Advert

Updated: Protected Hungarian spoonbill shot - BirdLife appeals for information

Hunters condemn shooting

The spoonbill five hours before it was shot. Photo Ray Galea, BirdLife

The spoonbill five hours before it was shot. Photo Ray Galea, BirdLife

(Adds St Hubert Hunters' statement) BirdLife is appealing for information on the shooting of a protected Hungarian Spoonbill in the Salina Bird Sanctuary yesterday afternoon.

It said in a statement that the bird was shot at around 3.50 p.m. following which two men in a blue car drove along the main road, stopping close to the shot bird.

One of the men got out of the car, recovered the shot Spoonbill, and got back into the car, which then drove off. The number plates, covered by cloth, could not be read.

The Spoonbill had been ringed with a unique combination of six coloured rings as a chick in Fejer, Hungary on the June 13, 2009. This was part of a Europe-wide study on Spoonbills by a group of specialist ringing researchers.

It arrived in Malta earlier this week and stayed in the Salina Bird Sanctuary Area until it was shot yesterday.

This is the second time in just nine months a protected bird ringed as a chick as part of a conservation project abroad was shot down in the Salina Bird Sanctuary, BirdLife said.

In October 2010, a German ringed Osprey was recovered by BirdLife Malta after being shot in the sanctuary.

Although the bird was sent to a rehabilitation centre in Germany it could not overcome its severe shotgun injuries.

BirdLife said that yesterday's shooting consists of a whole set of contraventions - spoonbills are protected birds under national and EU law, it is currently closed season, no hunting may take place in bird sanctuaries, and no shooting may take place within 50 metres of a main road.

The Hungarian spoonbill was shot down and recovered within metres of the very busy coast road in broad daylight.

BirdLife appealed for anyone with information to contact the police or the organisation.

The police can be reached on 119, 2122 1111, BirdLife on 2134 7646.

HUNTERS CONDEMN SHOOTING

St Hubert Hunters unreservedly condemned the shooting but took a sarcastic dig at BirdLife saying that, unfortunately, though many relevant details of the perpetrators were known to the organisation, their prowess at close up photography did not serve to identify the perpetrators.

The hunters urged anyone who might have witnessed the incident to forward any relevant details to the police.

They hoped that apart from providing excellent pictures of birds and sensational news BirdLife might also consider providing incriminating proof of the law breakers they witnessed.

Advert

105 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Mr Chris Xuereb

Jul 3rd 2011, 19:24

would you support & write on behalf of those that kill dogs if it was a legal traditional pass time and a so called right? not that we don't already know the capabilities of those you share common interests with.
just a yes or a no pls

Mr Peter Agius

Jul 3rd 2011, 08:35

Your comments serve only to try and justify the unjustifiable...that is the wanton killing of birds, this happening in Spring, Summer, Winter and Fall.

Mr Peter Agius

Jul 1st 2011, 23:15

Bla Bla Bla......as usual.

Fran Abela

Jul 2nd 2011, 10:19

There goes the champion of hunters ! I object to hunting the world over and not just Malta. You do not need to insult people from other countries because there is a majority worldwide that are against hunting. Yes, millions of hunters all over the world are still living in 650 AD if they insist on their so-called 'pastime' - some pastime that - killing live creatures. As to enjoying steak, rabbit and fish - this is a stupid argument because these animals are reared for food and every one is replaced by others. Birds are not - they are just being blown up in the skies and no replacement. Also the indiscriminate killing of birds - the world over - is to blame for the number of insects, etc. that use to be eaten by birds. It is useless trying to go on covering up for the hunters - they are hunters and stop there. I do not exclude the fact that there may be a few, I repeat, a few hunters who are sensible however, nothing will make me change my stance against hunting. I would eliminate it completely if I had the chance. Now I await Ms. Zarb Darmanin's reply or rather a diatribe against me ! Do not worry just stay calm and accept other people's opinions please like I reluctantly have to accept yours Ms. Zarb Darmanin.

K Perry

Jul 2nd 2011, 12:53

pot calling kettle black Madam.. look to your own laurels before rebuking others... the wizard of OZ used to make a lot of noise also but was merely a small man behind a large curtain.

