm was built abusively without permission of the landowners. Instead we have once again rewarded abusers and missed an opportunity to salvage a unique corner of Malta’s dwindling natural heritage.
Mr Carmelo Micallef
Jul 15th 2011, 16:26
Please help:
Illegal structure fails to get retrospective clearance but is allowed to run a farm for 14,000 chickens?
Please correct my interpretation to help me and others to understand what has actually happened. It is sometimes difficult for normal human beings to understand such occurances.
Astrid Vella
Jul 16th 2011, 10:22
Carmelo you are right as the twists and turns of such cases are often hard to follow even for those involved. The facts are as follows: the farmers built a factory on other people's land without their permission. This land is in the heart of the beautiful Natura 2000 site and Tree Protection area. After years of diverting the stream and possibly even polluting the surroundings with effluence of the farm the owners had to regularize themselves with the authorities. They applied for the necessary manure clamp and cesspits, claiming that the farm was legal, saying it was built in 1988 before MEPA was set up. Although the broiler unit which is the size of an aircraft hangar did not show up on the 1988 aerial photos, MEPA accepted their claim and issued the permit for the manure clamp etc. which permits them to continue operating the broiler unit.
CONCLUSION: Abuse is still occasionally rewarded on this island.