Advert

Air Malta’s low-cost troubles

Air Malta has suffered because of low cost airlines like Ryanair. Photo: Chris Sant Fournier

Air Malta has suffered because of low cost airlines like Ryanair. Photo: Chris Sant Fournier

Air Malta suffered as “a direct consequence” of the introduction of low-cost carriers on the UK routes but the airline’s management was “unable to react” to the competition, according to the draft restructuring plan.

Low-cost carriers started operating in 2006 when the government introduced a route support scheme, which was scheduled to last five years, to subsidise airlines that opened new routes in a bid to increase seat capacity and boost tourism.

However, the restructuring plan drawn up by government consultants Ernst and Young says Air Malta did not reap any benefits from the scheme despite it being open to all airlines.

“Air Malta has not realised any direct benefit from this scheme due to its high cost structure while the scheme has enabled competing carriers with more competitive pricing to increase passenger numbers and gain market share,” Ernst and Young say.

The report says that low-cost operations on the UK routes, particularly Ryanair and Easy Jet, meant Air Malta suffered significant reductions in fares and contributions across the board. It also highlights the company’s shortcomings in not being able to respond to the new challenge posed by its competitors.

“A commercial company would have taken steps to reduce the network by dropping less profitable routes and find new opportunities to grow as there are a number of underserved markets to operate to. However, the company simply did not have the appropriate commercial skills to act proactively,” the report says.

Analysing airport statistics for the period between 2006 and 2010, Ernst and Young say passenger traffic at Malta International Airport grew by an average of 5.2 per cent per year. However, the report says growth in the UK market was just 17,000 passengers per year for the whole period. As a result, the increased market share enjoyed by Ryanair and Easy Jet came at the expense of other airlines, most notably Air Malta.

Ernst and Young say Air Malta’s inability to react in an effective way was compounded by a confused product offering that tried to reduce prices while still providing services unavailable on low-cost carriers at no premium.

“Since the growth of low-cost carrier operations in Malta, the company’s product positioning and market offering has become increasingly confused. Its service is still promoted as quality, yet, it is not clear that customers perceive this quality as they remain very price sensitive on key routes. This has meant that the company continues to provide quality based products but on many routes has a pricing structure which has been set to compete with low-cost carriers rather than reflect its premium offering.”

The report says Air Malta was reluctant to change prices in some markets to reflect the difference of the service provided and the convenience of its schedule.

The “premium” services mentioned in the report include catering options, free carriage of baggage and access to a number of airports with premium locations like London Heathrow, which are not offered by its primary competitors Ryanair and Easy Jet.

Ernst and Young argue that the pricing strategy “promotes a perception of a homogenous product” when significant differences exist in terms of quality of service between the company and its low-cost competitors.

The report also highlights Air Malta’s strategic role for the country saying it is one of the few airlines that can convert seats for the transportation of stretcher cases and incubators.

“Air Malta provides essential social support for health care... and essential business links to Europe’s most important business destinations such as London, Frankfurt, Brussels and Paris,” the report says, noting these airports were not served by low-cost airlines.

Advert

52 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Mr Victor vella

Jun 30th 2011, 21:49

Dear George in Maltese we say `int ahna jew m`ahniex`. If you do not understand Maltese find someone to translate that for you mate. You said that you and your family traveled by Air Malta. How can one take you so serious when you said` Air Malta as quoted by others`. IF you and your family traveled by Air Malta there is no sense to quote others or you had so good experience traveling by Air Malta that you have nothing to say but to quote some pcielaq Maltin..

George Reeves

Jul 1st 2011, 15:40

Dear Victor,
If you read my comments properly, it CLEARLY states, " I flew with Air Malta every year with my wife and children for year's till Easyjet came along", and with reference to my comments about Air Malta not being anything special, if you read all the comment's made on this subject as I did, it was a Maltese person that made that comment originally, I was just agreeing with them.
Victor, I have been travelling to Malta every year since the late 60's, well before Air Malta came into being so as you can see I do know what I'm talking about. I even E-mailed Air Malta with complaint's in the past and they haven't even bothered to reply.
We have a saying in England;-
PUT YOUR BRAIN INTO GEAR BEFORE OPENING ONE's GOB!!!

Mr Victor vella

Jun 30th 2011, 22:28

Dear Jimmy Magro these are very good questions. I fear that this is a tactic used by the foreign brains and Air Malta`s employer. They let such information to be leaked so that they can see the reaction of Air Malta`s employees. The worst hit by such management by leakages were the pilots. Until last Saturday they said nothing but on Sunday when the leak turned to a cascade they even threatened to take industrial action. As far as I am concerned when the GWU had an industrial dispute with Air Malta under the present Nationalist government it used to take the GWU to court amid the media hype against the GWU. Under the regime of JN Tabone I do not know how many times he took Air Malta to court. As far as I am concerned the company`s pilots have any industrial dispute with Air Malta. So they have any right to strike. One could expect the government to take the necessary steps to take such illicit action to court. To-date the company had taken any steps. If the situation remained as it is then your questions will take more weight. Then one can say that the company is accomplice in such premeditated matter. The GWU could take the necessary steps to safeguard its members while the hypocrisy of this government continue to be the hallmarks of a ruthless bigot against the GWU. .