Mr Victor Falzon

Jul 1st 2011, 18:54

@ Joe Camilleri

"Usually the antis follow the bird in a bid to safegaurd it from poaching, how come they did not."

Ah so it's BirdLife's fault now, isn't it. And you guys want to be taken seriously. Tsk.

K Perry

Jul 1st 2011, 16:22

just to clarify, my comment was directed to Mr A formosa.

K Perry

Jul 1st 2011, 16:24

a good idea Mr Muscat! such a simple solution...

Mr John J Borg

Jul 1st 2011, 16:30

.....does not make sense.....could have been shot by an illegal shotgun.

Mario Muscat

Jul 1st 2011, 17:04

@ Mr Borg
It makes a lot of sense. The less guns at hand, the less abuse. I'm sure you won't be happy if your gun is taken away from you for most of the time and don't tell me you're not a hunter yourself as no one will believe you after posting such a comment!

Steve Zammit

Jul 1st 2011, 19:00

Well said Charles Gauci...agree with your comment fully

M. Cardona

Jul 2nd 2011, 09:31

Sur Charles Gauci ;

For Your Kind Attention here's my previous comment;

The circumstances beggar belief, however if this actually happened,IT IS CONDEMNED WITHOUT RESERVATIONS. If things happened as alleged, the individuals (possibly non-licensees) are the ones we need to weed from our midst, they're harming us all and nullifying all our genuine efforts.

Can BLM publish the picture of the blue car and make please for identification purposes? I'm sure someone would recognise the car even if the number plates were allegedly covered.

What I just cannot understand is how birdies like you manage to thwart what's black on white. Now go bark up some other tree Sur Gauci.

Mr Johnny Xerri

Jul 2nd 2011, 12:46

Chris Grillo,

I will try patiently to reply...to the usual nonsense about banning hunting or locking up firearms.

Firearms need maintance and care...they cannot be locked up for 3 months...they need weekly oiling and the right conditions (no humidity etc)

Secondly, it is open season from 1st june till end january...and from this year also for 3 weeks in spring...so they woukld be locked up during febuary/march and during May...thats 3 months out of 12... and moreover...protected birdsmostly migrate during the normal open season for game birds....so poaching would still happen during open or closed seasons.

Thirdly what happens when poachers cannot use their gun because it is closed season? They use unregistered or home mmade guns (such as in the cs of Star, the shot dog)

Fourtly, what about clay or target shooters.

5th what about guns with sentimental value such as inherited guns...who will be responsible of their condition when locked up?

6th what about the possibility of organised criminals (who may have evn corrupted the police/wardens) who could possess themselves of the arms held by 17000 hunters? They would have more firepower than the arm and police placed toghether.

I am fed up of all this even more than anyone....since I was the one forming part of a team getting up at 430am to get ready for Imnarja in order to help educate children on the importance of compansatory measure. I am the one protecting cultivating and mantaining the habitat I hunt in.

I beg to differ from your claim of ' Mat tajjeb, jehel il hazin.... dejjem hekk...' as presently I still have to hear of drivers being collectively punished for the actions of joy riders....and all males being castrated or imprisoned for rapes.

Mr Victor Falzon

Jul 1st 2011, 14:12

@ Anthony Formosa

1) If you are one of your so-called "law abiding hunters" you would be the first to condemn the act, but nothing so far but wisecracks.

2) What's your point? Ah, I guess there wasn't one...

3) Yes, the knuckle-walking dimwits who shot it turned up five hours later, by which time the photographer had left. Which part of that sentence still eludes you?

Mr Chris Xuereb

Jul 1st 2011, 14:25

You doubt the report & at the same time certain its a 'poacher' how conflicting is that?....give it time just like it was only a matter of time till we learnt that it was none other than hunters that destroyed the foresta trees or brutally killed 'star'.
...there are only 2 sides to a fence..on one side are people that shoot birds & on the other side are people that don't shoot birds...so it's pretty useless trying to sub divide a hunter from a poacher...can't you see you both share the same interests, that of shooting birds, that's why you both belong to the same proverbial 'Keffa'.
Where, what, when, why, if & but is simply irrelevant, yes i'm an extremist lover of life ..as opposed to?

