Mepa denies issuing permit for chicken farm
The FAA has urged Mepa to re-examine its 1988 aerial photos of the site of Wardija broiler unit. It says the only building on site at the time was this farmhouse.
Mepa this afternoon denied claims by Flimkien Ghal-Ambjent Ahjar that it had approved an industrial chicken broiler unit in Wardija.
It said the permit in question (PA 5784/08) only approved the change of use of an existing building to a manure clamp and the creation of two cesspits, holding tank and water reservoir, following an application to introduce waste management facilities to an already existing broiler farm.
A request in the application for the sanctioning of two illegally developed structures servicing the existing farm was refused and their demolition ordered as a condition to the permit.
Mepa said it also ordered a revised landscaping scheme to mitigate the impact that the existing farm may have on the visual amenity .
The Authority said that the Department of Agriculture had confirmed in the course of the proceedings that the applicant has been registered with it and at the same location since 1988. Aerial photos taken in 1988 and 1994 identified the main structures of the broiler farm, Mepa said.
"The impression given by the FAA, that Mepa recently approved an industrial chicken broiler unit for 14,000 chickens, when such farm already existed, is therefore totally false and incorrect."
Furthermore, an investigation was carried out by the Audit Officer Perit Joseph Falzon as in terms of Section 17C of the Development Planning Act concluded that the proper procedures as established by law were adopted in the assessment of this development application.
Meanwhile, in a statement of clarification, FAA said permit PA5784/08 was specifically to erect a manure clamp, to build two cesspits and to sanction a hut. The contested issue was the legality of the broiler unit itself, which the applicants did not seek to sanction, claiming it was in place in 1988 and therefore did not need a permit.
The FAA claimed that the Mepa aerial photos did not show any such building on this site in 1988, but still, the EPC accepted a certificate that it had existed, and granted the permit for the manure clamp and cesspits which made it possible for the broiler unit to continue to operate. Without the manure clamp and cesspits the chicken farm would not have been viable.
"FAA cannot understand how the EPC could request an assessment of the landscaping scheme and ask the Environment Protection Directorate to assess the survey of hydrology and watercourse related ecology after approving this permit in a Natura 2000 site," the NGO added.
It also noted comments made by hydrologist Marco Cremona that at the time of its construction, the broiler farm intercepted a natural watercourse.
5 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Astrid Vella
Jul 15th 2011, 14:03
It needs to be clarified that the ancient farmhouse shown in the above photo is what shows up on MEPA's 1988 aerial photos - certainly not a broiler farm capable of producing 14,400 chickens annually as MEPA and the Ministry of Agriculture are claiming.
Given that this is a Natura 2000 site and Site of International Importance, the least one would imagine would be a report by MEPA’s Natural Heritage Advisory Unit and an on-site visit to identify the small structure showing up on the 1988 photos.
This area was designated by MEPA as a Tree Protected Area stating that “the population of holm oak (ballut) in these woodlands probably represents the oldest oak trees in the Maltese islands. These trees form one of the four Maltese forest remnants that date back more or less 1,000 years ago.”
MEPA’s own Case Officer had strongly recommended refusal of this permit requiring illegal excavation of Blue Clay - had the EPC upheld this recommendation, the area could have been returned to its original state before the farm was built abusively without permission of the landowners. Instead we have once again rewarded abusers and missed an opportunity to salvage a unique corner of Malta’s dwindling natural heritage.
Ms Sabrina Borda
Jul 15th 2011, 00:04
Simple, Mepa must have it removed.
Maria Vassallo
Jul 14th 2011, 17:30
U halluna FAA!
Ghaliex ma xxamrux idejnkom u tinghaqdu ma' ohrajn u tnaddfu l-hmieg li jhallu l-maltin?
Aslu wasla sal-Belt, il-Floriana u nhawi ohra biex taraw il-hmieg!
Qed nistenna protesti imma ma jaslux!
Mr Ivan Calleja
Jul 14th 2011, 17:50
Inti qatt mort tipprotesta???? Jew biex tparla minn fuq is-siggu tal-kompjuter tajba!! Armchair critic!!
Mr Carmelo Micallef
Jul 14th 2011, 17:12
a fowl mess