Mr C Cassar

Jun 30th 2011, 12:51

Those in the Uk find the Eurozone expensive because of the dire state of Sterling (£), down some 25% against the Euro. Those in the Eurozone don't have that problem.

Malta really needs to turn and focus it's efforts on Eurozone countries, especially Germany which right now has a booming economy and uses the same currency. The UK market is history I'm afraid but the Eurozone provides a much, much larger market (7 times larger than that of the whole of the UK) for Malta to tap into without currency worries.

Time for Malta to move on now it has the Euro and cater for other Eurozone visitors.

Ray Mifsud

Jun 30th 2011, 19:48

It is true that the euro zone is 7 times larger. But are you saying that we should abondon the UK market?Thousands of british tourist goes to europe for there holidays. They still have to exchange the sterling to euro.

I am sure that our loss will be someone elses gain and for sure we cannot afford to loose this market.
Hotels should give incentive to those tourist who re visit. It is done abroad when using the same chain of hotels. All you have to do is register and everytime you book you are credited with points.

Who know, UK might change their currency to euro in the next few years?

A Camilleri

Jun 30th 2011, 12:50

Why not go round the island and ask the the bars, restaurants and so on.

Mr Mario Mercieca

Jun 30th 2011, 12:02

It doesn`t matter much.....not all outlets are five star plus the people who travel on low cost airlines may have saved some money in their flights which they spend on the island.

Ray Gatt

Jun 30th 2011, 12:06

What's your point exactly?

Ian Hodgson

Jun 30th 2011, 22:37

Yes tourists do spend good money I saved over £900 on my ryanair flights Airmalta cost over £400 each Ryanair was £120 each and that £900 will be spent in bars and restaurants I have rented a house this time but I like 5 star hotels My favurite is the Corinthia palace in March I stayed in the phoenicia if Airmalta was willing to compeate with Ryanair I would still be flying with them but it does leave me with a lot more money to spend. Ian Hodgson

Ray Mifsud

Jun 30th 2011, 11:59

That is what Ryan air is going to do in Reus Spain. They have operated as a base from there since Oct 08 and now they gave an ultimatum till oct to agree with their terms. I thing that what it did in France too.

I would not mind the competition but if played on the same levels. Should the subsidising cease they will be out the next day.

Paul Kew

Jun 30th 2011, 12:06

No problem with Ryanair. You get what you pay for.I personally don't mind paying £100 less for my flight and not having to travel 60 miles to Manchester on the dreaded M62. When Air Malta flew from Leeds I used them but they only flew in summer, at least Ryanair fly all year and at half the price of what I used to pay.

Ray Mifsud

Jun 30th 2011, 20:26

@Paul Kew

No one is disputing that you get what you pay for.

The facts are that the tax payer has to pay for LCC subsidies.

Ray Gatt

Jun 30th 2011, 12:02

It is mentioned that London Heathrow is not served. I say Peter Murray for AM Chairman.

Noel Barry

Jun 30th 2011, 10:52

Mr Tabone, it seems that you are not well informed who the top management were and still are. For your information the majority of top management were all Mintoffians, socialists, labourites, but not blue - eyed cwiec, as you called them. Please do your homework well before posting here. I know because i worked there.

Mr Pat Hobson

Jun 30th 2011, 11:16

@Barry. You must be joking, right?!!!!

Mr Pat Hobson

Jun 30th 2011, 11:17

@Noel Barry. You must be joking, right?!!!! But not a good joke just the same. How about J. N. Tabone, and these last 10 years who were directing and managing Air Malta?

Greta Rapinett

Jun 30th 2011, 11:36

1987 - 1996 - J N Tabone
1996 - 2004 - Louis Grech
2004 - 2011 - Lawrence Zammit

The first loss was made in 2002/2003.....hmmmm



Ray Gatt

Jun 30th 2011, 11:58

@ Pat Hobson - Louis Grech (PL's MEP)

Noel Barry

Jun 30th 2011, 12:05

Mr Hobson, I said top management and not Chairman.

Robert Camilleri

Jun 30th 2011, 13:10

@ noel barry!! int bis serjeta qedt tghid !! mela vera ma tafx x kien qedt jigri madwarek???

Noel Barry

Jun 30th 2011, 14:22

Robert Camilleri naf sew x'qed nghid u jekk int kont tahdem hemm, toqghodx tinheba wara subajk u taparsi ma tafx x'kien qieghed jigri. Jien ma nafx int kontx tahdem hemm jew le, imma jien kont ili nadem hemm minn qabel l-air malta, minn Jannar 1967 u naf sew x'qed nghid.

Robert Camilleri

Jul 1st 2011, 15:52

@Greta Rapinett
insejtu zmienek int???

Mr joe vella

Jun 30th 2011, 10:57

cannot agree more
reading between the lines of what has been reported by the auditors the whole matter is a litany of failures by chairmen, boards of directors, top managers
all guzzling good money to help the company on its way to a nosedive!
and the buck instead of moving up towards the big brass who put them there moves in the opposite direction towards the taxpayer's money!

Kieron O'connor

Jun 30th 2011, 09:33

Mr Ferriggi I think the words you are looking for are, "Political Interference".
Airmalta was protected in a local monopoly for many a year, now they are subject to an open and free market where consumers make there own choice and who to fly with and it cannot surrvive unless it is run as a proper independent business.
It will have to get "Lean" in a hurry.

Advert
Advert