Mr Wally Vella-Zarb

Jul 1st 2011, 15:48

??????????????????

Phil Humphries

Jul 1st 2011, 16:29

@ Anthony Formosa.

What are you suggesting ? - If this bird wasn't shot by a poacher, then who do you think is responsible ?

Mr Anthony Formosa

Jul 1st 2011, 16:52

Mr Humphries, Do you see a shot bird? Whoever reported these events must have been few meters away and had enough time to act, Why nobody shouted to leave the evidence behind as is the norm. And if this is proved and found guilty I wish he take what he deserves, but no one has the right to condemn all hunters.

Mr phil sam

Jul 1st 2011, 14:01

Reuben, it was carried out between two walls , on a slip way at Salina. Off the Coast Road.

Mr Johnny Xerri

Jul 2nd 2011, 12:33

Lyn Nobbs,

Please state your country of origine and residence....I am sure that w=once you do so it will only take me a short while to expose how animals are treated in your country.

Poaching exists in all countries...so please don't patronise me

Mr Joseph N. Attard

Jul 1st 2011, 13:42

Mr Formosa, the way you nit pick the report shows clearly where your sentiments lie. Other respectable hunters have already denounced the crime in no uncertain terms. The whole sequence could have been observed through binoculars. Not everybody is an expert in car identefication. Covering the numberplates is a crime in itself. The picture was take by someone else, a few hours before the bird was murdered. Only prison terms will work in the long run.

Mr Victor Falzon

Jul 1st 2011, 14:02

@ Anthony Formosa

In case you missed the bit, the bird was photographed five hours before it was shot dead by hunters. And yes the photographer had a telescope too, to read the information on the rings from a distance, which is the whole point of the rings. But that was when the bird was still alive - sadly, the photographer wasn't there five hours later when the neanderthal hunters came on the scene to do what they do best.

You people disgust me. Instead of deploring the act, you play the wise guys. But then again, keep it up: you are your hobby's worst advert.

Glenn Micallef

Jul 1st 2011, 14:06

Mr Formosa, you cast doubt on anything Birdlife says. Than, when they provide evidence you dispute its legality because there was no authorisation for the filming! Now all can see why you object so much to cameras! This way it is very easy to discredit a claim. So one day a group of your peers makes a publicity stunt (by releasing captive bred migratory Turtle Dove) to try to gain some PR points and a couple of days later, two butchers kill a Spoobill in a Nature reserve. If some were gullible enough to believe the publicity stunt, they got their reply within 48 hours. Any you complain about fences! So whether it is storks, spoonbills, opspreys, eagle or Ibis, it will inevitably be shot down as lond as it is big and rare! Ii amazes me how a couple of individuals, as you claim, can be responsible for such masscres.

Mr Anthony Formosa

Jul 1st 2011, 16:39

I only condemn when there is enough evidence. If the number plate was noticed covered with a cloth, who ever is reporting must have been close enough to shout and scare them away and leave the dead bird behind. All of you are wishing a hunting ban and clearly shows where your sentiments lie. In Malta we're all law abiding except if you're a hunter.

Mr Anthony Formosa

Jul 1st 2011, 13:34

Anything else you wish to stop? Mr Vella.

Mr john vella

Jul 1st 2011, 13:56

@Anthony Formosa
Thanks for asking!
YES, Stop this useless murder of birds by these cowboys!

claire cp

Jul 1st 2011, 17:45

THERE SHOULD BE NO SUCH THING AS A PROTECTED BIRD OR A HUNTING SEASON. ALL BIRDS SHOULD BE PROTECTED EQUALLY AND HUNTING SHOULD BE BANNED COMPLETELY ~~~ IF PEOPLE STILL INSIST ON SHOOTING THEN THEY SHOULD BE SENT TO THE JUNGLE AND HOPEFULLY THEY WILL BE THE ONES BEING KILLED BY AN ANIMAL. ITS JUST WHAT THEY DESERVE! ALL THIS KILLING IN VAIN...ITS DISGUSTING !!!!

Mr Johnny Xerri

Jul 2nd 2011, 11:00

Claire CP

Can you please enlighten me as to why all birds should be protected and as to why hunting banned...when we can still hunt abroad...and we can still kill birds and animals by contracting a killer who is better known as a butcher?

I can enlighten you using just 5 words as your self describtion word - I am an extremist abolishionist

Mr Johnny Xerri

Jul 2nd 2011, 12:28

Dear Chris Xuereb...

We will instead have to get ready for the usual ban aeverything solution...and most probably if a protected species get killed them....what shall we get ready for? Maybe a statement that banning hasn't served....so we shall imprison all those that had a hunting licence?...but what if the poacher without a licence and with a home made or unregistered gun still stricks? Shall we then imprison all males? But what if it was a female poacher?

Yes democracy does not encourage collective punishment...that is why if guilty...only that person will face the hand of the law...

I have yet to hear of all judges being imprisoned for corruption because 2 were found guilty of corruption.

I have yet to hear of all drivers being imprisoned for man slaughter if one driver is found guilty.

I have yet to hear of all males being imprisoned or castrated when a rapist stricks.



Mr Nyal Xuereb

Jul 1st 2011, 13:08

With all due respect, shotguns are used for many more things than simply hunting. Shotguns are used for target shooting, clay shooting, tactical shooting, law enforcement, military and many others more than hunting. Incidentally, the best results ever achieved in sports by Maltese were with the use of shotguns, mostly in the Double Trap discipline of clay shooting.

Eric Camilleri

Jul 1st 2011, 13:23

Gauci you want to bet your head on a chopping board that if you ban hunting and confiscate all shotguns there will not be another protected bird shot. The problem is not the legal hunters or their legal shotguns but the criminals that are prepared to carry out such a cowardly act, even premeditating the action with covered number plates on their car. The evidence is in front of you and yet you take it out against those who have nothing to do with this crime.

Mr Anton Portelli

Jul 1st 2011, 13:47

Yes as Mr Xuereb said would anyone be willing to bet that if hunting is prohibited for a whole year and during that time all guns are confiscated there wiill be no shooting of birds or no armed criminal acts?

It will be the same because the criminal will always get his weapon illegally and unregistered so it cannot be traced.

All these anti gun campaigns are senseless, look at England where guns have been severely restricted, Did armed crime go down or dit it go UP?

Mr john vella

Jul 1st 2011, 16:08

@Mr Nyal Xuereb
It is so true that we have some of the best shooters in this sport of shotgun competition. Yes they deserve all credit, but you seem to be aware that not all hunters can afford to buy a 'shotgun' that sportsmen use for target shooting, so we can start elimination.
I for one can not except anymore cowboys, be it shooting cornered animals in their fields or incoming birds that we are also equal by right entitled to enjoy.
Other fire arms have their ammo controlled, be it if it belong to collectors or sportsmen. Why when it comes to shotguns used for hunting we do not have the same regulations? or, make it more expensive for these macho to buy or make their ammo? I think something must be done today before tomorrow. Protests is only leading to deaf ears.

K Perry

Jul 1st 2011, 16:18

If hunting WAS banned in Malta (and I havnt posted anywhere for that before the righteous formosa starts) Not one single person would starve to death or become malnourished. Ever.
Anyone ever done a survey on how much the annual migration would bring in to Malta if eco tourism was promoted? how many more bums on seats in Malta airways? how many more hotel rooms filled? how many guides and organisations would be required?.
And how much the reputation of Malta as a whole would be bettered in a very competetive tourism market?

Mr Anthony Formosa

Jul 1st 2011, 16:58

Mr Perry, do you mind explain to us which country is doing this? as far as I'm concerned it is hunting that generates millions in other countries. And yes when I see the dead bird and the culprit caught I condemn but not before.

Mr Johnny Xerri

Jul 2nd 2011, 10:57

Well K Perry,

what has been done is an estimate of how much income hunting generates.

Hunters on average spend at least €2000 per year on licences, dogs & dog food, guns, ammo, rent of fields, fuel, clothing etc....app to 17,000 (hunters and trappers) spending €2000 each = €34 million. And tis was before the €50 special licence that generated €300,000 in licences only for just 3 weeks.

Bird wathing would generate nil since Malta is not a main migratory flyway...and people for the same amount of mone would simply go the were birds really migrate...that is Spain & Marocco...


What your comment really generates is a few bums in front of their pc,....and not more bums on the airmalta

Mr Johnny Xerri

Jul 2nd 2011, 12:21

Dear K Perry,

You stated that if hunting had to be banned...."Anyone ever done a survey on how much the annual migration would bring in to Malta if eco tourism was promoted? how many more bums on seats in Malta airways? how many more hotel rooms filled? how many guides and organisations would be required?."


Waht I can comment upon is that an Economics student at the University of Malta hadconducted a study of the economic impact of a ban on hunting....he estimated tat hunters spend €2000 annually on hunting...thats 17,000 hunters * 2000 = 34million.

During spring hunting 2011 €300,000 was generated through licences alone...in just 3 weeks!!!

On the other hand I can quickly asure you, without going into the expense of a survey...that bird watching will yield peanuts since Malta is not blessed to be on a main migratory route such as Spain or Turkey.

So in other words choose more solid rguments...unless what really interests you is not...having your bum on a seat in front of your PC...but 'more bums on seats in Malta airways'

Mr Anthony Formosa

Jul 1st 2011, 12:46

Is it only that some hunters never change? or is it that only hunters exists in Malta.

P Buħaġiar

Jul 1st 2011, 13:00

Sorry, but these are poachers not Hunters. poachers don't need hunting season to do such barbaric criminal acts. 1, close season. 2, Bird sanctuary, 3, shooting from a main road, 4, Protected bird, 5, Covered car number plates.
Do you call them Hunters these people? Tens of thousand very serious traffic contraventions occur each year, mostly from the same group of drivers, at least what I believe. Do you compare yourself, 'if you drive' one of them for a parking ticket contravention then?
Do you call and compare, a driver caught without license, without insurance cover, caught driving in drunken state, hit a person on pellican lights, with a driver booked on a parking ticket?

Mr Johnny Xerri

Jul 2nd 2011, 10:47

Lela Balzan,

Poaching is present all over the world.

Proof;

http://www.wildlifeextra.com/go/news/raptor-poisoning.html#cr

http://raptorpolitics.org.uk/2011/03/19/table-of-scottish-raptors-found-poisoned-shot-or-trapped-1989-2011/

The above are just 2 examples...many more if you go on the cabs website...yet no country ever had an international boycott in tourism...

So now that the fear of EU Fines is over because the ECJ and EU Commission accepted Malta's right for a derogation...lets not start with a new boogyman

Mr Anthony Formosa

Jul 1st 2011, 12:42

I will consult my Bible to try and ascertain whether bird's are God's creation and creatures too. Apparently not.

Even a RAT is a god creature, let's hope that if this story of event is true, shall be caught and punished.

K Perry

Jul 1st 2011, 16:06

More mumbo jumbo from A. formosa.. what is so wrong to expect legally abiding hunters to protect their sport by reporting illegal poaching/ hunting to the relevant authorities?? it happens in real Europe so whats your problem appealing to the legal membership? When i posed this question before there was no reply to it....surely an identification panel issued to memebers would weed out the irregulars?? then members can can alert the police. )r Perhaps, just perhaps some of the wrong fish might get caught in the net? Maltese hunters have been under scrutiny for a long time. why the reluctance to clear your name????

S. Camilleri

Jul 1st 2011, 12:34

Very True... And I am sure that with such a large hunting community there must be at least one level headed individual who knows someone who may have an idea who these individuals are! Malta zghira u kaccaturi mgienen suppost anqas... Come on ... anyone. Catching these bast**** will benefit everybody!

Mr Emanuel Curmi

Jul 1st 2011, 12:40

Absolutely right Clayton. The campaigning of the FKNK against the fabrications of the antis has certainly been dealt a blow here but am sure that by releasing a few more turtle doves, they will manage to repolish the reputation of their glorious sport.
A wonderful bird is shot down in a otherwise dismal period of the year for bird variety and all you ( and the FKNK ) are worried about is a tarnished reputation. I think you have just given the words IGNORANCE and EGOISM a new dimension.

Franco Farrugia

Jul 1st 2011, 12:48

U x'differenza hemm bejn dan l-ghasfur, u 'tajr iehor kaccabbli'? Mhux kollha ghandhom dritt li jtiru u li jghixu l-hajja naturali taghhom?

Reinhard Azzopardi

Jul 1st 2011, 13:12

kellu bzonn kulhadd jahsibha bhalek habib.

M. Cardona

Jul 1st 2011, 13:49

@ Mr Franco Farrugia,

nifhem li ghalik u xi ohrajn kull ghasfur ( u hlejqa) individwali irrispettivament mir-razza ghandu l-istess drittijiet. Id-differenza hi li t-tajr kaccabbli huwa ferm aktar numeruz u ghalhekk kacca ghalih hija sostenibbli.

Nifhem ukoll li hemm min jargumenta li konservazzjoni ta' speci ssehh billi kull ghasfur individwali jigi protett. Madankollu hemm in-naha l-ohra tal-argument li l-konservazzjoni tal-ispeci tigi ssalvagwardjata dment li n-numri jibqghu sostenibbli u ghalhekk jittiehdu mizuri biex jigi protett kemm in-numru kumplessiv kif ukoll l-ambjenti rispettiv biex dan ikun jista jsehh.

Intenni li filwaqt li ghandi opinjoni differenti minn tieghek rigward il-kacca, il-punt tieghek nifhmu; ghalkemm ma naqbilx mieghu.

Rigward dan il-kaz, jekk verament sehh kif allegat, allura dan l-att huwa wiehed ta' stmerrija u kkundannat bla riservi.

Tislijiet

Matthew Dimech

Jul 1st 2011, 14:14

Proset Clayton Borg ... naqbel mieghek u naf li hawn hafna iktar kaccaturi li jahsbuha bhalek ... mhux sew li mnhabba listess erbgha min nies dejjem jehel kulhadd! ... Dawn mhux talli kisru il ligi kontra il kacca izda anke tat triq!!

@Mr Franco Farrugia .... xdifferenza emm bejn il landa tonn taz zejt u il-hut liehor tal-bahar?? mhux kollu hut?? mhux kollu andu id dritt li jghum fil miftuh minghajr ma jinqabad?? ... X'differenza hemm bejn ziemel salvagg, dak ghal horse riding, dak ghad dressages ... mhux kollha zwiemel mhux kollha ghandhom dritt ikunu liberi u jigru kemm iridu!!

Stefan Micallef

Jul 1st 2011, 13:02

Int fejn taf x ghamlu l puluzija?

Mr SILVIO BONAVIA

Jul 1st 2011, 12:54

Mr ferriggi, u kif tirraguna int sena hadd ma jista jsuq karrozzi peress li dik t-turista tal-qawra ittajjret u nqatlet,veru tirraguna int

Mr Ernest Vella

Jul 1st 2011, 12:31

Bl-argument tieghek...waqfu il-parties li jsiru ghax ikun hemm id-droga forsi jitghallmu dawn il-barbari. Ma jidhirlekx li dak li ghidt huwa bla sens, ghax no.1 bhalissa il-kacca maghluqa...ghax il-kaccaturi jafu li bhalissa mhux zmien tajjeb ghal kacca anke meta kienet is-sena kollha u t-tieni haga nahseb din il-karrozza blue mhux fl-inhawi tkun...naqra sorveljanza mill-pulizija u road blocks meta jinstema tir kull ma hemm bzonn

Mr Anthony Formosa

Jul 1st 2011, 12:38

Mr Ferroggi, jekk int kontra l-kacca dik opinjoni tieghek imma ma ghandek l-ebda dritt li tissugerixxi tip ta imponiment fuq haddiehor. Kieku kullhadd jahsiba bhallhekk kieku d-dinja wieqfa. Din s'issa hija akkuza u mhemm l-ebda provi cari, ghax kulltant kif isiru l-affarijiet jew ma tantx jitwemnu jew min ghamel dan l'att kien superman. Jien kaccatur u edukat bizzejjed biex ma n'ghajjarx lil min ma naqbilx mad-delizzju tieghu.

Advert
Advert